Hum 101
First argument: Extra judicial killing is unethical.
This article basically talks about extra judicial killing which is not acceptable in a society. Though it is reduce crime, but ethically it is not a proper judgment. Only because of that Most of the people are becoming safe and happy. In 1972, the paramilitary group Jatiya RakkhiBahini came into force and had become renowned for its extra judicial executions. Now Rapid Action battalion (RAB) started such are killings again and introduced new terms of crossfire which is not totally acceptable in a society.
In my point of view, it is ethical. Only because of that crime is decreasing and people are become happy and safety. According to Jeremy Bentham theory it is go with utilitarianism because the principal of utilitarianism is maximum happiness of the maximum number. Though, RAB are killing terrorist only because of the safety of people. So, People get relief from their crime. It is beneficial to our society to maximize the happiness by killing a group of people. Moreover, if we talk about Duty ethics then it is also goes with this term. Duty ethics mainly talks about your intention of your action should be good. So, whatever they doing it are ultimately benefited for them and it is also their duty. So, they are performing their duty according to the law. According to the duty it is ethical because their intention is good.
Second argument: Extra judicial killing can neither bring peace nor eradicate terrorism.
Extra judicial killing can easily bring happiness and eradicate terrorism. Though some people they have to stop crossfire. If they stop this then in a society crime will increase. They again become more aggressive than before and do their heinous work again. So, if we want to stop them then we have to take some actions against them. Though it violets human rights article 1 which states that-“All human are born free and equal in dignity and rights. If we go with
Amratya Sen theory which is justice reduce
This article basically talks about extra judicial killing which is not acceptable in a society. Though it is reduce crime, but ethically it is not a proper judgment. Only because of that Most of the people are becoming safe and happy. In 1972, the paramilitary group Jatiya RakkhiBahini came into force and had become renowned for its extra judicial executions. Now Rapid Action battalion (RAB) started such are killings again and introduced new terms of crossfire which is not totally acceptable in a society.
In my point of view, it is ethical. Only because of that crime is decreasing and people are become happy and safety. According to Jeremy Bentham theory it is go with utilitarianism because the principal of utilitarianism is maximum happiness of the maximum number. Though, RAB are killing terrorist only because of the safety of people. So, People get relief from their crime. It is beneficial to our society to maximize the happiness by killing a group of people. Moreover, if we talk about Duty ethics then it is also goes with this term. Duty ethics mainly talks about your intention of your action should be good. So, whatever they doing it are ultimately benefited for them and it is also their duty. So, they are performing their duty according to the law. According to the duty it is ethical because their intention is good.
Second argument: Extra judicial killing can neither bring peace nor eradicate terrorism.
Extra judicial killing can easily bring happiness and eradicate terrorism. Though some people they have to stop crossfire. If they stop this then in a society crime will increase. They again become more aggressive than before and do their heinous work again. So, if we want to stop them then we have to take some actions against them. Though it violets human rights article 1 which states that-“All human are born free and equal in dignity and rights. If we go with
Amratya Sen theory which is justice reduce