Hirshleifer Teoh Lim 2009 JF
THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE • VOL. LXIV, NO. 5 • OCTOBER 2009
Driven to Distraction: Extraneous Events and
Underreaction to Earnings News
DAVID HIRSHLEIFER, SONYA SEONGYEON LIM, and SIEW HONG TEOH∗
ABSTRACT
Recent studies propose that limited investor attention causes market underreactions.
This paper directly tests this explanation by measuring the information load faced by investors. The investor distraction hypothesis holds that extraneous news inhibits market reactions to relevant news. We find that the immediate price and volume reaction to a firm’s earnings surprise is much weaker, and post-announcement drift much stronger, when a greater number of same-day earnings announcements are made by other firms. We evaluate the economic importance of distraction effects through a trading strategy, which yields substantial alphas. Industry-unrelated news and large earnings surprises have a stronger distracting effect.
[Attention] is the taking possession by the mind in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible objects or trains of thought . . . It implies withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others.
William James, Principles of Psychology, 1890
Almost a quarter of British motorists admit they have been so distracted by roadside billboards of semi-naked models that they have dangerously veered out of their lanes.
Reuters (London), November 21, 2005
IN SEVERAL KINDS of tests, there is on average a delayed price reaction to news that has the same sign as the immediate response. This phenomenon is ref lected in the new issue and repurchase puzzles (Loughran and Ritter (1995), Ikenberry,
∗ Hirshleifer and Teoh are at Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine and Lim is at Kellstadt Graduate School of Business, DePaul University, Department of Finance,
Chicago, Illinois. We thank an anonymous referee; Nick Barberis; Nerissa Brown; Werner DeBondt;
Stefano DellaVigna (NBER conference
Driven to Distraction: Extraneous Events and
Underreaction to Earnings News
DAVID HIRSHLEIFER, SONYA SEONGYEON LIM, and SIEW HONG TEOH∗
ABSTRACT
Recent studies propose that limited investor attention causes market underreactions.
This paper directly tests this explanation by measuring the information load faced by investors. The investor distraction hypothesis holds that extraneous news inhibits market reactions to relevant news. We find that the immediate price and volume reaction to a firm’s earnings surprise is much weaker, and post-announcement drift much stronger, when a greater number of same-day earnings announcements are made by other firms. We evaluate the economic importance of distraction effects through a trading strategy, which yields substantial alphas. Industry-unrelated news and large earnings surprises have a stronger distracting effect.
[Attention] is the taking possession by the mind in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible objects or trains of thought . . . It implies withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others.
William James, Principles of Psychology, 1890
Almost a quarter of British motorists admit they have been so distracted by roadside billboards of semi-naked models that they have dangerously veered out of their lanes.
Reuters (London), November 21, 2005
IN SEVERAL KINDS of tests, there is on average a delayed price reaction to news that has the same sign as the immediate response. This phenomenon is ref lected in the new issue and repurchase puzzles (Loughran and Ritter (1995), Ikenberry,
∗ Hirshleifer and Teoh are at Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine and Lim is at Kellstadt Graduate School of Business, DePaul University, Department of Finance,
Chicago, Illinois. We thank an anonymous referee; Nick Barberis; Nerissa Brown; Werner DeBondt;
Stefano DellaVigna (NBER conference
References: Bagnoli, Mark, Michael B. Clement, and Susan G. Watts, 2005, Around-the-clock media coverage and the timing of earnings announcements, Working paper, Purdue University. Baker, A. G., Pierre Mercier, Frederic Valleettourangeau, Robert Frank, and Maria Pan, 1993, Selective associations and causality judgments—Presence of a strong causal factor may reduce Barber, Brad, and Terrance Odean, 2000, Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors, Journal of Finance 55, 773–806. Barber, Brad, and Terrance Odean, 2008, All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors, Review of Financial Studies 21, Basu, Sudipta, 1997, The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics 24, 3–37. Bernard, Victor L., and Jacob K. Thomas, 1989, Post-earnings-announcement drift: Delayed price response or risk premium? Journal of Accounting Research 27, (Supplement), 1–48. Brennan, Michael J., Narasimhan Jegadeesh, and Bhaskaran Swaminathan, 1993, Investment analysis and the adjustment of stock prices to common information, Review of Financial Studies Brenner, Lyle A., Derek J. Koehler, and Amos Tversky, 1996, On the evaluation of one-sided evidence, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 9, 59–70. Broadbent, Donald E., 1958, Perception and Communication (Pergamon Press, New York, NY). Busemeyer, Jerome R., In Jae Myung, and Mark A. McDaniel, 1993, Cue competition effects— Empirical tests of adaptive network learning models, Psychological Science 4, 190–195. Chambers, Anne E., and Stephen H. Penman, 1984, Timeliness of reporting and the stock price reaction to earnings announcements, Journal of Accounting Research 22, 21–47. Cherry, E. Colin, 1953, Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 975–979. Cohen, Lauren, and Andrea Frazzini, 2008, Economic links and predictable returns, Journal of Finance 63, 1977–2011. Coval, Joshua D., and Tyler Shumway, 2005, Do behavioral biases affect prices? Journal of Finance 61, 1–34. Damodaran, Aswath, 1989, The weekend effect in information: A study of earnings and dividend announcements, Review of Financial Studies 4, 607–623. DeGeorge, Francois, Jayendu Patel, and Richard Zeckhauser, 1999, Earnings management to exceed thresholds, Journal of Business 72, 1–34. DellaVigna, Stefano, and Joshua M. Pollet, 2007, Demographics and industry returns, American Economic Review 97, 1167–1702. DellaVigna, Stefano, and Joshua M. Pollet, 2009, Investor inattention and Friday earnings announcements, Journal of Finance 64, 709–749. Desai, Hemang, and Prem C. Jain, 1997, Long-run common stock returns following stock splits and reverse splits, Journal of Business 70, 409–434. Dichev, Ilia, and Joseph Piotroski, 2001, The long-run stock returns following bond ratings changes, Journal of Finance 56, 173–203. Francis, Jennifer, Donald Pagach, and Jens Stephan, 1992, The stock market response to earnings announcements released during trading versus nontrading periods, Journal of Accounting Frazzini, Andrea, 2006, The disposition effect and underreaction to news, Journal of Finance 61, 2017–2046. Grossman, Sanford J., and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1976, Information and competitive price systems, American Economic Review 66, 246–253. Hirshleifer, David, and Siew Hong Teoh, 2003, Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting, Journal of Accounting and Economics 36, 337–386. Hirshleifer, David, and Siew Hong Teoh, 2005, Limited investor attention and stock market misreactions to accounting information, Working paper, Ohio State University. Hirshleifer, David, James Myers, Linda Myers, and Siew Hong Teoh, 2008, Do individual investors drive post-earnings announcement drift? Direct evidence from personal trades, Accounting Review 83, 1521–1550. Ho, Thomas, and Roni Michaely, 1988, Information quality and market efficiency, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 5, 357–386. Hong, Harrison, Terence Lim, and Jeremy Stein, 2000, Bad news travels slowly: Size, analyst coverage and the profitability of momentum strategies, Journal of Finance 55, 265–295. Hong, Harrison, Walter Torous, and Rossen Valkanov, 2007, Do industries lead stock markets? Journal of Financial Economics 83, 367–396. Hou, Kewei, 2007, Industry information diffusion and the lead-lag effect in stock returns, Review of Financial Studies 20, 1113–1138. Hou, Kewei, and Tobias Moskowitz, 2005, Market frictions, price delay, and the cross-section of expected returns, Review of Financial Studies 18, 981–1020. Hou, Kewei, Lin Peng, and Wei Xiong, 2008, A tale of two anomalies: The implication of investor attention for price and earnings momentum, Working paper, Ohio State University. Huberman, Gur, and Tomer Regev, 2001, Contagious speculation and a cure for cancer, Journal of Finance 56, 387–396. Ikenberry, David, Josef Lakonishok, and Theo Vermaelen, 1995, Market underreaction to open market share repurchases, Journal of Financial Economics 39, 181–208. James, William, 1890, The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1 (Henry Holt, New York), 403–404. Jegadeesh, Narasimhan, and Sheridan Titman, 1993, Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency, Journal of Finance 48, 65–91. Kaniel, Ron, Gideon Saar, and Sheridan Titman, 2008, Individual investor trading and stock returns, Journal of Finance 63, 273–310. Klibanoff, Peter, Owen Lamont, and Thierry A. Wizman, 1998, Investor reaction to salient news in closed-end country funds, Journal of Finance 53, 673–699. Kothari, S. P., 2001, Capital market research in accounting, Journal of Accounting and Economics 31, 105–231. Kruschke, John K., and Mark K. Johansen, 1999, A model of probabilistic category learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25, 1083–1119. Loughran, Tim, and Jay Ritter, 1995, The new issues puzzle, Journal of Finance 50, 23–52. McLeod, Peter, 1977, Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period, Acta Psychologica 41, 381–391. Moray, Neville, 1959, Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the inf luence of instructions, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 11, 56–60. Pashler, Harold, and James C. Johnston, 1998, Attentional limitations in dual-task performance, in H Peng, Lin, 2005, Learning with information capacity constraints, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 40, 307–329. Peng, Lin, and Wei Xiong, 2006, Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning, Journal of Financial Economics 80, 563–602. Pollet, Joshua M., 2005, Predicting asset returns with expected oil price changes, Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Simons, Daniel J., and Christopher F. Chabris, 1999, Gorillas in our midst: Sustained in attentional