Preview

How Did Indira Gandhi Assassination Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1717 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Indira Gandhi Assassination Essay
One of the most shocking and gruesome murder of any time, an assassination to put it precisely, that of then Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi, by her own security guards who were supposed to protect her at the cost of their lives. KEHAR SINGH, BALBIR SINGH and SATWANT SINGH were the appellants who were charged for entering into conspiracy and committing murder of SMT. INDIRA GANDHI under section 302(murder), 120B(criminal conspiracy), 34(Act dome by several persons in furtherance of common intention), 107(abetment) and 109(punishment for abetment where no express provision is made) of the Indian Penal Code. The Court held that the murder of Mrs. Gandhi by the security guards is one of the rarest of the rare cases in which extreme penalty …show more content…
THE OPERATION BLUE STAR -
Operation blue star was a military operation which occurred between 3 June and 8 June 1984, ordered by the then Prime Minister Mrs.Indira Gandhi in order to establish control over the Harmandir Sahib Complex in Amritsar, Punjab, and remove Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and his armed followers from the complex buildings. Bhindranwale had earlier taken residence in Harmandir Sahib and made it his headquarters in April 1980.
The 'blue star operation' was not directed to cause damage to AKAL TAKTH. In addition, the CBI is considered responsible for seizing historical artifacts and manuscripts in the Sikh Reference Library, before burning it down. The military action led to an uproar amongst Sikhs worldwide and the increased tension following the action led to assaults on members of the Sikh community within India. Many Sikh soldiers in the Indian army mutinied, many Sikhs resigned from armed and civil administrative office and several returned awards and honours they had received from the Indian …show more content…
That operation resulted in loss of life and property as well as damage to the Akal Takht in the Golden Temple Complex, which greatly offended the religious feelings of some members of the Sikh community. Beant Singh (deceased) and Balbir Singh,Sub Inspectors and Satwant Singh, a constable of Delhi Police posted for security duty in the office of the deceased Prime Minister Smt. Indira Gandhi and Kehar Singh, an Assistant in the Directorate General of Supply and Disposal, New Delhi, who were sikhs by faith, had been expressing their resentment openly, holding Smt. Indira Gandhi responsible for the action taken at Amritsar. They met at various places and at various times to discuss and to listen to inflammatory speeches and recordings calculated to excite listeners and provoke them to retaliatary action against
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Battle Analysis Paper Takur Ghar
    • 2998 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Battle Analysis Paper Takur Ghar

    Bibliography: Executive Summary of the Battle of Takur Ghar, Released through the Department of Defense,…

    • 2998 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhow Far Do Sources 10, 11 and 12 Suggest That the Amritsar Massacre Created Widespread and Long-Lasting Hostility Among Indians Towards British Rule?
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhow Far Do Sources 10, 11 and 12 Suggest That the Amritsar Massacre Created Widespread and Long-Lasting Hostility Among Indians Towards British Rule?

    One view presented by the sources is that Indians did not like the British rule. The theme of hostility is presented in Source 11, where Gandhi writes in 1920 that the British are “evilly manned”, using strong words such as “dishonest” and “unscrupulous”, suggesting strong feelings of hostility towards British rule, as Gandhi feels as though the British are almost cheating the Indian people “with no regard to the wishes of the Indian people”, meaning the British are doing what they want without consulting the people they are ruling over. This source shows that the hostility felt by Indians was in fact widespread because it is written by Gandhi, a man who represented and was supported by a variety of people from all classes. This theme of hostility towards British is corroborated in Source 10 where the British are described as “irresponsible” and, like in Source 11, the Indians feel their “rights of human beings are being denied”, showing that the Indians again felt that the British were doing as they pleased without Indian voices being heard. However, as the source is written by Motilal Nehru, leader of the INC, it is difficult to say from this source that hostility was in fact widespread – Nehru only represents the INC which has the high caste community as a significant majority, and as it is written in 1919, we cannot be sure if the hostility was long-lasting as it is the same year as the massacre itself.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Other Side Of 9/11 Essay
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Other Side Of 9/11 Essay

    Balbir Singh Sodhi was shot and killed by Frank Roque, who stated he wanted to…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Far Do Sources 10, 11 and 12 Suggest That the Amritsar Massacre Created Widespread and Long-Lasting Hostility Among Indians Towards British Rule?
    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Far Do Sources 10, 11 and 12 Suggest That the Amritsar Massacre Created Widespread and Long-Lasting Hostility Among Indians Towards British Rule?

    Sources 10, 11 and 12 suggest that the Amritsar Massacre, the incident in which British troops under the order of General Dyer fired at a crowd of Indian protesters on the 13th April 1919, did create widespread and long-lasting hostility among Indians towards the British. Creating the British government to be portrayed as repressive and irresponsible. However, the alternative view presented by the sources is that Indians were not hostile towards the British, but they were in fact appreciative of their help and did not feel that they were repressive.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi's Assassination
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mahatma Gandhi's Assassination

    On January 30, 1948, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was assassinated by Nathuram Godse. As Godse walks up to Gandhi, he shoots him three times in the chest from three feet away (Trumball 1). As “the strongest influence for peace in India that this generation has known,” Gandhi did not deserve to be assassinated despite the beliefs of Godse (Trumball 1). Gandhi’s main goal was always to gain independence for India; to do this he undertook 17 fasts (Smith 2). The assassination of Mahatma Gandhi was unjust because he was a nonviolent world leader and he helped promote peace between different religious groups within India; however, others may believe that he was to blame for the separation of India.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi essayedited
    • 1019 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gandhi essayedited

    There is the constant Hindu idea that social duty and obligation are far more important than personal desires.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Double Personalities In British Armed Force
    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page

    Double Personalities In British Armed Force

    These sorts of occurrences demonstrate the double personalities of Indian officers in British armed force. From one viewpoint they are showing themselves as cutting edge and faithful towards their occupation, however then again their regard and yearning for their way of life does not enable them to move toward that path. In this regarding life, is there any point to it circumstance, their actual characters are isolated which brings about their divided presence.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Amritsar Massacre - Summary
    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Amritsar Massacre - Summary

    Amritsar Massacre or “Jallianwala Bagh massacre’’, as it took place in on the 13th of April 1919 in Jallianwala Bagh garden in Amritsar, a city located in the north of India. General Reginald Edward Dyer had announced before 13 April that ‘’ any processions or gatherings of four men will be looked upon and treated as an unlawful assembly and dispersed by force of arms if necessary’’ (Cavendish, R., 2009). In the enclosed compound were about 5000 to 20 000 Indians according to different sources(Bose, P., & Lyons, L.,1999) They were in fact protesting peacefully against the “Rowlatt act” concerning the right of appeal for the people involved in seditious activities. Dyer placed the military vehicles in front of the only door of the garden and ordered the shooting of all the unarmed civilians. The shooting lasted until the British armed men ran out of ammunition. In fact, the military used approximately 1650 rounds of ammunition, killing 379 civilians and wounding 1136 others (Bose, P., & Lyons, L., 1999). The Amritsar Massacre is considered as a major turning point that led the British government to consider the possible independence of the Indian State as the massacre became source of controversies between the British officials and the Indian nationalists. All sources state clearly that the British government condemned the massacre and qualified it as ‘’unbritish’’. Churchill declared that the massacre was 'an extraordinary event, a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation'. Dyer, standing before the commission charged of investigating the massacre, declared that he acted according to the rule of law, by engaging more precisely the ‘’minimum force’’ policy of public-order (Doyle, 2011). Subsequently, he also justified his action by the fact that the Indian nationals were defying the British authorities, and his action…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi Obituary
    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gandhi Obituary

    Following the Amritsar massacre, in which over 400 Indian peaceful protestors were killed by British soldiers, Gandhi wrote his report of the Punjab Congress Committee, which encouraged Indians to withdraw themselves from anything associated with Britain.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    General Dyer Analysis
    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    General Dyer Analysis

    Jury and people of the court, there comes a difference between a warning and an attack. There also comes a difference between an attack and a massacre. General Reginald Dyer however, was unaware of these lines that could be crossed. The day in question was April 13th, 1919. A Sunday. It was in the public garden known as Jallianwala Bagh, in Amritsar India. The 13th was the day of the Sikh Baisakhi Festival, where thousands of people gathered to celebrate. However, a few days prior, Amritsar was put under martial law, where from there, General Dyer banned all meetings and gatherings in the city. However, word of this news hadn't spread, and many came unaware of the new law passed. General Dyer, after hearing the news, then sent out troops…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Amritsar Massacre Committed by the British
    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Amritsar Massacre Committed by the British

    The Amritsar Massacre took place on April 13th 1919. It was committed by the British, who were colonized in India from the 1600’s to 1945. Before the Amritsar massacre, there was tension between Indian civilians and the British colonies for decades. This caused protests, mostly peaceful, throughout India. In March of 1919 the British passed the Rowlatt Act, invading the Indians privacy and decreasing their rights. On April 6th leaders of a peaceful protest against the Rowlatt Bill were arrested followed. This caused riots by the followers of the Indian protest leaders.The Massacre changed many Indians feeling toward the British Empire in India. The Indians were treated with little respect from the British, the Indians’ behavior by leading protests against British rule was taken too seriously by the British. The Indians’ actions and behaviors should not have resulted in the Amritsar Massacre. After the massacre, India thought that the British Rulers ruled with disrespect; therefore, India’s relationship with Great Britain was damaged. Over the years, tensions have risen between them. This was the last straw for Indians. Indians wanted an independent government. The Indian National Congress stepped in to gain independence and justice for India. It took several decades but after the intelligence and convincing of strong leaders, like Mohandas Gandhi and Chandra Bose, and civil disobedience, India finally gained independence in 1945.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    History and Experience of the Sikh Diaspora in the United States
    • 3231 Words
    • 13 Pages

    History and Experience of the Sikh Diaspora in the United States

    Falcone, J. “Seeking Recognition: Patriotism, Power and Politics in Sikh American Discourse in the Immediate aftermath of 9/11”, Diaspora 15.1 (2006): 89-119…

    • 3231 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi Paper
    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gandhi Paper

    “An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind” (Gandhi). It seems like I’ve heard this quote a million times in my lifetime, but the meaning behind it didn’t set in until now. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was a world renowned political and spiritual leader and arguably one of the most influential people of all time. He pioneered ‘satyagraha’, the resistance of tyranny through non-violence and believed in and stood by this even in the most extreme circumstances. His actions not only led to Indian independence, but it sparked the civil rights movement here in America and Nelson Mandela used Gandhi’s non-violent methods to help end apartheid in South Africa. These weren’t the only situations where non-violence succeeded either, Khan Abdule Ghaffar Khan, Steve Biko, Aung San Suu Kyi and Benigno Aquino, Jr. used Gandhi’s non-violent tactics to win out over their enemies. Aquino even succeeded in freeing his Philippine people from the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos. All of these victorious situations show us that non-violence does work, but only in certain circumstances. I could be naïve and say that non-violence is a plausible solution to the world’s problems today, but I’d be lying to you and to myself as well; and in the following paragraphs I’m going to elaborate on my views.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Research Paper On Sikhism
    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Research Paper On Sikhism

    On another occasion, the year 1984 marked the Blue Star Operation. Following claims of two Sikhs of killing the Indian Prime Minister, an attack was launched on the Golden Temple by the Indian army. With no legal due process, young Sikh boys were arrested and killed from the Punjab villages. These activities saw most of the young men migrate from their villages to escape arbitrary arrest and torture. Some of them also migrated for economic…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Massacre of Arwal
    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Massacre of Arwal

    The massacre of Arwal is described by many as a post-independence Jallianwala Bagh, and justly so, in our opinion, say the two judges, while presenting a blow account of the felony committed by the State against the poor and landless in Arwal. The report on Arwal massacre was submitted by the Indian Peoples Human Right Tribunal which came into existence on January 10,1987. Two members of the Tribunal, Justic T.U. Mehta and Justice P.S. Potti inquired into the Arwal incident. The y went to the place of the incident and made on the spot inquires, they heard and recorded evidence from eyewitnesses to the incident and from the persons who had gone there immediately after the killings, including journalists, politicians, lawyers and other public spirited persons. They held sitting in Patna, Delhi and Arwal where they invited the state government and its officials to come to depose before them and to cross examine those who appeared as witnesses before them. The tribunal which began its work in January 1987, formally submitted its report on July30,1987. The report which is now available in print runs into 92 pages, and is a damning indictment of the Bihar Administration whose leaders and minios show up as a gang of criminals, liars, forgers and frauds, who have no respects for any of the decencies and norms of civilized life. In any civilized society where justice prevails and the rule of law is practiced, all of them should have been serving life-terms. But in Bihar , where these dregs of society are in control of the state, they have succeeded in criminalizing the entire state establishment and in letting loose state violence against the poor and the downtrodden with a brazenness that has few parallels in history.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics