Preview

How Does Juror Present Her Evidence

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
311 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Juror Present Her Evidence
The first impression that a juror would perceive of Beth, is that she looks professional. This is due to clothes she is wearing. Another positive of the way Beth presents her evidence is the fact that she makes it clear that she does not know the answer to some questions, such as when she is asked about other forms of synthesis and does not make it up. This is because it shows she knows her limitations, which prevents her from giving false information to the jury. However, this could also be perceived as that she does not have up to date knowledge about the subject of the case which would make her a less credible witness. Another reason why she could be discredited is the fact that she is not fully prepared. This is shown as she spent a lot of time looking through her statement trying to find certain answers and there were long pauses between answers leading to one of the barristers tells her the answer to one of her questions. …show more content…
This could show that she was nervous and may also show that she is unsure about the case. Beth made it difficult for the members of the jury to hear and understand what she said, due to the fact that she speaks quietly. As well as the way she uses her voice when presenting, something else she does which may make it difficult for the jury to understand her is when she used the term reflux. This is a complex scientific term that certain members of the jury, if not all, may not know the meaning of. Due to this, jurors may miss out on vital evidence in this case as they are unclear of the meaning and therefore how significant it is to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For starters, they did not collect the clothes that Lizzie had been wearing while present at the crime scene. This could have been helpful in the trial to persecute Lizzie if they had taken it and found traces of blood on it. Instead, Lizzie had kept the dress and later burned it, destroying any evidence that may have been on it. Investigators also failed to question people who were close with Lizzie (asides from her sister who was of no help). By questioning those close to her, investigators could have gained information about what Lizzie’s home life was like and if she had any hidden anger directed towards either of her…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of the judge is to present the fact, formalize the event, and to organize the jury. “You may perhaps wish to hear from me exactly what is meant by those words ‘reasonable doubt’” (Sayers 3). At this point in the case, the judge is teaching the jury how to decide whether or not a person is innocent, guilty or proven not guilty. In my opinion I believe that the judge is biased. Shortly after describing the death of Philip Boyes by arsenical poison, he accuses Harriet Vane of being the murder. He says that is a fact she killed him and that the problem to solve in this case is whether or not she murdered him with intent or on accident. The judge at this point is teaching the jury about the case and what they are supposed to agree on to make the final decision whether or not Harriet…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman and “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell reflected the time period where men dominated women. Over the years the roles that men and women play in society have been changed tremendously. It used to be that women were solely confined to house work, cooking, and taking care of their children. The men in most families were considered to be the winners in the household. In “A Jury of Her Peers” and “The Yellow Wallpaper,” the author’s symbolism and imagery to inform in conveying the place of women in society, and their struggle with gender inequality…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    All she wrote was “Johnson should not be fined or thrown in jail because in 1789, freedom of speech was established in the first amendment of the United States. Johnson burnt the flag as a protest against Reagan Administration policies while shouting ‘America, the red white and blue, we spit on you’. Johnson had all the rights to burn the flag because it did not harm or kill anyone or anything”. This short statement was not helpful nor was it a counter-argument. This is why the rest of the team had to come up with the counter arguments because leena was a distraction and not needed for the team’s success. Another obstacle was trying to use the right language to persuade the judges without being too assertive or being to weak. We only did 3 arguments but on each argument we made it perfect by being just the right amount assertive and using logical…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The judge rules on evidence competency issues because it is believed that it is too difficult for a jury to disregard evidence that should not have been admitted based on foundational evidentiary reasons such as the evidence is hearsay that does not meet an exception or an expert is not qualified to give testimony.…

    • 54 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mock Trial

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Greeting courtroom members, I am Shaneka Lewis apart of the Defence Attorney and I will be representing my client Donovan Tisi pleading not guilty upon the robbery and bodily harm charges. On December 5th 2013 at 5:30 PM, Anver Williams had claimed to be walking home from his basketball practice where he perhaps had been wearing his brand new basketball sneakers. As Mr. Williams was walking home he decided to take a short-cut home from a dark alley way that leads to Eglinton Ave. As Anver Williams was walking he seemed to come across a group of older men. Anver Williams explained how the young men approached him and toke away his hat and his sneakers after while being brutally attacked. My question and argument court, is to why my client Donovan is being called upon out of all of the young men who had claimed to be there during this dispute, is there enough proof or evidence to show that Donovan Tisi had been there or even took part in this crime, that Anver Williams is not sure of who had harmed or robbed him? As we are gathered here court I would like you all to investigate or try to find real evidence to prove that it had been my client Donovan that shows his participation in this act.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The story “A Jury of Her Peers” was first published in 1917 and was based on a authors one act play “Trifles”. “Trifles” was written in 1916 by Susan Glaspell. Glaspell wrote the play after an experience she had while working for a Des Moines newspaper.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It’s a scary but a true reality that prejudice has the power to overshadow the facts and evidence, which can prevent jurors from seeing the truth. From the start of the play, juror 4 votes the defendant guilty of murder, not based on facts but entirely based on prejudice and stereotyping the defendant. The fact that the defendant “was born in a slum” (p.g 12) and the generalisation from the outside world: “Children from slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society.” (p.g 12) convince juror 4 that the defendant must be guilty. Because of prejudice, he cannot see the details like the defendant’s birthplace and circumstances may potentially be used to prove that he does not have a strong motive. As pointed out by the 8th Juror, the defendant was raised in a slum and had “been hit so many times” (p.g 11) that a few slaps from his father cannot make the defendant commit patricide. Therefore, the defendant does not have a strong motive. When we compare juror 8 and juror4’s reasoning, we can see that prejudice and stereotyping can veil the truth of the case and hide it from jurors and consequently prevent them from seeing the truth. However, juror 4 is only prejudiced at the start of…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jury of her Peers

    • 3002 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Leadership is important. However, without developing an understanding of followers, and how to help them be most effective, an organization cannot survive. Critical thinking is defined as “thinking independently and being mindful of the effect of one’s behavior on achieving goals” (Daft, 2010, p. 424).…

    • 3002 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In A Jury of Her Peers, Glaspell reveals the struggle of what is right to your friends and what is your legal duty. Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, Minnie Wright’s unexpected peers, have much more in common than what meets the eye. As they begin their investigation through the Wright home; things appear to be much more obvious than previously motioned, but the unfolding of their blossoming friendship could end up putting Mrs. Minnie in the doghouse instead.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Testimony

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hello judges, jurors, and everyone else present in this court room today. My name is Dr. Alyssa Diaz and I am an expert witness. I was called here to testify on this court case. Also I am here to inform you how examining a piece of hair from a suspect from a crime can help to find out who actually did commit the crime. There are some basic things that people should know about hair.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginning to the end of her trial, Hutchinson believed she was not guilty. "I am called here to answer before you but I hear no things laid to my charge," says Anne at the beginning of the trial. The jury was frustrated with her words but they continued to present evidence they believed was enough to convict Anne. One of their evidences was that she was blasphemous. In her words, "He hath let me see which was the clear ministry and which the wrong. Since that time I confess I have been more choice and he hath left me to distinguish between the voice of my beloved and the voice of Moses, the voice of John the…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the United States of America, the criminal justice system is based on the adversarial system or common law system. An adversarial trial allows the accused or defendant to be given a fair chance to prove his or her innocence. The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that the defendant is to be given a fair chance to oppose the prosecution, have witnesses to help with his or her defense, face and question the complainant, and for his or her case to be heard by a group of people who are unbiased and impartial. This group is known as the trial jury.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Criminal Trial Process

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages

    After sentencing, losing party files appeal (in criminal cases, only the defendant can file an appeal because of double jeopardy rules)…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays