Hernandez Case
If we terminate, Cheryl from a company. The consequences would be having someone new and training him or her. Although the training will also cost a lot to teach someone new the companies, work duties. This way we could lose the productivity of the daytime and the consequences will not be good for an organization. One of the case study presented at the University of the Southern California Football coach Mr. Sakisian’s who had been on drugs and violated policies of his company. He has terminated and was unable to accommodate. Mr. Sarkisian’s had gone to his pep rally and taken two beers along with prescribed medication (Greenwald). Further the issues raised in court in the Greenwald articles states, “The Americans with Disabilities Act protects a “qualified” alcoholic who is considered to have a “disability,” which has
…show more content…
Sarkisian had violated the company policies, however, he was under prescribed medications. The other case had Hernandez addicted to drugs and violating policies, and the only difference is here being that he was forced to resign, and the company did not give him another opportunity. I learned that every company is different with their various policies and situations they face. I found out that it would be better if a supervisor carefully evaluates the problem and addresses it based on the results. I believe the Hernandez case needed more attention and evaluation on this issue since he had worked for so long with his good performance (“Kicking the Habit”). These both cases had similarity with my case. Bothe case had employees who have been working in the company for a long time. At the particular time, an issue had arisen towards them where they were addicted to the alcoholism. They violated the policies at the workplace by not cooperating well in the workplace. However, the management did not take the time to figure the issue properly and then come on
Sarkisian had violated the company policies, however, he was under prescribed medications. The other case had Hernandez addicted to drugs and violating policies, and the only difference is here being that he was forced to resign, and the company did not give him another opportunity. I learned that every company is different with their various policies and situations they face. I found out that it would be better if a supervisor carefully evaluates the problem and addresses it based on the results. I believe the Hernandez case needed more attention and evaluation on this issue since he had worked for so long with his good performance (“Kicking the Habit”). These both cases had similarity with my case. Bothe case had employees who have been working in the company for a long time. At the particular time, an issue had arisen towards them where they were addicted to the alcoholism. They violated the policies at the workplace by not cooperating well in the workplace. However, the management did not take the time to figure the issue properly and then come on