Hernan Cortes Hero or Villain?
The Sun Cannot be covered by a Finger
Hearing of the word hero brings to my mind a good looking man with some qualities of fair, equal, courage, brave, honest and a positive leader. This makes the opposite a villain a person who wishes wrong for someone or a person who creates evil. The event changes dramatically, a hero of the past may not be considered a hero in the present and versa. Hernando Cortes a hero for joining two worlds and conquering the most powerful civilization of America or Hernando Cortes a villain for making the Aztec Empire disappear. Hernando Cortez was an important symbol for the explorations, but killing people, ending the most powerful civilization in America and spreading diseases does not makes him a hero. With good strategy and few men Cortes defeated the Aztec Empire, first Montezuma II and then Cuauhtémoc. (5) Spreading disease “smallpox” to the Aztecs that then will spread the disease all over Mexico and making many people die. (2) Taking over a civilization that had his culture, language, religion and after doing all this finished with the entire Aztec Empire. (1) If you argue these reasons you get the results of a villain or in this case the result of Cortes.
"For the people of Mexico, Cuauhtémoc is a hero as the Spanish are inhuman exploiters in their treatment of the indigenous population." (3) Not only Mexicans believe that poor and cruel treatment for human beans is a crime. This is something that we were born and we immediately knew. Treating humans as slaves is shameful and this is exactly what Cortes did. Coming to a place that is not yours and saying that now is you place is one thing, but treating them bad so they would do what he order and killing them if they decided to oppose is another high level of evilness. (4) Cortés was ultimately responsible for the abuses suffered by indigenous and this contributes immensely to the "black legend" of conquest. (9) The black legend of the conquest was the abuse of the Spanish
Hearing of the word hero brings to my mind a good looking man with some qualities of fair, equal, courage, brave, honest and a positive leader. This makes the opposite a villain a person who wishes wrong for someone or a person who creates evil. The event changes dramatically, a hero of the past may not be considered a hero in the present and versa. Hernando Cortes a hero for joining two worlds and conquering the most powerful civilization of America or Hernando Cortes a villain for making the Aztec Empire disappear. Hernando Cortez was an important symbol for the explorations, but killing people, ending the most powerful civilization in America and spreading diseases does not makes him a hero. With good strategy and few men Cortes defeated the Aztec Empire, first Montezuma II and then Cuauhtémoc. (5) Spreading disease “smallpox” to the Aztecs that then will spread the disease all over Mexico and making many people die. (2) Taking over a civilization that had his culture, language, religion and after doing all this finished with the entire Aztec Empire. (1) If you argue these reasons you get the results of a villain or in this case the result of Cortes.
"For the people of Mexico, Cuauhtémoc is a hero as the Spanish are inhuman exploiters in their treatment of the indigenous population." (3) Not only Mexicans believe that poor and cruel treatment for human beans is a crime. This is something that we were born and we immediately knew. Treating humans as slaves is shameful and this is exactly what Cortes did. Coming to a place that is not yours and saying that now is you place is one thing, but treating them bad so they would do what he order and killing them if they decided to oppose is another high level of evilness. (4) Cortés was ultimately responsible for the abuses suffered by indigenous and this contributes immensely to the "black legend" of conquest. (9) The black legend of the conquest was the abuse of the Spanish