Preview

How did the 1784 election consolidate Pitt's Power?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
679 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How did the 1784 election consolidate Pitt's Power?
How did the 1784 Election Consolidate Pitt’s Power?
In March 1784 the British General Election consolidated William Pitt’s power in many different ways.
Before the election Pitt did not have the majority in the House of Commons. Pitt could only rely on about 150 votes whereas Fox and North had around 230. Even with the votes from independent MPs Pitt was still approximately 60 votes short. Also his position in the commons appeared weaker due to the fact that he was the only one in his cabinet to sit in the lower house. Pitt’s opposition were convinced they could easily defeat him and that his government was to be very short-lived and was famously expressed by Frances Anne Crewe (The wife of John Crewe –a leading Rockingham Whig), who described it as the ‘Mince Pie administration’ to be devoured by the opposition and be gone by Christmas. The fact that Fox had failed to devour Pitt can be explained by two factors: Pitt’s own political skill and the powers still available to the crown. These were demonstrated on the lead up the election in March 1784 when a tactical manoeuvre was to consolidate Pitt’s power.
Pitt gained support in and outside the commons separately. Pitt’s idea was to delay an immediate election in order for him to tackle his opposition head on. He though that this demonstrate his ability to independent MPs who would then support him in the long-term. ‘Pitt was determined to face his critics in the Commons, and events showed that his judgement was sound. It needed considerable nerve and courage to defy the coalitionists in the Commons. Pitt calculated that if he could impress the House he would set in train a shift of opinion away from the opposition and towards himself. This meant that when the Election took place the morale of the opposition would already be low. He knew that many of North’s followers had been reconciled to the coalition with Fox only because it held out the prospect of a stable ministry. Now that this expectation had been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    a beginning push to the movement of the revolution. England eventually found a new power…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government could not fumction without money so the issue was put to the voters to decide. The Conservatives had to win a large number of seats in order to justify their rejection of the budget, however they did not and ithe election was therefore a defeat for the Conservatives. However, the Liberals no longer had an overall majority in the commons so they could only get their bills passed if they got the support of the Labour party and Irish Nationalists. The Irish Nationalists would only give their support in return for granting of Home Rule for Ireland, so the Liberal party had to include Home Rule in their policy. The Liberals were reliant on the Labour Party as Labour would only support them in return for favourable legislation for trade unions, assistance for working class candidates to become MPs. This allowed the Labour Party to develop links with uniona and allowed them to field more candidates at future elections, enabling them to challenge the Liberal Party; weakening the Liberals. After the election the budget was re-introduced into parliament and was passed by both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal’s victory in the 1906 was a very significant one due to how they won it with such an overwhelming majority; it was the biggest electoral victory since 1832. In the 1890’s the liberals were suffering from a crisis identity and they were lacking in money and morale. In the 1906 election the liberals won 49.4% of the vote and that amounted to 399 seats which was such a large margin compared to in 1900 where 45% of the vote was only 183 seats. There are four main reasons arguably why the Liberals won the1906 election and these are through Conservative faults such as the massacre in the Boer war. The education act in 1902 and Chamberlain’s tariff reform campaign also lost the conservatives a lot of support, which meant people turned to liberals just due to disliking the conservatives. The most important reason was Arthur Balfour getting involved and not making the right decisions for the conservatives and losing a lot of the voters they had before. The liberals also used a very negative campaign in order to get voters to realise the flaws in the conservative’s ideals and make them vote for the liberals just through dislike of the other parties.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French revolution broke out in 1789, and while at first Britain was pleased and welcomed the changes that the revolution brought to France (i.e. the new constitutional monarchy mirrored Britain's political system in many ways.) Pitt and his government began to become worried when the revolution in France stepped up a gear and became more extreme, they obviously didn't want a repeat of the French experience in Britain. The outcome of the revolution was inevitable and in 1792 when France became a republic, it was also the start of a period of time (1793-1794) that became known as 'revolutionary terror'. Revolutionary terror is essentially force used or implemented against people or groups who are counter-revolutionary. This caused a great fear of revolution in Britain and contributed to Britain going to war with France In January 1793 after the execution of Louis XVI. This led to a fear of French invasion of Britain throughout the country and worried Pitt and his government greatly from 1793-1801. This fear was not unfounded as France tried to invade Britain twice, firstly, in 1797 a small group of French soldiers landed in the small welsh village of Fishguard . Even though this small band of troops were easily captured and dealt with, it still began to plant a very real threat of invasion into Britain's soils. In 1798, a larger French military force landed in Ireland and successfully assisted the Irish Rebels, which again showed and proved that the threat of invasion to Britain was now significant and there were now also British worried that France would begin to use Ireland as a 'stepping-stone' to invade Britain. After Pitt declared War on France in 1793, he had hoped to fight a traditional colonial war, but due to the state of the army, he had to focus Britain's army on the naval war and pay others to fight the colonial war for him. He paid for this by introducing income tax.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is argued by some that Peel was greatly successful up to 1841 due to the fact that he brought the Tory Party from being a “beleaguered minority” (Adelman, 1989) to being a strong, relevant power once again. However, this ‘low point’ of 1832 is often greatly exaggerated by admirers of Peel. Arguably the high levels of support that the Whig’s received in the election of 1832 was predominantly down to the fact that they advocated the issue of Parliamentary Reform, meaning that it can be argued that the period of unpopularity that the Tory party suffered in 1832 could only ever have been temporary. Arguably even if Peel had not advocated the policies which many consider to be very ‘successful’, the fortunes of the Tory Party would have still recovered, as many of the newly enfranchised voters, far from punishing the Tories, enjoyed the exclusivity of Parliament and wanted to retain that exclusivity through conservative policies. Although the skills of Peel as an orator did contribute to the Tory revival to a certain extent, the Whig majority in Parliament was so fundamentally fragile that it hardly needed exploitation by Peel. Although Peel did contribute to disuniting the Whig majority by, for example, exploiting the Whig difficulties in the management of Anglican Church funds in Ireland, the opportunity to do so arose spontaneously, and merely needed to be…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dividing a Nation The period of 1820-1840 was a very exciting time of growth in America. America was becoming more independent in its thinking and also in the way that its politics worked. There were many things that contributed to the reemergence of a two party system in the period of 1820-1840. The major political personalities were a major contributor. By using their influence on the people and their influence in the government, many men were able to help bring about the two different parties and to influence the views of each party. States rights was another major issue that helped to establish a two party system. Conflicts and disputes over the rights of the states ultimately brought about the rise of political parties by creating a division in the views of states and their people.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What were the key issues in the 1800 presidential election? Why is it called the "Revolution of 1800?"…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of course Pitt’s early political career was very important, as it is essential to recognise that he achieved his post as Prime Minister only by cleverly and politically climbing up the political ladder. During the 1780 elections, Pitt contested the “University of Cambridge” seat, but unfortunately lost. However during the next year of 1781, Pitt entered the House of Commons, within a year of entering the House of Commons, Pitt was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer. The Death of Lord Rockingham was also very important for Pitt’s rise to power. Many Whigs who had formed a part of the Rockingham ministry, including Charles James Fox, now refused to serve under the new Prime Minister. Pitt, however, was comfortable joining the Shelburne Government; he was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer (making use of his mathematics education).…

    • 716 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Madison, factions were caused by a few things. The first was the unequal distribution of property/wealth. Something else that caused factions was the fact that small groups were only for local issues/passions. Too many factions in a political party were dangerous, as each group believed a variety of different things. With many factions holding various opinions, this meant that no political party would have definite control of the government. This meant that the larger the faction, the more it could use its larger values and beliefs on others; merely because there are more people in a larger faction. Madison was against a majority rule. This is why Madison came to the conclusion that…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The split of the Conservative in 1846 due to the repeal of the Corn Laws and the following death of Bentinck were important factors in allowing Disraeli to become the leader of the Conservative Party. Disraeli was instrumental in the split of the Conservative Party, being the leader of the vicious attacks on the authority and reputation of Sir Robert Peel. Despite being a fantastic showcase of his speaking abilities, these attacks led to many of the more experienced and higher status politicians leaving the Conservatives Party, to join Peel in the Peelites group. The split left the Conservatives with little leadership, and it also opportunely put Disraeli in contact with Lord George Bentinck who status ensured that many of the remaining Conservatives were happy to follow the pair. Coinciding with Disraeli’s seeming reinvention, in 1847, he became ‘Knight of the Shire’ of Bucks and financed by his new patrons the Bentinck’s, he became a true dandy, more of a landed country gentleman. The death of Bentinck in 1848 left Disraeli as the only potential leader of the Conservatives, in the House of Commons. The split of the Conservative Party and Bentinck’s death were important in Disraeli’s emergence, however it was his oratory and political skill which largely caused the split, therefore being an underlying cause of a factor of his own success.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The election of 1800 was aptly named the Revolution of 1800. The Revolution of 1800 was a peaceful transition of power from one set of political ideas to another. Obviously, giving the election of 1800 this title means it has to have significant factors in the election. Many factors happen within foreign policy, judiciary, and politics during the election of 1800. These three areas are main reasons why the election of 1800 was renamed the Revolution of 1800.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Local government only dealt with what went on in the town only, so no outside matters came up. Still being under the Redcoats, the people were loyal until the British made a lot of bad decisions, with one of them being the Stamp Act in 1765. This act made people boycott imports from Britain because it taxed anything that was made from paper. Parliament later repealed this act to then give the Declaratory Act of 1766, which allowed Parliament to control the colonies through legislation. So they had complete control over all imports. Another bad decision was having troops stationed in the area in 1768 but two years later The Boston Massacre occurred. Making the people who were settled in these colonies rethink their pact with Parliament. The people of Concord wanted to take a stand but decided not to revolt yet since they wanted to have a better strategy and have stronger leaders back them up. But since the economy was crumbling from the British the settlers decided to…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens of the United States were found to be divided into two separate political groups during the ratification of the United States Constitution. The first group, the Federalist Party, having a nationalistic view, favored a strong central government, restricting powers of the states. However, the Republican Party believed that the power of the national government should be limited and the states be given additional power. Many different issues occurred between the two parties, however the debate on the first national bank, the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, and the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798, establish why the republican party adopted these views on the government. The republican party felt that definite rights should be reserved by…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Pitt's Success

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The French Revolution had shown that this typica aristocratic behaviour could have catastrophic results, and so caused fear for the monarchy despite the heavy loyalism in Britain. The crisis showed the weakness of Pitt's position, as with the King no longer in the political equation, Pitt's grasp on his position rapidly declined. It was essential for Pitt that he held the kings support. Had the Kings sudden incapability been permanent then a regency, headed by the Prince of Wales would have gone ahead and either Fox himself, or a Foxite would have been instated in Pitt's position. It was Fox's intention to restrict the monarchys influence, as this was the easiest solution to overcome Pitt. Pitt was unable to tsand y himself as an 'independent whig,' without the general support given to Pitt for having the Kings backing, the few supporters Pitt could trust and rely on would have been unable to uphold Pitt's rational ideas. Fox's popularity with the Prince of Wales, and the Pince's dislike for Pitt wouldve meant that had the King not recovered, Pitt would not have held his position at all. Though the fact that Fox was desperate for the support of the Prince of Wales it shows that it was not possile at all to hold a position of power without…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolutionary War

    • 824 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The word revolution had been defined as overthrow of government: the overthrow of a ruler or political system. That is exactly what the Revolutionary War had successfully completed. There is no exact point during this period that would constitute the cause of the war. It could range from the French Indian War to the Stamp Act. Mainly the Revolutionary War began because there was a disagreement between Great Britain and the thirteen colonies. There were series of events that led up to the Revolutionary War.…

    • 824 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays