Preview

How Did Alexander II Change Russian Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
460 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Alexander II Change Russian Society
Alexander II Nikolayevich became emperor of Russia in March 1855 after the death of his father Nicholas I. Regarded to many historians as the ‘Great Reformer’, Alexander II was believed to have transformed Russia and to because one of the greatest reformers in Russian history. He managed to emancipate the serfs and bring about reforms in education, military, justice, censorship and the economy. Despite all of this Russian society was unsatisfied, ultimately leading to the assassination attempts that ended his reign. In this essay I will be highlighting some of the main changes to the Russian society, then I will be talking about what remained and finally I will conclude.
One of the most impactful changes to Russian society during Alexander
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Did Alexander II Improve The Conditions For Russian Jews
    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Alexander II Improve The Conditions For Russian Jews

    Much like those in Germany, Russian Jews benefited from new freedoms granted in the mid-1800s. Over time they were supplied with the opportunity’s to hold middle-class occupations like business ownership, banking, teaching and manufacturing. This however was met with anger from some non-Jewish Russians, however violence was not used. Sadly, the situation for Russian Jews worsened considerably after the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881. Alexander had been of great assistance to the Jews, with some of his reforms improving conditions for Russia’s Jews. It was found Alexander was murdered by socialist revolutionaries, however many Russians considered socialism and anarchism to be Jewish inventions –therefore meaning the Russian Jews…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Alexander II Support The Development Of Russia And Serfs
    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did Alexander II Support The Development Of Russia And Serfs

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Russia in 1894 was unrecognisable from the Russia inherited by Alexander III in 1881. How far do you agree with this statement?
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Russia in 1894 was unrecognisable from the Russia inherited by Alexander III in 1881. How far do you agree with this statement?

    One thing that had changed in Russia from when Alexander had come into power in 1881 was that there was increased repression regarding politics. The Statue of State Security was introduced which brought government-controlled courts into the country and could now put on trial political opponents and they could also be arrested too without the need of a jury. This shows change as a lot harsher punishments were introduced that could be imposed on opponents of the government such as being sent to and exiled in Siberia and being hunted down by the Okhrana – Russia’s secret police. Although there was repression of political opponents before Alexander III’s reign, the punishment wasn’t as harsh and the violence that was encouraged by extremist groups was a lot more widespread and happened regularly compared to when Alexander III had introduced the Statue of State Security where attacks were something that didn’t happen as often. Therefore, it contributes to the idea that Russia was unrecognisable in 1894 compared with 1881.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 27 Review
    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Chapter 27 Review

    1: Russian society between 1815 and 1860 was full of reforms and a shifting government, all which led up to Alexander II who was responsible for many reforms.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Successful Was Czar Nicholas's Rule In Russia
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Successful Was Czar Nicholas's Rule In Russia

    Under Nicholas, the people suffered from his draconian policies, inciting a series of revolts. The Czar’s significance comes from his role in starting the Russian Revolution, which ended a backwards Russian Empire and created the Soviet Union, a state that influenced the world today. A person today can learn from the Czar’s mistakes and use them in daily life; for example, one can learn to listen to the problems of others before making a major…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain why opposition to Russian Governments was so rarely successful throughout the period 1855-1964
    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Explain why opposition to Russian Governments was so rarely successful throughout the period 1855-1964

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    How Did Alexander II Impact The Russian Czars
    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did Alexander II Impact The Russian Czars

    After the three partitions of Poland in 1772, 1793, and 1795, there were many more Jews in the Russian empire. The Pale of Settlement was a region in imperial Russia where the Jews were given permanent dwelling. The leaders of Russia were called Czars and they had complete power over the entire empire. This essay will discuss three Russian Czars, Nicholas I, Alexander II, and Alexander III and the impact they had on the Jews. The different levels of tolerance of these Czars to the Jews greatly influenced the quality of Jewish life at the time.…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was the defeat of the Crimean war Alexander’s excuse for change.
    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To what extent was the defeat of the Crimean war Alexander’s excuse for change.

    The defeat in the Crimean war was arguably the main reason why Alexander II made a series of reforms when he came into power. The devastating loss of the war proved the backwardness of Russia in relation to other powers and even though peasant unrest and the criticisms of serfdom were partially responsible for influencing Alexander II, the decision to make changes primarily came from the loss of the Crimean war.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did Tsar Alexander 1 Influence The Growth Of Russia
    • 3013 Words
    • 13 Pages

    How Did Tsar Alexander 1 Influence The Growth Of Russia

    Tsar Alexander I, an intelligent, handsome, benevolent, and aspiring leader ascended onto the Russian throne in 1801 to become one of Russia’s greatest reformers and military leaders. The Tsar who defeated the French Empire was profoundly influenced by their domestic and foreign affairs, leading his vision of Russia to enhance and protect the revolutionary ideals of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution. Initially open-minded to these western philosophies Alexander was inspired by his role models to spread these ideas, therefore becoming a “European” rather than just a Russian ruler. Thomas Jefferson who thought quite highly of Alexander, wrote from Monticello in 1806,…

    • 3013 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Tsarist and Soviet Regimes: Terror and Repression during 1855-1964
    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Tsarist and Soviet Regimes: Terror and Repression during 1855-1964

    Alexander ll became Tsar in 1855 after succeeding Tsar Nicholas l and was regarded as a “liberator” throughout his time as Tsar, until an attempted assassination attempt on him in 1866 were he turned more reactionary. Alexander ll was assassinated in March 1881, he was not radical and believed in a slow and progressive change, due to this he gathered much opposition to him and was eventually killed by The Peoples Will, and this kicked off ‘the era of great reforms’ [5].…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Draft ESSAY
    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Draft ESSAY

    An aspect of the Soviet Union that changed between 1801 and 1939 was the shift of the government from a czar ruled totalitarian government to a more distributed communist government. In March of 1801, Paul I was killed and his son Alexander I of Russia was appointed the ruler. Czar Alexander I was not too harsh of a leader. He led a government that was not too strict upon its people unlike his father. But this changed when the next czar came into power, Nicholas I in 1825. Anybody who was leading or supporting the Decembrist Revolt was executed. Nicholas I undid everything that Alexander I did. He censored media, ran secret police, and exiled 150,000 people. Alexander II was the next one in power who was extremely different from Nicholas I. He freed the serfs but did not let them leave. But he did allot power to the people by creating local councils called Zemstvos to give them control of their land and women the right to vote. Alexander III went back into a strict totalitarian government, censoring media and deploying secret police. Alexander III also wanted all Russian minorities to speak Russian and convert to Russian Orthodox. Russian Jews were specifically targeted; they had to live in ghettos and eventually many Jews fled to the United States. The last of the czars in this time period, Nicholas II, came into power in 1894. A decade after his appointment, over three thousand workers grouped outside the czar’s palace asking for reforms. The czar was not home, but he still did not approve the order to fire at the protestors. In order to bring back his name, he enabled a national assembly called Duma that would allow the people of Russia to elect. As one of his reforms, he gave more land to…

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ss notes
    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ss notes

    TIME LINE 1855-1881 Alexander II established the zemstvos: a form of local self government First Russian westernization attempt 1861- Emancipation of Serf: was incomplete serfs were left to pay for their land… redemption payments Mir: village community 1863-1864 reforms of law, education and local government 1881 Alexander II assassinated 1881-1894 Alexander III instituted an era of repression and reaction denounced democracy, free press blood revolution police force Okharana 1891 famine • crops failed and there were no reserves; Russia had great famine The Witte System: Railroads, Industry, Tax the Peasants He wanted to expand Russian industry and develop its economy Building railroads will stimulate the growth of other industries Results of Witte System: o Growth of industry at 8% per year…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is It Better To Abolish Serfdom In Russia
    • 2133 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Why Is It Better To Abolish Serfdom In Russia

    Some may argue that Emancipation was an ultimately successful endeavour as it brought about both fundamental and necessary change, and whilst it is true that there were various factors that ensured the development of Russia from a backward thinking and archaic nation that relied very much on what was -in flourishing western countries – a repressive and outdated feudal system, the ill-considered and very evidently selfish way in which this much needed reform was executed meant that despite some factors, from which the development and modernisation of Russia’s class system itself were enabled, for Alexander II were exactly the opposite of what he had been attempting to achieve, in increasing his chances of retaining power by preventing revolution and furthering Russia’s position within the world. For this reason it is difficult to claim Emancipation was a success in terms of what the clearly power-conscious Tsar set out to accomplish, when many of its key aspects were redundant and others provided a catalyst for consideration of concepts of political activism or further revolution, an unwanted and unanticipated advancement,…

    • 2133 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy
    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Last of the Romanovs
    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The Last of the Romanovs

    The first person to impact the fall of Imperial Russia was Nicholas II, the last Russian Emperor. In particular, Nicholas’ coronation marked the beginning of a downward spiral for the Romanov family. Tsar Nicholas II was born on May 6, 1868 and was the eldest son of Alexander III (Levykin, 1999). Nicholas II had to assume the throne earlier than the Russian population would have liked. Nicholas’ father fell ill in the spring of 1894 and his health never fully recovered. On October 20th, 1894, Alexander III died of nephritis, forcing Nicholas to become the next Tsar of Russia at a young age (Lincoln, 1976). After the untimely death of his father, Nicholas was in dismay about becoming Tsar of Russia, a position he never really wanted. This is exemplified when Nicholas II refers to being the Tsar as, “the awful job I have feared all my life” (Massie, 1967, p. 59). To further Nicholas’ fears, the Russian people and government believed he didn’t have enough political training to rule Russia effectively (Harcave, 1968).…

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics