Preview

Haig was the Butcher of the Somee

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Haig was the Butcher of the Somee
Haig was the Butcher of the Somme
Explain how far you agree with this view

Field Marshal Haig is known as the butcher of the Somme. But was he really to blame and responsible for the death of many soldiers he was in charge of during World War 1?
He is remembered mainly for the death of thousands of men during the Battle of the Somme. On the first day alone 60,000 British soldiers lost their lives. The reason that so many soldiers died was because Haig ordered his men to walk across no man’s land. They were very easy targets for the German machine guns. However these men died for a reason, they were protecting their families and everyone else on the Home Front. They also died to prevent Britain becoming a German nation.
The first reason I think he deserves this title is because he was incompetent and inflexible which resulted in many men being killed. His inflexibility is showed by the fact that he kept the same tactics even though it was obvious that many men were being mowed down by machine guns. Also Haig was very ignorant he didn’t listen to the advice and ideas of many military experts he just did things the way he wanted to do them.
However, at the time Haig was the best man for the job. He does not deserve this title as the British casualties were no worse than the French and Germans.
Another reason I think that perhaps Haig does not deserve the title ‘Butcher of the Somme’ because he had untrained men and they weren’t used to fighting which made them very vulnerable to the experienced German soldiers. We often think about Haig relaxed with his feet up while his men were fighting and dying. However Haig was under enormous pressure.
In conclusion I can see reasons why Haig should be remembered as the Butch or of the Somme however there are also reasons why he does not deserve this title. Although he may be partially responsible for the death of thousands of men, he was the right man for the job at that time.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    of the highly talented and decorated officers and soldiers of the british army. He also…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    of twenty-two years old, they should have noted his death as a casualty of war.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    well capable, strong leader who was preparing to lead the human race to victory in the war…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If devotion, industry, tallent [sic] & gallantry are the highest qualities of a soldier, then he is entitled to the distinction which their possession confers....Upon this occasion when circumstances placed him in command for a short time of an independent action, he proved himself eminently worthy of it.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people have the view that British generals such as Haig were useless leaders. Famous sources like ‘O What a lovely War’, ‘Blackadder’ and ‘The Trench’ support this. However from the 1980s many military historians have challenged this interpretation and states that under Haigs leadership, Britain and her allies won the war from encouraging new weapons and military tactics. After Haigs death in 1918, historians blamed him for needless laughter of nearly 750,000 British soldiers on the Western Front and biographers pilloned him for his overconfidence, insensitivity and logical shortcountings. However a new age group of scholars now believes that he may have been more a victim of position than a cruel monster. This essay will try and support and contradict this interpretation.…

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 1 is an extract from Sir Douglas Haig’s final dispatch, published in March 1919. This source begins to describe the Battle of the Somme as a tremendous victory. Haig claims that “The three main objectives… had been achieved.” Haig also then begins to describe the three objectives, “Verdun had been relieved…”, “German forces had been held down…” and “the enemy’s strength had been considerably worn down”. Haig also claims that as the objectives had been “achieved” this was enough to “…justify the Somme Battle.” This source was published shortly after the war in 1919, but was a few years after the Battle of the Somme allowing some time for the truth about the events of the battle to emerge. The source has some limitations as it was an extract from Haig’s own writing, who was Commander-in-Chief of the British Forces therefore the source may be bias towards Britain and their success in the battle. The purpose of the source was to inform people of Haig’s perception of the battle and due to this being one person’s view, the accuracy of the source cannot be verified.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we have discussed and examined over the past two weeks of our seminar, John Keegan’s The Face of Battle explores warfare from the viewpoint of the common soldier by analyzing and comparing the three well-known battles of Agincourt, Waterloo and Somme. Keegan's three examinations of Agincourt, Waterloo and the Somme begin by analyzing the traditional outlines of events. Keegan then moves through the main phase of each battle, attempting to make sense of the major events, providing the frame and context necessary in order to begin considering the combatants: how the soldiers felt before the battle, what actually happened when the troops engaged, focusing-in on what these nuanced psycho-sociological details provide. Towards this monumental effort, while limiting much of his coverage largely to the first day of the offensive, Keegan was particularly focused revealing the brutality of the first day of Somme: “In all, the British had lost about 60,000, of whom 21,000 had been killed, most in the first hour of the attack, perhaps the first minutes" (Keegan, 1983). The conditions of the battle were so abhorrent, Keegan describes, with “long docile lines of young men, shoddily uniformed, heavily burdened, numbered about their necks, plodding forward across a featureless landscape to their own extermination" (1983).…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Douglas Haig was a General during World War One. There is much controversy over General Haig’s reputation due to the high level of losses during his battles in command. Many people agree with David Lloyd George’s attitude of Haig and many other British Generals of World War One. They are said to be “donkeys”, incompetents who sent the “lions” (the soldier) into futile bloody battles. Many popular books, films and television programs also agree with David Lloyd George. The sad truth, however, was between two evenly matched opponents, that there was no other way of solving the conflict.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bg Lyon Characteristics

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He was the first General Officer to be killed during the American Civil War and could be found slathering mustard on bread in the midst of battle. Brigadier General (BG) Lyon was one of the most respected and most renowned officers during the American Civil War. His men followed him throughout the most dangerous battles, willing and ready to fight to the death for him. BG Lyon participated in four major American battles throughout his tenure in the military and was a true patriot who believed God, country, and family were the principles every man should live by.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source B3 was written by Fred Pearson, a private on the Western Front, writing a letter to a local newspaper in 1966. He said “The biggest murderer of the lot was Haig” describing how he stupidly sent soldiers to die, in the source he says how Haig “lived almost 50km behind the line” in the source with this quote he basically described Haig as a coward who didn’t know what the trenches were like. Source B2 is reliable because of the fact that it was written by a Private who was at the Somme during the battle, so in that respect he had a firsthand view of the battlefield. However the Source is also not reliable because of the fact that it was written 50 years after the Somme so the author could have forgotten some of the details, on top of that the fact that he wrote it for a newspaper so he could have over-exaggerated to get his story published.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My Lai Massacre Dbq

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I feel Calley is to blame since it was his responsibility to protect the civilians in My Lai from the Vietcong not be the one in which the villagers were scared by. Once he realized that the…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    General George S. Patton referred to by many historians as the “Forgotten General” didn’t see much action in almost the entirety of his military career. In fact he did not have the opportunity to show his genius in military warfare until World War II. It wasn’t until the end of 1942 thru 1945 that General Patton had finally proved to the world the genius he was in tactical warfare, and many compared him to Hitler because of his talk of never giving up an inch of land, his contempt for civilian authority, and his joy at killing. Patton’s love of war, coupled with his seemingly coldhearted approach to battle, still makes his critics uncomfortable. Despite the…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilfred Owen was the greatest war poet in World War I. His work on the poems were hugely significant because they challenge the notion accepted by society of what it was like for men to go to war. His varying narrative perspective puts him sometimes at the heart of the action and sometimes as a observer, but he never fails to convey the experience of the everyday man, the horrors and realities of war, and the psychological impact on its participates.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A lot of people called Douglas Haig the Butcher of the Somme. Here are some pieces of evidence to support this point of view.…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1916 witnessed the commencement of the battle of the Somme. Through the course of that one battle, a million British men were slaughtered compared to the combined number of American casualties in both the first and Second World War. The Battle of the Somme was planned as a joint French and British operation, approved by Haig. However, the German attack on Verdun in February 1916 turned the Somme offensive into a large-scale British attack. Haig accepted responsibility for the action and with the help of Rawlinson who devised his own plan of attack. The vital part of Haig's strategy was an eight-day attack to destroy the German defenses. Soldiers were lined up according to battlefield strategies, and led by major officers. The blood of the nations was poured into conditions of such horror and violence. “Lions led by donkeys”, was how the German soldiers referred to their British counterpart. Ever since the end of WW1 in 1918 which was won by the British allies against the Germans it has been hugely debated whether the phrase 'Lions Led by Donkeys' is correct. In this essay I am going to talk about the extent of which the phrase was a fair description of what had happened at the battle of the Somme, by looking at different people’s point of view about General Haig.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays