HAPPINESS RESEARCH: STATE AND PROSPECTS
REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY, VOL. LXII, NO. 2, JUNE 2005
Happiness Research: State and Prospects
Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
University of Zurich and CREMA - Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts
Abstract This paper intends to provide an evaluation of where the economic research on happiness stands and in which interesting directions it might develop. First, the current state of the research on happiness in economics is briefly discussed. We emphasize the potential of happiness research in testing competing theories of individual behavior. Second, the crucial issue of causality is taken up illustrating it for a particular case, namely whether marriage makes people happy or whether happy people get married. Third, happiness research is taken up as a new approach to measuring utility in the context of cost-benefit analysis.
Keywords: causality, cost-benefit analysis, happiness research, life satisfaction approach, marriage, selection, subjective well-being, terrorism
This paper intends to provide an evaluation of where the economic research on happiness stands and in which interesting directions it might develop. While the authors endeavor to provide a fair account, it is strongly influenced by our work undertaken at the chair for economic policy at the University of Zurich. The reader must be warned that other scholars might emphasize different aspects and problems, and in particular consider different future contributions to be important.
The first part of the paper discusses the current state of the research on happiness in economics. The survey section is on purpose kept short, mainly because the authors recently provided an extensive review in a journal and in a book (Frey and Stutzer 2002a,b). Here we only want to indicate the general flavor, and to direct the reader not familiar with the approach to the relevant literature. Instead, we emphasize the potential of happiness research in testing competing theories of individual
Happiness Research: State and Prospects
Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
University of Zurich and CREMA - Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts
Abstract This paper intends to provide an evaluation of where the economic research on happiness stands and in which interesting directions it might develop. First, the current state of the research on happiness in economics is briefly discussed. We emphasize the potential of happiness research in testing competing theories of individual behavior. Second, the crucial issue of causality is taken up illustrating it for a particular case, namely whether marriage makes people happy or whether happy people get married. Third, happiness research is taken up as a new approach to measuring utility in the context of cost-benefit analysis.
Keywords: causality, cost-benefit analysis, happiness research, life satisfaction approach, marriage, selection, subjective well-being, terrorism
This paper intends to provide an evaluation of where the economic research on happiness stands and in which interesting directions it might develop. While the authors endeavor to provide a fair account, it is strongly influenced by our work undertaken at the chair for economic policy at the University of Zurich. The reader must be warned that other scholars might emphasize different aspects and problems, and in particular consider different future contributions to be important.
The first part of the paper discusses the current state of the research on happiness in economics. The survey section is on purpose kept short, mainly because the authors recently provided an extensive review in a journal and in a book (Frey and Stutzer 2002a,b). Here we only want to indicate the general flavor, and to direct the reader not familiar with the approach to the relevant literature. Instead, we emphasize the potential of happiness research in testing competing theories of individual
References: Altonji, J.G. and Blank, R.M. (1999) ‘‘Race and Gender in the Labor Market,’’ in O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics. Volume 3C, Amsterdam, New York and Oxford: Elsevier Science, North-Holland: 3143 – 3259. Andrews, F.M. and Robinson, J.P. (1991) ‘‘Measures of Subjective Well-Being,’’ in J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver and L.S. Wrightsman (eds) Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, San Diego, CA: Academic Press: 61 – 114. Arrow, K.J., Solow, R.S., Leamer, E., Portney, P., Radner R. and Schuman H. (1993) ‘‘Report of the NoAA-Panel on Contingent Valuation,’’ Federal Register 58(10): 4601 – 4614. Becker, G.S. (1981) A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Blau, F.D. and Kahn, L.M. (2000) ‘‘Gender Differences in Pay,’’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4): 75 – 99 in Urban Areas,’’ American Economic Review 78(1): 89 – 107. Burman, B. and Margolin, G. (1992) ‘‘Analysis of the Association Between Marital Relationships and Health Problems: An Interactional Perspective,’’ Psychological Bulletin 112(1): 39 – 63. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. and Rabin, M. (eds) (2003) Advances in Behavioral Economics New York and Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation Press and Princeton University Press. 15 Collier and Hoeffler (2004) who wrote the background paper on ‘‘The Global Incidence of War’’, take, as they write themselves, the ‘‘obviously arbitrary figure of $1000 to a DALY’’ (p.6). Carson, R.T., Mitchell, R.C., Hanemann, W.M., Kopp, R.J., Pressers, S. and Ruud P.A. (2003) ‘‘Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill,’’ Environmental and Resource Economics 25(3): 257 – 286. Chay, K.Y. and Greenstone, M. (2001) ‘‘Does Air Quality Matter? Evidence from the Housing Market,’’ The Center for Labor Economics Working Paper No. 33, University of California, Berkeley. Chun, H. and Lee, I. (2001) ‘‘Why Do Married Men Earn More: Productivity or Marriage Selection?’’ Economic Inquiry 39(2): 307 – 319. Clark, A.E. (1997) ‘‘Job Satisfaction and Gender: Why Are Women So Happy at Work?’’ Labour Economics 4(4): 341 – 372. Clark, A.E. (2003) ‘‘Looking for Labour Market Rents with Subjective Data,’’ Mimeo, DELTA, Paris. Clark, A.E., Georgellis, Y. and Sanfey, P (2001) ‘‘Scarring: The Psychological Impact of Past Unemployment,’’ Economica 68(270): 221 – 41. Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A. (2004) ‘‘The Challenge of Reducing the Global Challenge of Civil War,’’ Copenhagen Consensus Paper, Environmental Assessment Institute, Copenhagen. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R.J. and Oswald, A.J. (2004) ‘‘The Macroeconomics of Happiness,’’ Review of Economics and Statistics 85(4): 809 – 827. Theory and Methods, Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. Frey, B.S. and Benz, M. (2002) ‘‘Being Independent Is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy,’’ IEW Working Paper No. 135, University of Zurich How Matters,’’ Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160(3): 377 – 401. Frey, B.S., Luechinger, S. and Stutzer, A. (2004b) ‘‘Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfaction Approach,’’ IEW Working Paper No Inspired Economics,’’ Revue de philosophie e ́conomique 4: 5 – 22. Frey, B.S. and Stutzer, A. (2002a) Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-Being, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press Frijters, P., Shields, M.A., Theodoropoulos, N. and Price, S.W. (2003) ‘‘Testing for Employee Discrimination Using Matched Employer-Employee Data: Theory and Evidence,’’ IZA Discussion Paper No. 807, Bonn. Galetovic, A. and Sanhueza, R. (2000) ‘‘Citizens, Autocrats, and Plotters: A Model and New Evidence on Coups D’Etat,’’ Economics & Politics 12(2): 183 – 204. Gruber, J. and Mullainathan, S. (2002) ‘‘Do Cigarette Taxes Make Smokers Happier?’’ NBER Working Paper No. 8872. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150(1): 18 – 36. Kahneman, D. (1999) ‘‘Objective Happiness,’’ in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz (eds) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology Foundation: 3 – 25. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (eds) (1999a) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Method,’’ Science 306(5702): 1776 – 1780. Kahneman, D., Ritov, I. and Schkade, D.A. (1999) ‘‘Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues,’’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19(1 – 3): 203 – 235. Lalive, R. (2002) ‘‘Do Wages Compensate for Workplace Amenities?’’ Mimeo, University of Zurich Well-Being,’’ IEW Working Paper No. 194, University of Zurich. Layard, R. (2005) Happiness: Lessons from a New Science, New York: Penguin. Lomborg, B. (ed.) (2004) Global Crises, Global Solutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84(3): 527 – 539. Lucas, R.E., Diener, E. and Suh, E. (1996) ‘‘Discriminant Validity of Well-Being Measures,’’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(3): 616 – 628 Selection into Marriage,’’ Journal of Marriage and the Family 54(4): 901 – 911. Meier, S. and Stutzer, A. (2004) ‘‘Is Volunteering Rewarding in Itself?’’ Evidence from a Natural Experiment Oreopoulos, P. (2003) ‘‘Do Dropouts Drop Out Too Soon?’’ Evidence from Changes in School-Leaving Laws. Mimeo, University of Toronto. Oswald, A.J. (1997) ‘‘Happiness and Economic Performance,’’ Economic Journal 107(445): 1815 – 1831. Pavot, W. and Diener, E. (1993) ‘‘The Affective and Cognitive Context of Self-Reported Measures of Subjective Well-Being,’’ Social Indicators Research 28(1): 1 – 20. Pezzini, S. (2003) ‘‘The Effect of Women’s Rights on Women’s Welfare: Evidence from a Natural Experiment,’’ Mimeo, London School of Economics. Portney, P.R. (1994) ‘‘The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care,’’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 3 – 17. Rabin, M. (1998) ‘‘Psychology and Economics,’’ Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 11 – 46. Rehdanz, K. and Maddison, D. (2003) ‘‘Climate and Happiness. Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change,’’ Working Paper No. FNU-20, Centre for Marine and Climate Research, Hamburg University. Rosen, S. (1974) ‘‘Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition,’’ Journal of Political Economy 82(1): 34 – 55. Sandvik, E., Diener, E., and Seidlitz, L. (1993) ‘‘Subjective Well-Being: The Convergence and Stability of Self-Report and Non-Self-Report Measures,’’ Journal of Personality 61(3): 317 – 42. Sousa-Poza, A. and Sousa-Poza, A.A. (2000) ‘‘Taking Another Look at the Gender/Job- Satisfaction Paradox,’’ Kyklos 53(2): 135 – 152. Stack, S. and Eshleman, R.J. (1998) ‘‘Marital Status and Happiness: A 17-Nation Study,’’ Journal of Marriage and the Family 60(2): 527 – 536. Stutzer, A. and Frey, B.S. (2003) ‘‘Does Marriage Make People Happy, Or Do Happy People Get Married?’’ Forthcoming in the Journal of Socio-Economics. Calculus Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press. van Praag, B.M.S. and Baarsma, B.E. (2005) ‘‘Using Happiness Surveys to Value Intangibles: The Case of Airport Noise,’’ Economic Journal 115(500): 224 – 246 1946 – 1992, Rotterdam: Erasmus University Press. Viscusi, W.K. (1993) ‘‘The Value of Risks to Life and Health,’’ Journal of Economic Literature 31(4): 1912 – 1946 Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially, New York: Doubleday. Weede, E. and Muller, E.N. (1998) ‘‘Rebellion, Violence and Revolution: A Rational Choice Perspective,’’ Journal of Peace Research 35(1): 43 – 59 Winkelmann, R. (2002) ‘‘Subjective Well-Being and the Family,’’ Working Paper No. 0204, Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich. Wintrobe, R. (1998) The Political Economy of Dictatorship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.