Preview

Hamilton's Curse Book Review

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1464 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hamilton's Curse Book Review
Book Review: Hamilton’s Curse: How Jefferson’s Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution- and what it means for America Today What kind of country is the United States of America? Is it really the land of the free or are the Americans controlled by an imperial presidency? Is America peaceful and prosperous? Is it possible to identify the source of America’s economic problems? Some people have a clear picture of how things really are; while others are never able to see the entire scope of the view. There may be conflicting answers to these questions; therefore, it is recommended to approach a historian for more accurate information. In the book, Hamilton’s Curse: How Jefferson’s Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution- and What It Means for America Today, the author, Thomas J. DiLorenzo, succeeds in answering the questions stated above. Even more, the author is able to identify America’s economic problems by narrowing them down to one source: Alexander Hamilton. The author of the book, Thomas J. DiLorenzo, presents excellent arguments with strong evidence of the contradicting political ideas between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. A thorough investigation and research is evidenced through many trusted sources that present logical information on the constitutional thoughts of Jefferson and Hamilton. In this book, DiLorenzo calls Hamilton the Founding Father of Crony Capitalism, an aristocratic New Yorker, and, above all, a nationalist. The author also points to Hamilton and Lincoln are the responsible for opening the floodgates of corporate welfare and corruption, two of the biggest problems of America’s economic problems. The following paragraphs will provide an organized summary of the content of the book. Hamilton’s Curse: How Jefferson’s Archenemy Betrayed the American Revolution and What It Means for America Today, is a well-written, well-argued book about Hamilton’s ideas of unrestrained expansion of the government, central


Bibliography: 1. Art Carden, “Hamilton’s Curse: How Jefferson’s Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution- and What It Means for America Today,” The Freeman, accessed March 2, 2012, http://www.thefreemanonline.org/book-reviews/hamiltons-curse-how-jeffersons-archenemy/ 2. Austin Petersen, “Book Review: “Hamilton’s Curse” by Thomas J. DiLorenzo’” The Party of Principle, accessed February 29, 2012, http://www.lp.org/blogs/austin-petersen/book-review-%E2%80%9Chamilton%E2%80%99s-curse%E2%80%9D-by-thomas-j-dilorenzo. 3. Institute for Principled Policy, “Book Review-Hamilton’s Curse”, accessed March 2, 2012, http://www.principledpolicy.com/?p=539 4. Thomas DiLorenzo, Hamilton’s Curse: How Jefferson’s Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution- and What It Means for America Today (New York: The Rivers Press, 2008)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Founding Brothers Summary

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He also introduces to the readers a crucial theme of his book, which is the importance of compromise, the importance of the individual relationships in the early Union, and the strict beliefs that the Founding Fathers had for one another. Since they knew each another so well and were very aware of the importance of reputation, their disagreements reproduced very high stakes. Starting with a violent clash, Ellis sets the stakes for which these men had learned to debate one another. Other stories end in violent death, but the reader now understands that Ellis views these relationships as heated and fanatical. The fine line between private life and public is often difficult to recognize among political figures whose lives and ideals were so closely tangled. Ellis's version of the Jefferson and Adams relationship will be explicitly…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton’s policies were shaped to favor the wealthy, but in such a way that the wealthy would lend the government money and give it political support, which would then cause the federal regime to strive, higher classes to fatten and grow with new wealth, and prosperity to trickle to the masses. Hamilton believed in forming a national credit out of all the states debts, as well as creating a Bank of the United States to have the government support itself in stock. Jefferson believed, contrary to Hamilton’s more “urban” views of economic progress, that rural and private farming would be the fairest way to build up the economy – from the bottom classes up. However, this would have been a very time consuming process and was therefore not suited for the infant America, who needed to grow quickly to find its place in the rest of the world. Jefferson also thought a Bank of the United States was unconstitutional and forbidden by the Founding Fathers instructions in the Constitution. However, Hamilton proved that the Constitution permitted it by showing how the Constitution stipulates that Congress may pass any laws “necessary and proper” to carry out the powers vested in the various government agencies, including the powers to collect taxes and regulate trade, therefore making a communal bank for the nation ideal and very beneficial to building and supporting an…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Boston Tea Party

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: Alexander, John K. Samuel Adams: America 's Revolutionary Politician. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002. Print.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Middlekauff, Robert. The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 (Oxford History of the United States). New York: Oxford University Press, USA, 2007.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hope and Heritage

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout countless books, stories, and articles that depict Thomas Jefferson he is placed on a pedestal as a nearly perfect man. The books all tell of his great achievements, but never do these books speak of his true manner and thought process pertaining to slave trade. Gordon Wood takes a deep dive into Jefferson’s personal life, plainly showing who he truly was.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideal American republic for Hamilton from Johnson perspective is that Hamilton created a scheme in order to run the country. The scheme was helpful to America because as he predicted America was able to borrow money more cheaply. The Debt-funding was the first policy drafted by Hamilton. He also spoke about implemented measures for individuals who tried to rebel against taxation. Hamilton got the militia to dissolve the rebellion to basically prove the government is not in control. In Zinn’s argument about Hamilton, he stated that Hamilton suggested that there should be a president and senate for life and the government should a line itself with the richest element of the society.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As new problems arose facing the new nation, many different views toward the new conflicts developed. Initially, Hamilton acted aggressively to deal with the new republic's financial troubles with proposals to fund the national debt, create a central banking system and uniform currency, and promote manufacturing with a high protective tariff. Jefferson opposed these policies, objecting to the concentration of power in the hands of bankers and currency speculators. Jefferson believed that an economy dominated by small farmers, not manufacturers, would best preserve republican values. Hamilton believed in a strong central government while Jefferson believed in States’ Rights. Hamilton believed, “United States becoming a commercial and industrial empire, a world power remarkable for its ability to balance individual freedom with government power” (Tindall). Jefferson believed that an agriculture based society would better protect the civil liberties of the Americans. He feared that the growth of cities would enrich the aristocracy and widen divisions between the rich and poor, just as it has today.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, one of the most important people of the time, was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Utilizing federal power to modernize the nation, he convinced Congress to use an elastic interpretation of the Constitution to pass laws that Jefferson deemed unconstitutional. These laws included federal assumption of the state debts, creation of a national bank, and a system of taxes through a tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey. Hamilton was also the creator of the Federalist Party. In contrast, Thomas Jefferson was born to a wealthy family but was nonetheless an anti-federalist. He was sympathetic towards the poor people and advocated state’s rights.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite their different views of the government and the economy, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two great leaders in United States history. Throughout their political lives, they never stopped debating and representing what they believed in. People disagreeing with the government and the government’s different views on issues led to the rise of political parties in the 1790's.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While both Jefferson and Hamilton were brilliant minds and were major contributors to establishing our nation, and its flourishing, they both had very different views on key structural aspects of the country.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton’s interpretation is not as strict as Thomas Jefferson’s. Hamilton believes that all laws made in the United States under the Constitution would be supreme law of the land. Hamilton also accepts the growing tension between Jefferson and himself. He says “ Mr. Madison, co-operating with Mr. Jefferson, is at the head of a faction, decidedly hostile to me, and my administration; and actuated by views subversive of the principles of good government, and dangerous to the Union… Mr. Jefferson… displays his dislike of… funding the debt… in respect to our foreign politics, the views of these gentlemen [Jefferson and his supporters] are… unsound, and dangerous. They have a womanish attachment to France, and a womanish resentment against Great Britain.” (Document 2)…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeffersonian Republicans

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson and his Republican followers envisioned a society in vivid contrast to that of the Federalists. They dreamed of a nation of independent farmers living under a central government that exercised a minimum of control over their lives and served merely to protect the individual liberties granted by the Constitution. Jefferson, in his dialog with Presbyterian minister Samuel Miller, demonstrated that the government will only be ruled by the Constitution, and not even God would have a say. (Document B) That vision proved to be a mirage, and Jefferson was to preside over a nation that was growing more industrial and urban, which seemed to need an ever-stronger hand at the presidential “tiller.”…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The early 1800s were a difficult time for the American people; they had just won their independence from Britain hardly more than twenty or thirty years prior, and the threat of failure still loomed large. The Federalist Party sought to destroy the threat of failure by strengthening the United States’ central government. As Alexander Hamilton said, “A firm Union will be of the utmost moment to the peace and liberty of the states, as a barrier against domestic faction and insurrection.” In Hamilton’s mind, strengthening the central government would ensure freedom for every American citizen by uniting the people to think and speak with a single voice. Hamilton had witnessed firsthand the political and economic confusion caused by states’ conflicting interests and corrupt taxation policies under the Articles of Confederation. He realized that the only way for the Union to survive and prosper was for the Federal government to take control of the country’s political and economic decision-making. With a strong Federal power in place, troublesome interstate conflicts could be solved swiftly and decisively, before they gained…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    R.B. Bernstein, a professor of law at New York Law School, and author of nearly twenty books on Early American legal and diplomatic history, is one of the latest in the long list of historians to attempt to tackle the life of Jefferson. In his work, Thomas Jefferson, Bernstein provides a well-organized and balanced history of Jefferson as he traces his life from his birth into one of Virginia’s wealthiest families, to his death as a man who was ridden with debt and insecure of his place in history. Published in 2003, the strength of Bernstein’s text does not lie in its ability to dissect this enigma of history, but in his ability to lay out his life and offer the facts as they exist without adding too much of his own opinion. Bernstein’s ability to write without muddling up the information he is presenting gives the reader a fairly unbiased look at the man who, in most of the other works he is covered in, takes the form of the authors perceptions. This is not to say that he does not give Jefferson credit for his achievements, or fault him where he deserves it, but Bernstein is able to point out these positive and negative features of Jefferson’s life without adding too much conjecture.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays