Preview

How Realistic Is the Realist Tradition?

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2131 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Realistic Is the Realist Tradition?
How realistic is the realist tradition? By Dan Andrei Dumitru

Realism as a tradition of thought in political theory has been a perennial approach and it can be traced back for more than two millennia. However, as Donnelly (2000, p1) remarks, “the link between realism and international theory is especially strong in the twentieth century”, being a dominant theory before and after the second World War and then declining after the end of the Cold War. Furthermore, as he points out, realism is not a fixed theory but rather a “general orientation” bounded by “a set of recurrent concerns and conclusions” (p1). In order to properly grasp what could be understood by a so-called realist tradition, it is essential that we first pay attention to classical political writers that have been associated with realist idea as this will give us a better comprehension of how the world is seen through the Realist prism. Afterwards, we will briefly look at self-declared 20th century realists and try to assess the relevance of this theory in the post cold-war era. In ancient political thought realist ideas can be fond in the writings of a number of authors, both in western and oriental political thought, most notably the Greek historian Thucydides, the Chinese military general Sun Tzu and Kautylia (also know as Chanakya), the adviser of the first Maurya emperor. The Melian dialogue is arguably the most relevant passage of Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian war for understanding realist international politics. The powerful city of Athens attacks the small colony of Melos that was allied with Sparta. The Melians argue that it is unjust as they have not been hostile to Athens. The Athenians reply that ‘the standard of justice depends on the equality of power to compel’ and ‘the strong do what they have the power to do and the week accept what they have to accept’ (Thucydides, 1972, 406). We can thus see how power is a cardinal factor in the realist conception.



Bibliography: Berridge, G. R., 2001. Machiavelli: human nature, good faith and diplomacy. Review of international studies, 27, 539-556. Available through University of St Andrews library. [ Accessed 27.10.2011] Boesche, R., 2003 Donnelly, J., 2000. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Forsyth, M., 2008. Thomas Hobbes and the external relations of states. In: Sloamp, G. ed., 2008. Thomas Hobbes. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Gillman, P., 1988. Hans J. Morgenthau and the legacy of political realism. Review of international studies, 14, 247-266. Available through the University of St Andrews library. [Accessed 28.10.2011] Hobbes, T., 1997 Machiavelli, N., 1961. The Prince. Translated by Bull, G., Harmondsworth:Penguin. Steans, J., Pettiford, L. and Diez, T., 2005. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall. Thucydides, 1972. History of the Peloponnesian war. Translated by R. Warner. London: Penguin

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Realism, as a way of interpreting international relations has often been conceived to be closely tied to the Cold War. Realism, rooted in the experience of World War II and the Cold War, is said to be undergoing a crisis of confidence largely because the lessons adduced do not convincingly apply directly to the new realities of international relations in the twenty-first century (Clinton 2007:1) Worse still, if policymakers steadfastly adhere to realist precepts, they will have to navigate “the unchartered seas of the post-Cold War disorder with a Cold War cartography, and blind devotion to realism could compromise their ability to prescribe paths to a more orderly and just system.” (Kegley 1993:141). This paper will demonstrate that this picture of realism is incomplete – realism is not an obsolete theory in contemporary international relations, but is indeed relevant - it can be, and has been applied in the twenty-first century. In order to prove this, the work of well-known political thinkers thought to be the precursors of realism, and the writings of present-day international relations analysts will be examined, and the core tenets of realism will be extracted. It will be argued that these root concepts of realist thought do not rely on the circumstances of the Cold War, and are thus not bound by its confines, with the possibility that these lessons retain their validity in addressing issues in the post-Cold War world of international relations.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the lack of definition, realism has been successful and has become a dominate theory in international relations (Rosenberg, 1994). Therefore defining it remains an active argument, meaning realist scholars continue to debate the fundamental assumptions of realist…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While it may appear that a government made a certain decision to help a struggling country, or start a war in the name of spreading democracy or bringing an end to terrorism, their true goals lie in much more selfish matters. For instance, a country might send an army into Africa to put a stop to an uprising of rebel soldiers, but on the back side they begin exporting valuable resources to their homeland. Realists believe that power, not peace, is the main focal point of political interest, a hypothesis which can easily be tested by observing the actions taken by previous governments throughout history. By focusing on the study of political power, realists create a continuity of analysis of policy: each state can be analyzed in terms of power politics. Notwithstanding, Morgenthau warns against two common misconceptions: the first would be trying to understand the motives of governing individuals and groups. This is a mistake because motives don 't always align to actual policy or the outcomes of said policies; and the second misconception is the alignment of ideology with action. Put simply, Morgenthau believed that a policy may be made to seem that it has the intentions of the people, or a cause the people believe in, at heart when the reality is that the policy is truly a means to gain additional power. Although it may sound rather obvious. Morgenthau warns that policy has been repeatedly guided by legal and moral guidelines instead of strictly political considerations. As a result, the power of a country and the welfare of its citizens have been routinely endangered. Instead, realism advocates that policy must arise out of purely political analysis. With that being said politics become a bit more translucent. If one were to follow the history of…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Donnelly, Jack, Realism and International Relations, (2004), The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press , pp. 6-43…

    • 4317 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Realism contends that politics is a struggle for power and ⁄ or survival, and consequently depicts international politics as a realm of recurrent conflicts among states with very little prospect for change. It is therefore not traditionally regarded as an approach which entertains an idea of progress. E.H Carr famously rejected ‘‘pure realism’’ as an untenable position precisely because it fails to provide ‘‘a ground for action,’’ and advocated finding a delicate balance between realism and utopia, as meaningful political action must include both. While realism certainly entails a degree of pessimism, it is far fetched to claim that realist scholars are radically sceptical about the future of international relations. The article investigates Hans Morgenthau and Raymond Aron, two leading classical realist scholars, and argues that neither advocated a strict version of power politics. On the contrary, they both attempted to find the balance Carr suggested between realist concerns and ideals necessary to spur political action. Both were also very aware of the dangers of nihilism, and upheld hope in the future of humankind, even if this hope remains tempered by pessimism as to whether it will ever realize its destiny.…

    • 8353 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cited in: John Baylis and Steve Smith. The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations, Third Edition, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005)…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    WORLD WARS PAPER

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kaarbo, J. & Ray, J. L. (2011). Global Politics, 10th Edition. Published by Wadsworth Cengage Learning…

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    G. John Ikenberry and Michael Mastanduno (Eds), International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, Columbia University Press, New York, 2003. Reserve.…

    • 4136 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Timothy Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith. 2013. International Relations Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 5551 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To do so, I will be using a variety of content, from journals to books. Focusing on Realism, I have looked at the works of John J. Mearsheimer and Kenneth Waltz. I will be analyzing their study of International Relations, and their Realist ideologies. When discussing the Middle East, Gregory F. Gause’s article entitled, “Systematic approaches to the Middle East International Relations,” has proved to be an important source of information. The crux of this essay, hence the discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the Realist paradigm for understanding International Politics in the Middle East, comes from a variety of different journals and articles. For instance, Mohammed Ayoob’s “Subaltern Realism: International Relations theory meets the third world” and Fred Halliday’s “The Middle East in International Relations: Power, Politics and Ideology” are two of the journals I will be using for this analysis.…

    • 3687 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Observations of Realists

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Taking into account realism is one of the more established theories of international relations, we have to also consider the global climate in which the theory was established and compare that to now. Hans Morgenthau was born in Coburg, Germany 1904 and experienced two world worlds. He and his…

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    IR Realism

    • 1338 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is realism? What is global politics? How do they become hand in hand? Is the realist theoretical approach the most appropriate for understanding global politics? These are some of the most prevalent questions asked. This essay will seek to discuss how realism and its main principles can be useful in understanding current events in international relations.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Realist approach is an important approach related to the study of international Politics. It based on really and tries to explain International Politics in context to reality. This approach revolves around two important elements viz, security and power. The supporters of Realist Approach believe that struggle for power is reality and we can not understand International Politics by ignoring this fact. Realist Approach is an old theory and it was there even in 18th and 19th century. But in International Politics this theory or view point became popular after Second world war and scholars like Max Weber, E.H. Car, Frederick Schuman, Nicholas Spykman, Reinhold Nicbuhr, Arnold Wolfers, Kenneth Thompson, George F. Kennan, Hans J. Morgenthau, Henry Kissinger. Hans. J. Morgenthau is considered the chief exponent of Realist Approach. He has responsible for building a realist model of international relations which seeks to explain all aspects of the struggle for power among nations.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Realism

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Realism is one of the key theories in international relations. Realism can be simply understood as a political point of view, which emphasizes on competition among countries in terms of power, with the aim of reinforcing their national security. For some scholars, realism is already obsolete as it only makes sense in the time of war. However, with regard to many issues arising, its premises and tenets still stand the test of the time, proving their reasonability.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Syria Conflict Essay Example

    • 2671 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Several general realist ideas and assumptions were discussed (Jackson, 2010). These are related to different aspects such as pessimistic view of human nature; international conflicts that are ultimately resolved by war, high regard for the values of national security and state survival and basic…

    • 2671 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays