Preview

How Did Montesquieu Change The World

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
966 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Montesquieu Change The World
Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron de Montesquieu, also known as Charles-Louis Montesquieu, was a very important philosophe of his time. Born in France to a rich family, he was then brought up by a poor family, which is why many say is the reason he had his way of viewing life. Montesquieu was a french philosopher who truly shaped modern government. But, to be able to shape the world so greatly, he had to study hard and develop all of his ideas. Montesquieu began studying in his home country, france, and studied in the university of Julily. Here, he went after what he was passionate about, and became a lawyer. From this point on, Montesquieu started developing ideas that would change the world forever.
Montesquieu was born into an era at the dawn of the eighteenth century where many countries in Europe were dealing
…show more content…
He argued that the best government would be one in which power was balanced among three groups of officials. He thought England - which divided power between the king-enforced laws, Parliament-made laws, and the judges of the English courts, interpreted laws- was a good model of this. Montesquieu called this idea the “separation of power” in which government was divided into three branches. He believed that separating government into three equal branches but with different powers was essential. That way, the government would avoid placing too much power on one individual or group of individuals. He wrote, "When the [lawmaking] and [law enforcement] powers are united in the same person... there can be no liberty." According to Montesquieu, each branch of government could limit the power of the other two branches. Therefore, no branch of the government could ever threaten to overthrow the freedom of the people. His ideas of separation would latter be used for a very important document that would change the Untied States

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron de Montesquieu was one of the greatest intellectuals in the Enlightenment Era. He had many good ideas about the world and how it works I say this because of his ideas of separation of power. Separation of power is when the executive, legislative and judicial powers of the government limit and control each other in a checks and balances system. Because each branch prevents the other from gaining too much power The state will have lasting freedom and strength. Our country has used this principle for the past 200 years, and we have remained strong. We have had no major rebellion against our leaders, save one, and we have remained a militarily and economically powerful country. And that is why I agree with…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Baron de Montesquieu also touches on the definition of a democracy, drawing inspiration form the Roman structure, “the body of people is possessed of the supreme power.” In The Spirt of Laws he also touches on the fact that similarities to Roman punishments enlighten other governments similarities to that of Rome. John Locke also touches on this separation of powers labeling then differently in The Two Treaties of Civil Government labeling then as legislative, executive, and federative…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brandy V Hrec

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Constitution is divided into separate chapters dealing separately with the parliament, executive and the Judicature. The "pure" doctrine of separation of powers prescribes that the functions of the three arms of government be clearly and institutionally…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Born November 12, 1746 in Beaugency France was a boy named Jacques Charles (Jacques). His nationality was French and his occupation was a physicist (“Jacques” Science). Charles began his professional life as a clerk in the French finance ministry (“Jacques” Science). He became interested in science when Benjamin Franklin visited France (Jacques). The only other information remaining about his childhood is he received a liberal education with no scientific focus (Jacques).…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist 47- In this paper, Madison is responding to the issue of having a federal government. He argues against the assumption that this new government will be allotted too much power and control America as an empire. In response, Madison writes that the U.S Constitution balances the government well by using the system of separation of powers among the executive, judiciary, and legislature. Madison also stated that these powers would blend and intertwine; however that would not affect the factor of separation of power. To support his argument, Madison referred to the writings of Montesquieu. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government concurrently holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other." He interprets this as a system that supports checks and balances. Overall, he responds by stating his views on separation of power and by stating checks and balances has been followed in individual state constitutions before, so it should be trusted now.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Constitution, it says that we must have 3 branches of government. Separation of powers. The federal government is separated into 3 branches, Executive, Judicial, and Legislative. Each branch has its own powers. No one can run the government by itself. This protects against tyranny by not allowing 1 person to rule over everything or to have too much power. There are checks and balances that prevent this from happening.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who lived from 1712 to 1778, was a man of many things. Rousseau was a composer, philosopher, and a writer in the 18th century. His political philosophy influenced the Enlightenment in France and across Europe, as well as aspects of the French Revolution and the overall development of modern political thought. Rousseau's also had ideas about education.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Government Branches

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The leaders of the states wanted a just and strong national government. And they also wanted to protect the peoples rights and freedom and prevent the government from taking advantage of its power. They believed they could do this by having three seperate branches of government; the Legislative, the Executive and the Judicial. This seperation is called in the first three sections, of the Constitution.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rene Descartes lived from 1596 to 1650. He was born in France, and went to a Jesuit primary school. He earned a law degree, but later on he began focusing on math and logic in the world. During the early 17th century, his ideas deviated more and more from previous philosophers. Because of this, he became known as “The Father of Modern Philosophy.” While some of his ideas weren’t completely original, his way of getting to them was. He believed in totally ignoring everything previous philosophers had done, and starting new, as if their work had never happened. He did not even trust his own emotions. He also believed that consciousness was the only truth in the world, leading to his most famous statement, “I think; therefore I am.” He also published several books, and despite his late entrance in the subject, and early death, he is still one of the most…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “While the colonies where under the ruling of King George and a monarchy with absolute power until 1776 when the colonies declared independence, they learned that this type of government was an unfair and oppressive system” (“The Colonies Under British Rule”). With the past leaderships in mind, the framers designed and wrote the constitution to distribute separation of powers; the three branches of government. Each branch was formed and given a certain set of responsibilities. A system known as Checks and Balances was put into order to ensure that one branch does not obtain more power over another. As time has progressed, the different branches have grown stronger as well. They work hand in hand to ensure that the country is running smoothly, and guarantees that the rights of the citizens are not…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The leaders of the state wanted a strong and fair national government. But they also wanted to protect individual freedoms and prevent the government from abusing its power. They believed they could do this by having three separate branches of government: The Executive, The Legislative and The Judicial. This separation is described in the first three articles, or sections of the constitution.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Building a New Nation

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When deciding how to build a government Montesquieu and Hume had ideas on how they thought the government should work. Montesquieu believed that a republic cannot exist well in large territories, you get to far removed and the political leaders end up getting to do whatever they want. Hume believed that a republic cannot exist in a small territory because the people will get caught up in the little problems and will lose sight of the big picture. He said that as long as we elect good leaders for the best outcome, it can work in a large society.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Montesquieu argument for the separation of powers, “he did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other” (270). In Federalist paper #48, describes how the Federal Constitution provides a defense through a blend of the branches of government. In class, we discuss that in order to make the separation of powers work there is a need to find a way that the legislative branch does not take power from the executive. He provides examples of Virginia and Pennsylvania in which the powers of the legislative were not protected against and the executive branch was usurped by the legislative. In class, we also discuss that there were three important things that prevent legislature to intimidate and control the behavior of the executive which means Congress controls over the President. First, elections which nor the president or the congress can control them, there are elected independently. Second, Salaries which means that there are fixed and cannot be altered, and finally the division of powers and the presidential veto, which it creates two different chambers the house and the…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussions brought up by thinkers such as John Locke, Voltaire, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau encouraged the political revolutionaries in the development of the birth of the rights of a man, beliefs of equality, freedoms, and liberalism. Along with it came the arrival of the “self-made” man, referring to the embracing of liberty of the individual and accepting radical views, creating another conflict with the values upheld by the monarchy.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Age Of Enlightenment

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gradually, complaints in the salons and coffee shops changed from idle whining into constructive political thought. They began to discuss substantive political and social philosophies of the day, and before long the French Enlightenment was born. From here, many highly influential political thinkers emerged during the Enlightenment. One of those was Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède and de Montesquieu. He was a political philosopher famous for his articulation of the theory of separation of powers, which is implemented in many constitutions around the world. Through his education and travels he became a sharp social commentator and thinker who gained the respect of his fellow philosophers with his masterwork The Spirit of Laws, which went on to have a major influence on English and American government. It was also during this time that the philosophes were denouncing Christianity with their nontraditional ways of thinking. They attacked the Church’s traditional idea of the “chain of being,” which implied a natural hierarchy of existence, and believed in a universe that was set in autonomous motion and never tampered with again. The philosophes also raised objections against the decadent lifestyles of leading Church representatives, as well as the Church’s persistence in…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays