How Should Fur Be Used In Garment Industry?
Fur should not be utilized in garment industry Fur is one of the oldest forms of clothing in the history, it might have been the first cloth that human wore. Fur clothing is the cloth made from furry animals, that’s why those clothing give people better comfort instead of other materials. In the past, people wore fur is for the sake of covering and protecting their body, however at the present time, it has become a kind of fashion which is one of the favour among fashion designers. Therefore, fur clothing is sold at some fashion outlets, for example:Calvin Klein, Vivienne Westwood, Marc Jacobs, Ralph Lauren, and Zara during winter season ( Sauers.J. 2012). However there are many people voicing out to against fur fashion, reason being some
…show more content…
So, opponents of fur should not be used for making clothing claimed that our ancestors killed the animals for the meat in order to survive at the first time, and now meat has already become one of the food that is indispensable on our dining tables. The fur was belongs to the trash can initially, so if we do not utilize the fur, isn’t it a sort of waste? In a result, opponents think that it is totally fine to wear fur clothing if human eats animal’s meat. Proponents of fur should not be utilized in garment industry do not agree with the points that pointed out by opponents. Proponents emphasized that the way how a furrier kill the animals in the fur farm is totally different from how the farmer kill cattle, chicken or other poultry in the farm. Furrier is the person who skinned the animals in the fur farm. In order to get a good quality and full piece of fur without any broken, the furriers skinned the animals alive (PETA animal welfare organization 1997). In a fur farm, when workers cut the skin and fur start from an animal's leg, the animal’s leg kicked strongly at initial, slowly the animal seems to give up and showed in the helpless eyes. When the fur is finally peeled off over the animals' heads, the naked, bloody body looks really terrible, the worse is some of the animals are seen still alive, breathing in ragged …show more content…
Yet, people who support fur should be banned in garment industry have reserved some of their comments. Human breed animals for fur in the garment industry, the action formed up an economic train which contributes to the economic. Nevertheless, the action carries out a series of problems and have some foreseeable impacts on human life too. The purpose of human taking fur from animals, indirectly give the next generation an unacceptable thinking that human can take anything they want from the nature without any consequences. Likewise, the cruelty to animals and the killing methods applied to the animals likely will result in the young generation behave violently to others, consequently raising the rate of crime in the society. Further more, fur farming causes environmental impacts, The earliest records of breeding mink for fur in North America were in the 1860s.Foxes were first raised on farms for fur in Prince Edward Island in Canada in 1895.(Singer.P. 1975). For each kilogram of factory farmed mink fur, 110 kilograms of carbon dioxide is produced; enough to drive a car from Toronto to Saint John, New Brunswick.Farmed fur outscores other textiles from 2-28 times for ozone layer depletion, soil and water pollution, and toxic emissions.( The association for the fur protection of fur bearing animals 2013). Moreover, People who wear fur clothing think that fur clothing brings them a kind of
So, opponents of fur should not be used for making clothing claimed that our ancestors killed the animals for the meat in order to survive at the first time, and now meat has already become one of the food that is indispensable on our dining tables. The fur was belongs to the trash can initially, so if we do not utilize the fur, isn’t it a sort of waste? In a result, opponents think that it is totally fine to wear fur clothing if human eats animal’s meat. Proponents of fur should not be utilized in garment industry do not agree with the points that pointed out by opponents. Proponents emphasized that the way how a furrier kill the animals in the fur farm is totally different from how the farmer kill cattle, chicken or other poultry in the farm. Furrier is the person who skinned the animals in the fur farm. In order to get a good quality and full piece of fur without any broken, the furriers skinned the animals alive (PETA animal welfare organization 1997). In a fur farm, when workers cut the skin and fur start from an animal's leg, the animal’s leg kicked strongly at initial, slowly the animal seems to give up and showed in the helpless eyes. When the fur is finally peeled off over the animals' heads, the naked, bloody body looks really terrible, the worse is some of the animals are seen still alive, breathing in ragged …show more content…
Yet, people who support fur should be banned in garment industry have reserved some of their comments. Human breed animals for fur in the garment industry, the action formed up an economic train which contributes to the economic. Nevertheless, the action carries out a series of problems and have some foreseeable impacts on human life too. The purpose of human taking fur from animals, indirectly give the next generation an unacceptable thinking that human can take anything they want from the nature without any consequences. Likewise, the cruelty to animals and the killing methods applied to the animals likely will result in the young generation behave violently to others, consequently raising the rate of crime in the society. Further more, fur farming causes environmental impacts, The earliest records of breeding mink for fur in North America were in the 1860s.Foxes were first raised on farms for fur in Prince Edward Island in Canada in 1895.(Singer.P. 1975). For each kilogram of factory farmed mink fur, 110 kilograms of carbon dioxide is produced; enough to drive a car from Toronto to Saint John, New Brunswick.Farmed fur outscores other textiles from 2-28 times for ozone layer depletion, soil and water pollution, and toxic emissions.( The association for the fur protection of fur bearing animals 2013). Moreover, People who wear fur clothing think that fur clothing brings them a kind of