How Did Milton Lose His Case?
Tiffin University
Problem Solution Analysis Paper
Submitted for
Course Number MGT 623
Legal and Ethical Issues in Management
Dr. Dave Ibarra
By:
Lauren M. Middleton
November 2nd, 2014
1. What does employment-at-will mean?
Employment at will essentially means that an employer can basically fire an employee for almost any reason, which includes no explainable reason at all, and employers are not legally guilty of any wrong for the discharge of employees under this policy. Halbert and Ingulli (2012) define employment-at-will as giving employers broad discretion to fire employees “for a good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all.”
2. In legal terms, why did Milton lose his case?
In legal terms, the reason that Milton lost his case is due to the fact that Maryland courts have recognized two reasons for exceptions to the use of the employment at will policy. "An individual cannot be fired for his or her refusal to violate any law or legal statute, and an individual cannot be terminated for faithfully exercising a specific legal right or duty” (Halbert & Ingulli, 2012). In essence, the court found that Milton was not asked, coerced, or ordered to violate any legal statute in the performance of his duties, and that there was no specific duty for Milton to report the activities of his organization …show more content…
Milton 's situation. This act prohibits employers from discharging employees in a retaliatory effort, due to the fact that an employee has either reported a violation of public policy or for the employee’s refusal to engage in activities that clearly are in violation of public policy. This act also includes compensation for wrongfully discharged employees in the form of lost wages and benefits, as well as punitive damages in some cases (Halbert & Ingulli,
Problem Solution Analysis Paper
Submitted for
Course Number MGT 623
Legal and Ethical Issues in Management
Dr. Dave Ibarra
By:
Lauren M. Middleton
November 2nd, 2014
1. What does employment-at-will mean?
Employment at will essentially means that an employer can basically fire an employee for almost any reason, which includes no explainable reason at all, and employers are not legally guilty of any wrong for the discharge of employees under this policy. Halbert and Ingulli (2012) define employment-at-will as giving employers broad discretion to fire employees “for a good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all.”
2. In legal terms, why did Milton lose his case?
In legal terms, the reason that Milton lost his case is due to the fact that Maryland courts have recognized two reasons for exceptions to the use of the employment at will policy. "An individual cannot be fired for his or her refusal to violate any law or legal statute, and an individual cannot be terminated for faithfully exercising a specific legal right or duty” (Halbert & Ingulli, 2012). In essence, the court found that Milton was not asked, coerced, or ordered to violate any legal statute in the performance of his duties, and that there was no specific duty for Milton to report the activities of his organization …show more content…
Milton 's situation. This act prohibits employers from discharging employees in a retaliatory effort, due to the fact that an employee has either reported a violation of public policy or for the employee’s refusal to engage in activities that clearly are in violation of public policy. This act also includes compensation for wrongfully discharged employees in the form of lost wages and benefits, as well as punitive damages in some cases (Halbert & Ingulli,