Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

How the first two political parties develop

Powerful Essays
1407 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How the first two political parties develop
The first two political parties were the Federalists and the Republicans or the Democratic-Republicans. The conflict between Jefferson and Hamilton gave rise to the two political parties by polarizing factions on opposite political sides. The parties were shaped during the administration of the country's first President George Washington. Issues of disagreement arose from these two politicians in national government versus state government, views on the Constitution, the French Revolution, and Hamilton's economic plans. Through these developments two political parties came to rise and differ on the ratification of the Jay Treaty, the Alien and Sedition Acts, and foreign affairs. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, while the Democratic-Republicans were led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Under the Washington administration Alexander Hamilton was the Secretary of the Treasury and Thomas Jefferson was the Secretary of the State and had differing views on government, which fractured the government in two parties. Hamilton believed that the success of the new government depended on its economic stability, and as such favored full funding of the entire federal debt and the assumption of the states' debts by the federal government. The issues of funding and assumption, coupled with other major economic issues such as the charter of the Bank of the United States and an imposition of an excise tax on whiskey, began to divide the government. The opposition party, Democratic-Republicans were organized by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. On the other hand Jefferson who fronted for the Republicans said that Hamilton's economic plans were a scheme to subvert the State governments. Jefferson also didn't believe in the idea of a national bank because he felt it was not necessary and this would profit the rich investors, who were not the base of America. Jefferson thought that the small farmer and agriculture was the base of America. Hamilton and Jefferson had two different opinions on how the government should be run, which was part of the development of these parties. Hamilton and Jefferson's views were completely different on what kind of power of the government had. Hamilton believed in a strong central government with supreme power over the state government to control commerce, taxation, the ability to declare war, and the making of treaties. He favored an industrialized nation and favored a protective tariff and a national bank. Hamilton favored a constitution that would be interpreted broadly, loose construction, so the national government would have more powers as needed. Jefferson thought that the national government's powers should be limited and the supreme power is held in the state governments because it was the states' rights. He believed that the people were the final authority and this would be shown through direct representation of the people in the state government. Jefferson thought that the stability of the new government relied on America's agriculture,and that the United States should be a agrarian nation with most of it's industrial products purchased from Great Britain or other European nations. Jefferson believed in strict construction of the Constitution, meaning that the government could only do what the Constitution specifically says. This was the basic philosophical issue between the two parties that wouldn't be solved until the Cvil War. Philosophies did change though in America when the French Revolution occurred and Britain was brought in the middle of it. When the French Revolution began in May of 1789 the United States was for the revolution because they modeled America's revolution. Things changed though in 1793 when Britain is brought into conflict between them and France and the United States had to choose a side. The 1778 alliance was a permanent alliance, where the United States were suppose to send war ships to protect the French West Indies. Hamilton, who favored the British, wanted Washington to proclaim neutrality and get rid of the alliance. While Jefferson, who had great affirmation for France, wanted to use the alliance as a threat against Britain to get them out of the Northwest. But Washington sides with Hamilton showing the Federalist in him and this was another crack in the wall that helped develop the division into new political facets. Another controversial topic that Hamilton and Jefferson argued about was the Jay Treaty and its relations with foreign affairs.

Under the Jay Treaty it stated that British troops would evacuate a chain of posts on American soil and would pay for damages for recent seizures of American ships. However the treaty never stated that Britain would stop the seizing of American ships in the future and the British decided that the Americans still owed British merchants for pre-revolutionary war debts. The Federalists saw the treaty as beneficial because it bettered relations with Britain. This led Hamilton and the Federalists to develop it's party around the idea of keeping close ties with Britain. While in the eyes of Jefferson it wasn't a beneficial treaty because it wasn't in favor with French relations, who Jefferson and the Republicans supported in foreign affairs. Also the Republicans saw this treaty as an attempt to unload cheap British imports into the American market. This was a further development to the foreign affairs and which party supported which country. The Alien and Sedition Acts were another facet of disagreeing views between the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Now that political parties have formed and each had the desire to gain the upper hand the Alien and Sedition Acts were formed. While a Federalist president, John Adams, was in office with a Congress dominated by Federalists the formation of the Alien and Sedition Acts came to being. The Alien Act said that the government can deport any alien who they felt were a threat in a time of war. The Neutralization Act extended the number of years someone had to live in America before they became a citizen, it went from six years to fourteen years. The Sedition Act stated that anyone who criticizes the United States government or the President is a crime and would be punished. The Federalists wrote up and passed these acts to try to prevent the support of Republican growth, to silence Anti-Federalist, and limit criticism of Federalist officials. This was because many immigrants were very poor and would've voted for Republicans in the upcoming election. Republicans were completely opposed because they thought it was a threat to citizen's individual liberties. Jefferson and Madison were extremely outraged and wrote up the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions to criticize the acts, the doctrine of nullification was first explain in these documents. In the Resolutions it pronounced that the states had the right to deem an act unconstitutional, and define the theory of nullification that the states have a right within their borders to nullify a federal law if they believed the law to be unconstitutional. This development of the acts and the Republican's repercussions to the acts brought great distain between the parties and brought about a close election of 1800. The Alien and Sedition Acts were made to try to stunt the growth of support of Democratic-Republicans, but the political group had many other supports then just immigrants. The political parties differed in support from people in America. The Hamilton and the Federalists were supported by merchants, bankers, and manufacturers. While Jefferson and the Republicans were supported by the southern planters, small farmers, and northern laborers. This led to a very specific division of the "rich, well-born, and able" supported the Federalists, and the "common man" supported Republicans. There were different regional support of each party also, the Federalists were supported by the New England region and the Republicans were supported the the South and the West regions. The Mid-Atlantic states moved from largely Federalist supports to Republican supports after 1798. This developed the parties to grow further apart in ideology of what was best for their country, being industry for the Federalists and farming for the Republicans. The two groups also supported different foreign policies and affairs. The Federalist were in favor of the British, and Republicans were in favor of the French. This brought great tension between the parties when France and Britain were at war with each other. The conflict between Jefferson and Hamilton largely gave rise to the political parties Democratic-Republicans and Federalists. Through their opposing views on Hamilton's economic plans, their interpretations of the Constitution, Jay's Treaty, and their views on foreign policies fractured the government into two factions. These disagreements shaped and developed the United States first political party system.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    America’s first two political parties began with Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. This established the three branches treasury, state, and war. Hamilton had the role of secretary of treasury which he was with the federalist while Jefferson had the role of relations with foreign countries and he was with Republicans. Jefferson believed that America would be more successful if it had agricultural traditions while on the other hand Hamilton beliefs were more economically planned through facilities. Hamilton’s ideas and the Federalists were having a stronger central government acting in interest of commerce and manufactured (like Britain).…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict over foreign and domestic policies between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson led to the development of two political parties. Although the Jeffersonian-Democratic were strict constructionist and the Federalists were loose constructionists, both failed to be consistent and chose whichever interpretation that better served their interests at the time.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A precedent to today’s Democratic and Republican rivalry, the United States witnessed the beginnings of internal political divisions with the First Party System. Those seeking a strong central government and well-developed foreign policies rallied their support behind the Federalist Party and its founder, the first Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton. Whilst those who desired more focus on the rights of individual states and the common people at the base of the nation became members of, the first Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican Party. However, neither party was able to stand the test of time: the Federalists with waning support dissolved during Monroe’s Era of Good Feelings, the Democratic-Republicans…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founders hoped to avoid factions in the government which was the equivalent of the political parties which came into being. The founding fathers goal would become unachievable during George Washington’s presidency which would mark the beginning of the two party systems. This system began with Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, was the Secretary of the Treasury and the antifederalists who became known as the democratic republicans led by Jefferson. Political parties were very important in the evolution of the way the united states governed itself due to the fact that people with shared economic and cultural goals joined together to influence policy decisions in America. These parties were able to back candidates for certain positions. Once…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our first president George Washington was a wise man and didn’t believe in political parties. He thought political parties would split apart the country and make government a competition instead of a place to serve the people. Although, inevitably the first political parties were made, the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. The original political parties in America had very different views on many topics including their interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, one of the most important people of the time, was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Utilizing federal power to modernize the nation, he convinced Congress to use an elastic interpretation of the Constitution to pass laws that Jefferson deemed unconstitutional. These laws included federal assumption of the state debts, creation of a national bank, and a system of taxes through a tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey. Hamilton was also the creator of the Federalist Party. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson was born to a wealthy family but was nonetheless an anti-federalist. He was sympathetic towards the poor people and advocated state’s rights.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the United States’ government first started, there were no political parties. However during the 1790s two different parties formed, the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans. What led to the rise of these different political parties though? What led to the rise of the political parties in the 1790s was the different views as to how the government should be run, the different ways of interpreting the Constitution, and how people viewed the Sedition Act.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economic health of the nation was the most important domestic affair. During George Washington's presidency, Alexander Hamilton & Thomas Jefferson, his two closest advisors, faced off on opposing views of what the role of government should be, thus forming political parties. Congress and President Washington went over Hamilton's economic plan for the new nation. Hamilton called for protective tariffs, a bank of the U.S., and the encouragement of industry: all domestic issues. But Jefferson only wanted a strict constructional view of the…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The political parties were divided as follows. There was Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and his followers who believed in a strong central government that would support their interests…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. The emergence of the Federalist and the Republicans established the First Party System in America. “[By] creating a new republic base on the rights of the individual, the North Americans introduced a new force into the world.” The nation’s first political party developed steadily in the 1790’s.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "There is nothing I dread so much as a division of the Republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader and converting measures in opposition to each other. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."1 This view, expressed by John Adams, was not shared by all, namely Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. As the early American government began to form, so did the two major political parties. Alexander Hamilton was the founder of the Federalist Party, while Thomas Jefferson led the Anti-Federalists in response.2 Both men used their prominence in each party to their advantage to influence the public and their disputes created controversy and discordance between the parties and the American people. Hamilton and Jefferson had many disagreements throughout their careers and had radically different opinions on what their new country should be like.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson was the Secretary of State, he has a big responsibility of controlling foreign affairs. He was also known for opposing Hamilton's plan of the National bank. He strongly felt the plain gave more power to the government than the Constitution allows. Most southern states had already paid off their war debts, he questioned why they should bail out northern states that still had debts. Thomas Jefferson also favored the Strict Constitution. The group felt congress should be limited to the power specifically granted by the Constitution. He criticized Hamilton for the use of federal force to repress legitimate criticism. Democratic Republicans favored him and James Madison also. The party was strongest among southerners and farmers.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists vs Whigs

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The opposing side, the Anti-Federalists led by Thomas Jefferson, believed that the bank was unconstitutional, because it was not specified in the constitution. The Federalists on the other hand deemed the bank to be "necessary and proper" to the government in order for it to run smoothly. The Federalists won out in the end and a national bank was created. Hamilton's financial system settled the problems caused by the revolutionary war, and the discrepancies between states and national governments rights when it came to taxation.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1809

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the early years of the United States (US), two political parties formed. These two parties were the Democrat Republicans and the Federalists. By 1809, the US had transitioned through both parties. Many Democratic Republican goals were fulfilled by Thomas Jefferson. Thomas Jefferson was the president of the US at the time. Because of these the Democrat Republicans were stronger in American politics in the US. The Democrat Republicans prevailed in American politics through expansion to the west, reduced the debt of the US, and revising the Federalist like aspects of the government.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson was Democratic-Republican. He opposed Hamilton’s banking plan, along with his Federalist views. He feared that allowing the Federal government to collect, hold, and spend all of the money gained from Hamilton’s pan would be dangerous and give too much power to it. This is why Jefferson supported the Virginia and Kentucky…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays