Preview

Hog Waste Cause Environmental, Socioeconomic Disasters

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hog Waste Cause Environmental, Socioeconomic Disasters
I have read your article titled, “Hog waste causes environmental, socioeconomic disasters.” I want to give you the correct information about the hog farms here in North Carolina and how they manage their hog’s waste products. These farmers are under attack each day by practices that are required by government in order to have their hog farm. First of all, one farmer can only feed 155 people, there are 7 billion people in the world, the most widely eaten meat in the world is pork, and 37% of the world meat consumption is pork. North Carolina is the second largest producer of hogs in the United States however.
The hogs “waste” is considered to be manure, this manure is full of fertilizers and nutrients that can be used on crops intended for their animal’s consumption, not human consumption. Manure is stored in a lagoon, this must be
…show more content…
The swine industry only counts for 0.4% of US Greenhouse Gases, while human waste is 2.2%. Human waste facilities are allowed to dump their waste into our rivers after treated, on the other hand the hog industry are prevented from this practice, hog waste is prevented from leaving their farm.
Finally, there is no way of getting around smelly hogs, many farmers have made windbreakers, farmers plant tree around their farms to keep huge amounts of hog smells from smelling up their communities. Pigs are now farmed in houses which is safer for the environment. The practices used in hog house are removing their manure form the stall and transporting it to a lagoon, this action has reduced the usages of water to 41% per lbs. carcass weight (PLCW), the amount of land used decreased by 78% PLCW and the carbon footprint per lbs. carcass weight decreased by 35% PLCW.
In conclusion the waste from hog farms doesn’t cause the socioeconomic, environmental disasters that you have wrote about in your article. Hog farms have now become safer for our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    nternal live hogs & developing animals to be processed are combined with processed pork products…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    THESIS: “Today the most serious environmental harm associated with the cattle industry takes place on the feedlot.” (70).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    fed to livestock. Hog, chicken, and cattle waste has polluted 35,000 miles of rivers in 22 states…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vegucated

    • 1590 Words
    • 6 Pages

    is animal agriculture polluting the air, but it is polluting our waters as well. All of the waste from…

    • 1590 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pigs unlike cows and chickens are highly intelligent animals. If you kill one pig in front of the others, they know what is occurring and they go crazy with fear knowing that they are next. As babies, they are exposed to painful disfigurements without any anesthesia or pain relievers. Their tail is cut off to decrease tail biting and is confined to overcrowded pens with bars and concrete floors where they live until they reach a specific slaughter weight. While they linger in these overcrowded environments, they are also exposed to extreme crowded conditions during transportation. One pig expert wrote, “death losses during transport are high, amounting to more than eight million per year. It is still cheaper so it becomes a moral issue. Is it right to overload and save $.25 per head while the overwhelming contributes to 80,000 death per year?” (factoryfarming.com). Sadly, this treatment is characteristic of factory farming, which puts profits before of animal…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The author starts off strong with logos, which appeals to logic. In response to the comments about animals in our food production, she writes, “the studies show only that the prevailing methods of producing meat — that is, crowding animals together in factory farms, storing their waste in giant lagoons and cutting down forests to grow crops to feed them — cause substantial greenhouse gases” (Niman), meaning that small farms and farms can cut down on greenhouse gases if, “they keep their animals outdoors on pasture and make little use of machinery.” (Niman) She points out, “In contrast to traditional farms, industrial livestock and poultry facilities keep animals in buildings with mechanized systems for feeding, lighting, sewage flushing, ventilation, heating and cooling, all of which generate emissions,” which are what most statistics pointing the guilt finger at meat production are referring to. The author, being a “rancher…who raises cattle, goats and turkeys the traditional way (on grass)” (Niman), neatly brushes off relations of “meat (especially beef) is closely linked to global warming” (Niman), to her own farm. Meat and dairy would certainly win the greenhouse gas competition if not…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer’s article criticizes factory farms for industrializing their farming practices and sacrificing good animal husbandry practices for increases in production. Singer indicates the ridiculous amount of animals affected by factory farm mistreatment by stating “[t]he use and abuse of animals raised for food far exceeds, in sheer numbers of animals affected, any other kind of mistreatment” (“Down on” 19). Singer evaluates the reasoning behind factory farmer’s unethical practices, and concludes that “farming is competitive and the methods adopted are those that cut costs and increase production” (“Down on” 20). By cutting costs and increasing production rates factory farming industry workers accumulate more wealth, and consumers are able consume more meat then physically necessary. One can evaluate this luxury the “Principle of Disproportionality” which states that “[a]ctions that meet nonbasic or luxury needs of humans are prohibited when they aggress against the basic needs of animals” (Sterba…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The manure also creates perfect conditions for the growth of fecal bacteria, like E. Coli (Indiana Water). “To prevent pollution from livestock operations, CAFOs and the manure they generate should be barred from sensitive areas like floodplains and cave country, where minute amounts of pollution can trash essential underground aquifers” (Indiana Water). Although there are many ways to prevent pollution from CAFOs, farmers do not always follow the protocol and precautions recommended for safe storage and removal of chemicals and manure. “The huge basins or “lagoons” where CAFOs store manure by the tanker truckload should have to be leak-proof and set back a safe distance from homes and waterways. And if there are spills, good inspection, enforcement and penalties should ensure that polluters pay a price” (Indiana Water).…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first key claim made is according to the (Natural Resources Defense Council),” as much as 40% of all the food produced in the United States never gets eaten.” This means so much food that can be eaten is just thrown away. “In 2013,49.1 million people lived in food-insecure households” (USDA). This is such a vital statistic because Homeless and impoverished people who have an insufficient amount of food could be fed instead of it being thrown away. Precious resources like water pumped in to water the vegetables and trees cut down to make room for farms are used for nothing. Another issue is the accumulation of food waste in landfills creates anaerobic conditions resulting in Methane gas. Methane gas is a key contributor to greenhouse gases, which are warming our planet at an alarming rate.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marks, R. (2001, July). Cesspools of shame: how factory farm lagoons and spray fields threaten environmental and public health. Retrieved from http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/cesspools/cesspools.pdf.…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Feral Hogs

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wild hogs can be an extreme nuisance to farmers. A total of $1.5 billion lost annually because of wild hog damage plus the potential crippling effects that disease transmission could have on the livestock industry. They can damage cropland in various ways: eating crops, trampling crops, rooting in the farmland and damaging the plants roots. “They just tear up…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To numerous people, pigs are a nuisance. They are usually viewed as dirty animals with no purpose other than for food. However, pigs contribute greatly to the environment. They are able to digest certain substances easier than humans and use resources to make life easier for us. On the other hand, phosphorus, one of the many essential nutrients for swine, has negatively impacted the environment due to swine excretions. Elevating this problem has led to the genetic improvement of swine.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Factory Farm

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Environment." Disturbing facts on factory farming & food safety. Organic Consumers Association, n.d. Web. 6 Dec 2011. .…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sci207 Week 1 Assignment

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Beef is a perfect example of using resources wastefully and is causing our environment to be degraded. In the Amazon and other places the rainforests are being cleared in order to raise cattle and about 70 to 80% of the grain that is produced in the United States is fed to livestock. The areas that are being cleared for…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article, “Vegetarian is the New Prius”, written by Kathy Freston, discusses the amount of contribution that livestock actively plays in the most crucial and serious environmental problem, from a local scale to global scale. Freston writes that the amount of livestock raised in United States soil is the main cause of air pollution, land degradation, water shortage, water pollution, biodiversity, and especially aids to global warming. This article attempts to convince readers to cut meat out of their diet and to become vegetarians, so that less livestock would be raised to feed the people and environmental issues would be cut down. Although it is true that Freston provides the audience with solid, legitimate factual arguments concerning the brutal slaughtering and consumption of livestock by humans, she fails to address the opposing argument. Although I am a personal fan of vegetarian foods, I disagree with Freston, primarily because my family has raised me on chicken and other meats. I believe that there will be livestock whether a lot of people change their diets and become vegetarians or not. At the University of Chicago, researches concluded that feeding animals for the production of meat, eggs, and dairy products requires growing upwards of ten times as many crops needed than if we just went without livestock. According to a report done by the United Nations animal agriculture takes up 70% of all agricultural land, and 30% of the total land surface of the planet. Upon seeing these disturbing facts, I do not believe that society will never 100% convert to a vegetarian lifestyle. Even if they do, there will still be millions of wild animals producing all of the same gases that are so harmful to our environment.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays