Preview

How Did The Economy Affect The Soviet Economy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Economy Affect The Soviet Economy
Soviet economy

First, let's see what conditions the Soviet economy had at its launch. It is known that Tsarist Russia was at one of the last places among the capitalist countries to produce industrial products per capita. In the middle of the 20th century, far ahead of Russia in terms of industrial production were the United States, Britain, Germany, and France. In tsarist Russia, cars, tractors, combines, powerful steam and gas turbines, diesel locomotives, electric locomotives, equipment for various industries, and much more, extremely important for the development of the economy, were not produced. The Russian economy of that period was an agrarian-industrial one. In 1917, as a consequence of the First World War, the level of industrial
…show more content…
However, personally I believe that the USSR had the opportunity to change everything, although many scientists, still cannot find an answer to this question. For example, the Republic of China at that time could prevent the crisis of the socialist system, it was just necessary to find the right approach. In my opinion, the USSR was blinded by all that was happening around at that time. For the USSR it was very important to surpass all the republics and countries that surrounded them and because of this, the USSR was drawn into many situations that had a negative effect on the USSR and which could easily be avoided. However, the government did not pay attention to the needs of citizens and competed with other countries in such things as flying into space and nuclear weapons. The above reflections, which cannot, of course, be considered as a thorough analysis of the causes of the collapse of the USSR, allow, nevertheless, to draw some generalized …show more content…
This means that, despite the existence of a number of objective prerequisites for the destruction of the Soviet system, theoretically the USSR could continue to exist, although it is difficult to say how long and how successfully. At the same time, one cannot exclude the possibility that the collapse of the USSR would not only be possible, but inevitable. However, after analyzing all the reasons, even though it is hard to point out one reason, I personally think that political system was something that failed the most because the government of the USSR did not cope with the task of overcoming economic problems and did not take seriously the secondary factors that ultimately brought them down. The government missed the moment when secondary factors began to exert huge problems on the USSR, and the development of the economy and the arms race took a back

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The patriotic war caused great destruction in the USSR in terms of social and economic. Many people were killed and many more left in a poor state, much of the industry was destroyed and the USSR would take years to recover fully. But in despite all the negatives the USSRS heavy industry was the highest it has ever been…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reforms and policies made during the last Tsarist years were not in the interests of the people but were made simply to maintain the power of the Tsar and his nobles. Most people would argue that during the years 1917-1964 there was more political freedom and less repression than in the Tsarist years. The provisional government did not meet the needs of the Russian people. They were an unstable and temporary government, and many people on the furthest parts of the Russian empire did not know about their existence. This provided them with many issues, such as trying to enforce democracy onto people they did not understand what democracy actually was. Many historians believe that at this point the people of Russia did not know themselves what form of government they wanted and due to the lack of education they did not know what form was best for them. In October 1917 came the Bolshevik revolutions. With their leader, Lenin, the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and came into power. The leadership of Lenin was met with great approval from the people. Lenin promised political freedom unknown to them under the Tsars and Provisional government. In his rule…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During The Cold War, There was a total of 4 change in power. Joseph Stalin being the first dictator of The Soviet Union during The Cold War, Nikita Khrushchev being the second, Leonid Brezhnev the third, and Mikhail Gorbachev the final leader of The Soviet Union. “While this meant change the underlying political reality was that the Soviet system did not trust the people. Government was retained in the hand of Party apparatchiks which the public had no role in choosing. Economically there were improvements.” Despite the improvements, living conditions were poor for the citizens of The Soviet Union. “Agriculture remained a major weakness with poor yields”. Although The Soviet try to improve life for people, life was still poor. The economics…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nation was created with poor decisions and dishonesty that throughout the years led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. Gorbachev’s decision to give more power to the people and how open elections which was similar to what was seen in a democratic government which began a slow process of democratization that destabilized Communist control. After 1990 elections, Gorbachev was faced with many political pressures which in turn sped up the process of his resignation. On December 25, 1991, the Soviet flag was taken down and replaced by the Russian flag that flies today. Gorbachev resigned as president and on December 26, 1991, The Soviet Union…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalinism, the term used to embody the form of government experienced by the Soviet Union under Stalin’s rule, had a significant and lasting impact on the USSR. Stalinism impacted on several aspects of life. Collectivisation was introduced which assisted in the funding of industrialisation, terror was used to create a communist state. Stalin centralised every aspect of life, from the single leadership of Stalin himself to party control of the state and its functions. Free will disappeared and service to the state was expected. Consequently a Stalinist state which had a major impact on the USSR was created.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The break up and dissolution of the Soviet Union on the 25th December 1991 heralded the end of the Cold War. It ushered in what had been termed 'the new world order ', furthermore, it was suggested by Francis Fukuyama to have signalled the end of history and the battle of ideas which had dominated much of the twentieth century (Huntington, 1996; 31). The 'clash of civilizations ' had already seen the demise of fascism as a credible force in 1945, the close of 1991 would see the end of communism in Europe. The relatively sudden collapse of the USSR has compelled thinkers and analysts to seek answers as to why the world’s second superpower could collapse so quickly…

    • 2282 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1957, Khrushchev attempted to decrease the amount of power the central government had and instead give power to regional governments. In turn, the economy was severely impacted. It was very hard to restructure the USSR without having a strong central authority. Additionally, the Soviet economy was full of imbalances especially in consumer industries. The USSR tried to produce only what was necessary in order to eliminate waste, however they usually did not produce enough which caused a shortage of goods. Furthermore, the Soviets did not have much money to invest elsewhere as they spent a good portion of their GDP on their military and their various space programs. Finally, Khrushchev spread the investments he could make to widely which, consequently, did not result in anything efficient being done due to the lack of…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought many changes to the Soviet Union. Stalin’s goal was to transform the Soviet Union into a modern superpower and spread communism throughout the world, and he was determined to sabotage anyone who stood in his way. He used many methods such as collectivization, totalitarianism and five year plan’s to achieve his goals. Stalin’s rule brought both harmful and beneficial consequences to the Soviet Union; however, the negative factors were so terrible, that they overwhelm the positive factors.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soviet communists did not like capitalism. They opposed private ownership economies of the United States and its allies. Russian leaders believed that capitalism was doomed and that communism would spread throughout the world. This caused great tension and the emergence of a new kind of war, a Cold War. Mistrust ran deep. In the words of Winston Churchill, it was as if an “iron curtain” had been drawn between the Soviet-controlled countries in Eastern Europe and the Western democracies.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    From Revolution to Ruin: Unraveling the Complex Forces Behind the Soviet Union's Dissolution The collapse of the Soviet Union, a transformative event marking the end of a geopolitical era, was primarily driven by a combination of internal economic inefficiencies, failed political reforms such as Gorbachev's Perestroika and Glasnost, and the exacerbating effect of external pressures including the arms race and global shifts towards neoliberal policies. These factors, compounded by the rise of nationalist movements within its republics, not only highlighted the systemic flaws inherent in the Soviet economic and political structure but also significantly undermined the legitimacy of the Soviet state, leading to its eventual dissolution in 1991. Economic…

    • 2661 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Soviet Economy has been termed a ‘command economy’. Do you feel this is an appropriate and adequate characterisation?…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In December of 1922 the creation of Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, better known as the Soviet Union, is created. First lead by Vladimir Lenin, the Soviet Union was found to be the first country to be considered socialist with plans to become a communist party in the future. The Soviet Union was made up of 15 republics and at the time was the largest country in the world. After Lenin’s death in 1924, Joseph Stalin came to power that had control throughout World War II until his death in 1953. After the war the Soviet Union became a global power and seemingly stayed strong until its fall on December 25th, 1991.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The economy of the soviet Union played a big part as to why they collapsed because it had been stagnating throughout the 1970s, as Western economies moved into new technologies, the Soviets economy stayed based on Karl Marx's analysis of the British economy in the mid 19th Century. The Soviets focused on heavy industry such as coal, iron…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For most of the 1900’s, the Soviet Union was one of the most powerful countries in the world. They fought in both World Wars and they also helped to defeat the Nazis in World War 2. Even with all of their achievements, the Soviet Union’s government began to disagree with the people and even force their will upon them in the mid to late 1900’s and they finally collapsed in 1991. The collapse of the Soviet Union was caused mainly by internal issues that developed long before 1991, like the government keeping secrets from the people, or the government disagreeing with the people.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life Under Stalin

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many problems began to spark up in the USSR. In 1921 industrial output was only 1/5th…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays