Preview

How Did Barbarossa Influence The Relationship Between Germany And Italy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2222 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Barbarossa Influence The Relationship Between Germany And Italy
During his thirty-eight year reign, which was characterised by his attempts to develop, maintain and restore imperial traditions, Frederick I Barbarossa adopted a number of different approaches. His methods in both Germany and Italy were founded on feudal ideology. In Germany, he was pragmatic and realistic, following a policy of collaboration in order to establish peace and revive the imperial authority that had been lost during the Investiture Struggle. This differed from his approach in Italy, where he sought to restore the old imperial rights, and had the methodology and mind-set of an idealistic reactionary. Furthermore, his actions in both of these countries were influenced and at times determined by his relations with the Papacy and foreign powers such as the Normans in southern Italy. Frederick’s practical approach to the problems of government in Germany is evident in his initial actions following his designation by his dying uncle Conrad III. During the Investiture Contest, a new nobility had emerged, consisting of nobles who had usurped the royal rights and lands that the king could not attend to. Unlike other contemporary monarchs, Frederick did not pursue an anti-feudal policy as this was not tenable in Germany. He acknowledged …show more content…
While he succeeded in capturing Rome in 1167, his army was decimated by a malaria epidemic and he was unable to undertake the planned conquest of Sicily. A significant development occurred in 1167, when the ‘league of Verona’ which had been formed in 1164, expanded into an alliance of sixteen cities. This was the Lombard League (Societas Lombardie), which was founded on the basis of military and diplomatic co-operation in pursuance of the recovery of the independence of the communes. The league, beginning in April 1167, reconstructed Milan when the emperor was absent in Germany - where he remained for the next six

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the case of Spain, during the Middle ages Spain was under Muslim power until the final expulsion in the 15th century. In the 11th century, a small Christian Spanish Kingdoms started to take to offensive against the Muslim. By the end of the twelve century, Spain was consulted in four different kingdoms: Castle, Aragon, Navarre and Portugal. Castle and Aragon were the two strongest Spanish Kingdoms. In the other hand, Germany and Italy did not create a centralized kingdom because of their weak kings. In Germany, the kings had come to rely on their ability to control the church and elect bishops and abbots as royal administrators. Frederick I tried to create a new kind of empire where Italy might be added as a appendage. He wanted to incorporate Rome and the Papal States into his empire. He had difficulties and finally failed. Frederick II was King of Sicily and King of Germany, and his goal was to establish a centralized state in Italy. Italy was divided in three: the papal states, the kingdom of Sicily and the republic of Venice. The northern Italy cities and the papal states did not want to give their…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The early modern era marked an important watershed for the development of the modern state. Louis XVI of France and Fredrick the great elector of Brandenburg-Prussia are exemplars of an absolutist monarch, but the similarities and differences in their approach would have far-reaching consequences for Europe as a whole. The first important aspect of centralization was the consolidation of the military. Both Louis and Fredrick reformed and reorganized their armies, commissioning new weapons, uniforms and organizational systems, continuing the trend towards professionalization and expansion. There were differences in the degree of focus on the army – Frederick utilized more resources relative to those available to him; however, overall the method of reform for the army was similar for both these absolutist monarchs, whom wished…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two despots underwent years of brutal wars with their neighboring countries in order to expand their territories. Half a year after Frederick II became…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourteenth century was a era of crisis. A “little ice” age led to famine, but a greater disaster followed:…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frederick the Great, along with his militaristic father, took Prussia from a dwindling spectator along the sidelines of European powers, and placed it on the top. Using his sheer militaristic nature, and the training and discipline of his army, Frederick the Great conquered many of the European armies. His actions lead to the development of the Prussian army. This army would have great influences all the way to World War I.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Austria-Hungary Imperialism

    • 4593 Words
    • 19 Pages

    - He wanted to be the pilot of European affairs, as a strong force of…

    • 4593 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Barbarossa faced different challenges in Germany as he did in Italy, warranting the use of different approaches to the situations. In Germany he faced a divided country at war with itself, with his House being right in the centre, battling with the next most influential House. His decision to cut his losses as such, by his feudal policy and with legitimising such fiefs as those which had already been taken, not with his permission, nor the permission of any king, but at the insistence of the nobles who claimed them. These newly landed nobles took advantage of the situation during the Investiture Struggle in which anarchy descended within Germany due to the existence on two 'Kings'. Barbarossa's intelligent decision not to re-open this closed wound by claiming back the land and titles that had been unlawfully taken, and instead, by legitimising them, created a peace within Germany and gained him valuable allies within his own Vassals, allies whom he would need for his campaign in Italy to be a…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Euro Notes

    • 17286 Words
    • 70 Pages

     Milan taken over by signor (which is a tyrant) • Under control of the Condottiero (mercenary) Sforza- Significant because after this, a few wealthy families dominated Venice (e.g. Medici)…

    • 17286 Words
    • 70 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outline 31.1

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    i. In Italy, Mussolini used his new, modern military to pursue his own imperialist ambitions.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Emperor Fredrick Wilhelm had to give up portions of Prussia’a territory, yet, due to the pressure by the other great powers. Still it had the chance of rebuilding and unifying much quicker than with a large and divided…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many similarities exist between German fascism, or Nazism, and Italian fascism. For example, both fascist movements were brought into power after facing very similar problems. One of the major problems that both countries encountered was a post-war economy teeming with instability. Germany's fragile economy was undermined by widespread unemployment, hyperinflation, and burdensome reparation payments, while Italy's economy was just as delicate. In addition, the Great Depression brought both countries even further into economic collapse. Another problem that brought about fascism in the two countries was post-war peace settlements, especially the Versailles Treaty. While the Germans were exasperated by the exorbitant reparation payments forced upon them by the Allies, the Italians felt betrayed by the peace settlements for denying them the territory and status they deserved. Another problem that the two countries faced was their dissatisfaction with their existing governments. Many Germans were disgruntled with the Weimar Republic for signing the humiliating Treat of Versailles, while many Italians were apprehensive of the chaos within their parliamentary regime. Lastly, widespread fear of revolutionary upheaval and the expropriations of a Communism system also caused many Germans and Italians to identify with fascism.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Absolutism Essay Example 7

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One common trait of an absolutist government is a single dominate monarch that rules the entire Nation. The absolute monarch needed to have complete control; however, the upper class tended to want to share some of the power. A strong monarch would then have to find a way to increase his power and weaken the nobles. In France Cardinal Richelieu’s power was contested by the Huguenot party. He quickly eliminated their political and military power while he let them keep their religious authority. He also sent out spies to determine if any nobles were trying to conspire against him. He also sent out officials to other provinces to enforce his laws. Lewis IV of France followed up on Richelieu’s practices by taking high offices away from nobles that he believed were gaining too much power. Fredrick William the great of Prussia decided that the best way to keep control was to give the aristocrats positions as officials in his bureaucracy. This gave them enough power that they would be satisfied, but not enough to overthrow him. Since Austria consisted of several different States, Leopold I kept control of Austria by allowing the local and regional governments set laws in their areas, and that they would yield to his authority in any matters that dealt…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War on the Western Front

    • 9546 Words
    • 39 Pages

    Germany and Italy had aggressive, expansionist foreign policy aims, stemming from their fascist ideologies – created an atmosphere of fear and tension in Europe…

    • 9546 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Germany’s obvious political and military ally in Europe was Italy. The Italians had been governed by a fascist regime under Benito Mussolini since 1925. Italian fascism was very much the elder brother of Nazism, a fact Hitler himself acknowledged. Yet for all their ideological similarities, the relationship between Hitler and Mussolini was bumpy and complex. The alignment of their two countries was consequently not as firm as many anticipated. By the late 1930s Germany and Italy had become military allies – however their priorities were still with their own national interests, rather than supporting the interests or ambitions of another country. The union between Nazi Germany and fascist Italy became a marriage of convenience and expedience, rather than a firm alliance of sister states.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays