Preview

How does the over fishing of sharks effect ocean ecosystems?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How does the over fishing of sharks effect ocean ecosystems?
How does the overfishing of sharks have an effect on marine ecosystems?

In this report, I will explain how the overfishing of sharks has an effect on marine ecosystems. Also, I will be touching on the dangers to sharks worldwide and the catastrophic impacts that the mass depopulation of sharks could have on both animals and humans. Overall, sharks worldwide are in danger due to the fact that as many as 100 million sharks are killed each year. This has devastating effects on marine ecosystems due to the fact that sharks help to maintain a balance in marine ecosystems and have done so for some 400 million years. Also, as they are the apex predators of the oceans, much like wolves or lions on land, they help to stop some species from over populating an area. If sharks are almost completely removed from an ecosystem there is a boom in the population of the prey of those sharks, for example cow nose rays. Then, the population of these rays ‘explodes’ causing there to be many more rays in the ecosystem than nature intended. Resulting, in a rapid decline of the animals that these rays feed on, for example clams and oysters. Then, the rays begin to run out of viable prey and so the exploded ray population begins to decline until the once diverse and functional ecosystem has been completely destroyed.

To put this into context, a fishery in North Carolina that had been there for 100 years had to be shut down due to the fact that the exploded population of rays consumed all of the clams and oysters that the fishery was harvesting causing them to go out of business. Along with many other commercially important fisheries including; Lotze, H.K, Pattengill-Semmens, McClenachan and many more on America’s East coast alone. This is happening to fisheries all over the world however it seems that a large majority of these fisheries that are no longer viable are located in the Pacific Ocean. This is not only due to the fact that the pacific is the largest ocean in the world but

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Double Language Analysis

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Forsythe attempts to magnify the size of the issue by suggesting that the only solution to solving the number of attacks is to kill a number of sharks reducing the species population. He uses statistics of “seven attacks in the last 4 years” to encourage the reader’s support. This positions the reader to view the writer’s argument as more convincing because it appears to be objective and reliable.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharks play a big role in balancing out marine life. They eat very efficiently they eat old, young, sick and slow fish. They set the marine life to the right size to fit the ecosystem. Scientist consider sharks as the “keystone” species. If the sharks aren’t there then the ecosystem would collapse. The ecosystem depends on them, without sharks the population would be over crowded. If the oceans were of crowded then there would be no room for any sea animal and everything would just collapse. We need sharks to help everything survive.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cownose Ray Evolution

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although evidence has shown that there is a recent change in the increase of the cownose ray that has caused a large boom, it's Well known that the cownose ray is a predator of shellfish when the water becomes warm. The marine systems caused by the removal of sharks remain misleading, due to the significant declines in large coastal sharks in the northwest Atlantic Ocean, which caused dramatic increases in abundances of smaller elasmobranchs (referred to as “Macropredators”) over the predation release. The large coastal sharks decline allegedly led to an order of large scale increase in the population of Cownose rays. Thereby the ever-increasing feeding of the cownose ray has led to the concerns for the shellfish populations along the U.S.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fundamental problem associated with overfishing of the oceans is the possible a lack of supply. Although fish are considered a renewable resource, there must be enough members of that species available to reproduce.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this study the author believes that the predator’s survival is linked to its prey, the Chinook salmon. The killer whales depend on this species of fish as the main food source, making it harder for the whales to adapt to a different source when needed. The salmon suddenly disappeared and the abundance of whales, and the pollutants they carried, led to a higher mortality rate. Because these whales only have one prey, the techniques they use to hunt are specific. It is important that these hunting techniques to remain constant for the marine ecosystem to have balanced populations. This article shows how both extremes can be harmful to the environment.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people aren’t sacred to enter the territory of sharks and their environment. A number of Australian’s oppose the culling of sharks and do not fear of getting back into the ocean. Miranda Devine published an opinion piece with the headline “A tasty dish for a very big fish… and it’s all our fault” in The Daily Telegraph newsletter on February 12th, 2014 with the contention that it is our fault that we have become part of shark’s food chain. This is directed to the people that do not support the culling with a very direct tone.…

    • 930 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marine habitats are in grave danger due to humans and Mother Nature. Hurricanes, typhoons, storm surges, and tsunamis are factors in which contributes to the destruction of marine habitats and are caused by Mother Nature. Human’s destruction to these habitats is much worse due to the fact that Mother Nature’s destruction is mostly temporary, while humans leave more of a lasting footprint on the habitats because of our persistence. (National Geographic, n.d.). Marine habitat destruction caused by humans are wetlands being filled for further development, runoff water which carries chemicals, pollutants, and wastes are pumped back into the water without…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    because of this, the entire food web is affected. Along with the species, the coral reefs…

    • 709 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You take one thing out of an equation and this change disrupts the rest of the process. So if we take sharks out of the picture, which at this point is not so hard to imagine, and our marine ecosystem takes a hit. Sharks are apex predators, meaning they are at the top of their food chain, and they provide a sort of order to other marine animals. Apex predators also provide greater biodiversity and higher densities of individuals, while areas without apex predators experience species absences. Sharks help maintain the health of ocean ecosystems by promoting biodiversity, having mutualism relationships and benefitting seagrass beds and coral reefs (sharks eat fish that deplete the seagrass). By preventing one species from monopolizing a limited resource, predators increase the species diversity of the ecosystem. So having this healthy food chain will actually promote other fish populations and keep our seagrass beds around. So there are environmental reasons to protect our friends, but they also help economic benefits as…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Through commercial fishing many of the ocean and seas marine life is caught and killed unnecessarily through netting and a lot of the marine life is not consumed, but discarded, in turn depriving many other of earth’s creatures their natural food source. As an alternative to declining marine life humans have begun raising their own fish. Although fish farming can be beneficial, it can also be harmful to the environment by spreading disease and other pollutants into other waterways affecting other habitats and wildlife (Sielen). In many other ways we are affecting the decline of our oceans.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On an ordinary day when we would see a cockroach or a small insect walking across the kitchen floor, the first and only thing that would flash into our mind is to get our hands on an insecticide and kill that blameless insect. From these little innocent insects in our homes we have moved to killing cows, pigs and turkeys to fulfil our dinner plates because we specifically farm them for food, therefore cause no change to the environment. What more do we now desire? What more do we human beings now desire? Last but definitely not lucky; the abundance killing of apex predators of the marine, SHARKS, not for food but for the threat they pose to us. We all know that we do not farm sharks for any means than why cull them and completely abolish the very few numbers left of them?…

    • 1092 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharks have always been an important part of Earth. Many cultures - beyond just the Chinese with their famous shark fin soup - consider them to be powerful symbols, deities, or sacred animals. They help keep the ecosystem in check. This, in turn, highly benefits the economy. It’s difficult to imagine a world without sharks - considering that sharks have existed for over 400 million years (What If There Were No Sharks?). This makes them approximately three million eight hundred years older than us. Unfortunately, with the rise of anti-shark movies such as Jaws, people have begun to fear sharks. Many of them wish to kill them, and will not mourn their loss. However, if one looks deeper into this solution, one will discover a myriad of problems. Problems which are guaranteed to occur if shark culling is continued. If the ocean is to be saved and humans are to be kept safe, an environmentally safe alternative to shark culling must be discovered.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did you know that vending machines are bigger killer than sharks? And that 10 people are killed by sharks worldwide every year? Yet we continue to kill 10 million sharks every year. Shark culling was implemented in WA in 2013 to protect swimmers, with great whites being targeted, although 50 species of sharks including great whites, are listed as vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered. The system isn’t cheap either with the government paying fisherman $610 000 for 107 days of the catch and kill program. This figure is not including the costs of drumlines and other programs helping the mitigation. We know that the ocean is the shark’s territory and people should need to make the decision whether to take the risk when entering the water. To elucidate my argument, I will explain in three different parts, the damage that it can cause on the ecosystem, the government are contradicting themselves by killing endangered species and that many other things are killing people at a faster rate.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sharks are very essential when it comes to their role in the ocean environment. Overall, they are what keep the ocean healthy and in balance. They are known as an apex predator. This means that they are among the top of the food chain. Because they eat so much implies that there are not many of them in the oceans. Otherwise, they would eat all the food and upset this balance of the ocean. Their feeding of fish also balances the ocean population. If they did not eat all this fish, the population of fish would be too high. Sharks tend to keep the fish population healthy also by eating sick and injured fish. They do not just stop there, they also eat dead fish and mammals and whatever other meat is around. Another interesting thing they do for the environment is produce more lobster. This is accomplished by something called a food web. For instance, they eat octopi, which eat lobsters, meaning that there will be more lobster in the ocean because its predator is not around as often.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Dutton’s essay “Toxic Soup” (2006) speculates about the effects that humans have on pollution in the ocean, as well as ways the damage can be reduced. In this essay, Dutton incorporates his personal experiences as a surfer and nature lover with statistics and his knowledge of the effects of water pollution on animals and humans. Dutton’s purpose is to raise public awareness of the need for environmental protection of the ocean in order to preserve and improve nature’s status. Given the language and references used, Dutton is writing for college educated adults interested in science and the environment.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays