Preview

How Are Ministers Made Accountable In Parliament? (15 Marks)

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
387 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Are Ministers Made Accountable In Parliament? (15 Marks)
How are ministers made accountable in parliament? (15 marks)

Accountability in parliament is the stem of the fundamentals of democracy; it is how we know that the ministers within the party we elect are doing their job correctly and to make sure the minister becomes responsible for any misdeeds or faults while practicing his/her profession. One of the most obvious forms of rendering out the faults of individual ministers is parliamentary scrutiny or to be more specific questions to ministers. Departments take it in turns to answer questions were ministers need to answer questions to see how well they know what they are doing and acknowledge the slipups in their plans. The idea of question time is that the opposition may seek out flaws in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the main functions of backbench MPs is scrutinize the government and hold them to account via different ways, and it is this function which proves them to be highly effective. Their role in Parliament ensures and strengthens the democratic legitimacy of the executive, thus giving government the authority and right to exercise political power. Another key role of backbench MPs is to act as cross-section of the larger society and therefore represent their interests in Parliament. However, the increase of power held by the government further supports the Burkean view that an “elective dictatorship” has formed considerably in the UK political system. In addition to this, many people have argued that backbench MPs have limited power in actually calling the government to account due to the party system, which ensures that MPs are dictated by ministers and party whips – who use persuasive methods (the promise of promotions or the threat of expulsion/demotion) reduce the effectiveness within the political system. There are both arguments for and against the effectiveness of backbench MPs, however it is debatable as to which outweighs the other.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    M1 – Explain in detail the responsibilities of the different levels of government in the UK…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Studies 3/4 Notes

    • 9289 Words
    • 38 Pages

    The Principle of Responsible Government • Our government is answerable and accountable to parliament, therefore to the people • It must act fairly and responsibly • If it doesn't it will lose the support of the parliament/people and it will be forced to resign/not be renewed for a another term • Ministers/MP’s are responsible to parliament, therefore the people • It needs the support of the lower house to stay as the government Responsible government refers to the concept that ministers and their leaders (premier/pm) are answerable to the parliament, and therefore the people, for their actions. The government is chosen by having the support of the lower house of parliament; if the government loses the confidence of parliament and the people it must resign. The government must act fairly and responsibly in their decision making and law-making. Sample Answer: Responsible government refers to the principle that ministers and their leaders (premiers/prime ministers) are answerable to the parliament, and therefore the people, for their actions. The government is chosen by having the support of the lower house of parliament; if the government loses the confidence of the parliament and the people it must resign. This ensures that the government must act fairly and responsibly in their decision making and law making.…

    • 9289 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are different ways that MPs hold the government to account; there are debates, select committees and questions, however there are many reasons in which these methods can be seen as ineffective. Accountability is forcing the government and it’s ministers to justify their policies, for opposition parties’ accountability may imply alternatives to the proposals of the government.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Commons can scrutinise the executive in a number of ways. Prime Ministers Question Time, occurring for half an hour every…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first sign that the Coalition has changed the relationship between the Executive and the Legislature would be the rising effectiveness and opportunity of scrutiny. Parliament’s role of scrutinizing the government has become extensive with the lack of majority in the House of Commons. With a majority in the government, MPs would usually support the governing party and there was less elbowroom for criticism. Parliamentary scrutiny has become most effective through Prime Minister’s question time, where the Parliament have a chance to hold the executive accountable every Wednesday, and The Wrights Reforms, brought about in 2010. This has made it harder for the government to pass legislation, as they can no longer use the select committees to ease the passage of legislation. The Wrights reforms changed the appointment of chairs of departmental and select committees to being elected by MPs rather than appointed by the Prime Minister. This has freed the select committees from the control of the whips and manipulation by the government. An example of the effectiveness would be when Theresa May faced difficult…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly backbench MPs allow the current government to be made accountable to the electorate. Backbenchers can take part in scrutinising opposition, or even their own parties, during events such as the Prime Minister’s Question Time, where, for an allocated time, the PM is asked questions concerning anything. Select committees can also be used to scrutinise. For example the head of the Public Bills committee is always headed by a member of the opposition, currently Margaret Hodge. This is to ensure that they are effective and non-corrupted. Although MPs have the power to dissolve the current government, through a vote of no confidence (last one in 1979), MPs that standalone against their party by having controversial or independent thoughts on an issue, then they are brought into line by party whips which could result in having an MP who does not represent you adequately. It shows that MPs achieve more together.…

    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Prime Minister

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    He/She chairs cabinet meetings and has the powers to call consensus in such meetings. The lack of security of tenure among cabinet ministers means that any cabinet minister deemed hostile to the Prime Minister can be fired (Savoie, 2009). Therefore the cabinet ministers have no incentive to revolt or stand their ground against the Prime Minister especially when it is only a small number of cabinet ministers holding an opinion contrary to that of the Prime Minister. Therefore, Savoie, (2000) argues that ministerial powers do not flow from the ministers but from the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister also appoints many office bearers who are responsible for providing checks and balances to his government. This includes officers such as the Auditor General, and governor of the Bank of Canada.…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Canadian Senate Essay

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Canadian Senate has often been referred to as the sober second thought. The house of commons was originally set up to have two chambers, the upper and the lower, to carefully decide Canadian laws. The Senate, in the upper house, reviews proposed legislation and ultimately decides whether a bill becomes a law. They are responsible for protecting the interests of Canadians, in all regions, and of all minorities.1 Recently however, there has been a big concern for more accountability. Many…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reinstating an upper house will further address apprehensions about legislative oversight. The introduction of a second chamber introduces an essential step for the enactment of legislation where it is a requirement for legislation it be permitted and approved by a second body of representatives (Aroney, 2008). This process enables more scrutiny and empowers a diverse quality of debate not only within the chamber but amongst media outlets, powerful framers of political action who provide the technological potential for interaction between the public and government (Althaus et al.,2007). Queensland’s LNP has been accused by Bob Katter’s Australian Party for their abuse of the system after controversial bikie and sex offender laws were rushed through parliament without scrutiny (ABC Premium News, 2013). Professor Nicholas Aroney from the University of Queensland articulates that reinstating an upper house would prevent issues like these happening in the future (ABC Premium News, 2013). The standard image of a responsible government proposes a chain of accountability (Althaus et al., 2007). Through the ability to analyse and review legislation upper houses have the capability to conduct inquiries and question ministers. This supports Aroney’s view that upper houses provide a very important layer of…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 1867, the Parliament of Canada has been the heart of Canada’s democracy. In fact, Parliament is the legislative branch of government in Canada with the lower house being the elected House of Commons and the upper house being the Senate. In Parliament, issues of the day are examined, the government is held accountable, and policies and laws are decided on. Although Canada has been a democracy for the last 150 years, Canada’s political institutions are in need of reform as distortion in representation at the House of Commons as well as the effectiveness of the senate are undermining Canada’s democracy. To be able to understand the extent of the issues in the legislative branch of government, it is important to know how each chamber operates…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Accountability Formation

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The dictionary states that the meaning of the word accountability is “the state of being accountable, liable, or answerable”. This means to me that if I don’t hold accountability for all my gear than I am not doing my duty as a soldier. Holding accountability for my gear is important for many different reasons in fact. For one if anything were to happen to my gear I am held sole responsible for it. Also if it is stolen or ruined for my lack of accountability and due to my actions the company is held back from doing their duties or even I completing mine, I would also be the one held accountable for the hold back. If the gear was stolen I would need to pay for it and it wouldn’t be anyone else’s fault except my own, even if it were simply damaged I would need to replace and/or fix as swiftly as possible to complete my duties so that I am not the one holding back others. Specially with it coming so close to leaving on a mission it is crucial that I hold exceptional accountability for my gear for I would not want to be the sole reason for a glitch in the mission before even leaving, with everyone working so hard to get ready to leave and to have everything in working condition in order for the mission to hopefully go off without a hitch. Being accountable for my gear is to be dependable. Being dependable in keeping track of all my gear so that I am ready for anything that would be needed of me at any time, rather it’s from my country, my superiors, or my fellow soldiers. It is also crucial for me to hold accountability for my gear being a specialist I am setting an example for other soldiers below me and for me not to hold that accountability it doesn’t make me look like a very good role model to look upon in time of need, for any reason. Showing accountability is also a duty for me as a soldier to keep track of all of my gear. If my equipment was taken they could of tampered with the gear and then given it back with me not…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    what is Accountability?

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Accountability is often used synonymously with such terms as answerability, responsibility, liability and other terms associated with accountability. As an aspect of governance, it has been central to discussions related to problems in both the public and private (corporation) worlds. At its root, accountability involves either the expectation or assumption of account-giving behavior. For some people it is extremely hard to take accountability for their actions. They refuse to take responsibility for what they have done. As a child our parents teach us that when we do something wrong we are punished for it. As adults we are less prone to take that responsibility if we do something wrong, be it at work or at home.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Accountability in Army

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First, what is accountability? Accountability comes from the term accountable, which by definition means “subject to the obligation to report, explain, or justify something” or…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power in theory in this system should lie with the commons and the chamber as they should be able to voice their opinions, and fight the policies of government properly but obviously parliamentary control does limit this a huge amount as how can this be true if a party does control power the opposition will be outnumbered and effectively be a lame duck and completely pointless. It means that parliament and the mps who are not inn government or the majority party have to literally sit there and can no longer really help their constituents on the issues that matter to them this certainly limits parliaments main function especially in opposition parties in particular. Secondly there is the argument that in politics and the majority party in particular there is a certain do as your told attitude, there is no more free thinking in parliament on a large scale anymore, mps are merely there to toe the party line as they cannot really step out of line as they may be deselected at the next election. This is a huge threat to there jobs basically but is very effective on behalf of the large party as it means that party whips will have to be used less, as most people in the party know that if they want to go far into the executive then they basically must…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays