Preview

How Important Was the Crown in Maintaining the Political Stability of Tudor England?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1429 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Important Was the Crown in Maintaining the Political Stability of Tudor England?
How important was the crown in maintaining the Political stability of Tudor England?

Tudor England was time of rebellion and turmoil. The head of Tudor England ,the monarch,was responsible for keeping his or her country running well. The crown was the sublime leader he or she ran the government and parliament and therefore he or she were responsible for maintaining political stability during this period. Tudor society was the epicentre of Tudor politics. The power of your words within the political world depended on your rank in the society. Higher ranks had their say whilst low ranking people of the society did what the higher ranked noblemen and earls said. The highest ranks were governed by the Monarch. Henry VII ordered himself to be named highness or majesty to prove is power over his people. Originally the king was led by the emperor and pope,but during Henry VIII's reign,where he surpassed the act of supremacy,he became an imperial leader. The Tudor population genuinely followed the rule of the 'great chain of being',this chain linked everything to god and stated that each person had their own rightful place in society. Even though this idea of a social chain was widely accepted it is clear that some peoples place in society and the monarchs attempt to reach imperial authority didn’t please everyone as rebellions in the Tudor period were ever frequent. To keep control the monarchs at the time had to re-enforce their own power and 'natural order' with sermons and tracts alike. During religious changes ,mainly during the 1530's where Henry enforced the act of supremacy and act of six articles,monarchs created oaths of allegiance to keep nobles loyal to the crown bided and supportive of the crowns decision,this was widely used between Henry VIII's reign and Elizabeth I's reign. The crown may of created oaths of allegiance but also had to supply nobles with 'rewards' to keep the supportive of his cause. The Monarch had the largest political power and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henrys complex financial policies were important in his control of the nobility. For example, he used bonds and recognaisances, which were raised for political and financial purposes, to restrain the power of his nobility. Between 1504 and 1508, £50,000 per annum was collected from the bonds, which shows that they obviously contained power in controlling nobles. Another device that Henry used were feudal dues. Wardships were the feudal due which most irked the nobility since it gave the king control of a nobles’ land and it also gave the king control over the marriage of there children, which if the heir was a female could mean that the family lost control of its land entirely. His careful management of crown lands is another example of how Henry’s power over his nobility rested on his successful financial policies. Henry had more crown land than previous monarchs, some lands were confiscated under the acts of attainder and others were reclaimed after the acts of resumption. This secured control and authority over England, and by 1508 his annual income from royal estates had rose from £12,000 in 1486 to £42,000. Finally, Henry used attainders and fines to avoid wars caused by nobles, which had caused problems to previous monarchs. Henry used Acts of Attainders to declare a nobleman guilty of a crime against the crown. The noble might be imprisoned and the attainted…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the Tudor Dynasty it is easily thought that the years between 1547 and 1558 were ones of crisis. With the succession of a child and the first woman within England, people have assumed that the years between Henry VIII and Elizabeth I were an unproductive interlude. The mid Tudor period is seen as negative years within the Tudor Dynasty. It is regarded that Henry VIII and Elizabeth I’s reputations were a factor in why historians such as A.F Pollard and S T Bindoff supported the ‘Mid Tudor Crisis’ . The ‘two little Tudors’, referring to Edward and Mary, seemed colourless in comparison to their surrounding successors, so much so that A Pollard says “Edward was portrayed as a sickly boy who, throughout his reign, was the pawn of two ‘regents’” while Mary was seen as an ‘intolerant, dogmatic and neurotic woman who failed to produce an heir’ . Therefore it could be seen that people believed the years of crisis were at their most dysfunctional between the years 1547-1558. W R D Jones argued that Edward and Mary’s reigns were a period of religious disruption, large scale disorder and rebellion alongside the inefficiency and sterility in government and administration, social and economic problems and disastrous foreign policy. This supports the description of the mid-Tudor period being dysfunctional. However there could be influence from the 16th Century writers such as John Foxe who was author to ‘Book of Martyrs’, which was written just after Marys death and depicted her as a monster . Foxe was responsible for a lasting picture of Mary as it fitted prejudices of a confident. Under these circumstances it was not surprising that the period 1547 – 1558 were marked by disasters. However historians such as David Loades, Jennifer Loach and Robert Tittler stress that there was much creativity in the period. Government under Duke of Northumberland…

    • 3558 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginning Henry wanted to make it clear who was the ultimate ruler and decided that power should be shared out between local governments and the Counsel of socially low-born ministers rather than the noble class which was seen in previous reigns. It was soon made apparent that Henry empowered men with legal training who shared his crown-centred view rather than others, this was due to the fact Tudor felt more secure knowing in the fact his powerful followers believed in what he was doing for the country. However this did not mean that he didn’t want the nobles to be behind him…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tudor governments during the Tudor period dealt with rebellions in different ways, whether most governments underestimated the threat posed by them will be dependent on how well and effectively they reacted and responded to theses rebellions. Most Tudor Monarchs were either not prepared or faced the consequences of their most serious errors, however factors that will have to be taken in consideration are how governments consulted with their advisers, how governments gathered information, the role of communication to nobles and officials in rebellious areas and the time bought when they had limited resources. How well governments dealt with rebellions before they became too dangerous and the decisions to raise troops will also be considered, as they too decide whether or not most Tudor government underestimated the threat posed by rebellions.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the content of the period 1485-1587, to what extent did the Northern Rebellion of 1569 represent a significant threat to the security of the Tudor State?…

    • 3209 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VII and Retaining

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1486, Henry persuaded both Houses of Parliament to take an oath promising that they would not retain unlawfully.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mid Tudor Crisis Essay

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There has been some debate as to whether it is true to say that during the reigns of the ‘mid-Tudor’ monarchs there was a crisis. For both Edward and Mary there were various factors that did pose problematic for them such as the threats to the Tudor dynasty through rebellions and neither having a strong heir to the throne after their deaths. Moreover, there were also factors such as finance and foreign policy that also made the crown slightly unstable as inflation continued to rise and England lost possession over French towns. However, although there is evidence to show that there was a mid-Tudor crisis, the stronger argument is that there was, in fact no crisis but a time where…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Middle Ages

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Going back to talking about with the Magna Carta. They king was over extending his power so the nobles wrote themselves a…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pilgrimage of Grace

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The King wanted to maintain order in his lands, and he wants to prove he is a worthy leader. According to Richard Morrison (doc. 7), who was a representative of Thomas Cromwell, a ruler has to be someone who is very wise, someone who has the ability to govern people in the right fashion. Cromwell believes that the King has the ability to do so; more so than the Pope. Since he believed this, Cromwell did not want a Pope to govern because he believed that the King was wiser, and that he would do a better job than the Pope. The governed should be happy with the fact that they have a wise ruler. Cromwell thinks that a wise ruler is necessary for the commonwealth. This is a viable fact because the common people would be much better off if they had a good leader than if they didn't. Cromwell may agree with this due to the fact that there have been very bad papal leaders in the past. Henry VIII (doc. 9) believes that he King has to be forgiving. After the march, the King excused those who were once against the church because he felt that everyone needs a second chance. If the marchers agreed to apologize and realize their mistakes, the King would simply…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tudor dynasty experienced differing uncertainties throughout their reigns on the throne of England. From politics and war overseas, to succession difficulties. Each Monarch throughout early modern England faced conflicting challenges and hardships, nevertheless Henry VIII stands out among them all. Henry’s turbulent years on the throne presents an evolution throughout English society, culture, religion and politics, to name a few. Henry was not expected to become King, being only the third child of Henry VII, himself also an unexpected King, winning his throne on the battle field against Richard III in 1485. His early youth was not that of the first in line to the throne, due to the unexpected death of this elder brother Arthur, Henry…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lotherington says, ‘No king could rule without the co-operation of the nobility, which was largely responsible for conducting the king’s business in the provinces’ and Pendrill supports this when he says that Henry VII’s prime aim was to restore a partnership in government, shifting the balance in his favour after the disruption of the Wars of the Roses. Policies to achieve this combined a mix of the ‘carrot and stick’ technique. The ‘stick’ approach combined military and financial restraints and a reduction in central and local power. Whereas the ‘carrot,’ approach saw Henry develop a reward system for service and encouraging loyalty from his peers. However the question remains, how did Henry do when meeting the nobles. Are we to believe Pendrill who claims, ‘Henry’s relationship with his nobility was, ultimately a failure.’ Or are we to follow Guy’s line who claims, ‘by means of bonds, Henry VII in effect disabled his nobility.’…

    • 1899 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tudor governments were relatively successful in dealing with the problem of rebellion, although this was more effective towards the end of the period than at the beginning shown through the decline in rebellion after 1549: only 5 English rebellions occurred as opposed to 10 before 1549. Over the course of the Tudor period the main aims of rebellions were only fully achieved in the rebellions of 1525, the Amicable Grant and 1553. In addition to this the reforms made to local government, policies directly implemented by central government and the effects of trials and retribution, such as Henry VII’s concessions made to the late 15th century pretenders, Lambert Simnell and Perkin Warbeck and later in the period during Elizabeth’s reign, who recognised rebel Shane O’Neil as Earl of Tyrone, all contributed to the reduction in the frequency and scale of English rebellions. Pre-emptive strikes implemented by Tudor governments were also instrumental, especially during the start of the period in Henry’s reign and later in Elizabeth’s reign, in preventing rebellion or stopping riots from becoming dangerous rebellions. In some areas these strategies and tactics worked better in some areas than others; Irish rebellions were generally more costly and more difficult to suppress.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays