Preview

How Did Nietzsche's Influence On Religion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
503 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Nietzsche's Influence On Religion
Friedrich Nietzsche, one of the most influential modern theorists, was influenced by several females that came into his life and rejected his love and his own inner struggles. Growing up in a household of “puritanical females: his mother, sister, grandmother and two maiden aunts” (Collins & Makowsky, 2010), adored him and nurtured him but, once he grew up he developed a “deep-seated sexual inhibition” which became the beginning of a powerful intellect. Although to this day, a plethora of academics argue that Nietzsche was too radical and insane, his theories on religion are powerful and enlightening, which help analyze our reality. During his growth in the realm of philosophy, Nietzsche argued that Christianity needed to be destroyed and society needed to reestablish its values. The main reason for this conclusion, was that in his eyes, it was clear that “political and intellectual repression was established by church” (Collins & Makowsky, 2010). In the …show more content…
Thus, for the sole purpose of getting to heaven individuals become compassionate, caring and loving in order to not be condemned to hell. The reason that we feel guilty is due to the fact that we are reminded about our mistakes on a regular basis. Good and evil differ from good and bad because the good and bad is described under the medieval and aristocratic. They focused on strength and the mentality that they worked hard to obtain what is theirs, and that nothing in their lives was handed to them. Good and evil are implied under priests, whom alone held no social power, yet their word had full religious support. Nietzsche wondered whether the good man was limited through the belief of needing to be good, unlike the evil man whom had no restrictions and was truly able to be free. This leads to Nietzsche's conclusion that morality has been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The racist and fascist foundation of Nazism has often been attributed to the writings of Nietzsche. In actuality, however, not only did Nietzsche not espouse such ideas, but also he also expressly opposed them. The blatant racism, oppression, and mass mentality of the Nazi regime are incompatible with Nietzsche's writings. Conceptually, it is difficult to fathom how Hitler managed to warp Nietzsche's ideas and writings to fuel his own totalitarian Nazi agenda. Although Nietzsche's writings did influence Hitler, it was only through misinterpretation and manipulation that Hitler came to believe that Nietzsche held pro-Nazi beliefs and promoted his works as the philosophical underpinning of the Third Reich.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm, Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Edited by Rolf-Peter Horstmann, Judith Norman; translated by Judith Norman. Cambridge University Press, 2002.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Beyond Good & Evil, Friedrich Nietzsche seeks to develop the idea of moral philosophy beyond basic pleasures, how they relate to the general population, and further into our own personal intricacies and how they create a set of rules that apply to most individuals. Throughout the book, Nietzsche articulate well over 200 epigrams, each of which highlights a different aspect of human morality. Nietzsche’s 68th epigram dictates: “‘I have done that,’ says my memory. ‘I cannot have done that,’ says my pride, and remains inexorable. Eventually--memory yields.” When assessing this aphorism, it is not only important to assess why our memory yields and what ensues as a result, but also what would occur if we didn’t. One could argue that we must remember our mistakes and learn from them and, by choosing to forget our mistakes for our own pride’s sake, we stall our own moral progression. However, it could also be said that forgetting our own mistakes is vital to our moral progression because rather than merely learning from our mistakes, by constantly remembering them, we allow ourselves to be caught in a cycle of guilt, preventing us from truly moving on. Rather than blindly assessing the aphorism on its own, one must look through Nietzsche’s lens regarding the concepts of intention and truth in order to determine which of the above interpretations is more plausible. Although the first notion is a reasonable interpretation of Nietzsche’s epigram regarding widely accepted notions of morality, the second proves to be a more valid conclusion when following Nietzschean philosophy. While the first interpretation allows for moral recognition and awareness, the second allows for actual progress in the individual.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eng103 1ST Essay

    • 1310 Words
    • 4 Pages

    being Christianity, is a misleading leader. Nietzsche once stated that morality goes to the extent to “condemn for its own sake” and that the “church is hostile to life.” (Nietzsche, Friedrich) Furthermore, he believed that Christianity, along with “morals,” is a hindrance to us and its only purpose is to chain us and bring us down. I believe that he found the thought of having such a powerful institution, such as Christianity and morality, as outrages and absurd for depriving the people from their true passions and only making the people feel that shame and guilt are the worst sins one can commit. He believed that the people should not allow Christianity or morals, or anything in general, to make one…

    • 1310 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The more powerful, noble men saw themselves as good when they observed the contrast between themselves and those inferior to them: the weak, poor, and common people. Here Nietzsche introduces the contrast between master morality and slave morality and how the first concept of good and bad arose. As I mentioned earlier, the masters, nobles, and stronger people defined good as a reflection of themselves. Now when they came to contact with the weak, the slaves, the poor, and the common people, they attributed the concept of bad to them as the opposite side to what they saw on themselves. Their position of power is what also gave them control over language the power label things such as what is good and what is bad. On the other hand when the weak side came into contact with the nobles, after realizing they were inferior to the nobles, the feeling of ressentiment arose, which as we will later see, rearranged the concept of good and…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    She discusses and describes the ideas of approximately twenty authors and provides a suggested reading list of thirty-two books. Not only that her survey spans a large body of work. Such as Nietzsche to…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The popular anti-Semitic belief in Germany held that Jesus and Christianity stood in complete opposition to Judaism; that is, Christianity represents “good” and Judaism represents “evil.” However, Nietzsche contests the German anti-Semitic movement of his time by interpreting Jesus and Christianity not as the opposite of Judaism, but rather, as its most refined expression. What Nietzsche finds egregious in Judaism, he finds even more so in Christianity. Whatever the anti-Semites detest about Judaism is actually more characteristic of their own Christianity. Furthermore, Nietzsche’s well-known observations about the contrast between master morality and slave morality also lead to misinterpretation. Ignorant and careless reading of Nietzsche by individuals motivated by hatred of Judaism such as the Nazis results in the false assumption that he was an anti-Semite or a Nazi who encouraged the Aryan master races to eradicate Jewish slave…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Age of Ideologies is a big part of the church history spanning from the year 1914-1989. Some of the most common ideologies that were viewed during this time were Nazism, Marxism, and Capitalism. In this essay one should be able to see how these ideologies effected the evangelical and ecumenical movements.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the time of The Bible and the creation of Adam and Eve, good and evil has existed in man. For example, in Mary Shelly novel, Frankenstein, the creature tells us that “is man, indeed, at once so powerful, so virtuous, and magnificent, yet so vicious and base? He appears at one time a mere scion of the evil principle and at another as all that can be conceived of noble and godlike.” He is questioning the existence of good and evil in all men. How can a person be good and bad at the same time? In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelly, the creature experience and proves how both good and evil exists in man.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality As Anti-Nature

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though many people at the time truly believed that the church provided them a great direction in life, Nietzsche strongly disagreed. Nietzsche believed that following a religion is to…

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nietzsche: the Conscience

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In his second essay of the Geneaology of Morals, Nietzsche attempts to identify and explain the origin of the conscience. He does not adopt the view of the conscience that is accepted by the “English Psychologists”, such as Bentham, J. Mill, J.S. Mill and Hume, as the result of an innate moral feeling. Rather, it is his belief that the moral content of our conscience is formed during childhood under the influence of society. Nietzsche defines the conscience as an introspective phenomenon brought about by a feeling of responsibility, in which one analyzes their own morality due to the internalization of the values of society. This definition holds the position that the conscience is not something innate to humans, rather it has arisen through evolution. In light of this, this paper will give insight into how Nietzsche reaches this conclusion, as well as what results from it. In order to do this there will be discussion of guilt, punishment, the will to power and implications from society.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we apply this scheme to Nietzsche's text, we can easily let the ironic question underlying it emerge. Simply, we have to substitute "Christian" with "man of culture", and the equation will remain the same. While Nietzsche is not criticizing the aim of becoming a man of culture, he is very hostile with the way German society expects people to pursue this ideal. Once again, he is critical of the way the social practices of his time make shape this ideal. Hence, it is not a lack of commitment what he is pointing at with his attack on Strauss' work, but rather to a misdirection in the German understanding of what culture is. Accordingly, by criticizing the exemplar of this misdirected way of becoming a man of culture, Nietzsche is attempting…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Me Centric World Analysis

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The word morality has grown to form a negative connotation created and provoked by the human race. As the world gradually yet continuously becomes depraved we begin to wonder if there is any “good” left in the world. If so, what would influence one to even care about being the good in this dark realm we all aimlessly wander in. In this “me-centric” world, morality has seemed to have completely vanished. The majority of moral acts are done for all of the wrong reasons. It is very rare to find a moral or good act done entirely out of selflessness and love expecting nothing in return. Unfortunately, men are desperately wicked and too weak to rely on only themselves alone, which is why the need for God is vital. This world is deprived of genuine,…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A religion can be seen as a unified system of beliefs and practices which are relative to sacred things and beliefs (Giddens 1972, p.224). It can shape ones thoughts and feelings and gives people a sense of hope and something to believe in. All three main sociologist writers Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim offer different perspectives on religion and how important it is to society. Some of the theorists chose to have a positive view whilst others argue the unimportance of religion. This essay attempts to discover which theorist has the most accurate perspective of religion in modern times. This is done by firstly explaining the basic ideas regarding to religion put forward by Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Then both Marx's and Durkheim's thought will be compared and contrasted in order to determine the differences and similarities between their ideas. Finally, it will be explained which one of the theorists views and ideas are the most relevant to contemporary times and why.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his work, Nietzsche introduces the concepts of Master and Slave Morality and with them, the problem of the Ascetic Ideal. Master morality is, in short, a morality of strength, individualism, and nobility that weighs actions on their consequences. Slave morality, on the other hand, values humility, sympathy, and kindness. It values actions based on whether their intent was one of “good” or “evil.” He links Slave morality to the moral codes of Christianity and emphasises that morality of “good” or “evil” is ultimately harmful. However, in modern times, Nietzsche believes that everyone experiences the struggle between Master and Slave morality.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays