Preview

history

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
626 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
history
Name:
Date:
Graded Assignment
Korematsu v. the United States (1944)

Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions.

(2 points)
1. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction?
Answer:

(2 points)
2. According to the first paragraph from the excerpts of the majority opinion, what did the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West Coast?
Answer:

(2 points)
3. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation?
Answer:

(2 points)
4. What did the dissenting justices think about the power of military authorities?
Answer:

(2 points)
5. The dissenting opinion raises the fact that Japanese Americans were being deprived of what rights?
Answer:

(40 points)
6. Imagine you are living in Los Angeles in 1944 and have just read about the case of Korematsu v. the United States. Write a letter to the editor of the Los Angeles Times telling which opinion in the case (majority or dissenting) you support and explain why.

Refer to the rubric and scoring instructions on the next page to see how your teacher will grade your assignment.

Answer:

Rubric and Scoring Instructions
Category
1 point
2 points
3 points
4 points
5 points
Score
Content
The letter does not fulfill the assignment. Content is not developed and ideas are confusing. The letter is so inadequate and flawed as to be unacceptable.
The letter does not fulfill the assignment. Content is poorly developed and ideas are confusing. The letter fails to address several aspects of the assignment and demonstrates a lack of clear understanding of the concepts and facts. It contains serious flaws.
The letter fulfills the assignment, but content is not fully developed and/or ideas are not clear. The letter fails to address all aspects of the assignment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Korematsu’s Side of the case involved several major arguments following the cases validity. The Violation of Korematsu’s Civil Rights, the violation of Korematsu’s and Others of Japanese ancestry rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and Whether Public law 503 and the Executive Order 9066 where legal and…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court's Decision - The Supreme Court upheld the order excluding persons of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast war zone during World War II. Three justices dissented. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court. He began with the observation that legal restrictions on the rights of a single racial group will always be “suspect” and that “courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.” However, they are not necessarily unconstitutional. The exclusion order imposed hardships “upon a large group of American citizens. …But hardships are part of war….Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger.” Justice Owen Roberts wrote in his dissent that this “is the case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on his ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Justice Robert Jackson noted that comparable burdens were not imposed upon descendents of the other nationalities (German, Italian) with who the United States was also at war.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Executive Order 9066

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ultimately, the internment of Japanese-Americans was a severe violation of their 4th amendment rights. They were american citizens and yet they were unlawfully imprisoned and displaced by their military and their government. The 4th amendment prohibits unreasonable…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greenlawn Safety Memo

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I have reviewed your response letter to Mrs. Smith’s concerns and it has come to my notice that your letter needs a bit of improvement. Below are my suggestions on how you can make the letter more effective in responding to Mrs. Smith concerns.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documents consistently showed that Japanese Americans had committed no acts of treason to justify mass incarceration. With this new evidence, a pro-bono legal team that included the Asian Law Caucus re-opened Korematsu’s 40-year-old case on the basis of government…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korematsu vs U.S

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kezia Howard 1 Kezia Howard Professor Myhre Law and Society 05 September 2010 I. KOREMATSU vs. UNITED STATES Korematsu vs. United States is a landmark Supreme Court case that involves the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, known for interning Japanese Americans during World War II. Fred Korematsu was a U.S.-born Japanese American, who showed no signs of disloyalty, but stayed in San Leandro, California, deliberately violating Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34, which excluded all persons of Japanese ancestry from that area. Decided in Post Pearl Harbor hysteria, President Roosevelt granted these laws, in order to “protect” the Japanese Americans from hateful crimes and to prevent espionage during this wartime. This case, decided with a majority vote 6-3, ruled that the exclusion orders were constitutional. Korematsu vs. United States has been incredibly controversial due to the court’s decision that the need for national defense outweighed Korematsu’s individual rights guaranteed to him in the Fourteenth Amendment and the Due Process clause. Despite the military’s right to war powers, General DeWitt had no evidence of disloyalty among the Japanese Americans. This fundamental flaw in authority should have led the court to rule in favor of Korematsu against the internment camps, which was essentially a euphemism for concentration camps. By analyzing the different arguments in the case, majority, concurring, and dissenting, the reader can determine that the dissenting opinion held the most persuasive amount of evidence. II. MAJORITY OPINION Justice Black, Reed, Douglas, and Rutledge made up the majority opinion, focusing on the idea that this case, based on administrative orders by the military, has no regard to race.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Never is this more eloquently illustrated than during the Japanese internment. Hirabayashi, a conscientious objector to the internment procedures utilized by the government, breaks the curfew set by Public Proclamation #1 and turns himself into the authorities and is arrested and conviction was upheld in the courts on the basis that Japanese Americans are not truly Americans because they are unassimilable and set themselves apart from mainstream society. The case of Korematsu, a man who deliberately evaded evacuation orders, despite being rejected from a previous attempt to enlist, went to the Supreme Court. The main point of contention was whether or not the evacuation was Constitutional; it was found to be legal due to military necessity and Korematsu was convicted. In the case involving Endo, who broke no laws and did not initiate her case, she was illegally detained because she was not a military threat. The day before the judgment, the evacuation was rescinded. The case of Endo passed unanimously (Shah). Asian Americans not only respected the legal…

    • 2386 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing Article

    • 404 Words
    • 1 Page

    A simple, two­paragraph letter to the editor has been started but never finished. Follow these…

    • 404 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We are very much glad that you have given us the opportunity to prepare this assignment and hope that this project work will meet the standards of judgment. But there may be some mistakes due to various limitations. Therefore, we beg your kind consideration in this regard. Any kind of suggestion and clarification will be accepted cordially. Your kind advice will encourage us to perform better Project work in future.…

    • 7848 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juice Bar and Boost Juice

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | Some form of referencing undertaken, however the style and formatting needs to be improved.A few spelling and grammatical errors; however, these do not create an issue in understanding the main arguments of the writer.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mll; Jm; Ml

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3) The end document should be formatted and written well (see below for writing suggestions);…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Strategy Management

    • 3572 Words
    • 15 Pages

    I acknowledge and irrevocably agree that the assessor of this assignment may, for the purpose of assessing this assignment:…

    • 3572 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sfdsfds

    • 9397 Words
    • 38 Pages

    carried out under my guidance. It is certified that all corrections /suggestions indicated for internal assessment have been incorporated in the report and one copy of it being deposited in polytechnic library.…

    • 9397 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Please be advised that Assignment One on the printed Tutorial Letter 101/3/2013 on pages 12 - 14 has a number of both typographical and numerical mistakes. This happened as a result of a number of factors: the initial assignment reading was too costly for the Department to commission in terms of copyright and had to be retracted at the last minute. The reading on "Affirmative Action: a losing battle?" was then included but with an almost impossible deadline, which resulted in the errors reflected therein. This is regrettable and we apologise for any inconvenience this might have cost you. The corrected version of the assignment is on page 3 and is attached to this TL and again on my UNISA for your convenience. The marks are out of 100 marks - 50 for Section A and 50 marks for Section B. NB: Please note that the due date has not changed in any way (4 March 2013).…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guidance

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    These mandatory guidelines are provided for preparation of short article or essay accepted for submission of assignment. These guidelines are issued to ensure standard and uniformity. To assure timely and efficient assessment of your submission, you must present your work in strict conformance with these guidelines. Any submission that does not conform to the specified requirements will be omitted. Your work will be accepted and marked provided they arrive by the due date and they correspond to these guidelines. Your submission should be delivered in printed form in page of A4 paper size with 2cm length of all margins, i.e. top, bottom, left, right. The submitted short article must consist of 150 words and cannot be more than 300 words. The writing should have the following structure:…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays