Preview

How does Hitler consolidate his power by 1934?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
862 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How does Hitler consolidate his power by 1934?
How does Hitler consolidate his power by 1934?

When Hitler became chancellor in January 1933, he was far from achieving the amount of power that he ultimately gained during the course of the Nazi regime. There were various obstacles to overcome in order to gain total power and to fully consolidate the rise of the Nazis.

The Reichstag Fire had given Hitler the opportunity to damage the reputation of the Communists and to heighten the reputation of the Nazis. Caught inside the Reichstag building was communist Van der Lubbe, who was captured and charged for starting the fire. This gave Hitler the perfect excuse to ‘get rid’ of the Nazis highest competition, he claimed all communists were behind the plotting of the fire and ordered many to be arrested. This left many empty seats in the Reichstag parliament and no communistic views to contrast those of Hitler. He wasted no time. On 23rd March he introduced an Enabling Act, which would allow him to have complete power in Germany. However, this law needed to be approved by the whole Reichstag, therefore great pressure was put on other parties in the Reichstag by the Nazis. By using the Law for the Protection of the People and State (article 48) and the excuse of the Reichstag Fire, Hitler banned the Communists from taking their seats, many members of the Social Democrats were beaten up by the SA, and many were too scared to turn up to the voting.

The result of these tactics was that the Enabling Act was passed. The Enabling Act gave Hitler the power to pass any laws without consulting the Reichstag, and without the approval of President Hindenburg. After March 1933 the Reichstag only really met to hear speeches by Hitler. The authority of all other political parties had been swept away. In the next elections, the Nazis were the only party allowed to stand.

Removing external opposition was a key factor for Hitler and the Nazi leaders. If they had no one to stand against their views, then they could bully

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The way in which legislation was used also meant Hitler was able siege more power legally. By passing the enabling act on the 23rd of March 1933 spelt the end practically of democracy in Germany and the start of Hitler’s reign as dictator. But as Source B tells of how Hitler had used SA and SS to control the crowds at the Kroll Opera House, this dominance shows that the Nazi party would do what it takes to gain the advantage whether it be legal or more aggressive tactics.…

    • 922 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In terms of Political power it can be argued that it marked the first step in the implementation of the Nazi volkgemeinschaft as it effectively allowed Hitler to eliminate political opposition as the right of freedom the press was removed, this therefore allowed Hitler complete access to all propaganda methods within Germany as Göring was MWP (Minister Without Portfolio) this therefore meant that Hitler could gradually begin implementing Gleichshaltung within the propaganda system, this meant that Hitler could utilise new propaganda methods such as the radio for his own ends due to his, and only his, access to the funds available to the government at the time, also as opposition leaders were arrested, Hitler was also able to eliminate much of the significant political presence within the German political climate of 1933, as the leaders of the SPD (Socialist Party Germany) and the KPD (Communist Party Germany) were arrested, this therefore made a more significant amount of voters…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Working to the Fuhrer

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The coined term “working towards the Fuhrer” helps shed light in understanding Hitler’s style of rule. “Working towards the Fuhrer” existed because of Hitler’s highly personalized style of rule. He rarely held cabinet meetings, met with cabinet members alone and disregarded customary governmental procedures. 2 Kershaw further explains the connection between “working towards the Fuhrer” and his rule, “Hitler’s sparse involvement in initiating domestic policy during the mid- and later 1930s and the disintegration of any centralized body for policy formulation means that were was wide scope for those able to exert pressure for action in areas broadly echoing the aims of nationalization of the masses.” 3 Due to Hitler’s disengagement from internal affairs, it opened the doors for party followers to carry out his aims to accomplish presumed party goals. Hitler’s style of rule that invited radical initiatives from below (“working towards the Fuhrer”, had substantial effects on both German society and the Nazi Regime during the 1930s.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within Source B, there is talk about the events that unfolded at the Kroll Opera House when the new Reichstag assembled on March 24th, 1933. This is the first important part of legislation within the year. The Enabling Act, once passed, gave Hitler the power to rule by decree without the approval of the Reichstag for a time of four years. This law required a two thirds majority in order to be passed and Hitler did not have this. Therefore, he put actions into place to make sure he did not necessarily need it. Centre and DNVP were bought off by threats and promises meaning the added to the attempted two thirds and the Communist Party was banned from taking its seat. Thus, Hitler had only the SPD duties who voted against the bill; this enabled Hitler to have his Act passed. This gave Hitler the ability to have his wishes instantly put into laws without having any opposition attempt to stop him. Within Source B, SPD deputy Wilhelm Hoegner, got across his point about the Nazis on the day the Act was passed. The Source gives off the impression that much intimidation was going on towards the SPD deputies as he states: ‘When we Social Democrats had taken our seats, SA and SS men lined up at the exits and along the walls behind us in a semi-circle’. This gives the…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On top of this clear idea that he could never have absolute power with political parties still around is the fact that the Enabling Act, which to an extent was the blockage of power for any other party, really sealed Hitler’s position as Germany’s next dictator. What he said now became law, and he could do whatever he wanted as long as it didn’t anger Hindenburg, the…

    • 1130 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Terror and violence were prominent factors in allowing the Nazis to consolidate power in 1933, for the reason that violence still had an impact on political developments, even the negotiations between Hitler, Von Papen and Hindenburg took place against the backdrop of well publicized acts of SA brutality. In May 1933 SA members stormed trade union headquarters and disbanded it. This violence led many leaders of the SPD to flee abroad and in June its party was officially banned and the 3000 that remained were arrested and a number were killed. This ultimately portrays the brutality of the Nazis, which effectively contributed to their consolidation of power. After the Reichstag fire the police were given the powers to detain suspects indefinitely without reference to the courts. The decree ‘For the protection of the people and the state’ was used to justify the arrest, imprisonment and often torture of thousands of political opponents, and on 23 March 1933 Hitler presented the Enabling Act to an intimidated Reichstag in order to consolidate Nazi power. The Reichstag passed laws which voted itself out of existence; the communists were barred from voting. The brutality of the Nazis' bought Hitler four years of a dictatorship. The Nazis managed to use terror with efficient ruthlessness and after the Enabling Act was the destruction of local state government; state…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler got Hindenburg to pass a law this was an emergency decree giving the police powers to search houses, supposedly to prevent a communist uprising Hitler thought was going to happen, he could arrest and punish people without trial, and there was no freedom of speech, which he actually just used to ensure that the Nazi's were always shown in a good light.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enabling Act 1933  amendment to the constitution passed by 2/3 majority (SPD refused to support it.) It suspended the Reichstag and allowed the government to rule by decree for the next four years. It was the final deathblow to the Weimar Democracy.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The primary reason as to why the decree was introduced was the fact that Hitler’s grip on dictatorship was far from secure. By January 1933, the Nazis had absolutely no majority in the Reichstag with only 196 seats, compared with the combined 221 of the Social Democrats and the Communists who could easily out-vote them. However, the Reichstag fire on the 27th February 1933 played a pivotal role in changing the fate of the Nazi party. To this day there is dispute over who actually started the fire, Hitler was unwavering in blaming a simple-minded Communist, Marinus van der Lubbe, claiming that he intended to start a Communist revolution that only the Nazis could deal with. But it is widely believed that the fire was a Nazi conspiracy, that members of the SA used a secret tunnel, which connected the Reichstag and Göring’s residence, to torch the place and then escape unnoticed. But regardless who was responsible, Hitler used the Reichstag fire as a means of extending his power and the Decree for Protection of People and State was signed by Hindenburg a day later, under the direction of Hitler who declared a state of ‘emergency’.…

    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Dbq

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The many actions taken by Hitler and the Nazi Party led to the successful control of Hitler over Germany. Cited in “The Western Heritage”, Since 1300 AP Edition; the Nazis attacked unemployment that by 1936 while the rest of Europe’s economy struggled, Germany no longer was haunted by it (Doc A). This describes how the Nazi party took steps toward making Germany a powerful country. In Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution of 1919, it stated that the…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hitler

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Great Depression in Germany provided a political opportunity for Hitler. Hitler used his position as chancellor to form a de facto legal dictatorship. Having achieved full control over the legislative and executive branches of government, Hitler and his political allies embarked on a systematic suppression of the remaining political opposition. By the end of June, the other parties had been intimidated into disbanding. On July 14, 1933, Hitler's Nazi Party was declared the only legal political party in Germany.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Third Reich

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Nazi rise to power brought an end to the Weimar Republic, a parliamentary democracy established in Germany after World War I. Following the appointment of Adolf Hitler as chancellor on January 30, 1933, the Nazi state (also referred to as the Third Reich) quickly became a regime in which Germans enjoyed no guaranteed basic rights. After a suspicious fire in the Reichstag (the German Parliament), on February 28, 1933, the government issued a decree which suspended constitutional civil rights and created a state of emergency in which official decrees could be enacted without parliamentary confirmation.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The individual German states likewise lost their freedom. Nazi governors were placed in control to supplant the chose state governors, making the Third Reich a Nazi just state. This main is further authorized by 'The Enabling Law', which gave Hitler the same power to settle on choices and pass laws as the Reichstag once had. The Enabling Law permitted Hitler a tyrannical position, as he no more needed to counsel the Reichstag on matters emerging, he could pass whatever strategy he wished. Be that as it may, it can be contended that the Third Reich was not a totalitarian tyranny as Hitler did not practice his power proficiently enough to end up a totalitarian pioneer. Mommsen portrays how he turned out to be abundantly expelled from everyday basic leadership and removed himself from strategies, either through sluggishness or through a trepidation of getting to be connected with disagreeable choices e.g. the Euthanasia program, which got to be disagreeable and was…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1933, Hitler and his National Socialist (Nazi) party were elected into power in Germany. Hitler was chosen by his party to become the new chancellor of Germany. The National Socialist (Nazis) won 34.1% of the overall vote. The German people were looking for a new voice for their suffering; they wanted a new leader to help get them out of their downfall during World War I, the Great Depression of 1929, and the Treaty of Versailles.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler became chancellor in 1933, after being voted ‘democratically’. Hitler was able to obtain this position by using a number of methods to fabricate himself as a man who would solve all of Germany’s problems, when in reality he was a power hungry, fascist dictator.…

    • 862 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays