Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

homosexual

Good Essays
1155 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
homosexual
According to Reuters, Scotland has voted overwhelmingly to allow same-sex marriages, becoming the 17th country to give the green light to gay marriage despite opposition from church groups. Hello my name is Alexander and today I will talk about the legalization of the homosexuals. First of all what is homosexual? Homosexual, or gays are people who are sexually attracted to people of one’s own sex, simply one man loves another man or woman loving another woman. In these days, there are country that legalized gay marriage, but it is a inevitable truth that there are more countries without it and people are looking at gay couples not as same as heterosexual couples.

Today, I’ll discuss about pros and cons of today’s controversy, my opinion and conclusion.

To give the simple summary of today’s pro and con, pro side argues that It is an individual freedom to chose whom will I marry, there will be more benefits for same sex couples when they marry, being homosexual is normal, not strange, it is minority discrimination to ban homosexual marriage, homosexual marriage don’t hurt anyone, marriage’s most important thing is love not other things, and show the benefit of the gay marriage. Con side argues that it is immoral, it weakens the definition of marriage, confuses children gender role, and there are problems when we allow this policy

Every people has same right to chose their spouse. The US Supreme Court ruled in 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur that the "freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause.” US District Judge Vaughn Walker wrote on Aug. 4, 2010 that Prop. 8 in California banning gay marriage was "unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses."

Many benefits are only available to married couples, such as hospital visitation during an illness, taxation and inheritance rights, access to family health coverage, and protection in the event of the relationship ending. An Oct. 2, 2009 analysis by the New York Times estimates that a same-sex couple denied marriage benefits will incur an additional $41,196 to $467,562 in expenses over their lifetime compared to a married heterosexual couple.

A simple and singular determinant for sexual orientation has not been conclusively demonstrated as various studies point to different, even conflicting positions. Some scientists hypothesize that a combination of genetic, hormonal and social factors determine sexual orientation. Biological theories for explaining the causes of sexual orientation are more popular, and biological factors may involve a complex interplay of genetic factors and the early uterine environment. These factors, which may be related to the development of a heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual or asexual orientation, include genes, prenatal hormones, and brain structure.

Everyone knows that discrimination is bad, but discriminations are happening in every part of the world. If we not allow gay marriage, it is minority discrimination. The Massachusetts Supreme Court wrote in an opinion to the state Senate on Feb. 3, 2004 that offering civil unions was not an acceptable alternative to gay marriage because "...it is a considered choice of language that reflects a demonstrable assigning of same-sex, largely homosexual, couples to second-class status."

The most important thing in the marriage is love, and the same-sex couples love each other same to heterosexual couples. Government should not stop people who love each other to marry.

The legalization of gay marriage benefits the society in variety of ways. First, it promotes equality and non-discrimination in society. This promotion of equality and non-discrimination plays an extremely important role in reducing homophobia and in affirming a minority group in society which has for so long endured significant discrimination and stigmatization. Legalizing same-sex marriage communicates to millions of people across the country that gay relationships are of equal value to straight relationships, thereby helping to reduce intergroup prejudice and supporting cultural diversity. Secondly, it promotes family stability and validates LGBT family units.
Today's children represent America's future and it is in the country's best interest to support their development, regardless of whom they are parented by. Marriage, as an institution, helps to foster the wellbeing of children by providing married couples with various rights, benefits and protections which can strengthen relationship bonds and family units. Around the nation there are millions of children being raised in households led by same-sex couples, many of whom are denied the right to legally marry in their home state. Third, it provides economic and business opportunities. The legalization of same-sex marriage has consistently been shown to provide an economic boost to those states and countries that have embraced marriage equality. The marriage and wedding industry is a significant one. Allowing gay couples to marry provides businesses in this industry with a large and new market to access. Nearly $260 million was injected into the New York City economy in the year following the legalization of same-sex marriage. Gay marriage tourism benefits those regions which permit same-sex marriage by attracting gay couples from other states and countries where it is not legal.

Now, let’s talk about the con side. First, Gay marriage is immoral. Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law. Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose. Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.

Secondly, gay marriage weakens the definition of marriage, according to oxford dictionary, the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife. There is no mention of homosexual, or same-sex, means that homosexuals doesn’t fit in the marriage.

Also, gay marriage confuses child the gender role. in the homosexual family, kids will have two father or two mother. That would confuse the kids about the gender roles.

Lastly, gay marriage lead to problems. Affirmative says that gay marriage is normal when you don’t have a prejudice, but if gay marriage become normal, first of all, birthrate will go down, because same-sex couple cannot get a child without adoption.

In my opinion, I believe that gay marriage should be legalized. Because every argument of pro seems right to me. And con’s argument just sounds silly. Everyone has right to choose their spouse, it happens biologically, in other words, unstoppable, the most important thing in marriage is love, we get benefit and they gets benefit. Therefore I strongly believes that gay marriage should be allowed.

Thank you

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Individuals against gay marriage insist the act is indecent, and permitting same-sex marriage will raise the separation rates. In addition, those against gay marriage imply that gays and lesbians are prone to spoil the long-standing practice marriage between a man and a woman. A further contention displayed by the defenders of gay marriage originates from the conviction that the real motivation behind marriage is reproduction. Gay marriage does not reinforce this conviction and should not wed, adopt or bring up kids.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights act. In all the cases, the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. The U.S Courts of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverse and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violated the couples fourteenth amendment rights to equal protection and due process.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prop 8

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The freedom to marry is a fundamental right, it's an expression of emotional support and public commitment. The plantiffs, the gay and lesbian communiuty, argue that they deserve the "fundamental" right to marry their partner. The state of California wants to keep sexual activity withing marriages and because of Prop 8, same sex couples are permitted to engage in any sexual activity. However, same sex couples are allowed to adopt children. Plantiffs want to have the state recognize their relationships. The Equal Protection Law of the fourtheenth ammendment states that "no state deny any person within its jurisdiction." Evidence at the trial shows that marriage in the US traditionally…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeff Jordan Parity Thesis

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In regards to everyone’s well-being, people should be able to do whatever they choose, as long as it does not bring harm to others. Respecting personal choices of others can be harmless because it cannot exactly harm anyone outside of that relationship. As a social norm, marriage is composed of and supports several aspects of life. It seems Marriage can exist without aspects of sexual relations, friendship and companionship, love, and responsibilities. Marriage is a civil, religious and expressive aspect; it is a symbolic institution. Public debates about same sex marriage develops questions in forms of religion, which finds same sex marriages unacceptable but take this matter internally. In a civil aspect, married people get a lot of government benefits which can occur as a conflict in rights as some people may agree to fairness than those who…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    jennifer t

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Everybody should have the right to a legally recognized union with a partner of their choice. The debate over whether or not people in same sex relationship should be allowed to marry, or even enter into civil unions is no new fight. Legalizing gay marriage has brought a new trend which then providing the arguments on supporting gay marriage such as denying them is a violation of religious freedom and minority discrimination encourages people to have strong family values and constitute a good based family as well as giving up high-risk sexual lifestyles. Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with most evidence proving biological causation, and marriage benefits should be available to all couples.…

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Media Bias

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Same-sex marriage has been an on-going battle for many years. California’s opposition to same-sex marriage, Proposition 8, barely passed in the 2008 election. Same-sex marriage has been a news-worthy topic since 1997 when Hawaii passed a Domestic Partnership policy which triggered other states to change policies as well. This issue started a state-to-state debate of whether same-sex couples should have the same rights that heterosexual, married couples have. This debate between states has reached a Congressional level. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear two cases surrounding this on-going debate. The cases the Court will hear are related to allowable benefits for same-sex partners, and California’s ban on gay marriage.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate of gay marriage is very complex, due to the many different feelings people express on the topic. One opinion is that gay marriage should be legalized nationally. Others feel that gay marriage should not be legalized but civil unions should be granted to homosexuals so they have an alternative that allows gays and lesbians to receive something that compares to the same rights as marriage. On the other hand there is a large group that believes neither gay marriage nor civil unions should be offered to gay and lesbian couples and that any legal union should be available to heterosexual couples only. The different opinions that are expressed by society’s attitudes towards gay marriage continue to cause great controversy throughout the country, and should come to a halt by allowing homosexuals to wed.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adocates throughout the world came together with one voice to fight for marital rights for same sex couples. According to an article in the Huffington Post, Liebelson and Terkel, reports that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that it is legal for all Americans, no matter their gender or sexual orienation, to marry the people they love. The decision is a historic victory of gay rights activitsts who have fought for years in the lower courts. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia already recognize marriage equality. The remaining 13 states ban these unions, even as public support have reached record levels nationwide. The justices found that, under the 4th Amendment, states must issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognize same-sex unions that have been legally performed in other states. Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Ruth BaderGinsburg, Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonai Sotomayor. In a rare move, the four dissenting justices each wrote an opinion (Dana Liebelson and Amanda Terkel,…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This essay covers the pros and cons concerning gay marriage. You will discover some new laws and amendments that are about to happen in our country, and some things that people are against. There are many issues that will be covered from rights and benefits to getting married legally. You will read reports, stories and articles from lawyers, newspaper reporters and news reporters on the pros and cons of gay marriage. There will also be a list of states that have passed the gay marriage right law, what it entails and when it came into effect. There will also be statements from lawyers stating how not recognizing gay marriage is unconstitutional and prejudice against gays, lesbians, transgender, etc. This subject has been at the center of controversy lately with both sides thinking that they are right.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opposing Viewpoints

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wilkins, Richard G. "The Constitutionality of Legal Preferences for Heterosexual Marriage." Family in America June 2001: n. pag. Rpt. in Homosexuality. Ed. Helen Cothran. San Diego: Greenhaven, 2003. Current Controversies. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 5 May…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marriage Equality

    • 2055 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Same sex marriage is one of the most controversial trends that appear in the world today. In today’s society most of us are taught that a marriage should be a union between a man and a woman, as well as, same sex relationships being a sin because it is looked down upon by God. Despite the criticism of gay marriage many states such as Massachusetts, California, New York, and Oregon have made same sex marriage legal. In the fight for gay…

    • 2055 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Issue of Gay Marriage

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This essay debates the issue of same sex marriage in the United States. It considers the pros and cons and examines the constitutional issues involved.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    faschism

    • 1046 Words
    • 1 Page

    Voters in Croatia HYPERLINK http//uk.reuters.com/article/2013/12/01/uk-croatia-referendum-idUKBRE9B005V20131201 approved a constitutional amendment that defines marriage as a union of man and woman, with 66 of votes cast favoring the change. At the same time, Scotlands government HYPERLINK http//www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-25003083 appears to be on trackto join neighbors England and Wales, which legalized same-sex marriage earlier this year. O HYPERLINK http//www.ifop.com/media/poll/2255-1-study_file.pdf nline pollconducted by the French Institute of Public Opinion (IFOP) found majorities in several Western European countries in favor of marriage and adoption rights for same-sex couples, with those in the Netherlands (85), Germany (74), Belgium and Spain (71 each) expressing the most support. In Scotland, the percentage of people who favor same-sex marriage has increased from 41 to 61 , according to the latest HYPERLINK http//www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/355716/0120166.pdf Scottish Social Attitudes Survey. Meanwhile, Croatians are not the only Eastern Europeans who oppose same-sex marriage. Apoll takenby the Levada Public Opinion Center found that 85 of Russian adults say they are opposed to allowing gay and lesbian couples to wed. Relatively few in Poland (21) and Hungary (30) express support for same-sex marriage, according to an online Reuters/Ipsos poll, which also asked about views on legal recognition other than marriage. In both countries, significant percentages support some kind of legal recognition for same-sex couples (39 in Poland and 21 in Hungary), while 24 of Poles and 26 of Hungarians oppose same-sex marriage or any kind of legal same-sex unions. More than half of the worlds HYPERLINK http//www.pewforum.org/2013/07/16/gay-marriage-around-the-world-2013/ countries that allow same-sex marriageare in Western or Northern Europe including the Netherlands and Belgium, which were the first two countries to approve such…

    • 1046 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LGBT

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe the LGBT community as a whole has made the most significant gains in the last 20 years. This can be proven with such facts as that in 1993 the all famous “Don’t ask don’t tell” policy was enforced, this permitted gays to serve in the military but banning homosexual activity. From 2004-2006 Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Connecticut all legalized all civil-unions. More recently, in 2012, both Washington and Maryland approved same-sex marriages. All of these points are all crucial to the development of the LGBT itself. This is why they have the most tremendous gains, especially in the last 20 years. While the fewest belongs to the improvements to citizen of the US with Asian descent. The issue with the citizens from Asian descent is not as pressing as it was in the past. The only highlight for this group was all the way in 1952 when foreign-born Asians were just given the right to become citizens of the United States. Some possible options for members of Asian descent is to incorporate themselves more in today’s society whether that be political, or in the entertainment industry. If they are able to do this, it will show that they are strong and have the opportunity to excel in things. This will showcase their abilities, thus, allowing greater acceptance from Americans. Though this is not an extremely pressing issue currently, it is still significant to some and should be treated with the upmost respect. If Asian descendants are able to do these things, their lives and their children’s life will be more prosperous than ever before.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics