Preview

Henry V Ethical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
645 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry V Ethical Analysis
It has never been agreed upon that life is an absolute right, but only that death is the absolute outcome. Philosophers call it a prima facie right, this right gets forfeited in actions such as aggravated murder, abortion, physician-assisted suicide, and other heinous crimes. However, the great western powers are on sure footing when it comes to this type of permitted murder, but a just war doesn’t make a total war acceptable. Williams Shakespeare’s play Henry V is loosely based upon England’s own ethical dilemmas in the early 1400’s. This is especially true when conflicting governments go into a war just because one side believes themselves to be in a just war the other may not.

This is true when looking at Henry V’s values. Like many, values
…show more content…
Scroop was one of Henry V’s closest friends before he was put in power, Scroop had started to see King Henry V as unstable and joined a coup against his life. “What shall I say to thee, Lord Scroop, thou cruel, Ingrateful, savage, and inhuman creature…”(scene 2 act 2) The King is absolutely infuriated at the fact that Scroop would turn against him in such a treasonous way later Scrope begs for his life, but the merciless Henry V has no patience for such treachery and sentences Scroop and the other two traitors to execution under arrest of high treason. Bardolph, a commoner, also faces the King's wrath when he is sentenced to be hanged for petty theft. “We would have all such offenders so cut off, and we give express charge that in our marches through the country there be nothing compelled from the villages… the gentler gamester is the soonest winner.”(Act 3 scene 6) Bardolph was a common thief that Henry V chose to make an example of, but mercy was not the deciding factor in this decision he believes by not harassing the french he will more easily win the war, the loss of the war seen as greater than the loss of a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Tim O'Brien on Injustice

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The unclearness and uncertainty of war is something that penetrates deep into life and it is something that affects every facet of every day. Justice is the pursuit of right, the elevation of goodness, and the elimination of evil; however, such lucid definitions often lack substance when stood up to the tests of reality. Injustice is the denial of rights and the lack of morality for the embracement of barbarism. When looking for injustices in the world, what most readily comes to mind are violent crimes? Murder, theft, and rape are domestic injustices commonly recognized, but injustices, like reality, exist in perception. Therefore, to deem someone or something unjust, first agreement upon its definition must be established. When the United States declared her independence, we perceived the unjust indignities to be clear; however, to the militant king, the refusal to pay his taxes was injustice and the nullification of his law was the warrant for war. When such implied meanings come in to play, one has to determine what is just. In order to eliminate war, first all nations must outline the true meaning of “injustice” and find suitable solutions for reparation. The most diligent participant of war is the injustice done upon both sides, the backing of both by god, and the misconception that both will prevail due to their side being right and just. These differing views of injustice and justice are what cause the eventual degradation of war. (JRSOT) Tim O’Brien takes account of the injustices of war when he refers to opposing…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V ruled England from 1413 to 1422. Before that, his father Henry IV ruled while his son, then known as Hal, spent his time with criminals and even took part in some of their crimes. Hal and his friends were led by a big time drinker, John Falstaff. Henry at that time was seen as a very bad future King, simply because of all of his bad habits, and was even threatened to lose his future position on the throne. As soon as Henry IV died Hal changed drastically, and even banished his old friend John, whom he was very close to.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Viii Research Paper

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry VIII is born in June of 1491 to Henry VII and Elizabeth of York. Being the second born son of this time he is considered to be the spare, while his older brother Arthur will be the heir to the throne. Since Henry is the not as important second born son there are very poor records of his upbringing and education. With this is mind it might be safe to assume a very common practice for this period of time would have taken place. This practice would be that of forcing the spare into the church with the hopes that they would become a high-ranking church official. Ultimately, this does not come to fruition with the death of Arthur in April of 1502. Since his brother had passed Henry VIII now takes his place in the succession making him next…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The power of the Nobility was the most important cause of unrest in the period of 1450 to 1470. ‘How far…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VII and Retaining

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Retaining involved magnates taking men into their service, generally involving the payment of fees and sometimes the granting of a distinctive badge or uniform (livery).…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII pt. 2

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry's most important minister early in his reign. Wolsey became Archbishop of York in late 1514, was created a cardinal of the Catholic Church the following November, and became Lord Chancellor of the realm in December 1515. Wolsey achieved singular stature in these offices. Since Henry was not so interested in administration as his minister, Wolsey took over many of the duties of kingship, overseeing England's finances and diplomatic relations with other European powers. Henry became extremely dependent on Wolsey, whose zeal and ability as an administrator made him indespensable. Among Henry's contemporaries on the European continent, many considered Wolsey to be the true ruler of England, since it was to him that foreign officials were often directed to address concerns meant for the English king.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V used ethos and pathos to convince his army to fight along his side during one of the many battles in the Hundred Years War. This battle in particular was the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. Right before they went off to battle, Henry used pathos much to his advantage. It’s not easy to go into battle, especially if you have no other choice than to go into battle. But he easily gains his army’s trust my insuring them of the future, “He that outlives this day, and comes safe home…,” this gives them hope and another reason to fight for. Adding on to the future, he touches a small part in their heart by saying, “this story shall the good man teach his son.” Every man on the battle field must have one thing in common and that is to have a son…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hunting, murder, and war are all words men have made to distinguish between types of killing and the varied justifications made for committing the same deed. In carrying out this most grave and final of all endeavors, as any other action, one sees it is not the actual temporal action itself that matters and defines the moment. The intention with which one sets out is even more important than what is done, and determines, at least within the actor’s mind, the righteousness of the act. G.E.M. Anscombe’s “War and Murder” provides the baseline definitions of how to categorize killing during a time of war. These views are supplemented by fictional works in which death and its cause play a central role. Richard Connell’s…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A review of chapter 2, 'The Crime of War' in Michael Walzer's book, "Just and Unjust Wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations." Allen Lane 1997.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part I explores what it means to be an honest and honourable man.’…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Henry within the past few acts have shown a great desire to achieve his goal. This suggest that he is very prideful for what his heart is set out for. However, his desires are also fueled by his emotions. More specifically when he encountered the ambassadors in England to make the suggestion of invading England. With the response and poor judgment assessed by the ambassadors in a mocking fashion, King Henry felt the need to prove them wrong and show that his plan for invading France was a worthy decision. In this particular instance, his pride leads him to strive even harder to achieve his goal for invading France. This can partially be due to the fact that Henry is continuously seen or assumed to act like a child. This can drive someone…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Is Henry A Good Leader

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Niccolo Machiavelli, in his work “The Prince” talks in detail about how a prince must act in order to be a truly effective and prosperous ruler. One of his cardinal rules for these princes is the idea that, “A prince should have no other object, nor any other thought, nor take anything else as his art but that of war and its orders and discipline; for that is the only art which is of concern to one who commands.” (The Prince, 58). William Shakespeare in his play Henry V tells the life of Henry the fifth, the king of England during the early 1400s, specifically during his own war against the French empire focusing on events before and after the Battle of Agincourt. So, even though Henry lived long before Machiavelli, it must be seen whether…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays