Preview

How Effective Is Police Stop and Search (Pace Act 1984)?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Effective Is Police Stop and Search (Pace Act 1984)?
Title
How effective is police stop and search (PACE act 1984)?
Introduction
This assessment will focus on Section 1 of The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Stop and Search powers). I will look at the use of stop and search before the Macpherson report and after the Macpherson report and compare how it has changed. The use of stop and search powers allow the police to tackle crime and anti-social behaviour, and to prevent more serious crimes occurring generally in public places like a Football match. A police officer can ask what you are doing, why you’re in an area and/or where you’re going. They also have the power to stop and search you if they have ‘reasonable grounds’ to suspect you’re carrying; illegal drugs, a weapon, stolen property or something which could be used to commit a crime, such as a dangerous weapon. You can only be stopped and searched without reasonable grounds if it has been approved by a senior police officer. This can happen if it is suspected that; serious violence could take place, you are carrying a weapon or have used one or you are in a specific location or area. However, you don’t have to answer any questions the police officer asks you. The Police officer will note down seven details these include; Ethnicity, Objective of search, Grounds for search, Identity of the officer carrying out the stop and search, Date, Time and Place. However being searched does not mean you have been arrested, unless any of these factors apply.
Sir William McPherson carried out an inquiry in 1999 following an investigation of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. The 18-year-old A-Level student was fatally stabbed in an unprovoked attack as he waited for a bus in Eltham, south London, in April 1993. Nobody, at the time was convicted of his murder. However in 2006 the Metropolitan Police's Acting Deputy Commissioner, ordered a cold case review that led to the convictions of Gary Dobson and David Norris in 2011 they were found guilty by an Old Bailey jury

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    [ 17 ]. Ben Bowling and Coretta Phillips, (2007) ‘Disproportionate and Discriminatory: Reviewing the Evidence on Police Stop and Search’. Modern Law Review. 70(6) 944…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Random stop: Can the police do this? Arbitrary: NO. Roadblocks are lawful. Police can stop people if they do it without discretion. It’s okay if they stop every car, or every third car (etc) but not just random “suspicious” cars.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Having reviewed the facts of the case, the issues with the police treatment of Guy Lancaster lie within his arrest, travel to the police station, his detention and the interview conducted. The issues will be analysed in chronological order, referring to the legality of the police’s actions using statutory law. The refusal of Lancaster’s bail application by Magistrates was justified after considering the circumstances of the case.…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This section gives police the authority to pretty much arrest anyone for anything provided they abide by the above statements. Also if an offence has…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The following paper reviews probable cause as it applies to the duties of law enforcement. We will review different scenarios involving probable cause and the different court rulings that govern police and other law enforcement officer’s procedures involving the searching of a residence, arresting offenders, and the use of warrants. Due, to the inconsistency and complexity involved in real life situations, a multiplicity of use involving warrants, probable cause, searches, and other police actions can occur.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry Report of 1999 was a result of the murder of a black man named Stephen Lawrence. The murder took place on the 22nd April 1993 on Well Hall Road, South East London. The murder of Stephen Lawrence quickly became a “Cause Célèbre” otherwise known as a case which attracts a great deal of public attention. The case is also became one of the most high profiled racial killings in the history of the United Kingdom. As a result of Stephen Lawrence’s Murder, the home secretary Jack Straw for a public inquiry conducted by Sir William MacPherson into the death of Stephen Lawrence.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite a criminal case, a private prosecution and an inquest, no-one has ever been convicted of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. The racially motivated murder of this young black student and the subsequent bungling of the police investigation outraged the public and press alike. The Daily Mail campaigned vigorously for Stephen Lawrence. They even formally accused five men of murder and invited them to sue them if this was wrong. No complaint was ever made.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, the Exclusionary Rule and fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine was created as an important protection of the Fourth Amendment. This paper has discussed the Exclusionary Rule, fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, and the difference between the two. It has also discussed the civil liability that officers may be subject to for their mistakes and how they may be forgiven from liability if their mistake was objectively reasonable or if it was made in good faith. Lastly, the author has discussed the importance of obtaining a search warrant when available and how this seemingly simple procedural step will prevent the suppression of evidence, as well as, protect the officer and agency against any civil liability. Although many times officers’ conduct searches under the emergency exception of the warrant requirement, it is generally a lackadaisical excuse which can hardly be defended. In modern times with the inception of recent technology it has become quicker and easier to obtain search warrants, either telephonically or by electronic means. Therefore, it should be instilled in officers through academic and field training to always secure consent or a search warrant prior to conducting a search in order to protect themselves and the integrity of the…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Human rights act affects the all of the Uniformed Public Services because of the fact that it means that everyone has these rights all over the world and the Britain is sworn to protect everyone’s human rights in the UK and the human rights of citizens of the United Kingdom all over the world. This can affect the police services because of the fact that in the Human Right act, it states that you have a right to freedom from arrest or unjustified police searches, ‘among the wide range of circumstances covered by the act are disproportionate use of stop and search powers against ethnic minorities’ http://www.theguardian.com/humanrightsandwrongs/affect-public-sector. So the police cannot arrest someone if they do not have any proof, because everyone that is a citizen of the UK is entitled to a right from the freedom of arrest, so this might mean that even though the police may know a person has committed a crime, if that cannot prove it then they cannot arrest him/her. This affects the police service because it means that they may be letting a criminal back on to the streets to possibly commit more crime.…

    • 1986 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This type of searches happens when police see a suspicious person trying to commit a crime, so they stopped them before it happens. The police…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I would advise Norbert that there are several factors that need to be considered before concluding if his search was legal. Firstly the question arises that did the policemen have the right to stop and search Norbert. It can be argued that the police did have the right to stop Norbert under PACE (s 1(3)) as they were suspicious that Norbert was involved in the theft that had taken place in the next street and Norbert was a well known burglar (Bentley v Brudzinski ), however it can also be argued that Norbert was coincidently there to meet his posh new girlfriend and “reasonable suspicion can never be supported on the fact that the person is known to have a previous conviction, this cannot be used alone as the reason for searching” Norbert. R v Bristol.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “After Terry this type of police encounter became known as a ‘Terry stop’ or an ‘investigatory detention.’ Police may stop and question suspicious persons, pat them down for weapons, and even subject them to…

    • 2993 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A justifiable search could have many factors that would allow an officer to conduct a proper search or make a lawful detention and stops. One of them is a search warrant, which carries a limited authority to detain persons present and also search the property detailed on the warrant. Another is a criminal profile; an example would be of a drug dealer that would fit the physical description given to the officer. Anonymous tip, multiple informant’s, an example is like two or more persons able to identify someone that has committed a crime, and of course police observation. However if the officer sees something suspicious he/she has to articulate why such person has broken the law and given him/her probable cause to do a warrantless search or detention on such said person. Scope falls in the actual process of the search, meaning that you could only reasonably search with in the search area, an example that my teacher Mr. Enos discussed in class, was if your searching for alcohol in a vehicle then you could only search were alcohol could be reasonably hidden inside a car. Place refers to a public or private area, an…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Current law allows police officers to conduct stop and frisk searches of persons based on reasonable suspicion, as determined by Terry v. Ohio where supreme court decisions determined that individuals can be searched not only for probable cause (where an individual is under suspicion of committing a specific crime) but also for reasonable suspicion (where an individual is thought to be taking part in of have taken part of a crime, using facts and beliefs at hand which a reasonable inferences can be drawn from). In these instances, a pat down can be done only for the search of weapons for the preservation of the officers’ safety. The officer can not manipulate objects not believed to be weapons in order to determine if they are other illegal substances (Minnesota v. Dickerson). Additionally the police need to notice something in you actions that makes you suspicious (Rogers v. Arizona). The police can not stop a person because of protected status such as race, gender etc. When police are conducting an investigation, you have to cooperate with them or you might be arrested as well (Hiibu v. Nevada).…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three statutory rights of arrest are preventative, breach of peace and public order. I don’t think a person should be arrested to stop them doing something as they have not committed a crime so the police should not have the right to arrest someone who has not yet committed a crime. However, breach of peace and public order are effective as it is arresting a person who is a danger to society as they have caused harm/fear to a victim.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics