Preview

Homework Assignment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
314 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Homework Assignment
Tashley Stockham
ASSIGNMENT for Week 2
3. According to this appeals court, what errors were made by the judge at trial?
The judge erred in “refusing to allow the defendants to introduce evidence that no other employees were treated abusively…and in denying defendants’ requested jury charge on mitigation.” (McAdams 173) McAdams, T. Law, Business and Society, 10th Edition. McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions, 40848. .
7. Would the police violate a suspect’s Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure by secretly placing a GPS tracking device on the suspect’s car for an extended time without first securing a warrant to do so? Explain. See, for example, United States of America v. Lawrence Maynard, 615 F.3d 544 (D.C. Cir. 2010); petition for rehearing en bane denied, United States of America v. Antoine Jones, 625 F.3d 766 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
Yes, if there is no probable cause for a warrant, they have no right to secure any type of tracking device so they can try to find probable cause. If they can’t convince a judge, they have no case, they are to be lawful and not cross that line.
8. An Erie, Pennsylvania, public indecency ordinance prohibited knowingly or intentionally appearing in public in a “state of nudity.” Pap’s, the owners of Kandyland, an Erie establishment featuring totally nude dancers, challenged the constitutionality of the ordinance.
a. Explain the nature of that constitutional challenge.
I would have to say it would challenge the first amendment. The right to assemble or even to some aspect(if one chose to argue this way), the right to religious freedom.
b. Decide the case. Explain. See City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000).
I would decide they have the right to assemble as they please, as long as it is on private property, not on a public street for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Govt201 Unit 1 Amendment

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4th Amendment - Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Investment income and related expenses amount to $7,000 and $500, respectively. What is Mike and Sally's interest deduction for the 2012 tax year?…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It203 Homework 5

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the table design view of SQL Server, select all the columns that make up the primary key and then select Set as Primary Key.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knott Case Summary

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Knotts (1983) provides an apt framework to evaluate this question. In Knotts, a beeper device “had been placed in a container of chloroform” (Jones Slip. 8) much in the same manner as here—asking the distributor to install the device in the container. The device “allow[ed] law enforcement to monitor the location of the container” (Id). Also like Knotts, police here used the installed device to track their target’s movements on public thoroughfares. The Court held in Knotts that “there had been no infringement of Knotts’ reasonable expectation of privacy since the information obtained—the location of the automobile carrying the container on public roads…—had been voluntarily conveyed to the public” (8). So too here; the device only gave police information that Kilgrave knowingly extended to the public. Likewise, Kilgrave would not be able to invoke the Fourth Amendment’s heightened protection of personal effects here, for the police installed the tracking device in the headlight before it was his property. Indeed, “[the Court] specifically declined to consider” the effect of the distributor’s consent “on [Knotts’s] Fourth Amendment analysis” (Jones 8). Hence, under existing law, no trouble arises from tainting an effect before it becomes the target’s property. Consequently, the police’s surreptitious bicycle tracking does not qualify as an unreasonable search under the Fourth…

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over time, technology has impacted the police and other law enforcement agencies with new devices for gathering evidence. These new tools have caused constitutional questions to surface. One particular case in Oregon of an individual (DLK) aroused such question. DLK was suspected of growing marijuana inside of his home. Agents used a thermal imager to scan DLK’s residence form the outside. The results indicated heat, just like the kind that is generated by special lights used for growing marijuana indoors. Constructed by the scan, a judge issued a search warrant. A warrant – a legal paper authorizing a search – cannot be issued unless there is a cause, and a probable cause must be sworn to by the police officer or prosecutor and approved by a judge. A warrant must describe what is being searched and what will be seized. 100 marijuana plants were found finalizing the arrest of DLK; however, did the scan violate DLK’s Fourth Amendment rights? The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Constitution). This amendment touches on the expectation of privacy in your home and person. The government is not unable to search you, your home, your belongings, or take your belongings, also known as a seizure, without a good reason. A person’s Fourth Amendment rights may at times seem to delay the world of law enforcement. If the police feel that they have…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Colin Hodgkins Case Study

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: Colin Hodgkins and his three friends left a restaurant in Marions County, Indiana, after attending a school soccer game. The four minors were stopped shortly after 11:00 P.M. by local police officers and were arrested for violating Indiana’s curfew regulation. The Indiana curfew was set at 11 P.M. on weekdays nights. Colin Hodgkins mother Nancy wants her children to participate in activities protected by the First Amendment rights, no matter what time of the day or night it is. She filed suit against the Mayor of the City of Indianapolis and other local government officials. The lower court found only and incidental burden on the minors First Amendment rights.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, majority opinion argued that the law at Pinellas Park was unconstitutional because it was not narrow enough to include all reasonable exceptions; it only targeted activities most likely to result in crime. The dissenting or minority opinion argued that the law was interpreted too strictly and that the whole law should not have been deemed unconstitutional because minors should not be allowed in public places at late hours without an adult.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hazelmeier Case Summary

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The majority opinion on this case supports that T.M. in his claim that the city ordinance is unconstitutional. I agree with this because it’s not fair, even though it was created to protect the people in the city. The ordinance isn’t specific enough to go after crime related activities in the community. I believe that minors should have the same rights as adults, which is why I disagree with the ordinance. Finally, I also believe that a city curfew interferes with parents trying to set rules for their own children to follow.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homework Assignment 5

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The four levels of state courts are as follows: The trial court of limited jurisdiction, the trial court of general jurisdiction which hears various kinds of cases, the intermediate appellate courts with a fixed maximum and minimum term of imprisonment and only hears appeals and the state courts of last report or Supreme Court of the state.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homework #4

    • 365 Words
    • 1 Page

    Responding to the philosophical dilemma of the Euthyphro, the first conclusion “What is moral is not moral because it is commanded by (the) God(s)”, the premises to support this conclusion would be from James Rachel’s chapter, “Does Morality Depend on Religion?” Rachel evidences that “according to Exodus 20:16, God commands us to be truthful. On this option, the reason we should be truthful is simply that God requires it. Apart from the divine command, truth telling is neither good nor bad. It is God’s command that makes truthfulness right”. Rachel is stating that God commands us to be not to be liars and leaving the command on the side, telling the truth is neither good nor bad but it is God’s command to make the truth right. Also, Rachel states that lying would lead to trouble but God could have given us another command. For example, being liars and it would not be a bad thing because God gave us that command. Therefore, he could give us more reasons to command the opposite so, from a point of view of a moral; God’s command is a random choice. Thus, with this conclusion, we are stuck with consequences that even most religious people would find it offensive. The second conclusion “What is moral must be moral because it is commanded by (the) God(s)”, the premises to support this conclusion would be from James Rachel’s chapter, “Does Morality Depend on Religion?” Rachel defines “God, who is infinitely wise, realizes that truthfulness is better than deceitfulness, and so he commands us to be truthful; he sees that killing is wrong, and so he commands us not to kill; and so on for all the moral rules”. Rachel means that God knows what is right for a human being so he commands us to be honest and truthful because he knows that it is wrong. If we take this option, then we would abandon the conception of right and wrong because we are leaving ourselves open to a lack of reasoning. Many religious people opinions are to accept the fact of right…

    • 365 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assignment Brief

    • 1434 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this assessment you will have opportunities to provide evidence against the following criteria. Indicate the page numbers where the evidence can be found…

    • 1434 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fourth Amendment Essay

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Probable cause is usually what gets people caught up in the Fourth Amendment. Probable cause in based on two cases, observational and informational,” if a police officer sees a suspect being suspicious and maybe not doing what they…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4th Amendment

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages

    All Americans are entitled to their rights. The Fourth Amendment states that we the people have to deny search and seizures from law enforcement without a warrant. The fourth amendment generally prohibits police from entering a home without a warrant unless the circumstances fit an established exception to the warrant requirement. According to the book The Constitution: Our Written Legacy by Joseph A. Melusky, the Fourth Amendment gives the right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Although we are entitled to these rights, police sometimes use and abuse their authority. In many cases, the Fourth Amendment has helped prove the innocence of one’s actions.…

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Fourth Amendment

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In some cases when a warrant is being executed there is times when law enforcement can seize an item that is in plain sight even if the item in not yet specified in the warrant, but if that precaution were to be taken there would have to be an obvious reason (Salon.com). Often times law enforcement create problems when acting without a warrant, because they seize an item to soon, or invade a property without probable cause. However, there are cases where the Fourth Amendment does not always apply; which does not make it any more okay to intrude on people’s property. For example, private invasions of property, not acting in the way of the government authority are exempt from the Fourth Amendment (Wex Legal Dictionary). A seizure of a property only occurs with the meaning of the Fourth Amendment; for law enforcement to seize a property, it would mean to take into their possession, this shows just how important a warrant really is or officers could technically seize any property they would like. The people of the United States rely on the Fourth Amendment to keep our properties private and safe. Warrantless searches of private properties are mostly prohibited, if they were not prohibited law enforcement would be free to search and seize properties and objects, and ultimately arrest people without valuable…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment provides the people of the United States, the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. Against unreasonable searches, and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons and things to be seized” (U.S Constitutional Amendments, 1972). The design of this Amendment is to create a type of barrier in order to protect individual rights to privacy, also preventing illegal search, and seizure of personal property. These search warrants are in…

    • 1424 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays