Preview

how successful were Alexander reforms in transforming the russian soicety

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
959 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
how successful were Alexander reforms in transforming the russian soicety
How successful were Alexander reforms in transforming Russian Society by 1881?
24 marks

Alexander came to power in 1855, but before he became Tsar Alexander witnessed the shameful defeat against Britain, France and Turkey in the Crimean War in 1854 This had given him the opportunity to observe some of the problems which Russia faced; Alexander believed that changes had to be made towards modernisation. The population of the Russian Empire was 74 million and 22.5 million were serfs. The emancipation of the serfs transformed the Russian society because, it gave the serfs more legal rights such as owning property and land, the serfs were granted with more personal freedom in making decisions who they married without interference. Nevertheless this reform was unsuccessful because the serfs still had to pay redemption payments which was 15 to 20% above the market value of the land they received, this not only changed the Russian society but also confused them because, the peasants could not understand why they were being asked to pay for land which their families had farmed on for generations. Showing that this reform was not successful as serfs had the ability to buy and sell land which had serious implications consequently, it led to a raise in the number of landless peasants who found it difficult to find alternative employment. The nobility also suffered because they were totally unprepared without having to reply on the serfs. This changed the nobility in the Russian society because the position and power of the nobility was based upon serfdom. Furthermore the military also heavily depended upon the serfs to fight in the Crimean War. This leads to one of Alexander’s successful reform which was the military reform in 1874-75 this was a priority because the defeat highlighted the backwardness
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How far do the views in the Source A and B differ regarding the benefits of “Working towards the fuhrer”? (12 marks)
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How far do the views in the Source A and B differ regarding the benefits of “Working towards the fuhrer”? (12 marks)

    The Crimean war had highlighted the inadequacies in the Russian military. An example of this would be the lack of war materiel, such as rifles. The Crimean conflict had gone from bad to worse for the Russian military. The largely serf conscript army of the Empire, was poorly trained and poorly disciplined, this led to a number of mass desertions from the battle grounds, with almost The siege of Sevastopol was a sad and crippling defeat for the Russian empire, losing more than a 5th of its forces in the region. Alexander saw this as a triumph for the free troops of Britain and France, and a humiliating defeat for his conscripted and enslaved army. The Crimean war had also led to the eventual realisation that technological inferiority on the side of the Russians led to their defeat, The minister, Dmitri Milyutin, is described as stating quite bluntly, that “Russia must modernise, and it must build railways”. This is also a reference to the multitude of supply problems endured by the military, due to the lack of sufficient infrastructure such as railways. This makes the Crimean war a contributing factor to the Emancipation of the serfs, which defined Alexander II as a reformer.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Alexander II Support The Development Of Russia And Serfs
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did Alexander II Support The Development Of Russia And Serfs

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain How Far Had Russia Progressed From 1855 To 1900?
    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How Far Had Russia Progressed From 1855 To 1900?

    Many of the opposition fled to other European countries where they continued to plot against the Tsar. This shows how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress politically by exiling all of their possible contenders. This allowed the Tsar to have much more control over Russia much like before Alexander ll reign. The persecution of Jews caused many to join radical parties and organisations. This shows us how there was not even the slightest bit of democracy within Russia, and how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress. Another major problem in Russia was the growing population of peasants. This caused famines within Russia in 1892 and 1893. This famine was a cause of many peasants death which shows how Russia did not have the money or resources to keep up with their growing population. This showed a lack in progress as they could not even support their country’s people with…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    how far were divisions among opponents responsible for survival of Tsarist rule in 1905
    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages

    how far were divisions among opponents responsible for survival of Tsarist rule in 1905

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was the defeat of the Crimean war Alexander’s excuse for change.
    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To what extent was the defeat of the Crimean war Alexander’s excuse for change.

    The defeat in the Crimean war was arguably the main reason why Alexander II made a series of reforms when he came into power. The devastating loss of the war proved the backwardness of Russia in relation to other powers and even though peasant unrest and the criticisms of serfdom were partially responsible for influencing Alexander II, the decision to make changes primarily came from the loss of the Crimean war.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did Tsar Alexander 1 Influence The Growth Of Russia
    • 3013 Words
    • 13 Pages

    How Did Tsar Alexander 1 Influence The Growth Of Russia

    Tsar Alexander I, an intelligent, handsome, benevolent, and aspiring leader ascended onto the Russian throne in 1801 to become one of Russia’s greatest reformers and military leaders. The Tsar who defeated the French Empire was profoundly influenced by their domestic and foreign affairs, leading his vision of Russia to enhance and protect the revolutionary ideals of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution. Initially open-minded to these western philosophies Alexander was inspired by his role models to spread these ideas, therefore becoming a “European” rather than just a Russian ruler. Thomas Jefferson who thought quite highly of Alexander, wrote from Monticello in 1806,…

    • 3013 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Tsarist and Soviet Regimes: Terror and Repression during 1855-1964
    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Tsarist and Soviet Regimes: Terror and Repression during 1855-1964

    Alexander ll was seen to be liberal in the early years of his reign as seen in the emancipation of the Serfs in 1861. This gave the Serfs more freedom and basic rights which at this time was a major liberal reform compared to the majority of the previous Tsars, this was by in large Alexander’s greatest reform. The emancipation, he hoped, would lead to greater agricultural output in order to finance the railways, and the beginning of the…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Changes and Continuities in Labor Systems in Russia
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Changes and Continuities in Labor Systems in Russia

    Huge changes came to Russia when the tsar Alexander II came to power. His reforms freed the serfs and industrialized the nation’s economy. In the past, Russian serfs were tied to the land and worked on the land for the land owners and received no pay. While they were permitted to have farms of their own, serfs had to work the lord’s land whenever called upon, even during times of harvest when their own crops need harvesting or tending. Due to Alexander II’s reforms, these serfs were freed. Once these serfs were freed, they either went into the city to look for work or out to the country to find land. Many also fled to surrounding societies to escape the Russian hardships of being a serf. Russian labor was also changed through Industrialization, also influenced by Alexander II’s reforms. Factories and railroads expanded and industries like coal, steel, and petroleum boomed. Serfs who were emancipated found easy work in factories that were booming. With new industries creating new jobs and plenty of freed serfs to take them, the Russian labor system greatly changed between 1750 and 1914.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    To What Extent Do You Consider the Emancipation of Serfs 1861 to Be a Key Turning Point in the Development of Russian Government and Society Till 2000?
    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To What Extent Do You Consider the Emancipation of Serfs 1861 to Be a Key Turning Point in the Development of Russian Government and Society Till 2000?

    Many historians argue The Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861, to be a key turning point within Russian history. It drastically altered Russia’s economic, political and social stipulation. One could propose the argument that this event lead to the fall of communism in 1990, further more suggesting the extent to which this event affected Russia. Hence this is ‘perhaps the most defining moment in Russian history, with its impact being seen many years after the event itself’. Although historians identify short term effects of this event, the significance to which this event developed Russian government and society up to the 21st century has been so tremendous that they cannot be disregarded. However when one considers the argument of the likes of Louis Hobart who suggests the event was only a contributing element to ‘the social and economic transformation’ it must be asked to what extent was this event alone a key turning point in the development of Russian Government?…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was the Russian state more stable in 1881 than in 1855?
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent was the Russian state more stable in 1881 than in 1855?

    The first way the Russian state was more stable in 1881 was the increased freedom of the serfs. Serfdom was abolished in 1861, and although the serfs were not completely free, this was a major step for Russia, and helped them catch up to the western countries. This made the state more stable, because it briefly caused a decrease in the number of occasions of peasant unrest, which had been increasing before the decree was passed. It was hoped that the emancipation of the serfs would mean the peasants were free to leave the land they had been previously bound to, but there were many rules that came with the emancipation decree, which made it hard for the peasants to leave, and also to increase their wealth, due to one rule saying they must pay the landlords labour service of two years before they were truly free.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peter The Great Influence On Russia
    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Peter The Great Influence On Russia

    He enacted reforms, changed the class system, and modernized his military,but he did so at a cost. Peter’s mission for westernization was more for himself than his people. Because of his needs and costly reforms the peasantry struggled. “ Peasants made up 97 percent of Russia’s population… they became tied down in a system bordering on slavery”( Sherman 406). They were forced to pay these taxes enacted by Peter with money they did not have. They were forced to be slaves for nobility, a concept that sets Russia back into the Medieval ages. Even though Peter the Great helped Russia into the modern world, at the cost of the peasants. Causing historians to question if Peter’s ends justified the…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How successful was Alexander II in dealing with opposition to his regime?
    • 722 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How successful was Alexander II in dealing with opposition to his regime?

    The first measure he took shortly after he came to power was to emancipate the serfs in order to modernise Russia and finally bring social stability after years of chaos and fighting to keep up with the West. The Emancipation Edict was passed in 1861 but was better known as the “Great Disappointment” due to the fact that state serfs had to wait until 1866 to be freed, and as a result of the redemption tax serfs had to pay back to their former owners for the loss of labour and as payment for the allotments they received at emancipation. The serfs also could not keep the land they had worked - day and night – on and ended up getting bad quality land most of the time as their former owners kept the fertile, good quality land, and this unfair distribution of land led to even more hostility and disappointment. Mirs were set up to provide uniformity and stability. They were responsible for the allocation of land and they had special village courts, which ensured that the peasants remained separate and denied the full equality of other citizens, despite supposedly being “free”.…

    • 722 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    To What Extent Do You Consider That The First World War Was A Key Turning Point In The Development Of Modern Russia In The Years 1856
    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To What Extent Do You Consider That The First World War Was A Key Turning Point In The Development Of Modern Russia In The Years 1856

    Agriculture was a crucial area which needed to be reformed if Russia was to ever be modernised. At the root of the inherently backward Russia was the peasant workforce, who mainly worked in the agricultural sector, which left Russia a world away from other European Countries in terms of industry. ‘Out of the 60 million people in European Russia in 1855, 50 million were peasant serfs’1; this was a huge obstacle to modernisation as it limited. The goal of Emancipation was to release the peasants from the land that they were bound to in order to create an industrial workforce that would drive modernisation. The predominantly agricultural workforce would now work in factories thus changing Russia into an industrial juggernaut, which would be key in modernising Russia. The reform was also crucial as it was the first step in the deconstruction of the Ancien Regime within Russia. Emancipation was key in establishing support for the monarchy, ‘in other countries Serf emancipation took place as a consequence of social and organic change’2, this meant that in Russia the monarchy had…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is It Better To Abolish Serfdom In Russia
    • 2133 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Why Is It Better To Abolish Serfdom In Russia

    Some may argue that Emancipation was an ultimately successful endeavour as it brought about both fundamental and necessary change, and whilst it is true that there were various factors that ensured the development of Russia from a backward thinking and archaic nation that relied very much on what was -in flourishing western countries – a repressive and outdated feudal system, the ill-considered and very evidently selfish way in which this much needed reform was executed meant that despite some factors, from which the development and modernisation of Russia’s class system itself were enabled, for Alexander II were exactly the opposite of what he had been attempting to achieve, in increasing his chances of retaining power by preventing revolution and furthering Russia’s position within the world. For this reason it is difficult to claim Emancipation was a success in terms of what the clearly power-conscious Tsar set out to accomplish, when many of its key aspects were redundant and others provided a catalyst for consideration of concepts of political activism or further revolution, an unwanted and unanticipated advancement,…

    • 2133 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution
    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A Nationwide Revolution

    The first reason for the revolution in 1905 was the developments in the Russian countryside and how they produced a general unhappiness among the landowners and even the peasants. A long-term social and economic cause was the continuing dissatisfaction of both these groups to the Emancipation reform of Alexander II in 1861. The Landowners did not approve of the act because it denied them the free labour they had access to before the emancipation of the serfs. They had lost their free labour and large amounts of their land. By 1905 many of the Landowners were facing large debts. Although the act did end serfdom in Russia, the peasants were still angry due to the redemption payments they were expected to pay and the poor quality of land they received. They also disliked the fact that they were still tied to the…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics