In some countries, serious criminals such as serial murderers and terrorist bomber hardly escape death sentence. While many complement on such tough justice, others condemn it mainly for religious reasons. It appears to me that those who are against the death penalty have failed to notice the more humane aspects behind this seemingly inhumane charge. My essay will look at those humane aspects as against those to the opposite.
First of all, death penalty proves to be an effective ‘kill one to warn all’ approach I law enforcement. Crime rates in China have reportedly been fallen to a certain level since the implementation of death penalty. By nature, whether it has to do with the fear caused by uncertainty of afterlife or not, human beings would be afraid of death. Death sentence, in as sense, is kind of psychological approach to put off the evil flame in mankind.
Secondly, some people do deserve this harsh punishment for their wicked act against humanity. A serial murderer who slaughtered dozens of innocent children, a terrorist who launched an attack that killed hundreds—can you figure out a better penalty to resort to for paying the blood these beasts have spilled? Even relatively lighter crime like corruption might result in life long imprisonment, what then, the crime a degree higher like mass murder should be punished with other than ‘an early road to hell’? I just wonder how many people in the world would be willing to spare a terrorist who blasted off 3200 lives in 9.11 attack…
Thirdly, death sentence can serve as a means of psychological therapy and mental compensation for the victims and their loved ones. For instance, the Tokyo Trial, which ended up sentencing to death a group of Japanese chief war criminals, is said to provide an efficient psychological relief for those victimized Asian nations during the war.
Death sentence, apparently, is not aimed against morals and ethics, it is, on the contrary, put up to preserve humanitarian codes by assuring the security of the society and the safety of each individual as it can intimidate potential criminals.
Considering the matter this way, it becomes evident that death penalty is more of help than harm. Be it psychologically or politically beneficial, it contributes to the maintenance of social order. I, therefore, suggest we be for it.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Therefore, the death penalty should be abolished because although it has its benefits, the bad outweighs the good in this particular situation. With the death penalty, innocent lives…
- 1021 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty is a controversial topic that has existed since the beginning of civilization. The death penalty, and capital punishment are interchangeable terms that provide legalized murders at the hands of the government. This form of killing is permitted in approximately 38 states (Capital Punishment, 2011). The death penalty has been a way for humans to control one another throughout history. The death penalty is a chancy way of instilling justice. In addition, there is no guarantee that the person sentenced to death is completely innocent. For many years, the death penalty has been the cause of many innocent and untimely deaths. The death penalty is a final decision to a possible mistake. Also, the death penalty infringes on…
- 395 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The death penalty should still be used for the simple fact of the famous quote in the bible “An eye for and eye”. It is known that when someone kills someone or either steals they get what they have coming for them, but there are other ways to settle this that helps and seems right for everyone. Like if it something minor happens it does not have to go straight into severe punishment. There are even more ways to do something that makes everyone happy, they just have to compromise and figure it…
- 800 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
However, I believe that the death penalty should not be allowed. I am strongly against the death penalty because it violates God’s rules and it costs the tax payers way too much…
- 365 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Firstly, the death penalty is a form of revenge which is an outdated method for justice in our society today. Using this method of an eye for an eye type of punishment is the inhumanely killing of a person. As said by Ghandi, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" meaning revenge or retribution is not the answer you should seek when punishing someone. This form of punishment has been used since ancient times and is so severe that it can not be reversed. The permanence of this punishment is unsparing and does not give the person any chances to be rehabilitated or try to be integrated back into society. The very worst means of torture or disciplinary action is to take a person’s life. The whole purpose of our justice system is to impede criminals from committing crime by the means of punishment that…
- 1004 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
My personal look at the death penalty is that it should be administered only in cases of…
- 2031 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…
- 849 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Buddhism: The death penalty is a clear form of revenge. It is a severe form of punishment because it is so final. The human life is ended and the executed person is robbed of the opportunity to change, or restore the harm done. Before supporting execution we should consider whether criminals are naturally negative and harmful people and whether they will always remain in the same state of mind in which they committed their crime or not. The answer, is definitely not. However horrible the act they have committed, it is believed that everyone has the potential to improve and correct themselves.…
- 772 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The death penalty or in other words capital punishment is a form of execution used for a long time. It is a form of punishment that was and still is used by several countries for various types of crimes for hundreds of years. However the death penalty has become a very debatable and confronting issue for last decades due to the fact of people having different opinions on this issue. In some countries it is considered to be a part of the judicial system, while in other countries it is considered to be an act violating human rights. During the first decade of 21st century, about two thirds of world vide countries have abolished the capital punishment due to the fact it is a violation of moral codex and human rights. There are always pros and cons to every action humans are able to do, so it is with the issue of death penalty. Countries such as China, USA, Japan or India have still retained to the execution of criminals by death penalty. However there are many intergovernmental and human rights organization such as the European Union that understands the death penalty to be one of the most pressing human rights issues of all time. (Babcock S., 2007) People are questioning the courts if death penalty really deters the crime, or if it is just a need to satisfy society’s desire for revenge. We can find many arguments against it; however the answer to question of abolishing the death penalty by the entire world is unclear and in far future. China is the country known for using many forms of inhuman punishment methods. There can be find an evidence showing the China to be the country with the highest execution case rate. I could not believe these statements, so I decide to search this issue and…
- 1834 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
People also believe that the death penalty is a deterrent to criminals, the most powerful weapon to prevent the crime occurred. But the fact is the death penalty compared with other kinds of punishment, the death penalty does not deter crime has a special function. Offenders can be divided into two categories: Impulsive type and plan type. For impulsive, they are in the non-rational state at the time of crime, reckless commission of a crime, the death penalty cannot afford deterrent for them. For the plan type, there are too many elements need priorities than death, such as Benefits available on crime, criminal attitude towards his life and so on. Thus, the deterrent effect of the death penalty not prominent than other kinds of punishment. As some homicide, injury, rape, crimes were mostly due to some conflicts or situations stimulation, so that the loss of reason, impulsive, and at the moment committed a crime. In this case, the perpetrators are often impossible to accurately discretionary legal consequences of his crime may cause. For these people, the death penalty deterrence can be said too late to play. Furthermore, most of these people will regret afterward, in fact, sentenced these people to death runs counter to repentance, even those who escaped will continue to stimulate criminal psychology. According to studies, many murderers have that idea after killed first person: "kill one person is dead, kill more people is dead too, so it's ok to kill more.” So the death penalty maybe is an indirect stimulation of the…
- 1292 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
During the past few years, the death penalty has been the source of controversy in most countries across the world. Supporters of the death penalty have raised many questions over the years: Do we ignore criminals’ social rights? Do we also ignore the legal right of the state to impart punishment by death? At the current time, approximately 97 countries have done away with the death penalty. The real question is do people believe the death penalty is a good thing or should it be abolished altogether? As we can see, there are always two sides to every story.…
- 2636 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Why would we kill people who kill people to show that killing remains wrong? Often times in the justice system, a suspect with a heavy crime brought against them, have a high chance of getting sentenced to the death penalty. Although many times the verdict comes back correct, what about the lives of the innocents? Their life became limited once they got wrongfully convicted. Throughout this paper I will explain why capital punishment should not remain an option in the justice law system with first, explaining how sometimes innocent peoples verdict can result in the sentencing to death; second, the wrong message the death penalty sends to society; and third, a solution. In essence, the death penalty prove to have a high risk taking innocent lives.…
- 746 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A death penalty can also be served as a strong deterrent against potential criminals. Humans are naturally afraid of death, and would rethink again before offending the law. Death penalty can also be seen, as a way to console the victim’s families, should the criminal committed an act of murder. However, one could also argue that even if justice is served, we can never bring back the dead to life.…
- 478 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The ultimate punishment for a crime is and should be the death penalty. With many views to cover and different types of view, this paper will be about pro death penalty. There is one point I will cover that will be against the death penalty, and that will be executing an innocent person, the rest will be cost to have inmates in jail and how incarceration does not rehabilitated inmates. Life or death is a very important decision that cannot be taken lightly.…
- 2255 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Over the years capital punishment has been banishing from countries, innocence people have been convicted and executed too many times for the system to uphold any longer. Nearly 40 years of evidence proves the death penalty does not work. The system should not be an option any longer. There are other ways for criminals to pay for their crime no matter how big it was, and no matter what society thinks. Everyone commits mistakes but that doesn't mean they should be put on death row.…
- 623 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays