Preview

Henry Viii as a King, Evaluation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1676 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry Viii as a King, Evaluation
How far did Henry VIII achieve his aims as king between 1509-1514?

To an extent Henry VIII achieved his aims as King between 1509-1515. Whilst he achieved aims such as to have glory in battle such as with France to earn prestige and therefore establish greater power within the European countries, he did fail in some aspects with most set aim as king. An example of this is his inability to produce a male heir to the throne which arguably was one of his prime aims as king. One of Henry’s main aims as king was to be a different leader in terms of his style from that of his father; he wanted to be a more warlike leader who was more dominant across Europe and also to be a generally more popular king. We know that this would have been one of Henry’s main aims as in the first year of his reign he executed Empson and Dudley. These two people were corrupt and unfair leaders and were very unpopular within England; they were very much associated with Henry’s father. By Henry executing them publically in 1510, by way of a big public ceremony illustrated two things to the people; firstly that he is a perhaps fairer king and that their desires were what were to shape his decisions and secondly that he would be a completely different, more popular and significant leader on a larger scale, so within Europe, by having more of a dominant presence, this is shown through the bold and trademarking execution. Henry succeeded in this aim, he indeed did become a more popular leader by taking the interests of his people very seriously, and he even built a strong army to protect everyone from frequent civil wars so making England more of a unity in itself and therefore a stronger nation. Also Henry, in an attempt of gaining the popularity from the nobility, cuts back on bonds and recognizes to please them as well as letting the nobles into his private life more and inviting them to private events of his, this in turn would’ve made them feel more important and involved with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another aspect was that Henry didn’t and couldn’t have a lot of victories, this was due to England being poor. Instead, the 20 year old French successor, Francis I invaded northern Italy and recaptured Milan from the Habsburgs. Francis, like Henry, wanted to be the centre of attention and he could afford to. Another person who made Henry look weaker, was Charles V who became the King of Spain, The Holy Roman Emperor and the Duke in the Netherlands, he was the ultimate ruler, whereas Henry lacked great titles so couldn't compete and couldn't improve his ‘warrior…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Warfare was the way Kings achieved this. David Potter is quite sceptical about such high flown ambitions but other historians believe that this objective underpinned Henry’s character. Driving factor was rivalry with Francis I and Charles V. 3 ambitious young monarchs…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far do these sources suggest that young Henry VIII was an impressive figure as a king?…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Henry V had two major areas of impact, his first campaign into France in 1415, in which he captured a powerful tool in the form of the castle Harfluer. During the same campaign he won a decisive victory at Agincourt, smashing the French opponents even when heavily outnumbered. His other area of significance was his second campaign into France, in which he would eventually conquer all of Normandy and take the French crown for England. Henry V achieved all of the goals during his lifetime; he conquered and occupied all the northern areas of France. Most importantly though, is that he secured the throne of France for England.…

    • 3238 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry VII took the throne after a battle against the former king Richard III whose forces outnumbered Henrys by two to one. Henry VII had a couple of big problems, one of them was that there were people that had a stronger claim to the throne than he did, his only claim was that god let him win the battle, therefore the nobility didn’t respect him at the beginning of his reign. Another of the problems he faced was the fact that he feared a lot about his security and about his son, and in order to keep his family and himself safe, he signed treaties with other countries so they didn’t attack each other because Henry, not being a conventional king, preferred peace than war.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Henry VIIs reign started on the 22nd August 1485 he adapted many different techniques and ideas so keep his nobility from gaining too much power. Some of these ideas became successful however some didn’t achieve the goal and some even made it worse leaving the nobility with more power. He followed through with new ideas until his death and therefore the end of his reign on the 21st April 1509.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How successful was Henry VII in dealing with challenges to his royal authority in the years 1489 to 1499?…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To some extent Henry VII was successful in dealing with the challenges to his royal authority in the years 1485 to 1509. However, there were also limitations to this success. This essay will evaluate Henry’s actions, meaning that a conclusion can be drawn on how effective they in fact were.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tudor dynasty experienced differing uncertainties throughout their reigns on the throne of England. From politics and war overseas, to succession difficulties. Each Monarch throughout early modern England faced conflicting challenges and hardships, nevertheless Henry VIII stands out among them all. Henry’s turbulent years on the throne presents an evolution throughout English society, culture, religion and politics, to name a few. Henry was not expected to become King, being only the third child of Henry VII, himself also an unexpected King, winning his throne on the battle field against Richard III in 1485. His early youth was not that of the first in line to the throne, due to the unexpected death of this elder brother Arthur, Henry…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII DBQ

    • 1150 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wanting an annulment from Catherine the Great, Henry VIII created the Anglican Church through the Act of Supremacy in 1534. This marked the beginning of the Protestant Reformation in England, and Thomas Cromwell, Henry VIII’s head of the King’s Council, instigated a series of governmental policies including new taxes, growth of royal power in the north of England, closure of monasteries, and elimination of Catholic church lands. In response to Cromwell’s doings, marchers staged protests and armed demonstrations that came to be known as the Pilgrimage of Grace. The religious goals of the participants of the Pilgrimage of Grace discussed the issues of Protestantism and the need for Catholicism to be firmly re-established. The participants also had religious and political concerns about the corruption of the church and Parliament’s authority, resulting in political opposition about treason and government from those supporting Henry VIII.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Play King Henry V was set in England in the early fifteenth century. King Henry IV has died, and his son, the young King Henry V, has just assumed the throne. Henry lays claim to certain parts of France, based on his distant roots in the French royal family and on a very technical interpretation of ancient land laws. When the young prince, or Dauphin, of France sends Henry an insulting message in response to these claims, Henry decides to invade France. The climax of this war comes at the famous Battle of Agincourt, at which the English are outnumbered by the French five to one. The night before the battle, King Henry disguises himself as a common soldier and talks to many of the soldiers in his camp. Sometime later, peace negotiations are finally worked out: Henry will marry Catherine, the daughter of the French king. Henry’s son will be the king of France, and the marriage will unite the two kingdoms. One question that comes to mind as your reading this play is, do they portray King Henry as the ideal Christian king?…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On this question there are two opposite views. First, traditional, is that Henry’s and Wolsey’s foreign policy was a complete failure; it was short-sighted, naïve, anachronistic and way too expensive. As John Guy said in 1988, Wolsey ‘overreached himself in diplomacy’. The other view, in contrast, is that Henry VIII and Cardinal Wolsey, although not reaching much success had a very practical, flexible and purposeful foreign policy. Witness for this view is Mandell Creighton who in 1888 said: ‘Wolsey had a capacity which amounted to genius’. However, in my opinion, both these views are extremes, stressing too much some fact or other in English foreign policy in 1509-1529.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed that his rule was that of God's grace and no one was allowed to speak against him or say that he was wrong, especially the Church. King Henry VIII had the power as king to declare war, pardon convicted criminals, create and abolish parliment, as well as control the Kingdom's coinage. King Henry VIII managed a royal court of nobles that had to help manage his kingdom based on his personal views or risk execution as he freely did without remorse for many other nobles that had opposed or questioned him. The estimated number of execututions that King Henry VIII has gone through with has been said to be in the 72,000 range however this is also said to be argued on it's vitility as many believe this statistic is greatly exagerated to unreasonable numbers. King Henry VIII killed friends, public servants, attendents, abbots and even a cardinal by the name of John Fisher. This lead many nobles and high ranking people within the Kingdom to grow weary of their safety, for any miss step could lead them to being executed for treason or worse. However that is not to say that people where still not willing to try and gain his favor for those who do can recieve great prosperity and power. Those who were close to King Henry VIII could possibly be known as chief minister allowing them to have a large role in King Henry VIII's affairs and political decisions. (Black,…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays