Preview

How Is The Atomic Bomb Justified

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
611 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Is The Atomic Bomb Justified
In 1945, when the atomic bomb was dropped in Japan I felt that it was not justified. Even though it saved thousands of American lives it was at the cost of others lives. The United States could have gave the Japanese a warning before dropping not one, but two bombs on them. However, the Japanese did not surrender until after the second bomb I think a warning would have made the bombing “justified.” To begin with, even though the United States and Japan were at war and were protected their own citizens they could've tried to prevent the war a little further. President Truman should have warned the Japanese and let them know what the United States was capable of. However, he ordered the people to drop the bomb with no warning. However, if the Japanese did not agree to surrender after the warning then the bombs could have been dropped and had been “justified.” I also feel that the United States went in thinking about it the wrong way. “Interested in producing the “greatest psychological effect,” the Committee members agreed that the “most desirable target would be a vital war plant employing a large number of workers and closely surrounded by workers’ houses.” (Interim Committee Meeting, 1945) The people should not have wanted to kill innocent people only and maybe they …show more content…
However, Truman felt it was necessary to drop the bomb to save the people of the United States. “If the war dragged on and Americans had to invade Japan, it might cost a million lives. The atomic bomb, President Truman knew, might kill many thousands of innocent Japanese. But life for life, the odds were that it would cost less.” (Roy Rosenzweig Center for History, 2017) Since the war had been going for years and it needed to come to an end. Neither side was going to voluntarily give up or surrender so the President Truman did what he thought was necessary to save the United States and to provide security for the people of the United States which is his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Harry Truman is justified for sending atomic bombs from the United States to Japan civilian cities. Two parts of Japan in particular named Hiroshima and Nagasaki were targeted to kill off the civilians. The bombs were supposed to target a certain range of people, the hiroshima ranged from 90,000 to 146,000 and the Nagasaki ranged from 39,000 to 80,000 deaths. These bombs initiated the action of surrender from Japan and this happened on August 15, 1945. There are documents that prove Harry Truman should be justified for the participation in winning the war for the United States.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    America was justified for dropping the bomb on Japan during World War Two because they didn't want to lose any more American lives. These American lives are major values to their loved ones.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The atomic bomb shouldn’t have been used in World War 2 to defeat Japan. America could have used other alternatives then the deadly atomic bomb. President Truman should of waited a few more weeks for russia to declare war on Japan. The thought of invasion by both of America and Russia probably had an even more scared effect on the Japanese government then the Atomic Bombs. America could of also continue the conventional bombings and blockade.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How could anyone possibly justify a decision that would result in over 265,000 potentially innocent people losing their lives? Justifications like this have been made throughout history by evil leaders with mal-intentions, or by psychopathic fundamentalists, but never by a governmental organization as respected and trusted as the United States. How is it possible that the most financially and socially developed country in the world is not asked to apologize for taking the lives of thousands of civilians? When reflecting on this decision made by the United States, there are a few factors worth mentioning. The first is the animosity held by the US not only against Japan but the axis powers in general, the strong desire to conclude a very painful time in world history, and the United States desire to become heroic. Although I do not know the specific thought processes and or actions that took place during this difficult time, I do have the ability to gather facts and attempt to recreate a simulation of what took place.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was the use of the atomic bomb on Japan a good decision? In July 1945 the U.S. dropped the atom bomb on Japan saving hundreds of thousands of American lives. By dropping the atom bomb on Japan America was able to end WWII earlier saving lives on both sides. In WWII the US should have used the atomic bomb on Japan because it saved American lives and helped end the war earlier.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I feel that they were not morally justified because the atomic bombs were extremely horrific. The bombings killed so many lives of innocent people and the horrible effects on the people for years after the bombing. The after effects of the bombing have caused health problems such as cancer and birth defects for decades later to people that weren’t even born yet.…

    • 62 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japans army was too strong for the United States to invade. That is why they chose to drop the bombs. The american soldiers were very tired from four years of fighting the war. Japan had two million soldiers waiting for an invasion to happen. There is no way the war would have ended without the bombings.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason the dropping of the atomic bomb was the right thing to do because it saved many more lives. It was estimated that millions of american soldiers lives’ were saved. If the bomb was not dropped then the United States would have lost millions of the young…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was justifiable to drop the atomic bomb because it was the final turning point in winning WWII for the United States. As the history.com notes, “Six months of strategic fire-bombing of 37 Japanese…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The large death toll and the civilians who were targeted are crimes against humanity. The Nippon Times in Tokyo pointed out, “What meaning is there in any international law… in any concept of right or wrong, if the very foundations of morality are to be overthrown as the use of this instrument of total destruction threatens to do” (Document 4). By using the atomic bomb, the U.S threw away the morales it seemed to hold for itself. America is often known for helping other nations when needed, but annihilating hundred of thousands of people completely of a helping hand. Although this was during a time of war and Japan was the enemy, this is beyond acceptable actions of war because of both long and short term implications and death.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people today could argue their side and reasons on why they think the United States was justified in bombing Japan. But was Osama in Laden justified in orchestrating 9/11? No one in their right mind would support the killing of innocent civilians on 9/11 on the basis of the argument that Osama Bin Laden and his cohort wanted to end the war between radical Islam and the U.S. So why is it acceptable for the U.S. to have incinerated tens of thousands of civilian men, women, children and babies to end the War, when there was a military alternative? The U.S. could have continued the war against the Japanese armed forces instead of targeting Japanese civilians. If the Japanese civilians who were killed are not deemed to have been innocent because they may have supported the Imperialist Japanese Government, then neither was those who died in the World Trade Center or any Americans, because they support the U.S. Government!…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Lyly, in his novel Euphues, once said, “All is fair in love and war.” When it comes to war, anything goes. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified, for there are positive effects, the Japanese were brutal, and it ultimately saved lives. Firstly, there are the positive effects brought on from the bombings.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Hague 2, the bombing of cities or towns that are not defended, and using a weapon to cause superfluous injury is prohibited during war. So, why did we drop the bombs then? We targeted innocent Japanese civilians for no absolute reason. Civilians outnumbered troops in both cities 5:1, therefore forfeiting them both as military targets. The 200,000 killed at both sites were not the only sufferers. The ones who survived had to live with serious defects, such as keloids, or several different diseases.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays