Preview

A Comparison of Kenneth Waltz's Theory of Neo-Structural Realism with Earlier Strains of Realist Thinking

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1391 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Comparison of Kenneth Waltz's Theory of Neo-Structural Realism with Earlier Strains of Realist Thinking
How does Kenneth Waltz theory of neo-structural realism differ from earlier strains of realist thinking? What are its strengths and weaknesses?
Realism has been a dominant theory in the study of international relations, as it provides an explanation for the continuous state of war the international system faces. However, realism is not one unified theory, but is differentiated into distinct historical categories: classical, modern and structural realism (Baylis, Smith and Owens: 89). In this essay, I intend to investigate how structural realism (which, after the publication of Kenneth Waltz’s Theory of International Politics (1979), the approach has officially entered the picture) differs from the earliest forms of realism. Furthermore, I will look at its strengths and weaknesses, which will allow me to analyse its relevance in studying international relations.
Waltz, the leading neorealist thinker introduces a unique approach in understanding the international political system. The main difference between neorealism and classical realism is the degree of science that is applied in its theories. Kenneth Waltz rejects the concept normative analysis in the study of international relations as he believes that it would be subjective, and hence unscientific (Jackson and Sorenson 2013: 79). Due to this, it has marked a significant and unique approach in studying the subject of world politics. Waltz focuses on the changes and continuities of the structure of the international system, and its interacting units, but believes that the features of these units must be ignored in order to maintain a scientific approach. On the contrary, classical realism takes a more traditional path to the study of world politics. It focuses on the normative aspects of IR, thus highlighting the significance of political values such as national security and state survival.
On the other hand, leaders and their foreign policy is the central analytical focus in classical realism (Jackson and



Bibliography: Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens. eds. 2011. The Globalization of World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jackson, R. and Sorensen, G. (2007) Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press. Morgenthau, H. (1956a) Politics Among Nations: Struggle for Power and Peace, 3rd edn. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Waltz, K. (1959) Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press. Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. United States: McGraw-Hill. Waltz, K., ‘Structural Realism After the Cold War’, (2000), International Security, Vol 25, pp. 5-41. Schelling, T. (1980 [1960]). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Realism, as a way of interpreting international relations has often been conceived to be closely tied to the Cold War. Realism, rooted in the experience of World War II and the Cold War, is said to be undergoing a crisis of confidence largely because the lessons adduced do not convincingly apply directly to the new realities of international relations in the twenty-first century (Clinton 2007:1) Worse still, if policymakers steadfastly adhere to realist precepts, they will have to navigate “the unchartered seas of the post-Cold War disorder with a Cold War cartography, and blind devotion to realism could compromise their ability to prescribe paths to a more orderly and just system.” (Kegley 1993:141). This paper will demonstrate that this picture of realism is incomplete – realism is not an obsolete theory in contemporary international relations, but is indeed relevant - it can be, and has been applied in the twenty-first century. In order to prove this, the work of well-known political thinkers thought to be the precursors of realism, and the writings of present-day international relations analysts will be examined, and the core tenets of realism will be extracted. It will be argued that these root concepts of realist thought do not rely on the circumstances of the Cold War, and are thus not bound by its confines, with the possibility that these lessons retain their validity in addressing issues in the post-Cold War world of international relations.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the lack of definition, realism has been successful and has become a dominate theory in international relations (Rosenberg, 1994). Therefore defining it remains an active argument, meaning realist scholars continue to debate the fundamental assumptions of realist…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hong Kong Protest

    • 2343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A realist sometimes names ‘structural realist’, for realists, the international system is defined by anarchy, which means there is no central authority (Waltz, 1979). States are considered as sovereign and autonomous of each other, and there is…

    • 2343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neorealists argue that the end of Cold War was purely a reoccurring event which marked the point of international restructuring, but it was of no great importance. This journal responds to this view as its writer attempts to convey the importance of that time, as it marks the end of a two century interregnum in which the world is transformed from the Ancien Règime of monarchical powers towards a new world order. This journal contains a wide collection of work, from which the writer portrays that the world has two possible endings in terms of its international structure. Both ends seem rather bleak and in essence describe the fate of liberal internationalism, first ending focuses on the indefinite liberal homogeny whilst the other looks into a more pluralist world system.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weber, Cynthia, International Relations Theory A critical introduction, (2010) 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Third edition published by Routledge, pp. 13-23…

    • 4317 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Realism vs. Liberalism

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kegley Jr. C (1995) Controversies in International Relations Theory. Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. Belmont, US: Wadsworth…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay will address why the three main approaches to world politics did not predict the end of the Cold War. Firstly it will briefly give a background insight into what the Cold War was. Then it will go on to explain what characterises the three main approaches to world politics which are Realism, Pluralism and Structuralism, it then will briefly look at the distinctive theory behind them. Lastly the essay will analyse whether or not the three main approaches could have predicted and anticipated the end of the Cold War.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Duncan, W. R., Jancar-Webster, B. and Switky, B. (2006) World Politics in the 21st Century. London: Pearson Longman…

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Realism contends that politics is a struggle for power and ⁄ or survival, and consequently depicts international politics as a realm of recurrent conflicts among states with very little prospect for change. It is therefore not traditionally regarded as an approach which entertains an idea of progress. E.H Carr famously rejected ‘‘pure realism’’ as an untenable position precisely because it fails to provide ‘‘a ground for action,’’ and advocated finding a delicate balance between realism and utopia, as meaningful political action must include both. While realism certainly entails a degree of pessimism, it is far fetched to claim that realist scholars are radically sceptical about the future of international relations. The article investigates Hans Morgenthau and Raymond Aron, two leading classical realist scholars, and argues that neither advocated a strict version of power politics. On the contrary, they both attempted to find the balance Carr suggested between realist concerns and ideals necessary to spur political action. Both were also very aware of the dangers of nihilism, and upheld hope in the future of humankind, even if this hope remains tempered by pessimism as to whether it will ever realize its destiny.…

    • 8353 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Extended Essay History

    • 4675 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Denis Sinor (ed.), The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, vol.1, Cambridge University Press, 1990…

    • 4675 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Neorealism, a concept of international relations that emerged in 1979 by Kenneth Waltz, is a theory which forces on demonstrating how the world works instead what the world ought to be. Neorealism thinkers claim that international structure is established by its ordering principle, which is anarchy, and by the distribution of power, measured by a number of great powers, which have the largest impact on what happens in world politics.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Morgenthau, Hans J., Kenneth W. Thompson, and W. David. Clinton. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006. Web. .…

    • 3984 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Melian Dialogue

    • 2099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bibliography: International realations theory Paul R Viotti Maek V Kauppi The Globalization of World Politics John Baylis and Steve Smith Realism and international relations Jack donnelly International politics K.J Holsti…

    • 2099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Krieger, J. 2001. The Oxford Companion to Politics of the World. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    WORLD WARS PAPER

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kaarbo, J. & Ray, J. L. (2011). Global Politics, 10th Edition. Published by Wadsworth Cengage Learning…

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays