Preview

How Did Socrates Socieving The Truth Or Virtue?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
884 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Socrates Socieving The Truth Or Virtue?
In the years that followed the Peloponnesian War, unusual and new philosophical teachings and concepts sprung anew. Through the rise and growth of Sophists, Athens and Ancient Greece began to question themselves regarding truth and virtue. With such concepts supposedly being answered by these Sophists, they were not met without opposition. A philosopher named Socrates countered the arguments of the Sophists by exposing their carelessness for the truth and their desire for greed instead. Although Socrates’ behavior was percepted as rebellious, he would soon expose the Sophists for what they are. As well his own strong acceptance for the truth and virtue rather than personal victory.
Beliefs of the Sophists largely consisted of secular-based …show more content…
He did not alter or change his beliefs in order to convince the judges to choose a verdict that would acquit him. Nor did he make arguments that relied on the emotions of others than could make them have sympathy for such an old man as he. Nor did Socrates attempt to hide from his accusers, instead he confronted them directly and exposed them for the frauds that they are. In one of his last arguments, Socrates states that Meletus and his other accusers aren’t accusing him of teaching falsehoods, but instead of teaching the real and actual truth. For Meletus and his other accusers, the truth is whatever they perceive it to be and that there is no definite answer for anything.
In the end, Socrates was voted guilty of corrupting the youth and impiety by a court of judges. Although his fraudulent enemies attempted to silence both Socrates and the truth, their attempt failed miserably. Even now, after two thousand years, Socrates is still to this day considered to be one of the greatest philosophers that ever lived due to his love and determination to find the truth. Socrates may have passed on, but he nor his teachings for the truth will never be
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Who Is Socrate In Socrates's Apology?
    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who Is Socrate In Socrates's Apology?

    “Men of Athens,” Socrates refers the jury men as men of Athens instead of juries. “Jurymen—you I would rightly call jurymen…” He only recognizes the juries who voted him acquittal are true jury men. “How my accusers affected you” Socrates did not blame the juries for misunderstanding his behaviors or giving him a penalty. The only thing he could do is to explain the truth to the jury men for each accusation on him. The entire Apology was his words to defend himself from all the charges he faced. “As for me, I was almost carried away in spite of myself, so persuasively did they speak…And yet, hardly anything of what they said is…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Happened To Socrates Corrupt The Youth?
    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who Happened To Socrates Corrupt The Youth?

    Socrates’ discussion with Meletus stems from Meletus leading the prosecution against Socrates. Socrates is charged with “corrupting the youth and of not believing in the gods in who the city believes, but in other new spiritual things.” During his trial, Socrates is given the chance to defend himself against the accusations. Socrates argues that the charges against him are contradictory and incoherent.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Socrates Guilty
    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Was Socrates Guilty

    Is Socrates actually guilty of either of the crimes with which he is charged: impiety and corrupting the youth? Are these crimes dangerous for a political community? Is Socrates, in his Apology, fully persuasive that he and his way of life pose no threat to the city? (To answer these questions, you will need to ask yourself what is the foundation for Athenian or, indeed, any political society.)…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Guilty In Socrates's Apology
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Guilty In Socrates's Apology

    To begin, Socrates did not believe in the same gods as Athens, the easiest of his convictions to prove because of his Apology. In his plea, Socrates distracts the jury with stories of disbelievers. As the defense begins, he does not say that he does believe or disbelieve in the gods of Athens, since the easiest answer for an innocent man is “I did not do it.” Instead, he takes a route of disapproval and disbelief that this charge was brought up against him, “Socrates does injustice by not believing in gods, but believing in gods (p.77 27a),” he says in a mocking manner that is meant to make the jury question themselves. He further twists and turns the accusation by saying similar things; is there such thing as one who “believes… in human matters but not humans,” “not believing… in horse matters but believing in horses,” and “not believing in flute players, but believes in flute matter (p.77, 27a-b)?” To finish his point, he makes a final example of the atrocity of the charge against him, “Is there anyone who believes that there are daimonic matters, but does not believe in daimons (p.77, 27c)?” This argument…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Not Guilty: The Criminality Of Socrates
    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not Guilty: The Criminality Of Socrates

    This is evident from the very beginning of the text, as Socrates states, “And yet hardly anything of what [my accusers] said is true” (p. 22). While the texts suggest Socrates is not guilty, being presented with only the Apology and Crito leaves a gap of knowledge, which presents the question of whether Plato and/or Socrates are depicting the truth.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Socrates Put On Trial
    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Socrates Put On Trial

    Socrates was put on trial because he was charged with crimes. The first was “corrupting the youth.” (43) The second was “refusing to acknowledge the gods acknowledged by the city.” (43) The third count was “introducing new divinities.” (43) The reason Socrates was put on trial was because he was going around challenging men about their knowledge and wisdom. He was told by an Oracle that he was the wisest man who lived, but he was skeptical about it, so he went and tested out that theory. He went around questioning men, usually different groups such as politicians or rich men who thought they knew everything about the world. However Socrates always showed them up and they got so angry they decided to take him to trial, for what they call “corrupting…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death Of Socrates In Plato's 'The Apology'
    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Death Of Socrates In Plato's 'The Apology'

    Throughout the trial Socrates speaks to the court as if he were just having a conversation with them, rather than him being at trial. He explained to the jury that has no experience with the law courts and that he will instead speak in the manner to which he is accustomed: with honesty and…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    When Did Socrates Put On Trial Essay
    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Did Socrates Put On Trial Essay

    Socrates’ starts his defense by stating that all he will do is speak the truth and not waste time telling stories. “So they, as I say, have said little or nothing true, while from me you will hear the whole truth—but by Zeus, men of Athens, not beautifully spoken speeches like theirs” (46). He also does not refer to the people who brought the charges on him by name, only by “accusers”. Socrates also states later that he knows he is not well liked in the city because he has trapped nearly everyone, including most of the jury in a philosophical conundrum. For me the fact that Socrates does not know who is accusers are and that he is being…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Platos Apology
    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Platos Apology

    Socrates sticks to he is innocent and anyone that knows him knows he is telling the truth. The prosecutors will do anything to prove otherwise and encourage other people like maletus to think the accusation against Socrates is true. Socrates says, “what is the accusation which has given rise to the slander of me, in the fact has encouraged Melatus to proof this charge against me.”(1-2) Socrates knows they are encouraging the lie about him and want to prove him guilty. When Socrates says,“rise of the slander of me”(1-2) he is saying this accusation everyone is trying to say is true about him is…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates: The Innocence Of Virtue
    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates: The Innocence Of Virtue

    Virtue, rather than being a teachable piece of knowledge, seems to be an innate understanding. Every person in the world, save perhaps psychopaths and sociopaths, naturally has a strong moral compass. An example that proves this idea is the innocence of children. I have never witnessed a child perform an action with solely malicious intent. Children always have some outside motivation for any hateful actions they perform, so they never do it only to hurt someone. At this point you might think that, yes, children do not do anything with only malicious purposes, but the fact remains that they continue to perform such actions. This is true, but honestly, how have children learned to do such hateful things? No child would consider cursing at anyone if they were angry, but since they observe others performing these actions, the children begin to develop the idea in their minds that doing so must relieve their suffering. It seems, then, that humans learn harmful…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Apology Analysis
    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato's Apology Analysis

    Meletus accuses the philosopher of corrupting the youth as oppose to bettering them. Socrates is also arraigned with being a sophist, making the bad look good, not believing in god - or at least not recognizing the gods worshiped by society and finally, being an outright ‘evil-doer’. During his speech, Socrates first addresses Aristophanes (A playwright of Athens), and his pursuit to make Socrates out to be a bit of a trash-talker who claims he can walk through air along with other absurdities. Socrates claims that although he is a teacher of philosophy, he does not charge. Even though frowned upon Socrates admires anyone that possess such great knowledge and is able to charge for their teachings. In a modest manner he states, “Had I the same, I should have been very proud and conceited; but the truth is that I have no knowledge of that kind.” This is important because it aids in the proving of Socrates innocence, being that if he was indeed such a pompous, conceited philosopher he would not be able to admit his lack of knowledge. Throughout the excerpt Socrates makes reference to many stories in effort of proving to the jury before him how he acquired such an atrocious reputation. Socrates mentions that he believes the only reason he was put on trial was because Meletus does not like him for possessing such unique…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrates: Creating Elaborate Arguments
    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Socrates: Creating Elaborate Arguments

    Socrates in his defense of the accusations brought onto him, argues on several different topics that disprove any accusations that Meletus brought to the trial. His approach at defending himself through arguments was a bold move, and as we know from reading the text, the jury still finds him guilty regardless of this strategy that backfired on him. One argument that stuck out was how he did not corrupt the youth, but if he did it was unknowingly, which does not deserve punishment. His first premise is that no one intentionally causes harm, and from that his second premise is he did not intentionally mean to corrupt the people if he did. Thus leading to the fact that he should not be punished for an act…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Unjust Analysis
    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates Unjust Analysis

    Socrates, one of the greatest minds go Ancient Greece’s was no exception. As a sophist, Socrates was considered a teacher of the noble. Sophist of Greed taught young men ’arete’: excellence or virtue for a price. However, Socrates wasn’t a regular sophist, he never accepted any monetary reward for his ’teachings“ (b316,p813) and he never actually taught anything but rather trained minds to think. Socrates states at the trail that he doesn’t have any true knowledge and he believed that in order to have any true knowledge one must be able to produce a single, clear definition of a subject without any exclusions to the rule, something that he was never able believed that he couldn’t do.Rather than use he own opinions to teach his pupils what to think, Socrates used ”systematic questioning“ (b136p813) to help clear their own minds and reach their own conclusions just by thinking. A skill that they could carry forward, into their lives as Athenian citizens. With this in mind, it is nearly impossible for the Athenians government to find Socrates guilty of…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Virtue Ethics Theory
    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Virtue Ethics Theory

    * Socrates is considered by many to be a martyr for truth and integrity because of his courage and adherence to traditional beliefs. He was charged with charges of atheism, treason, and corrupting the youth of Athens – all death penalties, just for trying to question tradition. In spite of all the powerful people he offended, no one seemed that eager to kill him and his cell door pretty much remained open for him to escape. Yet, when his execution day arrived, he drank his cup of poison and died. Socrates was determined to force the people of Athens to accept responsibility for their choice of comfortable superstition over logic and reason.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Socrates Wrong
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is Socrates Wrong

    He begins by stating that: “Meletus says… that I am guilty of corrupting the young” (36). He then reply and “turn the table around” by accusing Meletus of being guilty of “trifling… that he brings people to trial on frivolous grounds” (36). Socrates then asks Meletus to step forward and question him if it is his concern that youth must be as good. He then added that Meletus shall speak up and prove that Socrates does corrupt the youth, rather than being a good influence. Through this, I do believe that Socrates’ claims are convincing, considering the fact that he is trying to prove that his sole purpose of sharing his knowledge and wisdom is for people to know themselves.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics