Preview

House of Lords- Require a Reform?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3936 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
House of Lords- Require a Reform?
QUESTION

“…reform of the House of Lords remains unfinished business. There are still 92 hereditary peers sitting in the Lords. But ending the anomaly, in the Government’s view, does not go far enough to ensure that Britain’s second chamber is fit to meet the demands and expectations of this century. The legitimacy and authority of the second chamber continued to be called into question”

The Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, former leader of the House of Commons, The House of Lords: Reform, February 2007

In recent years there have been many attempts to reform the House of Lords. Critically analyse this situation with view of the reforms that have already taken place, and how this will affect the Westminster parliament

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Statutes
Acts of Union 1707 & 1800
Bill of Rights 1689
Constitutional Reform Act 2005 Sect 2, 23 & 61
House of Lords Act 1999 Sect 1, 2(1) & (2)
Life Peerages Act 1958 Sect 1
Magna Carta
Parliamentary Act 1911 Sect 1 & 2
Parliamentary Act 1949 Sect 1
Peerage Act 1963 Sect 1, 4 & 6
Reform Act 1831

ANSWER

Two houses reside within the courts of the Parliament, namely the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The House of Lords is known as the Upper House or the Second Chamber of Parliament of the United Kingdom and it plays a vital role in governing the government. Within the Parliament, both houses have the duty to scrutinise, make and amend law; however with the passing of time the House of Lords had had many reforms that lead to their decrement in power. Currently in the House of Commons, elected representatives of political parties sit in and is more superior compared to the House of Lords, where appointed and a marginal number of hereditary peers by Her Royal Majesty, the Queen sit in.

History of the Parliament - Historical Timeline of reforms in the Lords

Countless

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    They wasnted the Lords to never again block a measure passed by the House of Commons. Therefore in 1990 they drew up a bill to curb the power of the House of Lords by taking away the power to veto. Reform of the Lords was vital as the Conservatives were strongly opposed to Home Rule for Ireland, and would vote against any Home Rule Bill in the Lords. This was necessary as the Liberals had promised Home Rule to the Irish Nationalists, in return for their support, so reform of the Lords had to take place before Home Rule could be brought in. The 1910 Parliament Bill proposed that the House of Lords was to have the power to amend or reject those bills the speaker of the Commons certifies to be true money Bills. The Lords veto was abolished, but could delay it for no longer than two years. Also the maximum period between general elections was to be reduced from seven years to five to make parliament more accountable to electors. Although the Bill was not as radical as it could have been because it did not alter the composition of the Lord. The Bill would easily pass through the House of Commons but to curb the Lords’ power would have to be passed by the Lords themselves. Asquith planned to ask King Edward Vll to create 570 new peers, who would be willing to outvote the Conservative Lords and therefore ensure the parliament bill…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On the other hand some of the rules and regulations that the House of Lords have are similar to the stages of the commons. After the bill has been completed all its stages in the commons, changes to the bill in the house of the lords will require an extra stage in the commons called, lords amendments considered. Therefore implementing the ban will offer the vote to disprove or approve of any alterations made by the lords. In…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Built Baptist Church in Rhode Island; complete freedom of religion and shelter for Jews, Catholics, and Quakers…

    • 2149 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The house of lords is the upper chamber of the Uk’s bicameral parliament, Beginning in the the 11th century. The house of lords’ role in government is to work with the house of commons to; make laws, check and challenge the actions of government ( the house of lords has no veto power) and provide independent competence. Firstly, in 1999 the Labour party under Tony Blair as Prime Minister reformed the house of lords. For centuries the house of lords consisted of members that inherited their seats, the Act removed such right. The act reduced members of the house of lords from 1,330 members to 669 members and a proportion of the members that are ‘cross benchers’ members with no party affiliation. In order for this act to receive supported votes, Tony Blair and the labour party passed the Weatherill Amendment that put in place a deal that allowed 92 of the 669 members to remain heredity. The reforms in houses of lords progressive towards democracy due to the fact that Historically, members of the House of Lords have been the richest and most important landowners in the country, who would pass their peerages down through their family, which creates bias towards the wealthy. By…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another way in which the government’s power could be seen to be reduced is the reform of the House of Lords. This is because there is speculation over whether after enforcing Stage 1 of the reform (the removal of hereditary peers from the House of Lords, other than 92) the process should…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The House of Commons has many functions including those of passing effective legislation, representing the views of the people they represent and holding the government to account to ensure that all decisions made are based purely upon the desire to benefit the public and to scrutinise all the actions of the executive.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is an element of truth in the given statement and this essay will seek to explain UK’s Parliament today does, to a certain degree, lack democratic accountability, and this can be shown in dominance of the (i) Executive, (ii) Unrepresentative, and its (iii) Detachment from citizens.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Gov't

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Most legislation originates in the Commons. The House of Lords may take a part in shaping legislation, but it cannot permanently block a bill passed by the Commons, and it has no authority over money bills. The crown need not assent to all legislation, but assent has not been withheld since 1707.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ww1 and Ww2

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Congress of the United States and the British Parliament have many similarities and quite a few differences as well. The foundation for Congress is derived from Parliament yet the differences reflect our country’s formation of independence from England. Traditions and ceremony are rich in both countries and the legislatures formed to govern them. Despite the differences, the Congress of the United States and the British Parliament remain connected through fundamental principles. In this essay, I will compare and contrast the two legislatures to illustrate.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1999 Labour reformed the House of Lords; Labour removed 600 hereditary peers and reduced it to only 92 hereditary Lords in the House of Lords. However, the labor government did propose a system of “elected peers”, where the public could choose peers to sit in the House of Lords. This proposal was never fully implemented into the UK constitution. Until this proposal is full entrenched it is argued that the Lords are not democratically legitimate as all policy making institutions must have legitimacy. Therefore, there is much that can be done towards constitutional reform.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reinstating an upper house will further address apprehensions about legislative oversight. The introduction of a second chamber introduces an essential step for the enactment of legislation where it is a requirement for legislation it be permitted and approved by a second body of representatives (Aroney, 2008). This process enables more scrutiny and empowers a diverse quality of debate not only within the chamber but amongst media outlets, powerful framers of political action who provide the technological potential for interaction between the public and government (Althaus et al.,2007). Queensland’s LNP has been accused by Bob Katter’s Australian Party for their abuse of the system after controversial bikie and sex offender laws were rushed through parliament without scrutiny (ABC Premium News, 2013). Professor Nicholas Aroney from the University of Queensland articulates that reinstating an upper house would prevent issues like these happening in the future (ABC Premium News, 2013). The standard image of a responsible government proposes a chain of accountability (Althaus et al., 2007). Through the ability to analyse and review legislation upper houses have the capability to conduct inquiries and question ministers. This supports Aroney’s view that upper houses provide a very important layer of…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Party Discipline

    • 3485 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Mahler, Gregory. “Congress and the House of Commons: Legislative Behavior and Legislative Roles in Two Democracies.” Ed. C. Soe. Annual Editions; Comparative Politics, 02/03. 20th edition. Guilford, CN: McGraw-Hill, 2002: 74–78…

    • 3485 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The House of Commons holds both legislative functions and is also designed to hold the executive accountable. It can be argued that due the introduction, and reforms, of select committees and the regular questioning of ministers the House of Commons is effective. However, it could also be argued that party loyalty and whips have become more important than effective scrutiny.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the House of Commons there are many parties all fighting individually for control of the house, and to be in power and govern the land of the UK. To win the election and do this a party or coalition of parties needs a 326 majority to be able to form a government. This system creates a dominance in the house of commons if that majority is achieved sufficiently, as with Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 where he had over a 150 seat majority, it is this kind of one party dominance I am going to be discussing in this essay and whether or not it limits parliaments main function to represent constituents and pass laws which benefit them.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays