Preview

Han and Roman Attitudes Toward Technology

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Han and Roman Attitudes Toward Technology
Han and Roman Attitudes Toward Technology

Technology is an important aspect in all civilizations, and depending on the point of view looked at the opinions vary greatly. Especially when comparing opinions of lower class and upper class people, or gender. During the early first centuries of the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire there were a lot of mixed feelings toward technology. Depending on whose opinion you heard the answer would vary between negative and positive outlooks. Most opinions seemed to have been based off of the following categories, practicality, citizen’s use, and beauty. Opinions varied depending on the major concern of the point of view and the class they belonged to. When opinions were weighed on practicality their major concern was the efficiency of the technology and if it was easy to use. One Han government official wrote to local officials in the early second century (B.C.E) concerning flood prevention (doc. 1). His opinion was well educated because being of an upper class and being a government official meant he was well educated, and also his opinion was of a situation he witnessed and he had proof to support his thoughts. His opinion was unbiased and trustworthy because his concerns were not for himself but for all the people of the civilization. This is proven when he states more organization is needed in order to stay on top of issues that affect everyone of the dynasty. He felt technology was advanced enough to prevent flooding more efficiently but there needed to be a greater effort into establishing a greater number of water conservation offices in each district. Overall he did not believe that technology was lacking but the organization of the use of technology was. Huan Tan, an upper-class philosopher in about 20 C.E also had an opinion weighing on practicality (doc. 3). Being a philosopher you can assume he was well educated and therefore his opinion is educated. Huan’s point of view was based on practicality because he had a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    AP World History DBQ

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After reviewing these documents it is clear that the Roman’s and Han’s attitudes towards technology differed from person to person. For the most part, Romans disapproved of new tools that were being invented, unimpressed by hammers and tongs, they thought tools were useless and made people indolent. On the other hand, most Hans thought technology was a wonderful thing, making peoples lives easier and completing tasks faster. To better understand the Roman and Han impression on technology, one must understand their opinions and situations regarding the use of new tools and other technological advances.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ap world history 2007 dbq

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the height of the Han and Roman Empires, the emergence of technological advancements heavily influenced their societies. These advancements had several benefits in improving the social order of the empires, however they also had their negative effects; the essential argument being that the more elaborate, and intricate the inventions were, the higher they were considered in the social classes. The simpler, craft-like inventions on the other hand, were said to be made by men who are not wise. This mindset and belief was mainly held in the Roman Empire. The Han Empire had viewed technological advancements as a positive way of aiding in societal use, however their only concern was that the price in goods produced by such forms of technology had significantly increased, not allowing the commoners to buy them. Both the Han and Roman Empires perceived the rise of technology in a positive sense, primarily in their elite classes. Although the Han and Roman both viewed technological advancements in a positive way, some state run technology was viewed in a negative sense; resulting in an increased price of goods that the common, working class could not afford.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the classical era, Han China and Ancient Rome were the pioneers for the change and the plethora of improvements that took place in civilized societies. The Han Dynasty consisted of persistent regional riots and rebellions against harsh state demands, and Ancient Rome expanded through the Mediterranean and areas of Hellenistic civilization. Together, these two civilizations introduced many essential changes in human life and provided an arena for the spread of organized civilizations. Although both Han China and Ancient Rome acquired powerful religious systems, Ancient Rome’s social structure was far more structured than Han China’s in regards to treatment of women and social status.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will compare similarities and the differences of the Roman and Han Dynasty empires. It will compare their creation, maintenance, culture, and decline.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When comparing attitudes towards technology in Han China and Ancient Rome during the Classical period, there were both similarities and differences. One way in which they were similar was that both their attitudes towards technology were that it was a necessary part of a civilization, because it helps to regulate an empire. One way in which they were different was that while Han believed that technology was a gift from higher powers, Rome believed that technology was useful but not to it’s full potential or fit for people of this community. Documents 1, 2, 5, and 7 all hold the attitude that technology in these civilizations was completely necessary. Documents 3 and 4 hold the attitude that technology is a gift and relates to their religion. Documents 6 and 8 hold the attitude that technology is an artistic and inventive process.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Chinese attitude towards technology was that it should be useful to and help the common people. The Roman attitude towards technology was that it was it was of little prestige and didn't relate to the upper classes and was therefore of less importance.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome used a centralized government with roads to help them rule their large empire, yet Han China had Confucianism to legitimize their rule while Roman emperors were dependent on the support of a large military force for legitimacy from 204 B.C.E to 476 C.E.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Whereas Han China (202 BCE- 220 CE) and the Roman Empire (~800BCE- 476 CE) were thousands of miles away from each other, they had many similarities and differences. Some of the similarities include peasant rebellions, while the differences are such as woman’s rights and their views on manual labor.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is no doubt that things that benefit people and gift are considered positive. A Han government official (Document 1) wrote to local officials in order to advise them on how to use their technology to prevent floods, showing his interests in maintaining the empire so that it doesn't fall. Not only that, Han Guan, another government official (Document 2) goes against the way the government is monopolizing the making of technology and that technology should be made by the people, since government made technologies are brittle and costing the government more money as not much salt is being produced. It is very interesting that an official would speak against the government, but it may be due to the fact that the scarcity of salt is costing this official money. Both officials may also be looking to maintain their positions or get higher ones once the emperor sees how well they are looking after the empire, which can only be maintained with the help of technology. Others in Han society consider technology as a gift from enlightened leaders. Huan Tan, an upper-class philosopher (document 3) mentions that Fuxi invented some technology which was efficient and beneficial to society. Fuxi, is said to be a wise enlightened emperor which means that since Fuxi made it, it is no doubt a great gift. There is also some government sponsored history (Document 4) which characterizes Tu Shih as a just and commoner loving man who developed technology in order lift some of the burden of labor off the people. Technology was Tu Shih's gift to the people and Tu Shih, was considered a Fuxi. Therefore this government sponsored historian also considers technology a gift.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman empire and the Han empire collapsed for similar reasons as well as some different reasons. Firstly, both Rome and China’s governments became an ineffective way to control an empire. Secondly, nomadic tribes invaded both Rome and China. These tribes broke into their respective empires and laid waste to the land. Yet differences exist between the collapse of the two empires. A large part of the collapse of Rome was due to inflation. The Han empire was not as affected by inflation as the Roman empire was. The external invasions that caused the collapse of the Roman empire and the Han empire could be compared to invasive species from the realm of Biology.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman and Han empires were both very powerful, in their own rights. Although their culture and beliefs were very different, their ideology and governments were, at points, very similar. Both empires experienced a rise, plateau, and fall, which eventually changed their entire empires.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay #1-Compare and Contrast the Han and Roman Empires in terms of their technological achievements…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If you’re still unsure about this argument, I will offer a little more textual evidence. In Doc 4, the speaker describes Tu Shih, a governor of Nanyang, by saying that “he was a generous man and his policies were peaceful.” This shows respect and admiration for Tu Shih and his ways of government. Now if we take a look at Doc 7, we see that Seneca, an upper-class Roman philosopher and adviser to Emperor Nero, states that he “[does] not believe that tools for the craft were invented by wise men.” This statement shows a lack of respect and gratitude towards the people who made the basic necessities of the…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire demonstrated many different attitudes and reaction as new technological advancements emerged and diffused thought the empire. The romans sought out that tradition was necessary to incorporate and implement into their works, which involved much more workload. On the other hand the Han accepted of most new advancements, as it benefited and contributed toward their social and economic status, that develop rapidly…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays