Preview

Honour in King Henry the Fourth

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1260 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Honour in King Henry the Fourth
Indeed, the notion of honour in King Henry IV is portrayed through multiple characters within the play. It is understood that Falstaff and hotspur’s interpretations of honour act as a character foil to validate Hal’s modern and compassionate form of honour, although, in Shakespeare’s world of deceit and blind ambition, he suggests that extreme forms of honour without the ability to adapt to the climate around them will ultimately fail. Falstaff proclaims that honour itself is just “a word” - “air”; this brings forth the audiences capacity to validate what he says and ultimately contextualize with him which further brings forth the question “what is honour?”
Falstaff delivers this diatribe against honour during the battle at Shrewsbury, just before the climax of the play. Linking honour to violence, Falstaff, who is about to go into battle, says that honour “pricks him on” to fight, meaning that honour motivates him; he then asks what he will do if honour “pricks him off,” that is, kills or injures him. He says that honour is useless when one is wounded: it cannot set an arm or a leg, or take away the “grief of a wound,” and it has “no skill in surgery.” In fact, being merely a word, honour is nothing but thin air—that is, the breath that one exhales in saying a word. He says that the only people who have honour are the dead, and it does them no good, for they cannot feel or hear it. Furthermore, honour doesn’t “live with the living” because honour is gained through death. Falstaff therefore concludes that honour is worthless, “a mere scutcheon,” and that he wants nothing to do with it. Henceforth it is realized that the polar opposite of Falstaff is Hotspur, who’s concept of honour comes in the form of praise from the king himself, declaring Hotspur to be "the theme of honour's tongue". Indeed, Hotspur is committed to honour. The pursuit of this grand ideal consumes all his energy and shapes his every thought. But throughout the course of the play we see that this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry was using his meaningful speech that arises from his spirit to convey more trust to his followers. This speech was a good example to show how Henry and all other strong feudal rulers in this era used their strength and unique personalities to amaze and persuade but not to force their people to become their followers. The unique and the highly effective speech and the thoughts of Henry v shows how open were individuals in Elizabethan era about expressing themselves to reveal social or political viewpoints.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How does Henry V demonstrate his ability to make all of his men feel valued and equal? What does he do or say in his speech, while talking to his men? Do you think his men feel valued and equal? If not, why? I will give three examples that show how Henry V demonstrates his men are valued and equal.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play King Henry IV part 1, Shakespeare reflects both sides of Prince Harry, and his reformation that guide him to be a great King. In the beginning King Henry states; “When honor speaks, it speaks about Hotspur. I can only see my own son, Harry, and his reputation for wildness and dishonor.” Harry is known as a disgrace, his days consist in being a thief and not behaving as an honorable prince. He accepts himself as a disaster; and no one thinks that his capacity and attitude can lead him to be a great man with a clever plan. By the middle of the play he exposes his great secret; “I’ll be so wild, I’ll make wildness an art form, then redeem myself when the world least expects me to.” His elaborate plans consist in exhibiting the worst…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII pt. 2

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry's most important minister early in his reign. Wolsey became Archbishop of York in late 1514, was created a cardinal of the Catholic Church the following November, and became Lord Chancellor of the realm in December 1515. Wolsey achieved singular stature in these offices. Since Henry was not so interested in administration as his minister, Wolsey took over many of the duties of kingship, overseeing England's finances and diplomatic relations with other European powers. Henry became extremely dependent on Wolsey, whose zeal and ability as an administrator made him indespensable. Among Henry's contemporaries on the European continent, many considered Wolsey to be the true ruler of England, since it was to him that foreign officials were often directed to address concerns meant for the English king.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Initially Hotspur is held up as a superb soldier and a model of chivalry and honour in marked contrast with Hal’s idleness and frivolity. The contrast between the two Harrys begins in Act 1 with King Henry’s praise of Hotspur’s victories in battle. Hotspur is referred to as ‘gallant Hotspur’ and the King describes him as ‘fortunes minion and her pride’, comparing him unfavourably to his own Harry who is stained with ‘riot and dishonour’. The comparison is further taken up when our introduction to Hotspur, fresh from battle, is juxtaposed with our introduction to Hal, drinking and planning frivolous robberies in the Boar’s Head Tavern with his Eastcheap friends. Hotspur is clearly a man of action to a degree that he becomes almost a parody of someone who is obsessed by honour gained in chivalric fashion through great victories in battle . His exaggerated claim that he will ‘pluck up drowned honour by the locks’ so that he alone may wear her garland and reap the full honour, paints a picture of a young man who is overly concerned with honour to the extent that he cannot spare time for his wife or await the opportune moment for further victory through the rebellion.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hotspur's Views On Honor

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Honor is commonly associated with people in places of high worthiness and respect, in Henry IV – Part 1 we aren’t given a set definition of what they view honor to be. Instead, honor has different meanings to different characters in the play. Shakespeare portrays his views on honor through the characters of Hotspur, Falstaff, and Hal. Since these characters have such contrasting views on honor it creates conflict for them with other individuals because they aren’t able to see eye to eye on their opposing actions.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry V Leadership

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Leaders in today’s work environment are faced with challenges that are similar to challenges faced in the past. Although technology has caused our challenges to be on a broader scale they still represent the same issues that have been faced for years regarding confidence in leadership and how to foster leadership. While in battle Henry V gave his soldiers the freedom of choice to fight with him or if they had the desire to leave, they could. He would not consider them deserters. By doing this he won loyalty and devotion from his men. Henry used rhetoric skill to achieve this result. He did not want his men to leave due to his small army size but he made his men believe the small army size was more…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hal and falstaff

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In act IV, prince Hal and Falstaff develop unusual relations. The two characters frequently exchange good-natured insult towards each other. The reader comes to see this as a reality as they are unfit to have a good relationship with each other. Though they are related through blood, they hate each other with the spontaneous insult they have in this act. Prince Hal is the surrogate son of Falstaff. He is the factious son. Falstaff is said to be the second father. He is like a parent who does not care about their son’s wellbeing. He has no respect at prince Hal. On the hand, prince Hal is the one who persuades him to emulate him to take his parental role. Their relationship with each other leads to the development of a character similar to King Henry. They all want to impress their audience. Falstaff seems to influence Hal into developing character of King Henry. He wants him to like a leader. He teaches him to learning the art of appreciating every small gift the society has to offer. Though Hal relationship is completely different from his relationship with…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Rothfuss wrote in one of his most recognized books that “words are pale shadows…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Henry within the past few acts have shown a great desire to achieve his goal. This suggest that he is very prideful for what his heart is set out for. However, his desires are also fueled by his emotions. More specifically when he encountered the ambassadors in England to make the suggestion of invading England. With the response and poor judgment assessed by the ambassadors in a mocking fashion, King Henry felt the need to prove them wrong and show that his plan for invading France was a worthy decision. In this particular instance, his pride leads him to strive even harder to achieve his goal for invading France. This can partially be due to the fact that Henry is continuously seen or assumed to act like a child. This can drive someone…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Open Window Analysis

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In essence, in our society mankind demonstrates respect and honesty in various ways, Richard Connell uses specific phrases and tones to show how honesty and respect is necessary and useful in a society. In “The dangerous Game” in…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Role Of Honor In Macbeth

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the play Macbeth, William Shakespeare uses diction to convey a change in not only his characters but their environments and other character’s points of view. The varying uses of honor allow Shakespeare to introduce motifs about Macbeth’s changing character throughout the play. In the start of the play, Macbeth is an innocent thane, yet by the end, he is a merciless king who becomes obsessed with his possible power. The honor represents his valiancy at first even though by the end, honor becomes worthless because Macbeth has abused it and has lost any trust from his people.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet, You Crazy

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The early England’s notion of honor described by Terry is promise. Men were considered honorable simply by right of birth and involved forever loyalty to one’s lord. Honor simply gave its holder dignity and status of a true honorable man, and this was categorized as the most important feature in a man. However during the Renaissance period, there was a major shift in the beliefs of honor. Terry said, “One of the most complex changes in the code of honor was a move from an external code to an internalized concept of what it is to be an honorable man.” (Terry 1071) The involvement of blood and lineage stopped coming in to play and in every situation, men behaved to please both “their state and their god.” (1071) The modern code of honor is heavily affected by religious affair and needs to satisfy god and one’s loyalty. Hamlet, the protagonist of the play is caught in an ambiguous world, the pressure between the old and the new code of honor leads him to become mad and think of…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fear and foreplay

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Consider how an individual’s struggle to restore honour and certainty has been has been reflected and developed in a text you have studied in English 30-1. Discuss the idea(s) developed by…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays