Preview

How does Priestly present Sheila Birling in Act one?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How does Priestly present Sheila Birling in Act one?
How does Priestly present Shelia Birling in Act One?
In act one Priestly presents Shelia Birling using a variety of techniques. Firstly, during the beginning of the act, Priestly uses stage directions to present Sheila as a half-joking character with the stage direction ‘[half serious, half playful]’ to show that although the conversation may be sincere she beings a lightness to the atmosphere. In addition, another stage direction ‘[mocking aggressions]’ also indicates this half-joking, half-genuine characteristic and shows that Sheila adds the humour and sarcasm to the conversation in to room to insure it don’t become too firm. However, towards the ending of the act Sheila hears about the girl’s death which causes her ‘mocking’ side to disintegrates and the stage directions change to ‘[distressed]’ and ‘[agitated]’to show that this girls horrible death has touched Sheila and she concerned about the outcome of the investigation.
Secondly, during the onset of the act Priestly also used speech to present Sheila as a possessive character, especially when Gerald proposes to her and she says referring to the ring “Careful! I’ll never let it go out of my sight for an instant” this show how excited Shelia is with the ring and how she’ll never be without it, some would say that she’s focusing all of her attention on the ring instead of her fiancé, which further show how women were perceived as going for the men with wealth. Furthermore, Priestly also uses speech to present Sheila’s concern about the women’s death when she says “It’s just that I can’t help thinking about this girl - destroying herself so horribly” this show she’s distort about the circumstances of the death. Additionally, towards the end of the act you get a sense that she feels guilty for the women’s death. For example, “So I’m really responsible”, this indicate that she feels that her acts have accounted for the death.
Moreover, Priestly also uses the way the other characters interacted with Sheila

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As soon as they meet in act one, Birling attempts to show his social superiority to the Inspector, boasting about his contacts in the police force, this shows Birlings character and the type of person he is, big headed and boastfull. Within the play Mr and Mrs Birling seems to be the only characters that are unable to accept the fact that they helped in the death of eva smith. In contrast to Mr and Mrs Birling Sheila has total opposite views and realises what she did was wrong, and wishes that she could go back and never get Eva sacked-…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - At the end of the play, Sheila is much wiser. She now views her parents and Gerald from a new perspective. She now…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.B Priestley was born in Bradford, Yorkshire on 13th September 1894. He firm believer of socialism which is a political theory or system in which the means of production and distribution are controlled by the people therefore he disagrees firmly with capitalism. Priestley set his play in 1912 because the date symbolized an period when all was very unusual from the time he was writing. In 1912, inflexible class and gender restrictions seemed to guarantee that nothing would change. However by 1945 the majority of class and gender divisions had been infringed. Priestley wanted to make the most of these changes. The Inspector wants to teach the Birling Family to care about other and not only themselves and he wants to show that social status and wealth are not significant factors. One of Priestley’s major concerns was that even that the war has ended people were living in poverty and living depressed lives. I think that J.B Priestley is trying to tell people that they shouldn’t rejoice after the war because several people have been killed. Priestley shows that there shouldn’t be a division between people of different class. In 1912 the Birling family lead a comfortable life Birling is a prime example of a capitalist, J.B Priestley is keen to highlight the selfishness of him in the play. J.B Priestley wanted to highlight what was right and wrong in society as it is a morality play .In this essay I am going to investigate how J.B Priestley uses dramatic devices to intrigue the audience.…

    • 820 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After 50years of being apart Bridie and Sheila have their first reunion. Upon Sheila’s arrival to the hotel there is immediate friction as Misto makes slight indications to the audience towards the end of Act One, Scene Two. An example of this is seen through the technique of stage directions, “Sheila looks at Bridie with surprising intensity-but not with affection. Bridie…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On page 59, Sheila says, “… You turned the girl out of one job, and I had turned her out of another. Gerald kept her - at the time he was suppose to be too busy to see me. Eric - well, we know what Eric did. And mother hardened her heart and gave her the final push that finished her…” Here she is reminding her family’s involvement of Eva’s suicide as they were trying to push the blame off themselves. Sheila, on the other hand, does not like this and sums up the chain events in order. You can tell she feels rotten about the whole thing and she will not forget it.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truth, honestly and candour is the central idea of the play. The idea of truth, telling the truth and recognising the truth is located in the interrelationship between the two women during the war. An example of this is when Sheila reveals her secret of ‘giving herself up to a Jap’ to save Bridie which has been kept hidden since the war. In the scene, Misto uses a combination of techniques such as lighting, music and sound to convey emotions from the audience as Sheila tells her story. The scene concludes with both characters isolating in separate spotlights and the music plays to the audience as the scene ends with tension and suspense. This then shapes the perception and meaning of concerns and experiences to make the audience think of the interrelationship between the two women and the heroic deeds of women during the war.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Birlings are a family of wealth and power, who take pride in their high social position. Mr. Birling is a successful businessman, and the family inhabits a nice home with a maid (and likely other servants). The play begins with the family celebrating and feeling generally pleased with themselves and their fortunate circumstance. Throughout the Inspector’s investigation, however, it comes out that several of the Birlings have used their power and influence immorally, in disempowering and worsening the position of a girl from a lower class: Mr. Birling used his high professional position to force Eva Smith out of his factory when she led a faction of workers in demanding a raise; Sheila, in a bad temper, used her social status and her family’s…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a prominent contrast in the way Shelia addresses those of the older generation at the begging of the play to the Shelia the audience become accustomed to towards the end which again conveys the tension due to Shelia’s lack of obedience. Sheila also adopts the Inspectors blunt language: ‘I’m staying here until I know why that girl killed herself.’ Regardless of the idea that women of the time were thought to need protection from all things disturbing or unpleasant Shelia does not hesitate to bring attention to the solid fact that she is well aware that Eva/Daisy ‘killed herself’.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    inspector calls notes

    • 3464 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Sheila when she sees the ring ‘is this the one you wanted me to have.’ - emphasises that Sheila is Gerald’s possession.…

    • 3464 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shoe Horn Sonata Essay

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Even though Sheila is traumatized by her own act for over fifty years, she manages to reveal the truth to Bridie, which in itself is a huge difficulty, but still very definitively she retorts that “I’d do it all again, if I had to.” This shows that even after all the physical and psychological hardships encountered during the war, Sheila is still willing to make heroic sacrifices for Bridie. This use of language helps the audience to experience empathy for Sheila who sacrificed the only thing that was a sacred asset to…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shoe Horn Sonata

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The theme friendship is exemplified through out the play and is evident through the stage connection between sheila and Bridie. This is quoted when sheila states ”Guidance? You mean a barrage orders sheila- did you eat your grass? Why haven’t you drunk your charcoal water? God how I hate that stuff”. Through the use of rhetorical question the composer illustrates the level of friendship they had for each other and the bond they shared because of their traumatic experience during WW||. Consequently this quote exemplifies the struggles the two women underwent during the time they were held captive and how their friendship grew and become unbreakable due to that.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare presents the theme of love in different ways for each of the characters and for some, such as Romeo, Shakespeare's portrayal of this theme changes as the play progresses. In Act I, Scene V, When Romeo sees Juliet he speaks about her, using the metaphor: "She doth teach the torches to burn bright!" This suggests that Juliet's beauty is almost glowing - stunningly beautiful. Shakespeare also includes alliteration with the phrase - "teach the torches!"; this raises the pace to express an increasing sense of excitement from Romeo as he remains fascinated by Juliet. This phrase is emphasised by the exclamation mark.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act 1, Priestley uses the character of Inspector Goole to arrive unexpectedly at the Birlings household and not only shatter the very foundations of their lives but challenge us all to examine our senses of right and wrong. His use of the Inspector opens the door to explore responsibility in this play as he one by one challenges them to reveal their guilt. I think that the idea of the play and particularly the role of the Inspector are to try to bring the Birling family to understand that they have a moral responsibility for the death of Eva Smith, if not a legal one. Therefore it could be said that Eva Smith was simply a victim of her class and time. This point is very significant and is the basis of the entire play, to grasp it is imperative to the understanding of the play, without this, an analysis of responsibility would be far more difficult.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The opening scene at Queen’s University sees her perform silly and often naïve actions, reacting to the statements of others without truly thinking about the meaning of what is said. Constance feels the need to apologize when Ramona offhandedly chastises her for drinking Coors beer: “It … was a gift” (MacDonald 12). The rebuke, seemingly innocuous, is delivered with malignance and condescension from Ramona, Claude Night’s love interest; in not analyzing the emotions governing it, Constance misunderstands her words as decrying her choice of beer. Her response, trying to justify her perceived wrong, is not only pathetic, but also comically ridiculous. Similarly, Constance is undone in her search for the Fool because she does not seek to understand the deeper meaning behind the words of other characters. The ghost attempts to explain her influence on the two texts to her, but she hilariously misunderstands, confusing “You’re it” with “Yorick” and “A lass” with “Alas” (73-4). The ghost’s communication of Constance’s status as the Fool, although implied, is constructed as to make the point evident; nevertheless, her acceptance of the words’ surface meaning leads her to a vastly different comprehension, creating a scene of comic contrast. The comedy culminates in…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporting Notes

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After researching into the background of Katie Mitchell, we found that she directed Ghost, another Ibsen play, which encouraged us to explore other Ibsen plays. This led us to Hedda Gabler, a naturalistic play in which we believed we could adapt and direct to suit Katie Mitchell’s style of play. By following the book ‘The Director’s Craft’, we could gain an insight into her ways of directing and how she believes you should work in order to achieve a certain style of play. The exploration of the characters within the play, allowed us to record a backlist of what we believe may have happened, allowing a bigger picture to form in which we could establish what we thought the play was trying to achieve. This allowed us to create more believable characters and discuss what we believe to of happened between the time gaps between the scenes. Katie Mitchell’s idea of performing a play is that to completely immerse yourself within a character, and imagine you are them from all angles, this allows us to understand emotions and feelings behind the character.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays