Preview

How Important Were Wolsey's Foreign Policies in Strengthening the Royal Authority of Henry Viii?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1817 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Important Were Wolsey's Foreign Policies in Strengthening the Royal Authority of Henry Viii?
In many respects Wolsey’s foreign policies were very effective in confirming Henry VIII’s royal authority and demonstrating his strengths, however in other ways they did not show this quite as well instead leaving him isolated. Many events need to be taken into consideration when deciding on the effectiveness of Wolsey’s foreign policies, these are the Anglo-Spanish treaty, the treaty of London, the field of cloth and gold, the election for Holy Roman Emperor after the death of Maximillian, his treaties during the second French war and finally his attempts at gaining an annulment for Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon.

In 1515 Francis I won a victory against the Swiss, and so took power of Milan making him much more powerful. In response to this Wolsey set about creating an anti-French coalition via a Anglo-Spanish treaty and beginning agreements with Maximillian. Unfortunately England’s foreign policies were at the mercy of continental events so when Ferdinand of Aragon died leaving Charles I in charge, he made peace with France increasing their territory and thus their power yet again and so more of a threat to those who stood against them. Along with this Maximillian them made peace with France which meant that any talk of a anti-French coalition would be stopped as they could not compete with France and its allies. The only solution was to follow the heard and make peace with Francis I, this decision lead to the Treaty of London in 1518. Up until this point Henry’s authority had not been increased or demonstrated at all but this was due to events that Wolsey had no control over but it did mean that Wolsey had, had no impact Henry’s royal authority.

In 1518 the treaty of London was created. The idea spiralled from papal initiative to make peace among the countries so that war with the Turks could be more effective and ending in Wolsey’s getting 20 different European rulers to sign an extended version, the rulers included Francis I, Charles V, Maximillian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However in source 6, it should be remembered that Henry is giving Wolsey an instruction which although giving him freedom too, shows that Henry was in overall control. Also, the report from Cavendish in source 4, is possibly un-reliable as there is a link that Cavendish, being Wolsey’s “friend and servant,” may be biased towards his master. This may lead him to possibly exaggerate the powers actually bestowed by Wolsey. Additionally, source 4 offers no indication of the year that this occurred in, as it is possible that Wolsey’s power worked throughout the ten year period depending on certain events. For example, throughout the French Invasion of 1512 and 1513, when Henry led on occasion 30,000 soldiers into France, it is clear that Henry was in control.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many successes of their (Henry and Wolsey’s) foreign policy. Wolsey was a successful peace broker, and the treaty of London in 1518 was a great example of him ability. This treaty in 1518 was an agreement of peace which seemed to put England in to the centre of diplomatic affairs in Europe (which was what Henry wanted). The treaty bound France, Spain, the Papacy, HRE and England against the Turkish. At the time it seemed like a great success as it seemed to signify the end of fear of England being isolated in Europe, however in the long term it failed despite the short term success.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Henry didn’t always get his way. Early on in his reign he made an agreement with Maximilian of Burgundy to aid him in his campaign against the French and the Flemish so long as…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The English Foreign Policy from 1515 to 1528 can often be described as incoherent; this is because the aims of foreign policy from 1515 to 1529 kept altering due to the change in balance of power in Europe. This meant that for England to keep acting as the centre for European affair the foreign policy would have to keep changing. A result of this was that the foreign policy seemed ineffective due to lack of structure, the high costs, and few territorial acquisitions was the traditional opinion on the foreign policy that it was a failure. However with all of these mentioned factors the foreign policy could also have been seen as very effective. This was due to its ability to adapt to situations that arose in the period 1515 to 1529. If you break down this time period into smaller sections you can look at them individually and see where the foreign policy was effective on a smaller scale. When looking at this way it is easier to get a bigger picture as to how effective the foreign policy actually was.…

    • 3141 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘How far was Henrys foreign policy merely defensive in the years between 1487 and 1509?’ (24 marks)…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main success in foreign policy was Wolsey successfully delivering a policy of peace between 1511-25; this is shown in Source 4 where M.D. Palmer refers to the peace at London in 1518, where peace was agreed between twenty countries in Europe, as Wolsey’s ‘greatest triumph’, which it indeed was, at least for Wolsey if not just for England at the time. It’s outcome for Wolsey was appointment as papal legate which granted Wolsey the power to act on the Pope’s behalf which was a great deal of power to hold and definitely a success for Wolsey. The benefits of this peace for England were also quite significant as it meant England was no longer isolated as it previously had been as it was now a key player in European affairs as Henry and Wolsey wanted; this in turn also meant it presented a better image to the other European powers and instilled a sense that England was more powerful than it was in reality. As well as the Treaty of London, Wolsey also planned the events at the…

    • 1761 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War of the Roses was a crucial and significant period in the England’s history playing an important role in it. There were many factors which can be seen as the causes of the war. However, it is vital to clarify to what extent its outbreak was caused by Henry’s inadequacies.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly I believe that Henry VIII's foreign policy was an overall failure, for various reasons. Henry VIII's foreign policy was to be drastically different to that of his predecessor and father, Henry VII. Where Henry VII's foreign policy was very reserved and almost non existent due to the need to rebuild the stability of his own country and his complete lack of resources and money at the time, Henry VIII's was completely the opposite. As Henry was born into wealth and security he didn't quite have the same morals as his father, and wanted to be the heroic, chivalrous night like Edward V. He wanted England to regain glory, power and status in Europe and with his aggressive foreign policy he was completely and utterly prepared to go to war for this, and that's what he did. However Henry VIII was not powerful enough to go it alone and he needed to pick and ally. He joined with the Holy League, which consisted of Spain, the Holy Roman Empire and the Pope and in June 1512 invaded a France. This seemed like a great idea with Henry now being allied against his enemy France with power like Spain, however this first attempt turned about to be a disaster. Ferdinand of Spain manipulated him and used his his attack on Northern France as a distraction so they could attack Navarre. Henry's men were left dejected, diseased and mutinous forcing retreat. So, due to Henry VIII's naivety his foreign policy is so far unsuccessful. Nevertheless, Henry was mostly unperturbed and determined and invaded Northern France again in June…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source C (by David Grossell) is undoubtedly the most obvious of the three sources for showing agreement with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30, however source C also shows a disagreement with this suggestion as it states that “English diplomacy.... Failed to bring great gains to the county” Grossell is clearly talking about the amicable grant and its failure, as the amicable grant consequently lead to England forming an alliance with France whilst leaving the alliance they had with Spain. As a result of this England in 1529 were sidelined from any European affairs going on at that time period which most definitely would have had negative implications for England.…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    He increased the amount of warships in the Royal Navy from 5 to over 40 and constructed fortifications on the southern coast. Through these efforts, Henry earned the title as the “Father of the English Navy”.Despite frivolous spending on war and luxuries, the dissolution of monasteries brought wealth to England. It pleased the Protestants and furthered the dissolution of Catholicism from the Church of England.Among Henry’s political accomplishments was his granting as Lord of Ireland, as well as the Laws in Wales Acts of 1535 and 1542 which brought Wales into the English Kingdom. These successes point towards Henry increasing the rule of England over neighboring territories. Henry VIII was certainly not the nicest king in England’s history, but many of his goals were accomplished how he wanted them to be. He obtained his male heir, obtained the necessary power to end his marriages, built drastically upon the Royal Navy, and was awarded numerous titles. In the question of success, not everything has to be completely moral to expect a successful reign. While England was sure to see more tough times ahead, it was certainly not broken or completely exhausted of resources when Henry…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the VIII wanted to end his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in 1527 with using an annulment, this was then Wolsey’s job to provide what the king wanted. Due to Wolsey’s constant victories, he was able to sustain power for 15 years, outlasting the King‘s other advisers. Yet his fall was swift and dramatic, which came after his failure of obtaining Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In regards to this, it seems clear that this is the reason why Wolsey fell from power, yet there are possible contributing factors that must take into consideration. For instance Wolsey’s failure sometimes was out of his control as Queen Catherine was Charles V’s aunt so he would never accept the annulment in fear of hear being humiliated. Charles also had captured Pope Clement this meant that all decisions would have been controlled and manipulated to Charles’ will, delaying the annulment even more. Another failure that was out of Wolsey’s control was the role of factions within the court, Anne Boleyn and her family…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolsey had always caused resentment from the nobility, and this only grew as he became more dominant in Henry VIII’s government. Not only did nobles dislike him due to his low birth contrasted with his high positions, such as becoming Lord Chancellor in 1515, but resentment was also caused by his lavish lifestyle. Although opposition against him had got stronger throughout his career, this in itself was not significant enough to cause his fall. It was a factor that undoubtedly would’ve swayed Henry, however the ultimate reason for Wolsey’s fall was the failure to annul Henry’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This rebirth came after being embarrassed and humiliated by his marriages to Cleves and Howard. It is also important to recognise as Richardson does, that the reason the peace after 1545 is so uneasy is because of Henry’s achievements in war. No longer was there a balance in honour, therefore Francis was stuck in a peace he wanted to resolve - hence the continued sour relations that weren’t seen after the Field of the Cloth of Gold, which was otherwise similar in circumstances. The reason Henry VIII acted in such a reserved, and what has been interpreted as fearful way in 1539, was because of extent of the threat - the potential for a Catholic Crusade from a Habsburg-Valois alliance had a significant potential, in the wake of the Papal Bull of Excommunication against Henry VIII. Had the Treaty of Toledo been followed through it would have presented an existential crisis to the throne. However other explanations for his alliance seeking have been uncovered by McEntegart. He argues that, whilst security still remained a top priority, the king also had theological reasons for discussing with the Schmalkaldic League, exemplified by his considerations, at least on aspects of the Augsburg confession, in order to assist in creating uniformity in the Church. Furthermore he reveals the great plays of Cromwell’s faction in this period against the conservatives in order to further his heretical cause. This in turn led to Henry more closely seeking relations with the Schmalkalden as well as withdrawing from mainstream European politics. Security was secondary to honour, partially due to honour producing a security in its own right, at least in the eyes of Henry, but crucially due to the great focus that was still placed on the role of a chivalric and Godly…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    League Of Nations Dbq

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Treaty of Versailles brought World War I to an end. It was signed on 28 June 1919 in Versailles. The main structure in the treaty was for Germany and her allies to accept the responsibility for causing all the “loss and damage" during the war. The clause of the treaty stated Germany as the antagonist in the war and therefore made Germany responsible for making amends to the Allied nations in payment for the losses and damage they had sustained in the war. The Treaty called for the formation of a League of Nations in which the promise of mutual security would avoid another major world war…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays