Preview

History of the Us Court System

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1540 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History of the Us Court System
History of the United States Court System

Abstract When Congress first met on March 4, 1789, one of the first items of business was to fulfill the requirements of Article III, section 1, of the Constitution. Article III, section 1, provides that the "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." The First Congress responded by enacting the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established 13 district courts in major cities, three circuit courts, and a Supreme Court composed of a Chief Justice and five Associate Justices (Library of Congress).

History of the United States Court System

The Judiciary Act of 1789 was one of the first pieces of legislation enacted by the newly formed U.S. Congress. The law created a dual court system – federal and state – that existed in no other country at the time. More than 240 years later, the system remains a vibrant protector of the rights and liberties guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution (United States Courts).

The Constitution’s Article III was ratified in 1787, creating a Federal Judiciary that would feature the U.S. Supreme Court at its pinnacle. Left to Congress, however, was the job of fleshing out what the Constitution created (United States Courts).

The Judiciary Act of 1789 established a three-tiered federal court system – the Supreme Court, three appellate courts, and 13 district courts. The Act also provided the courts and the justice system with needed staff (United States Courts).

Today the Federal Judiciary closely resembles the three-tiered system Congress fashioned in 1789. Today’s Supreme Court is comprised of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices. Congress also has created 13 courts of appeals and 94 district courts (United States Courts).

The Court System of the United States

The judicial branches of the United States federal and state



References: State Courts Systems. (2004-2007). Retrieved August 29, 2011, from "court system in the United States: State Court Systems." The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia.: 29 Aug. 2011 <http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0857620.html>. The Federal Court System. (2004-2007). Retrieved August 29, 2011, from "court system in the United States: State Court Systems." The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia.: http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0857619.html Library of Congress. (1789). In A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774 - 1875 (p. 73 of 755). Library of Congress. Schmalleger, F. (2009). Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century. Prentice Hall. United States Courts. (n.d.). Anniversary Marks Creation of U.S. Federal Court System. Retrieved August 29, 2011, from United Stated Courts: http://www.uscourts.gov/News/NewsView/10-09-15/Anniversary_Marks_Creation_of_U_S_Federal_Court_System.aspx

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The article Marbury v. Madison and the Establishment of Judicial Autonomy by William E. Nelson, discusses “. . . a balance between two concepts democracy . . . and the rule of law. . .” (Nelson 240). The court case Marbury v. Madison took place in 1803. This court case is famous for the creation of judicial review; “the doctrine allowing courts to hold acts of Congress unconstitutional” (Nelson 240). During the presidency of Adam, sixteen circuit judges were appointed. Adams secretary of state at this time was Marshall, whom could not “deliver the commission for one of the new justices of the peace . . . William Marbury, before the end of President Adams’s term . . .” (248). Marbury v. Madison was started because Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state James Madison refused to give William Marbury as well as others their commissions. Because of this act by Madison, Marbury as well as others decided to petition for a writ of mandamus for their commissions. According to Cornell Law School, a writ of mandamus is “an order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion”. The case of Marbury v Madison led to the Judiciary Act of 1801. This…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning. "chapter 6." Judicial process in America. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011. 125. Print.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early national period, the judiciary was the weakest of the three branches of government. When Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review in MarburyMadison by declaring an act of Congress unconstitutional, he greatly strengthened the judiciary. Even though the high court exercised this prerogative only one other time prior to the Civil War (Dred Scott v. Sanford), the establishment of judicial review made the judiciary more of an equal player with the executive and legislative branches.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An appellate court is a court that takes initial trial decisions into review upon the outcome being seen as unconstitutional by either the defendant or the government. Congressional act of 1789 Created a supreme court, appoint 6 justices and establish a lower federal court system. Various acts of congress have changed the number of seats in the supreme court over the years. the lowest amounts between 5-6 and the highest 10. In fact after the civil war the seats were fixed to nine, that's 1 chief justice and 8 associate justices of the United states of America.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dq's Dual Court System

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Each of the original American colonies had its own court system for resolving disputes. Whereas State courts evolved from early colonial arrangements, federal courts where created by the United States constitution (Schmalleger, F 2009). Duel court system has been impacted by its history because the concept of two court systems still remains. There have been changes to the individual courts to make them run smoother like the three tier uniform model adopted by the state courts. If the United States of America adapted a different court system it would either have one individual court to handle all cases or like England have numerous courts to hear certain…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Act of 1789 gave Congress the act of granting the Supreme Court the right to issue writs of mandamus. Article III of the Constitution grants the Supreme Court the authority to review acts of Congress to validate whether they are unconstitutional or not and therefore void. Article III of the Constitution also states "the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be a party. In all other cases, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction." The Supreme Court held that they had the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether or not they were constitutional and void those that were not, but that Congress did not have the right to expand the scope of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction beyond what was specified in the Constitution. The Supreme Court also held that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional and therefore void.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the year of 1789 the most crucial piece in the American legislation emerge from the first section of congress. The Judiciary Act of 1789 implemented the judiciary clause of the constitution that gave power to the congress to set a new number of justices on the Supreme Court and established a new system in the federal courts, as well creating a position for attorney general. This Act implemented a high court of six justices that later increase to nine by 1869…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury v. Madison

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a the year of 1803 a watershed case, Marbury v. Madison, John Marshal Chief Justice's opinion founded the Supreme Court's power to declare acts of United States Congress, and by significance acts of the president, unconstitutional if they surpassed the authorities allowed by the Establishment or Constitution. But most significant thing was that the Court became the judge of the Constitution, the final authority on what the document meant. Intrinsically, the Supreme Court became as a matter of fact also as in theory an equal partner in authorities, and it has acted that role always later on (Erskine P.88-109).…

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confederation Compromise

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It allowed decisions to be made at the federal level that were best for the country with representation for each state. Ease of legislation was made possible by a reduction in what was considered a majority vote and the federal government was able to tax individual citizens. A system of checks and balances was established by creating an executive branch headed by the president, a judiciary branch, and a legislative branch. The Judiciary branch created the Federal District Courts, Federal Circuit Courts, and the Supreme Court and was passed by congress in 1789. In order for the federal government to administer the armed forces, post office, and trade and commerce regulation, there would need to be a presidential staff known as a cabinet which would be chosen by the president. The Attorney General, Chief Justice and other cabinet positions would also be appointed by the president. The judiciary system would be used for citizens and state’s rights to be…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main purpose of the Federal Court System is to hear that cases that usually have a direct conflict with the United States as a whole and not necessarily cases that affect a citizen unless that case were to involve certain aspects such as violation of Constitutional Laws or when the United States is considered a party within the case itself. The basic structure of the Federal Court System is dictated within the United States Constitution…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Texas Judicial system is described as complicated, negligent, and poorly structured to handle current legal proceedings. At the top of the Texas court system sit two high courts, the Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals. Each court has nine judges and when comparing…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nevada State Court System

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Judicial system in the United States is made up by the Federal court and State court system and each court is responsible for hearing certain types of cases. The major goals of the both court systems are to solving legal disputes and vindicating legal rights. The State court system is made up with the two sets of trial courts that are the trial court of limited jurisdiction and trial court of general jurisdiction.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The court plays a very critical role in American Criminal Justice. Without the development of courts, those who violate the law would face no penalty and would commit crimes and walk free. In this paper I will evaluate and examine the American Criminal court system. I will describe the court and the purpose that it serves as so I will also define the dual court system. I will also describe the role that early legal codes, the common law and the precedent played in the development of courts.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most important source of law is the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution is the foundation of both federal and state laws. The United States Constitution also protects us the people, particularly the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. One amendment that I feel is most relevant today in criminal law is Amendment VI Right to Speedy Trial, Confrontation of Witnesses. According to (Mount, 2011) Amendment VI states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence”. Tom Head wrote (Head, 2012) “The "speedy trial" clause is intended to prevent long-term incarceration and detention without trial--which amounts to a prison sentence without a guilty verdict”. If you were to prolong a trial, over time evidence can become lost, witnesses could and would forget facts, and an innocent person could end up doing time for a crime he did not commit. It is in the best interest of both the prosecution and the defense to have a speedy trial so that the proper facts and evidence can stay fresh. The right to a public trial assures the defendant that a fair hearing can take place. Allowing the public to view a trial helps reduce the risk of an unfair or a bias trial. An impartial jury of the state would be a jury that is not bias and comes from the state and district of which the crime took place. Head (Head, 2012) stated “Not only must jury members not have…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Impact

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Let us first examine the area where the Court has had the greatest amount of historical impact, interstate commerce. Article One, Section Eight, Clause Three of the United States Constitution is commonly known as the “Commerce Clause,” and states, “The United States Congress shall have the authority to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays