Preview

Hate Speech On Campus Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
596 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hate Speech On Campus Research Paper
Hate Speech Codes on Campus

In the debate over censorship of hate speech on college campuses, the opponents conclude that colleges should censor hate speech on campus because minorities have the civil right to equal enjoyment of education, free of harassment. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that we should not censor hate speech on campus because students have a right to academic freedom. In this essay I will conclude that colleges should not censor hate speech.
In the article titled, “Colleges Should Censor Racist Hate Speech,” (Virginia Law Review, March 1990) Daryl Brown concludes that colleges should censor hate speech on campus and the prominence of blatant and subtle racism on campus will require a two prong

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the United States of America and in almost all countries, there are laws against harassment, libel, threats, and incitement to commit crimes. These speech codes are for the safety of citizens and are often used to suppress hate speech in private institutions and in the workplace. Speech codes should be allowed on college campuses in order to create a safe environment for people of different sexes, races, sexual orientation, religions, and classes, and to provide an equal learning environment for all by limiting the freedom of speech.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Derek Bok’s article “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus,” he states that while some free speech is degrading or offensive, it is still our First Amendment right to say what we want (31-33). Bok brings up the example of two student from Harvard University who hung up a confederate flag. Some people believed that this action was demeaning, since often times the confederacy is equated with slavery. Students of the campus fought to have the symbol taken down. Bok agrees that the way in which the students handled themselves was uncalled for, but at the same time stated that it was their right to display this kind of symbol. Bok believes that deciding what qualifies as free speech, and what doesn’t, is an impossible question to answer.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Ofn Racist Speech

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case of “Brown v. Board of Education” is a case of racist speech of which Mr. Brown argues for the principle of equal citizenship. He opines that signs and symbols convey segregation thus inflicting inferiority of black students. This is an example of hate that caused the students torment and deprivation of full education. If there is a need to understand the elimination of signs and symbols, then it is of paramount importance that we need to understand racist speech is a must to be shielded.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the debate over whether speech codes should be enforced or not on university campuses, the opponents conclude that university’s should not enforce a hate speech code because it impedes academic freedom. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that it is a university’s responsibility to enforce hate speech code for an equal education opportunity. In this essay, I will conclude that hate speech should be regulated by a code enforced by the university because of the protection it offers. In the article titled, “Speech Codes Threaten the Free Exchange of Ideas on College Campuses” Eugene Volokh concludes that colleges should enforce a speech code.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Derek Bok’s article, “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, Bok writes about what has been a long-lasting controversial issue in the United States: freedom of speech and expression. The author claims that though the acts are “insensitive and unwise,” they are permitted, and lawfully so. Acts of expression are committed on a day-to-day basis and in a broad aspect of environments; some are offensive while others are not. Who decides what is offensive and what is appropriate? This is one of the dilemmas that the Supreme Court has had to consider, since what might offend one person might in turn be acceptable to another.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s explanation of the harm principle is not as useful as once believed. Although the harm principle does in fact have some logic, it fails to set clear and concise borders regarding what denotes allowable hate speech. The harm principle essentially states that all speech, including hate speech, should be allowed. However, speech that causes a definable harm must be censored. For example, merely offensive speech is allowed; however, the context of the offensive speech in question is important in understanding when to apply Mill’s harm principle. The principle has some major flaws, as Mill does not take into consideration the numerous factors that must be examined before deciding whether or not to apply the principle, such as the individuals and groups involved, and their present circumstances within society. These factors are not always shown to be clearly conducive to harm; individuals can be affected by certain actions that are not clearly defined as noticeably causing harm to someone, such as suicide. Many people view suicide as solely causing harm to the individual that takes their own life. However, it is often forgotten that the individual’s family and friends are significantly affected, and potentially even traumatised. The harm principle cannot offer an absolute answer because harm is a very subjective concept. Some actions do overt harm to others but other actions result in implicit forms of harm. Therefore, this paper will begin by examining Mill’s reasons for protecting free speech. By analyzing a case involving David Ahenakew’s comments, it will attempt to scrutinize the harm principle in more detail to determine whether or not the principle can act as a guiding path for how to deal with problematic hate speech. Ultimately, this paper will argue that although Mill sets forth a strong, plausible argument for the protection of free speech, the harm principle is not specific enough to be applied to contemporary discussions regarding…

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As American people, we know that we are entitled to certain rights according to the constitution; one of which is freedom of speech. In Civility and Its Discontents, Leslie Epstein explores the limits and contradictions of this much cherished right when considering whether he would expel a student who wrote racial slurs in the dorm rooms of a University if it was up to him. He discusses this situation and topics that stem from it in an analytical yet somewhat emotionally involved tone and makes the reader reflect on the wide range of information presented about the issues of political correctness, freedom of speech, expulsion, and racism.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you were to ask many Americans whether hate speech was covered under the first amendment, many would be surprised to find out that in most circumstances it is protected. For the augment essay, I plan to argue that hate speech should be covered under the first amendment, and its coverage is essential to the idea of free speech.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naturally, many negative connotations come along with the term “free-speech zone.” The wording alone automatically insinuates that free speech should not be allowed everywhere, which is hardly the true intention of the idea. Sometimes the right of free speech is taken advantage of; such as in certain rallies and protests, where disruptive noise, violence, and destruction often occurs. Universities hold a responsibility to their students of providing a reasonably safe and undisruptive environment to learn and excel in. Universities are not creating “free-speech zones” to limit free speech, but rather to maintain a secure atmosphere that is conducive to concentration and higher learning.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lifeless bodies with slashed throats were found in the mountains of Virginia nearly six years ago. This is quite a disturbing image; the unfortunate result of a hate crime. What exactly is a hate crime? The American Psychological Association defines hate crimes as "violent acts against people, property, or organizations because of the group to which they belong or identify with" (1). The different groups usually involved include homosexuals, ethnic groups, and religion affiliations.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Racist Speech

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his article On Racist Speech, Charles R. Lawrence III also tries to convey his point that racist speech need to be regulated, especially on college campuses. He gives many reasons why, but the three most prominent are Brown vs. the Board of Education, the fighting words exception principle, and the idea of racist speech at "home". The infamous case of Brown vs. BOE is not always thought of as a speech case. When he says we can regulate racist speech on collage campus without violating the 1st Amendment. This contention seems to be his thesis statement, because it is the strong because the recent surge of racist incidents on college and university campuses and in response to some universities attempts to regulate harassing speech. The policy on campus is making by faculty. In this article "On Racist Speech" Charles R. Lawrence III is giving speech to the audience that he strongly believes on 1st Amendment protector very conserved about racism. As a person who had to deal with a lot of things dealing with racist speech, I can agree with most of the things Charles R. Lawrence III talks about in "On Racist Speech". Lawrence talks about the First Amendment.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Hate Crimes

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States of America has a long dark history in terms of racism, from the civil war to World War II minority groups have been the target of crimes of hatred and prejudice. From public lynching, cross burning, arson to vandalism are just some of the tactics used by hate groups to display their prejudice. According to the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) the term hate crime was not used until the 1980s, however investigations conducted by the FBI on hate related crime stretches far back to the First World War, on the group called the Ku Klux Klan attracted their attention. The department of justice defines a hate crime as “Hate crime is the violence of intolerance and bigotry, intended to hurt and intimidate someone because of their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious, sexual orientation, or disability. The purveyors of hate use explosives, arson, weapons, vandalism, physical violence, and verbal threats of violence to instill fear in their victims, leaving them vulnerable to more attacks and feeling alienated, helpless, suspicious and fearful.” Communities such as people of color and LGBT are two groups that had been overwhelming impacted from white supremacist groups and anti-gay group. Crimes motivated by hatred have led to legislation that requires the tracking of statistical data to gather information and…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Censorship on college campuses have always been a controversial topic. In the United States, the government can not prevent the publication of a newspaper, even when there is reason to believe that it is about to reveal information that will endanger our national security. Some college schools, however, have limitations on what should be published on their campuses. These restrictions have caused a lot of outrage from students who believe in free speech and freedom of the press. Some students feel that these restrictions prevent them from expressing themselves and what they believe what is important. City College of San Francisco does not have any student publishing restrictions other than a copyright policy. This should be changed for City College should have some restrictions to protect students from being harassed by the press. Although censorship on campus publications attacks the first amendment, creates bad publicity, and prevents students from expressing what they think is important; it helps prevent violence, restricts hate speech, protects ones reputation, and gives a safer feel to students on college campuses.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In three of the six articles I have read the author was for regulating hate speech. Those three are Mari J. Matsuda, Charles R. Lawrence III, author of "If he Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus (155)," and also Richard Delgado and David H. Yun, authors of "Pressure Valves and Bloodied Chickens: Paternalistic Objections to Hate Speech Regulation" (162). Matsuda believes that hate speech is assualtive against race and sexism (150). I also believe that hate speech is assualtive, especially when it is a racial or sexual comment. Lawrence believes that "minority-group students need this support of protection" (155). This I also agree with. Students should be able to walk throughout their campus without having to worry about what will be said to them that day. Delgado and Yun believe that the parenthetical view is the problem of hate speech. This is do not agree with. Although all three of these authors do agree on one thing, and that is regulating hate speech.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main argument for banning hate speech is that hate speech leads to violence, often against certain groups of people.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays