Preview

Herbert Marcuse's The Sunflower Symposium

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
366 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Herbert Marcuse's The Sunflower Symposium
Herbert Marcuse, Religion/Philosophy, The Sunflower Symposium, (207-208). Herbert claims that if he absolutely had to pick he would not forgive the NAZI soilder. He solemnly thinks that he would do the exact same thing as the author and that he would not give an answer.
He would refuse the request because he thought that it was unjust. “It always seemed to me inhuman and a travesty of justice if the executioner asked the victim to forgive” (207-208). Wiesenthal's anger was righteous because being in the place that he was in, the soldier probably is asking forgiveness to make himself feel better before he dies. Wiesenthal knows that the soldier is asking for forgiveness to the wrong person.The author organized his symposium by stating his opinion

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Internationally recognized as the ‘Nazi who said sorry’ collectively, it was from Speer’s remorseful attitude during his trial in 1946 as well as his previous crimes committed in the Nazi movement from which his significance in German and international history is seen.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    HUM 301 Sunflower

    • 3280 Words
    • 14 Pages

    A profoundly poignant account portraying the internal conflict Simon Wiesenthal experiences when a dying Nazi soldier earnestly seeks his forgiveness, The Sunflower provokes introspective discussion about forgiveness, justice, mercy, and human responsibility. While metaphorically gazing upon the sunflowers displayed on the graves of soldiers, Simon is forced to mechanically march towards the Technical High School he once attended. The familiar surroundings evoke memories of the hatred and contempt he encountered while he was a student, particularly on the examination days that had been entitled "a day without Jews" by his Polish classmates (Wiesenthal 20). When he arrives at the Technical High School (now a military hospital), Simon and the other prisoners are instructed "to carry cartons filled with rubbish out of the building" (Wiesenthal 22).…

    • 3280 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Sunflower, Simon Wiesenthal documents his experiences in a Nazi Death Camp. Sent (along with other prisoners) to clean medical waste in a hospital converted for the express usage of injured German Soldiers. On the way, "Our column suddenly came to a halt at a crossroads. I could see nothing that might be holding us up but I noticed on the left of the street there was a military cemetery . . . and on each grave there was planted a sunflower . . . I stared spellbound . . . Suddenly I envied the dead soldiers. Each had a sunflower to connect him with the living world, and butterflies to visit his grave. For me there would be no sunflower. I would be buried in a mass grave, where corpses would be piled on top of me. No sunflower would ever bring light into my darkness, and…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simon Wiesenthal Analysis

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Simon Wiesenthal takes his readers on a course back in time with his writings of The Sunflower. Simon recollects moments when he was subjected to live in Nazi concentration camps during World War II. Karl, a dying SS soldier implores for forgiveness for his crimes against Jews of Simon. Our main character is conflicted by the request and leaves his readers by asking what would one have done being in his position. Providing an answer to this question can be determined by the analysis of Simon’s experiences and findings of experimenters. Philip Zimbardo and Stanley Milgram’s experiments demonstrate the relationship and effects that authority has on subjects. In “The Perils of Obedience”, Milgram applies his analysis of his experiments showing…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No matter how bad a crime a person commits, one should still forgive that person when he or she asks for forgiveness. Sometimes people go for the wrong thing because they’re forced to do it just like the dying Nazi. Simon Wiesenthal should have forgiven the dying Nazi because one should forgive but not forget, it is a central tenet of the Jews religion, and there’s no limit to forgiveness.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Elie Wiesel's nobel prize acceptance speech, Wiesel uses this platform to delegate and urge people to remember the holocaust, that they may learn from his experiences and understand his mission, using both emotion and moral ethics, Wiesel takes a stand that no person may feel at peace until the matter is resolved. In his speech wiesel gives his statements due to his feeling and urge to reach out due to the terrible memories that haunt him and as an example he uses is when he talks about the little boy ¨And now the boy is turning to me: "Tell me," he asks. "What have you done with my future? What have you done with your life?" here Wiesel expresses his feelings for the past, that it urges him to do more; using an example of his past self…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Wiesel reports that after Buchenwald was liberated, the prisoners had no thoughts of revenge. Is this surprising?…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a teenager, his biggest plan for the future was to further his spirituality. When Moché asks Wiesel why he prays, Wiesel responds with, “Why did I pray? Strange question. Why did I live? Why did I breathe?” (Wiesel 14). He is so devout and in-tune with God that he relates praying to the simple task of breathing. His faith was practically limitless. However, by the end of the book, Wiesel’s faith in God is destroyed by the horrors he witnesses. This is supported by many events Wiesel experiences during his time in the concentration camps. For example, shortly after becoming a prisoner, some of the other men are reciting Kaddish and praising God. Wiesel, however, questions, “Why should I sanctify His name? The Almighty, the eternal and terrible Master of the Universe, chose to be silent. What was there to thank Him for?” (42). The events that took place at the crematory begin to strip him of his religion, similarly to how his innocence slowly fades from him. Later on that night, he reflects on what had happened that day and states, “Never shall I forget those moments that murdered my God and my soul and turned my dreams to ashes” (43). Not only did the the crematory kill his fellow Jews, it also killed his God. Wiesel does not doubt that God exists. He just no longer believes in his ultimate mercy. Instead, he believes God is cruel, unfair, and indifferent to suffering, which, consequently, is a God Wiesel…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Large Scale Crime Analysis

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    We do agree that a man has no right try to forgive injuries of other victims. However, in The Symposium of The Sunflower, Christopher says that, “But insofar as this act of not merely a personal act of one SS man against one Jewish child but an incident in a general campaign of genocide, the author was as much a victim…” (Christopher 179). In his words, if the Large-Scale crime comes too large that millions people involved, every single victim or offenders could be seen as the whole side because every individual’s surroundings, actions and endings would become increasingly similar with each other’s that we can consider those individuals as a whole groups. For example, in The Sunflower, Wiesenthal could represents all of Jewish victims in a massacre because he was also suffered from Nazi’s torment and forgiveness would be easier because Wiesenthal might be killed soon or later by Nazi, same as those Jewish families killed by Karl. The only difference is who will shot at him actually. Whereas, I think Wiesenthal could not represent all Jewish. First of all, even though World War II was a world scale warfare and millions of Nazi solider involved, and killed millions of Jewish victims. In this case, everyone still have to treat individually, though. To illustrate, Wiesenthal and Karl even never met each other before that nurse guided Wiesenthal to Karl in the hospital before Karl died, so Karl has no possibility harass Wiesenthal and he only feel guilty about what he had done instead of feel guilty about whole Nazi’s killing history. So Wiesenthal did not need to forgive the whole Nazi and he has no right to replaces that Jewish family to forgive Karl, because nobody authorized Wiesenthal with rights to represent others. In the other hand, Wiesenthal already knew he was going to be killed soon or later, by Nazi, so I hardly…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nazi Germany, Representations of the Past, and the Holocaust. In this he describes that the public burnings of the Hebrew Bible had nothing to do with racial ideology but more to do with Nazi anti-Semitism. His interpretation and argument of the holocaust is different than many other scholarly articles that impose that Hitler and his Nazi followers were racially prejudice and wanted to watch the impure nations burn. In David Caldwell’s article Reflections on holocaust and Holocaust, he argues that the final solution occurred because of human propensity for genocide and the lack of effort to intervene in the holocaust from other countries. He argues that it is human nature to act in hateful manner to other races and communities unlike the one a person identifies with and that this could have led to the isolationist nature of other countries that kept them from intervening. In Daniel Goldhagen’s book Hitler’s Willing Executioners, he argues that the Nazi plan to annihilate the Jews was due to the growing anti- Semitism in Germany post the Great War that caused many Germans to become willing and active participants in the execution of the Jewish Nation. He argues that the political ideology of the time period allowed for the growing anti-Semitism that was adopted by most of the German population. In Kevin Spacers book, Antisemitism, Christian Ambivalence, and the Holocaust, Spacer claimed that the Nazi Germans were not the only anti-Semitic group but that many Christian European nations faced Christian anti Semitism which ultimately lead to some of these countries involvement in the holocaust and other countries unwillingness to…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This thought is not directed at how a forgiving attitude would help the SS man, but how it would help me. Simon is not furious and bitter that he was asked to forgive a SS soldier. Instead he is pondering over whether he made the right decision, he was in doubt, knowing he could not speak for all the Jews. Desmond Tutu speaks of victims who have suffered much, yet forgive. He states, “This magnanimity, this nobility of spirit, is quite breathtakingly unbelievable” (Tutu 267).…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eichmann in Jerusalem

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In her book, Eichmann in Jerusalem, Hannah Arendt uses the life and trial of Adolf Eichmann to explore man's responsibility for evils committed under orders or as a result of the law. Due to the fact that she believed that Eichmann was neither anti-Semitic, nor a psychopath, Arendt was widely criticized for treating Eichmann too sympathetically. Still, her work on the Eichmann trial is among the most respected works on the issue to date.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Herbert Marcuse begins his 1969 essay on freedom and liberation this way – dedicating his words and his theories to the militants around the country who have taken their freedom and their future into their own hands. They have hit the turning point, what Marcuse calls “the Great Refusal,” the moment of recognizing societal repression in a complex capitalist system and attempting to put an end to it. They took the idea of revolution and put it where it belongs, into the dimension of liberation; they inspired Marcuse to outline new possibilities for real human freedom. Marcuse comes from the Frankfurt School of Germany, founded in the 1920s by a group of Marxist intellectuals and a major source of intellectual social theory during the twentieth…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Who stands firm? Only the one for whom the final standard is not his reason, his principles, his conscience, his freedom, his virtue, but who is ready to sacrifice all these, when faith and sole allegiance to God, he is called to obedient and responsible action: the responsible person, whose life will be nothing but an answer to God’s question and call.” This quote reflected Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s view of Christianity. Bonhoeffer was a German pastor and religious scholar who opposed Adolph Hitler and the German Nazis. Bonhoeffer was one of the few Christian leaders actively to resist the discriminatory actions of the German leaders.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Wiesel says, "I know your choice transcends my person," he means that he is grateful for being chosen for the Nobel Peace Prize. Also, Wiesel indicates that he is thankful that the committee surpassed himself and recognized people who sacrificed from the Holocaust. Wiesel refers himself in the first person and the third person during paragraphs four through six to help the reader better understand his piece. With the use of two different narratives, Wiesel gives the reader a better understanding and it also creates an image in the reader's head of what has happened from his point of view. When Wiesel says, “if we forget, we are guilty, we are accomplices,” he means that if people ignore that something could occur once more, people are…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays