Preview

Hbr Vertex Case Critique

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1920 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hbr Vertex Case Critique
Josh Boger – R&D Portfolio Management in October 2003
Analysis of Pharmaceutical Industry:
As mentioned in the case, Pharmaceutical industry was experiencing a significant growth between 1993 and 2003. New technologies and approaches such as Rational Drug Design, High Throughput Screening, etc. were advancing drug discovery process to a new level. There were many drugs being approved and commercialized during this period and some of them have become blockbusters in the market. As companies have increasing sales revenues, they were able to invest more in R&D, which resulted in high R&D budgets and many external research partnerships.
However, as the industry was entering 21st century, it was also facing couple of challenges: Firstly, companies started to experience a declining productivity in their R&D pipelines. Secondly, there were concerns being raised about the increasing cost of health care in recent years. Lastly, new laws and regulations are being introduced in patent protection and clinical testing areas. As a result of these factors, big Pharmaceutical companies were switching their preferences from entering early stage research partnerships to alliances for drug candidates that have more and promising clinical data.
Analysis of Vertex Pharmaceuticals:
Vertex is in a strong position in terms of its R&D portfolio as of October 2003. Their largest programs, caspase and kinase, are already partnered, which provides the company necessary funding to progress in these areas. The company’s culture is shaped around the idea of discovering and developing novel drugs for important diseases with unmet needs. Furthermore, senior leaders are open to listen to different opinions and ideas from every level of the organization. Although Vertex is focused on small molecule research, the leaders of the company believe that they can compete with Big Pharma with a greater efficiency due to its smaller size. One of their capabilities to achieve higher efficiency was to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Ldr 531 Week 5

    • 2421 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Plunkett, J. W. (August 19, 2010). Domestic & Foreign Pharmaceutical Sales, PhRMA Member Companies: 1975-2009. [Electronic version]. Biotechnology, Drugs & Genetics Industry. Retrieved October 24, 2010 from http://www.plunkettresearchonline.com…

    • 2421 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pharmaceutical industry has several high entry barriers as shown in figure 1. Economies of scale, product differentiation, government policy and capital requirements and financial services are few barriers for new entrant. Level of threat from rivalry is also high in this industry. Industry has presence of large number of small firms of a similar size. They are in direct competition with one another,…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the main issues is that Big Pharma is doing illegal and unethical market. For example: Pfizer did illegal marketing of Neurontin Drug. Moreover, they are doing Salesmanship over Science. They are marketing their drug and not focusing on research. They are also marketing drugs which actually have not been approved by FDA.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The pharmaceutical industry includes companies that research, develop, market or distribute generic and branded drugs. The industry expanded during the 1980’s and drugs to treat heart disease and AIDS were prominent. Consumer demand for nutritional supplements and alternative medicine increased during the 1990’s with the Internet facilitating direct purchases of drugs. Advertising for direct consumption of pharmaceutical drugs became more prominent; pharmaceutical companies were criticized for over medicating personality or social problems.…

    • 3675 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: AstraZeneca’s main six therapy areas represent a significant proportion of the worldwide burden of disease as projections indicate the burden of disease (chronic disease) will continue to increase next 20 years.…

    • 3585 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Fastest Drug Developers Consistently Outperform Their Peers, Generating Substantially Higher Revenue and Cost Savings ; Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development; September/October 2006 Tufts CSDD Impact Report…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quick Dissolving Chips

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    latest decade, and the field has transformed into a quick creating zone in the pharmaceutical…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |The absorption |Diminished when the drug was taken during or |Not affected by food intake |…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pharmaceutical manufacturers a multi billion industry who are solely depend on research and development of drugs which is a very risky as one out of ten thousand becomes actually approved for sale. Parallel research is done in various pharmaceutical companies once a clinical path is being discovered and this requires intensive competitor monitoring procedure. Therefore drug companies are combating each other to develop multibillion dollar drugs each year to survive.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vertex Case Team 2

    • 543 Words
    • 6 Pages

    probability, pralnacasan deal with Aventis, oral not injection, good antiinflammatory drug has high potential, relatively quick to market (2008),…

    • 543 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Much new innovation goes ahead the business in the wake of being tried just for wellbeing or whether the new treatment is practically identical to existing ones or even placebos. Patients and specialists frequently request the most current medications, regardless of the possibility that there is practically no confirmation that they are better. Costs for more up to date medicines are regularly higher than for the items they supplant.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sanofi-Aventis Acquisition

    • 5913 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Bibliography: Cleaves, K., Thayer A., (August 2004). Warning, merge with care: Sanofi-Aventis. Modern Drug Discovery. Retreived on June 6, 2014 from http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/archive/mdd/v07/i08/pdf/804business2.pdf…

    • 5913 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contrast with the research findings of Scherer at al., it is that in the pharmaceutical company large number of the diversified portfolio might not return huge profits. The strategy of the Rumack pharmaceuticals was that they expanded their product range to sustain and then capitalize upon the market share, which the product variants would secure for the company. In case of the pharmaceutical industry the rate of growth often demanded by the market to be sustainable for the company, usually would coerce the pharmaceuticals to engage in the low risk activities which was the same as in the case of Rumack.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merck Case

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Merck had a 14% increase in sales between 1997 and 1998 and 22% increase in sales from 1998 – 1999, and a 13% annual increase in earnings over the same period. Merck’s business strategy consists of two parts: (1) developing and marketing new drugs through internal research, and (2) developing partnerships with smaller biotechnology companies. Since 1995, Merck had launched 15 new products that earned $5.9 billion on sales of $32.7 billion. Furthermore, Merck may agree to license new drugs from other firms and with its larger capital and greater assets, can assume the risk of submitting the drug through various regulatory approval phases. If the drug becomes profitable, Merck can earn significant cash flows while paying a royalty to the licensor. However, most important is the option that Merck has in deciding when to abandon or continue on this project (deferability or optionality). If Merck reaches a point when its expected NPV is negative, it can simply abandon the project. As a licensee, Merck can allow smaller biotechnology firms to focus on research and development. These smaller firms often have smaller budgets and are not financially or personnel equipped to handle the costly and long FDA approval process, and the subsequent marketing, distribution, and sales of new drugs. This task is better suited for a larger company, such as Merck, which has more resources and money.…

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are high cost and risks associated with developing new drugs and bringing it to market as out of every 5000 compounds tested in the laboratory by a drug company, only one of these ultimately make it to the market.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays