Preview

How Successful Was League of Nations in the 1920s?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1134 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Successful Was League of Nations in the 1920s?
The League of Nations was an organisation designed to maintain peace throughout the World. It was created during the Paris Peace Conference. The League of Nations was the idea of Woodrow Wilson, the president of the USA. The League’s main aims were to bring together all nations in a parliament to discuss and settle disputes, to protect the independence of countries and safeguard their borders, to improve peoples living and working conditions, and to make war obsolete by persuading nations to disarm. From the beginning of its creation the League of Nations had to overcome many obstacles. One of the major problems the League had was that the USA never joined, thus leaving Britain and France in charge of the League. Without the USA the economic sanctions that the League would impose on others, would not be as effective. Both Britain and France were not strong enough, to be able to lead the League of Nations; they were both weakened during World War One. For Example they had both lost a lot of their armies and their economy was weakened. Another weakness of the League was that it did not have an army of its own, and it would have to depend solely on the co-operation of the armies of its members. In addition the council of the League met once a year and the assembly met five times a year, thus causing the League not to be able to talk about a problem immediately. The League of Nations had to deal with many disputes during the 1920’s. A few of these disputes were settled successfully while some were failures. Some successes were the dispute between Poland and Germany regarding Upper Silesia. The League sent British and French Troops to maintain order. There the League organised a successful plebiscite, but the voting turned out equal and the area was split. The industrial area went to Germany, and the rural area stayed to Poland. The League safeguarded rail links between the two countries, and made arrangements for water and power supplies from one side of the border to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the end of the Great War (WW1) the League of Nations was established with the aim to end warfare throughout the world. The idea was suggested by the American President Woodrow Wilson, in his 14 point plan. The premise of the League was, to improve international cooperation, peace and security through the world. Other things mentioned in its covenant were:…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Woodrow Wilson’s idea to make a “league of nations” failed within his own country because the United States did not want to join it. “The League strikes a deadly blow at our constitutional integrity and surrenders to a dangerous extent our independence of action”, this exemplifies the way most people in the U.S. felt about the league, that it would tangle the United States in to more foreign affairs. Because the United States was changing its foreign policy to more of an isolationist one, it wanted no part of this league.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The USA rejected the League of Nations because it was heavily linked to the treaty of Versailles which many Americans disagreed with, therefore this led the USA to reject joining the League of Nations because it was created to support the treaty of Versailles and to enforce its terms. The USA rejected it mainly because some were worried about the financial cost of joining. For example, many people feared that American money would be spent on keeping world peace which was Wilson’s dream (to control foreign affairs in order to abolish war to bring peace). This would mean that American money would be spent on the aims of the League of Nations which were to improve people’s working conditions and to tackle diseases; therefore American money will be spent on medication and the working environment. This suggests that the USA thought that if they signed it would be a promise made to spend money (no matter how much it may cost) in order to resolve international problems.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result, Woodrow Wilson suggested the League of Nations. Members of the League of Nations included France, Portugal, Great Britain, Canada, India, China, and eventually Germany (after it was allowed to join), Mexico, and several other countries. The United States did not join the League of Nations, which a multitude of people found odd, considering it was President Woodrow Wilson’s idea to form the League, as stated in his Fourteen Points. However, a great deal of countries were willing to join and participate in a more passive form of peace instead of militarism. Because of this, people were hopeful that world peace could actually happen.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The League of Nations, which was created in 1918, was supposed to provide collective security for all members, seek peaceful solutions between conflicting nations, prevent any conflict and ultimately prevent another world war. It failed to do this. The League, which did not have a standing army, could not enforce collective security for its members or any aggressive country against its policies and its economic sanctions proved useless, while League members also valued its own national interest over the Leagues interest. As seen in war between Russia and Poland in 1920-1921, the invasion of the Ruhr in 1923 and the invasion of Abyssinia in 1935. The League was ineffective in preventing conflict and hostilities between these countries and its efforts to stop them were futile.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress decided that they did not want to join the League of Nations, because they didn't want to get involved in foreign affairs and future conflicts. They wanted the United States to make their own decisions.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the League of Nation and the Treaty of Versailles were huge organizations for our world that brought many different and similar ideas to the world leaders at the time. Many topics that brought out the common and uncommon relationships between the two are that they united many nations, many countries…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. The forerunner of the United Nations (UN) was the League of Nations, an organization conceived in similar circumstances during World War 1, and established in 1919 under the treaty of Versailles “ to promote international cooperation and to achieve peace and security”. The League of Nations seized its activities after failing to prevent the Second World War. The advance of science and economic activity also brought in their wake, increased military capability which was put to devastating use by World War 1. As a result of the havoc wrecked by that conflagration, nations began to think of ensuring international peace and security through international cooperation. Thus the League of Nations was established under the treaty of Versailles, as an organization through which through which world peace could be ensured through collective security, by means of organization, discussion and agreement. Unfortunately, that body partly as a result of its own inadequacies, collapsed in the sequence of events leading to the Second World War. 1 By the time the Second World War broke out in 1939, the league had passed on in the annals of history.2…

    • 13436 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    HIstory

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One reason for the failure of the League of Nations was the attitude of the members. The Britain only cared about protecting their empire and building their trade. The French were worried about another attack from Germany only. Britain and France saw the League as a great tool to practice their own wants, and their biased foreign policy, however, that was totally against the “idea” of the league. The U.S.A practised the policy of isolationism and so did not join the League of Nations at all. As U.S.A was the one who introduced the League of Nations, it was very controversial when U.S.A did not join LON. Everybody knew that the League needed the U.S.A’s money and troops so that it could work effectively. As America was the world’s most powerful nation, this was a serious blow to the prestige of the League. The countries did not practise what it preached and did not put into practise the 26 articles of LON and so in this aspect, the League had failed to promote international cooperation. Therefore, one reason for the League’s failure was the attitude of the members because they were more concerned about their own affairs than fulfilling the aims of the LON.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    League of Nations set the treaties called the Paris Peace Treaties. Set by the Allies from War, not allowed membership!…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Worl war 1

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The League of Nations was an international organisation, headquartered in Geneva,Switzerland, created after the First World War to provide a forum for resolving international disputes. It was first proposed by President Woodrow Wilson as part of his Fourteen Points plan for an equitable peace in Europe, but the United States was never a member.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the League of Nations and the United Nations aimed to maintain peace The League succeeded in settling dispute between Bulgaria and Greece, Greece and Italy over Corfu Island. These conflicts were only between small nations. However, the League failed to check the aggression of the Axis powers. This led to the outbreak of the Second World War. In 20-year time, another great war broke out in 1939. Comparatively, the United Nations could help maintain peace more effectively. The United Nations succeeded in the Korean War. The intervention of the UN force was successful. An armistice was signed in 1953. The UN stepped in the Suez Crisis and arranged a cease-fire. Although the root causes of some conflict could not be resolved, e.g. the Israeli- Palestinian conflicts, another great war did not break out until now. This shows that the United Nations was more effective in maintaining peace. Both the League and the United Nations aimed to improve peoples well-being and living standards. The League solved the problem of refugees, prisoners of war, improve workers working environment and conditions, especially child labour. It also prohibited slavery trade. It set up unified measurement systems. It provided loans to Austria and Hungary to solve post war economic problems. The UN specialized agencies, e.g. WHO, WTO, World Bank, IMF, UNEP. They all did very well in improving peoples living standards and social well-being. They aroused international concern over some issues which need support and cooperation among nations. Also, they give financial assistance and technical support to the developing nations and they acted as a bridge between developed nations and developing nations in various issues. The specialized agencies set up the quantitative target for the member nations to achieve. Also, they educate the developing nations the importance of health, family planning, environmental conservation. Work with NGO. Comparatively, the United Nations agencies did more…

    • 787 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before Hitler was leading the Germans and the Axis powers in WW2, he was defying the treaty of Versailles and committing crimes to try to get Germany back to its former glory. Even though Hitler was committing all these crimes, the League of Nations was not doing anything to stop him. This allowed Hitler to keep doing what he was doing. All of this made Germany more powerful. Also, the fear of war forced the League of Nations to make decisions that they probably would not have made if they were more powerful thus placing smaller countries at risk. If the League of Nations was more assertive with Hitler, then Germany would not be able to become as powerful, enter the start of a war and take over territories. If the League of Nations used collective…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plan for the League of Nations was part of the peace treaty that ended World War One. By law, the United States Senate would have to vote on the treaty. President Wilson believed the Senate would have to approve it if the American people demanded it. So Wilson traveled across America. He stopped in many places to speak about the need for the League of Nations. He said the league was the only hope for world peace. It was the only way to prevent another world war.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After World War I U.S was strongly discouraged by war and absolutely sure they don’t want to be involved in any European affairs anymore. Therefore they did not ratify the Versailles treaty and did not join the League of Nation in 1920. Warren G. Harding in his speech on October 1920 claimed that “League strikes a deadly blow at our constitutional integrity and surrenders to a dangerous extent our independence of action”.1 If U.S had joined the League of Nation the country would be obligated to make things and act in a way they don’t necessarily always want to.…

    • 2267 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays