Preview

Henry Kissinger Email

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry Kissinger Email
Henry Kissinger - Diplomacy
Chapter 7
Urvashi Deshmukh and Louise Forbes
Brief Summary of the Chapter:
According to Kissinger, Germany may not be solely responsible for the outbreak of World War I. There were other reasons for the start of the war, for example, the change in the balance of power, which led to an arms race amongst the European powers.
Bismarck was an astute and revered leader in the European community. His departure signaled a change in Germany’s foreign policy. Germany’s pursuit for its own security became the reason for its insecurity. Germany became the strongest military power in continental Europe and caused Great Britain, France and Russia to align against it. Ironically, for the greater part of Imperial Germany’s history, Russia was considered the main threat to peace in Europe. Russia always wanted more land and craved for territorial expansion.
A remarkable change occurred in British foreign policy between 1890 and 1914. The architect of change was the Marquis of Salisbury. Salisbury authored the phrase “splendid isolation” to depict Britain’s stance of neutrality, yet involved Great Britain in continental alliances.
The young Kaiser’s foreign policy acumen was a poor shadow of Bismarck’s diplomacy. William II’s first diplomatic move was to reject the Tsar’s offer to renew the Reinsurance Treaty for another three year term. The Kaiser, by doing so, pulled perhaps the most important thread out of the fabric of Bismarck’s system of overlapping alliances. Bismarck’s ambiguous treaty, which was a tactically brilliant move, acted as a balance between Austria’s fears and Russia’s ambitions without having to break with either nations or to escalate the endemic Balkan crisis. The Kaiser literally paved the way for the Franco-Russian alliance. Throughout his reign, the Kaiser was better at starting crisis than he was at concluding them.
Germany tried hard to bring Britain on its side. But the bullying tactics and the demand for a formal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    To begin with, one would have to look at the various factors that led to souring in relations between countries, for example, “Weltpolitik”. Germany was a new country, and had industrialized pretty quickly. Its nationalism was growing which led its imperialistic attitude. Thus it had ditched “realpolitik” and cast its eyes on the rest of the world. Germany did not “want to place anyone in the shadow,” but still have “a place under the sun.” Britain and other leading powers did not want Germany to have an empire, because they were scared it would make Germany even more powerful. Germany accused them of double standards and led to it feeling resentful to the other countries.…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate of Germanys responsibility for the outbreak of war first began with the charge of war guilt given in Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty. Germany rejected Article 231 and successfully campaigned against it as by 1950 it had become widely accepted that Germany where not solely responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914. The first source from Gordon Corrigan, Mud, Blood and Poppycock, published in 2003 addresses Germany’s “unconditional support” to Austria- Hungary to support the idea of Germany being the main reason for the outbreak of World War 1. In this source Corrigan refers to Fritz Fischer’s theory in which he argued that Germany’s leaders might not have been solely to for what happened in 1914 but hold a substantial share of the responsibility. Source 2 from L.F.C Turner, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1970 agrees with Source 1 by reinforcing that it was Germany’s support to Austria and the Blank Cheque that were vital in the starting of War. On the other hand, Source 3 from James Joll, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1984 disagrees with source 1 as Joll highlights the involvement of other countries with a main focus on Britain being a main factor in the cause of war. Source 2 agrees with this to some extent as it also discusses that Germany is not the only country that is responsible.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Von Bismarck worked on the two issues, unification of Germany and isolation of France (Germany's mortal enemy). He believed that as long as Britain, Russia and Italy were assured of the peaceful nature of the German Empire, the French could be contained. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s style of working and understanding of foreign relations strengthened and unified other European powers against Germany in time for World War I. There are numerous examples of how reversal in policies of Wilhelm II acted as a catalyst to trigger off sensitive issues such as militarism, nationalism, imperialism and caused imbalance in the alliances leading to the onset of The First World War.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The outbreak of the First World War occurred in 1914 and there are many reasons for why the outbreak happened. Blackbourn writes that Germany “had done much to create international tension” and this implies that Germany were responsible for the outbreak of war as tensions were rising between countries in Europe due to the relations they had with several other countries. This had a knock on effect due to the Alliance system which was in place so that countries were protected by their allies. It meant that any sort of conflict between two countries escalated quickly due to the countries across Europe being locked into an alliance. The importance of the Alliance system can be reinforced by L.F.C Turner who writes “Bethmann pushed Austria into a premature declaration of war” which suggests that Germany were responsible because they gave Austria a Blank Cheque which was Germany giving Austria permission to attack Serbia stating that they would help aid their attack on Serbia as they wanted the war to happen sooner rather than later. This is because they knew Russia was growing stronger and they were feeling encircled by the Triple Entente which was the alliances between Britain, France and Russia and they clearly felt threatened due to where they are placed geographically. Bethmann also writes in the source that Germany “built a battle fleet aimed at the British” which implies that Germany was aggressive…

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    causes of WW1 dbq

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One underlying cause of World War I was militarism. Militarism is when nations invested heavily in their armed forces in order to remain stronger than one’s enemies. Well first Great Britain spent the most money on its navy so it could have a very strong military. Also Germany spent the most money on its army, to also have a very strong military. This evidence supports the claim that militarism was an underlying cause of the war because Germany had the strongest power on the continent. But the British navy was the strongest in the world. So obviously both countries, Germany and Great Britain, began to battle to see who had the strongest and most powerful military in the world.…

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first opinion presented in the sources is that decisions made by Germany’s leaders were responsible for the outbreak of the First World War.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 M.A.I.N Causes

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Britain had yet to decide it`s position . London was suspicious of the growing might of Germany , but she had clashed with France over the Sudan in 1898 . In late 1903 Britain and France signed the ` Entente Cordiale ` . It was not a formal alliance , but a friendly `understanding` , and neither country was under any obligation to come to the aid of the other in the event of war . In August 1907 Britain strengthened it`s commitment to France by signing an agreement with Russia. Europe was divided into two powerful blocs.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bismarck main objective was to bring together the German states and to form a powerful great German State; this is why he became the main architect in the German unification. To succeed in this difficult task he used Realpolitik. He was as incredible in dealing with foreign affaires as with domestic affaires. The success of the unification was tremendous but it resulted in a very complex state that future generation had difficulties to deal with. Napoleon was brilliant in domestic affaires, but he preferred to deal with foreign affaires, which he actually wasn't able to arrange well. "The irony in Napoleon's life was that he was much better suited for domestic policy, which basically bored him, than he was for foreign adventures, for which he lacked both the daring and the insight"(P.106 Kissinger). The way he handled foreign affairs brought France into a deep crisis. He finally stopped to reign and France couldn't cope with such problems he had established.…

    • 2108 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Bismarck was dismissed in 1890, Germany set her sights on competing with England. Germany believed that land power was no longer sufficient and she needed to pursue building a greater navy to measure up to England's. In addition, in 1905, the Kaiser gave a speech in Morocco publically announcing “...Germany’s support for Moroccan independence and integrity” (41). This action was not a true act of value and morals, but rather one with hidden intentions, “... [the Kaiser] did mean to suggest was that Germany had as much of a claim to Morocco as any other greedy European power” (41). This backdoor finagling was an example of the danger of imperialism. Additional countries would feel the tensions similar…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have heavily debated the causes of the First World War. Fritz Fischer, author of Germany’s Aims in the First World War, wrote that Germany was undeniably responsible for the war. Fischer argues that Germany took advantage of the Austro-Serbian conflict in order to stage a preventive war, and pull herself out of European isolation. His research showed that Germany had similar aims in both WWI and WWII, setting out to consciously to become a world power.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One cause of World War I was Militarism. Germany had an industrialized military and spent millions of dollars trying improve and prepare them for war. Many other countries seen this newfound competition and started to try and rebuild their armies and navy so they could keep up. With Germany’s new and improved army, they started to gain confidence and were convinced that they could win a war. Germany was very focused on utilizing their army. As soon as the war declared, Germany without a doubt didn’t hesitate to “make the first move.” This caused a problem however because of the other nations rush to industrialize their armies and try to make them just as good or if not better than Germanys. Militarism played a huge part in the cause of World War I.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He realized the political and geographical chaos within Germany after the Congress of Vienna in 1814-1815. This was greatly due to the high number of local battles and internal wars within the un-unified Germany. The existence of these struggles was mainly because, through the congress’s “balance of power”, European powers were limited to reduce the possibility of the uprising of continental strength which might oppose a threat to Europe. Bismarck, being and opportunistic politician did not like the situation of anarchy and took in hand the responsibility to unify Germany, and by mass election of the people he up rose in between the mid 19th century. This characteristic trait and behaviour made him an untrustworthy figure in the eyes of his political allies, why? Simply, they worried that such an opportunistic symbol such as Bismarck would un-doubtfully take advantage of a vulnerable situation, like he did in Germany, and introduce a setback, which in turn may misdirect Germany threat to neighbouring areas, leading to continental feud, thus damaging local trade through mercantilism, political alliances such as that between Austria and Prussia, and future democratic recessions such as those in the north German Confederation of the year 1876. Otto Von Bismarck was now the Machiavellian politician who kept the European powers on high alert through the process of signing treaties and…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations volume II: The American Search for Opportunity, 1865-1913. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck on the other hand was politically and ideologically a strong leader. He knew exactly what he wanted and he used whatever means necessary to achieve his goals. He was a Realpolitiker through and through. This included making sure the monarch and the state being preserved plus making sure that unification would take place under the Hohenzollerns, not Austria. He did that by making Italy an ally and defeating Austria with the Prussian army in 1866.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays