Preview

How successful, in your opinion, was the New Economic Policy?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1999 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How successful, in your opinion, was the New Economic Policy?
How successful, in your opinion, was the New Economic Policy?

The New Economic Policy, or NEP, introduced by the Bolshevik government in 1921, was an attempt to readjust and realign the Soviet economy and to prevent its implosion. The basic concept of the new policy was that the appropriation of food from the peasants, as pioneered in the infamous ‘War Communism’, was to be abolished and replaced by a ‘tax in kind’. Peasants were then left in undisturbed possession of the land, free to sell their produce in the market. The policy ran from 1921 until 1928 and generated a great deal of controversy, both at the time and from historians since. A common argument levelled at the policy was that it was unsuccessful in attaining what it was trying to achieve and should not have been adopted by the Bolshevik Government.

In order to assess whether the NEP was in fact successful, it is necessary first to examine the situation prior to its adoption. Many have argued that the New Economic Policy was adopted as a result of the failures of War Communism; the government had experienced great difficulty in feeding the urban population and the peasants soon discovered that war communism entailed the forcible confiscation of their grain to feed the cities. This idea angered many of the peasants, who were left starving while their food was exported to feed those people living in the cities. By the autumn of 1920 it was clear that Bolshevik Russia was in ruins; industrial output was minimal, railway rolling stock was dilapidated and economic life rested on a primitive system of barter. It was obvious, therefore, that some form of economic reform was necessary.

The event which actually sparked off the introduction of NEP occurred in March 1921 in Kronstadt. A group of sailors caused a revolt by demanding an end to the special position of the Bolshevik party, a relaxation of economic controls and the restoration of freedom of speech for all. The uprising was quickly suppressed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The New Deal was an economic plan developed by Franklin D. Roosevelt, based on Keynesian Economics that was geared towards pulling the nation out of the Great Depression. Although it did not achieve its main goal, it steered the nation in the right direction so that it finally ended in 1943 when unemployment rates reached pre-Depression rates. However, many critics argue that the New Deal was not effective at all in ending the Great Depression because it caused an even greater debt after FDR left office. This may be true, but this is the main point of Keynesian economics by using deficit spending to increase aggregate demand, and in turn stimulating the economy. The New Deal “provided regulation for a modern financial economy, establishing the Securities and Exchange Commission, passing the Glass-Steagall rectrictions on banks, and creating deposit insurance. It established federal unemployment insurance, a minimum wage, and of course social security. It enabled unions to organize…eventually, it created the Bretton Woods framework for international trade and investment” (Jeff Madriek).…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you agree with the view that Conservative economic policy was a success in the years 1979-1983?…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period before 1941, Stalin was able to institute his economical policies of Collectivization and the 5-year plans. ‘Backwards was to be defeated and enslaved’. Russia had to make up for 100 years of lost time for fear of being consumed by the western world. Stalin, sole leader of the Bolsheviks by the late 1920’s, believed that Russia could modernize their Agricultural and Industrial sectors through his policies.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) To what extent was the New Economic Policy (NEP) essential to the Bolshevik consolidation of power?…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia’s industrialisation as a result of the reforms of 1891 proved crucial in the fall of the old order. After Witte’s reforms of the late 1890s the population of Petrograd doubled between 1890 and 1910. With the working population in the cities it gave revolutionary groups the advantage of having a large group of frustrated workers in a confined space. In relation to the events of 1917 February revolution the population density allowed the numbers participating in the violent revolts to reach colossal numbers. With the Tsar on the war front, the masses persuaded the soldiers to join the revolutionary forces and by the time he came back, it was too late. Cities such as Petrograd and Moscow weren’t designed for the population increase, and as such workers were living in crowded dirty, overcrowded apartments. These living conditions lead to the frustrations throughout the revolutionary groups. Witte’s reforms converted a large portion of peasants into proletariat. As the tension raised in 1917 that same industrial working class responded with strikes. The strikes started by the Pulitov Steal workers on the 18th of February 1917 started out with one company, but the frustration with the Tsar wasn’t just in one factory. In exactly 12 days one strike had turned into a revolution the reason was that the reforms of Witte and Stolypin .With the peasants now in factories it ment they lacked farmers and had nobody to farm the good harvests in the war years, in fact the harvests of 1915 and 1916 were the best of the century. Without the food to feed a starving nation, the Russian government was in trouble and with this Wittes reforms that were designed…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, in 1924, Stalin wanted to keep the NEP going, even though it went against Marxism as the NEP meant that a mixed economy in which there were features of capitalism. The main reason Stalin did this was because it was a measure brought in by Lenin, and at the time, Stalin wished to make himself seem as loyal to Lenin as possible, to appear to be the natural heir.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Depression was when America went through a downfall and the stock market crashed severely. Two long term causes were that many businesses were closed down, causing many to be unemployed. Millions of people also lost their savings due to bank failures, after banks have given loans without receiving money back. President Herbert Hoover was elected in 1928, shortly before the Depression occurred. Hoover believed in rugged individualism and voluntary help from the community, without the government to force anything, the Depression was prolonged as citizens were not able to work together. President Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected after running against Hoover in 1932, he won by a landslide. Roosevelt then initiated the New Deal, a plan to revive America with many different programs. Many will argue that the New Deal was a failure, however the New Deal was a successful plan and got America out of the Depression.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NEP, abbreviation for the ‘New Economic Policy’, was a number of policies deployed by Vladimir Lenin to improve the conditions of post war USSR. The NEP replaced the system of War Communism which was used between 1918 and 1921. The main motive for the War Communism policy was to support and supply the Red Army with food and weapons during the Russian Civil War. However, after the war the country was in turmoil and the majority of the Soviet Union’s population suffered hardship and poverty. This was when a quick solution was needed to revamp the Russian economy and the NEP policies were the solution. The NEP was made to balance the needs of the well of and the poor. The NEP allowed small business to prosper and make money which seemed popular to the peasants. It had also created more stability within the country in the economical sector but all these successes did not last.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the years 1906 – 1914, Peter Stolypin was pushing to de – revolutionise the peasantry and put into place economic reform, and there is evidence of this working. During these years large amounts of agricultural reform were set in motion. In 1906 45.9 million tonnes of agricultural production was produced, by 1913 this had grown significantly to 61.7 million tonnes. The massive change in the amount of product shows that agricultural and therefore economic reform had taken place. Farmers, at this time, had also started paying higher taxes, which is sign of higher income, again strengthening this idea of economic reform occurring. Stolypin, however successful he was in his endeavours, was pushing fiercely for a more independent and de-revolutionised peasantry. During November 1906, huge action was taken to change the way the peasants lived. They were freed from the constraints of commune control and land banks were set up to give money to those peasants who chose to leave. Many were also encouraged to move to Siberia, all of these reforms were starting to lay a foundation for a more independent peasantry. Economic reform was being pursued desperately by members of the government such as Stolypin, this can been seen by the copious amount of law, for example peasants leaving commune control, being put into place. The fact these laws were coming about shows that Russia was undergoing economic reform to some extent during this period, whether it was successful or not.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A. IntroductionOn July 2, 1932, at the Democratic National Convention, the crowd listened intently to the phrase:" I pledge you, I pledge myself to a new deal for the American people." This was the first time when the term" New Deal" was mentioned by Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the 32nd president of the United States. Since then, the New Deal name was soon applied to the programs instituted by Roosevelt from 1933 to 1939 with the goal of relief, recovery and reform of the United States economy, in order to solve the economic problems created by the depression of the 1930 's.…

    • 2873 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian Communist Party first emerged under the Bolsheviks in 1905 when general strikes were organised in St. Petersburg and Moscow. At this time the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, were a minority group and increasingly divided from the Mensheviks over pace of reform and ideology. It was due to the Tsar’s ignorance throughout World War One that the Bolshevik saw an inadvertent increase in influence of opposing groups. Although, the Bolsheviks were not in power by 1917 their membership was increasing and it was Lenin’s simple slogans, such as ‘Peace, Bread, Land’ that attracted the Russian population, increasing Bolshevik influence. The fact that the Bolsheviks were the only party to promise an end to the war won the ‘hearts and minds’ of the Russian people, which could be argued that Lenin was the most significant individual in the changing influence of the Russian Communist Party. However, it was both the leadership from Lenin and military organisation from Trotsky that meant the October revolution of 1917 was, to a certain extent, a success. Darby argues that ‘Without [Lenin] it is unlikely that the Bolsheviks would have taken power in October’ whilst Figes claims ‘Trotsky became its principal source of public inspiration’. Post the October revolution, the Bolsheviks were a majority in the second All-Russian Congress of Soviets, proving that they had managed to exert a large amount of influence on the Russian population. After this it is more difficult to assess whether it was certain individuals that played a part in the changing influence of the Russian Communist Party as in the summer of 1918 Lenin set up a one-party state and ended the Constituent Assembly. The introduction of the NEP, in 1921, increased party influence as the peasants were allowed a little capitalism back, ending grain requisitioning and armed resistance in the countryside. It is hard to evaluate…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collectivisation was the process by which Russian agriculture was reformed, small farm were merged into larger units, in hope of production becoming more efficient and increasing its output. Stalin was aware of the increasing possibility of a war with Germany and so self-efficiency in food production became more imminently important in order to survive a war against the western powers. From 1927-1929 harvests fell, simultaneously affecting the wider economy. The government needed to sell grain abroad so they could receive the foreign currency necessary for resources needed for industrialisation. Collectivisation was therefore introduced to increase efficiency and introduce mechanisation. This added urgency to a need to increase output meant that high targets were set which were met with incentives and also punishments, pushing the economy towards its maximum potential making the essential contribution to the transformation of the Russian economy.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The words of Leon Trotsky, said decades before the eventual demise of central planning, highlight the underlying flaw of the planned economic system; lack of information. The central planner’s realized that the information and signaling required for any modern economy could be found more effectively in a market based system and consequentially central planning was abandoned. The systemic failure of central planning due to poor information was most prevalent in Eastern Europe and the USSR, as evidenced by their economy’s productive inefficiencies, allocative inefficiencies and pricing difficulties. This essay will classify the traditional soviet economy and examine the production, allocation and pricing difficulties which caused its end.…

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    End of Civil War. Kronstadt uprising. Introduction of the ‘NEP’. 1924 -­‐ Death of Lenin (beginning of power struggle) 1927 -­‐ First ‘Five Year Plan’ 1928 -­‐…

    • 10825 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Powerful Essays