Preview

Historical Events That Have Influenced the

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
358 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Historical Events That Have Influenced the
Historical Events that Have Influenced The
Foundations and Structure of
American Legal History

Even though Mr. Korematsu defied and evaded moving to a relocation camp in conjunction with the Civilian Restrictive Order No. 1, 8 Fed. Reg 982 he was still able to successfully prove that this order was unconstitutional and violated his rights. This order, Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34 of the Commanding General of the Western Command, U.S. Army stated “All persons of Japanese ancestry should be excluded from that area.” It should be noted that his countrymen, who were also Japanese-American citizens, were herded into relocation camps during the war because we were at war with the Japanese Empire and the United States feared they would invade our West coast. As a result of security measures, the United States decided to segregate the Japanese-American citizens from the rest of the country for their safety.
These people were essentially being held against their will and discriminated against which violated their Fifth Amendment right, which basically says that this right protects against abuse, being deprived of life, liberty, and property. This landmark case provided for protection of citizens and influenced law in this country by stating that no person or persons shall be deprived of their rights.
This case provided positive impact against such issues such as race relations and discrimination, such as denying benefits to or depriving a certain race from their due. The positive and negative impacts are and can also be related to the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp. Did the US learn from the mistakes they made with the relocation of the Japanese-Americans? Are they really holding them against their will? Are they all enemy combatants of the United States or did they just get caught up in the sweep?

References
Certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit http://tourolaw.edu/patch/Korematsu/ KOREMATSU v. UNITED STATES, SUPREME COURT



References: Certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit http://tourolaw.edu/patch/Korematsu/ KOREMATSU v. UNITED STATES, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 323 U.S. 214, December 18, 1944, Decided http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/korematsu.html The U.S. Survey course on the web http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5151

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Korematsu’s Side of the case involved several major arguments following the cases validity. The Violation of Korematsu’s Civil Rights, the violation of Korematsu’s and Others of Japanese ancestry rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and Whether Public law 503 and the Executive Order 9066 where legal and…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court's Decision - The Supreme Court upheld the order excluding persons of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast war zone during World War II. Three justices dissented. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the Court. He began with the observation that legal restrictions on the rights of a single racial group will always be “suspect” and that “courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.” However, they are not necessarily unconstitutional. The exclusion order imposed hardships “upon a large group of American citizens. …But hardships are part of war….Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direst emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger.” Justice Owen Roberts wrote in his dissent that this “is the case of convicting a citizen as a punishment for not submitting to imprisonment in a concentration camp, based on his ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry, without evidence or inquiry concerning his loyalty and good disposition towards the United States.” Justice Robert Jackson noted that comparable burdens were not imposed upon descendents of the other nationalities (German, Italian) with who the United States was also at war.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Executive Privilege Dbq

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page

    Hamdi v. Runsfeld - Was regarding the government's policy on captured enemy combatants. Post 9/11 2001 with the war on terrorism, The Bush administration to the position that any supporters of the enemy could be detained…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, Executive Order no. 9066 is one of the most controversial things looked upon in America's history. Historians, Americans, and Japanese review the historical episode and re-examine their ideas about the history of the U.S. and the lessons it teaches today. Although there are opposing thoughts, Japanese internment camps during WWII were vital and extremely necessary for the U.S. because…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buffets v. Klinke

    • 3142 Words
    • 10 Pages

    73 F.3d 965; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 436; 37 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1449; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Service 315; 96 Daily Journal DAR 507…

    • 3142 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Citation Quiz

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    CitationsComplete each citation. Remember that in an actual document, you would underline or italicize the title.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Korematsu V Us

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During World War II, shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt passed Executive Order 9066 which allowed the Secretary of War to declare certain areas as "military zones" and gave the military power over the attorney general. These newly declared military zones were made in the western US and were areas "from which any or all persons could be excluded". Although the document does not specify any races or ethnic groups, later orders issued that all people of Japanese decent (even American citizens) were excluded from these military zones that included all of California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii. The Japanese in these areas were forced to evacuate to Internment Camps; where they could only bring what they could carry with them and where they would stay until further notice. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese-American citizen (American born) who decided to stay at his home in California during this time and was arrested for the violation of Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34. Korematsu challenged his arrest and the case was taken to the Supreme Court, where it was questioned if Executive Order 9066 violated Korematsu's 14th and 5th amendment rights (right to equal protection under the law and life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness). The court also questioned if Korematsu's constitutional rights were allowed to be violated due to the special circumstances of war. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sided with the government by ruling that the government was permitted to deny the Japanese of their constitutional rights because of military considerations, and that such exclusion was not beyond the war powers of congress and the president since it was done with national security in mind. Almost 40 years later after serving his sentence, Korematsu brought his case back to court filing for a writ of Coram Nobis to correct the previous ruling and achieve justice. Korematsu won this…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documents consistently showed that Japanese Americans had committed no acts of treason to justify mass incarceration. With this new evidence, a pro-bono legal team that included the Asian Law Caucus re-opened Korematsu’s 40-year-old case on the basis of government…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War II, a time of confusion and fear settled around America. Previously respected and average everyday citizens became feared and outcast by most people in the United States. “All citizens alike, both in and out of uniform feel the impact of war in greater or lesser measure (Justice Hugo Black).” The government declared that all the people of Japanese descent living along the Pacific coast be sent to live in concentration camps where the living arrangements were not the most pleasant and were overcrowded.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several reasons that “Military necessity” had required the evacuation and the internment of persons of Japanese ancestry under Executive Order 9066. One reason was the mass removal and incarceration was due after pearl harbor. America wanted a mass removal and incarceration of Japanese and even Japanese Americans that even though they grew up in America there only loyal to japan and they were going to kill Americans. Also the FBI had already considered Japanese language teachers, Buddhist clergies, and Japanese organizations. Many propagandas were surfacing around America for example Dr. Seuss contributed with a picture of Japanese American holding TNT bombs and looking for a signal to blow up California showing this perception…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kelo

    • 23643 Words
    • 95 Pages

    Kelo v. City of New London, 268 Conn. 1, 843 A.2d 500, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 54 (2004)…

    • 23643 Words
    • 95 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korematsu Essay

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Korematsu was born to a Japanese-American family that owned a flower nursery in 1919. After World War II broke out, Japanese living in Pacific states were sent to internment camps. Korematsu refused to go to an internment camp. In 1942 he was arrested and sent to a camp. The U.S. Supreme Court supported his conviction in 1944 on the grounds of military necessity. In 1983, Korematsu appealed his conviction. Later that year a federal court in San Francisco overturned the conviction. In 1988 Congress passed legislation apologizing for the internments and awarded each survivor $20,000. While the American concentration camps never reached the levels of Nazi death camps as far as atrocities are concerned, they remain a dark mark on the nation's record…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1932, the Powell vs Alabama Case reversed the convictions of nine black men who were accused of raping two white women. All the defendants, apart from one, were sentenced to death after a series of one-day trials and they were given minimal access to their lawyers before their trials which meant their defenses weren’t precisely planned. The convictions were reversed because the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that they weren't given a fair trial, they were denied legal counsel, and the juries excluded members of their race. This was a significant ruling because the Supreme Court had recognised that African Americans were being treated unconstitutionally, and the little rights that they did have, had been violated. This evidence shows that the Supreme Court was important in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights because the Courts had accepted that African…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In every Supreme Court case there is a question, in this particular case the question has to do with segregation. The question is: “Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race deprive the minority children of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment?” The 14th Amendment basically says that all states will have equal protection to everyone within their jurisdiction. It provides due process under the law and equally provides all constitutional rights to all citizens of this country, regardless of race, sex, religious beliefs and creed. (Kernell,…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays