How Did Warfare Cause Hardship For Civilians
The proposition that warfare caused hardship for civilians is a valid reason because all the sources agree on it to some extent civilians.
Firstly sources 1 and 2 tell us that warfare did cause hardship for most people during that time.
Due to all the bombs being dropped many people were forced to move out of their homes. This caused a lot of hardship for the civilians because people had to move house due to the “ghastly [air] raids” source 2 says. Source 2 also tells us that “For amidst such suffering and hardship…Everyone seems intent only on patching roofs, propping up walls, cooking fried potatoes on an upturned electric iron” this source tells us that life would have been very hard for the civilians. We know that this would be true because source 1 shows us that houses have fallen down and people are moving out because it is very unsafe to live where they are. Source 4 also tells us a little bit of how hard it was for the civilians in London, it shows a German man dropping bombs on London but it also shows that it did not affect them. Even though a lot of deaths occurred there was lots of buildings destroyed, they still stood strong, this doesn’t mean it wasn’t hard for the civilians though. Warfare did cause a lot a hardship for civilians. …show more content…
Source 3 tells us that “people… were collapsing into nervous hysteria” this would have caused so much hardship for the civilians because people were going mental, all the rescue services were going mad and “the hospitals were crammed” source 3 says. Warfare was very hard for the all the rescue service because they were breaking down into nervous hysteria and the emergency service people in the hospitals would’ve been busy 24/7. Warfare caused a lot of hardship on the civilians mentally and
Firstly sources 1 and 2 tell us that warfare did cause hardship for most people during that time.
Due to all the bombs being dropped many people were forced to move out of their homes. This caused a lot of hardship for the civilians because people had to move house due to the “ghastly [air] raids” source 2 says. Source 2 also tells us that “For amidst such suffering and hardship…Everyone seems intent only on patching roofs, propping up walls, cooking fried potatoes on an upturned electric iron” this source tells us that life would have been very hard for the civilians. We know that this would be true because source 1 shows us that houses have fallen down and people are moving out because it is very unsafe to live where they are. Source 4 also tells us a little bit of how hard it was for the civilians in London, it shows a German man dropping bombs on London but it also shows that it did not affect them. Even though a lot of deaths occurred there was lots of buildings destroyed, they still stood strong, this doesn’t mean it wasn’t hard for the civilians though. Warfare did cause a lot a hardship for civilians. …show more content…
Source 3 tells us that “people… were collapsing into nervous hysteria” this would have caused so much hardship for the civilians because people were going mental, all the rescue services were going mad and “the hospitals were crammed” source 3 says. Warfare was very hard for the all the rescue service because they were breaking down into nervous hysteria and the emergency service people in the hospitals would’ve been busy 24/7. Warfare caused a lot of hardship on the civilians mentally and