Preview

Guns Are Best Controlled by Good Aim

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3918 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Guns Are Best Controlled by Good Aim
GUNS ARE BEST CONTROLLED BYGOOD AIM. Guns, like many other issues of the day, have two distinct opposing views with many people in the gray area. Even when looking at a tragic situation, people will have two opposite spins on it. For example, a suicidal madman on top of the Empire State Building kills six people including himself with a gun. Gun-control advocates think that outlawing guns would have stopped the killing from ever happening. Pro-gun advocates think that it would have been stopped by innocent people being armed and fighting back. In order for an issue to even be at hand, both sides must agree that there is a problem with guns and gun control. Both gun-control and pro-gun advocates do agree there is a problem, pro-gunners say it is too hard to own a gun and the gun-controllers say it is too easy to get a gun. While using a point-counterpoint style to argue against gun control I will show guns are best controlled by good aim. The government must keep guns out of the hands of violent criminals and the mentally ill, and they must not limit the rest of the society from owning them. Gun control advocates will argue that gun ownership is not a right and is not protected by the 2nd amendment. They further believe guns are harmful to society. Gun control advocates also believe guns are not needed for self-defense. Gun-controllers use points such as: the constitution, specifically the 2nd amendment, hunting and gun related assaults to try to prove their point. Some of their arguments are based in emotions and only have significance in the specific case they are trying to illustrate. When a high school aged boy kills a teacher, two students and then injures one other what should we do? According to gun-control advocate, we must make it impossible for kids like him to get their hands on a gun. Their number one goal is to make personal use or ownership of guns to be viewed as wrong. This is a typical emotional argument that the


Cited: 3 Common Myths. http://www.gunfree.Inter.net/csgv/bsc_3my.htm. Friday, Jan. 17, 1997. Jan. 17, 1997. Carlile, Dr. Simon. USA Gun Deaths. http://www.med.usyd.edu.au/medfac/GunControl/fp_3_1_1.htm. Friday, Jan. 17, 1997 http://www.spectacle.org/996/2d.html. Friday, Jan. 17, 1997. http://www.law.lib.uchicago.edu/faculty/lott/guncont.html. Friday, Jan. 17, 1997. Sterba, James P. Morality in Practice. San Francisco: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1997 Sugarmann, Josh. Reverse FIRE. http://bsd.mojones.com/mother_jones/JF94/sugarmann.html. Friday, Jan. 17, 1997.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is quite clear that by looking at criminals intentions and the overall protection of our country's people gun control should not be administered. Since the establishment of our great nation guns have played a central role and have been of great importance. Though some may think that guns are weapons of war, crime, and violence our Founding Fathers realized they were an essential right that needed to be preserved for the citizens. In the Bill of Rights the Second Amendment of the Constitution reads "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Gun control proponents have…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proponents of stricter guns laws believe mass shootings and other violent crimes would decrease with stricter gun control but opponents believe making guns harder to get will take away our second amendment right to bear arms and that if everyone had a gun they would be able to protect themselves and that in itself would reduce violent crimes. Both sides of the issue has opinions, facts and statistics that support their claims. However, I still stand firm in my conviction for stricter guns laws. I believe the pros definitely out weight the cons. Stricter guns laws should include more comprehensive background checks to include gun owners and anyone who has access to the guns, longer waiting periods, and evaluations for mental illness and depression.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In fact, individuals seek support of police and criminal justice agencies to resolve matters that would be resolved in the past using individual weaponry. Opponents of gun control argue that these rights are essential. Advocates of gun control have argued that there is a definitive need for greater management of access to guns, while those opposed to gun control often cite the Second Amendment as the underlying principle for maintaining…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people have formed different views on gun control, gun control is one of the largest debates across the nation. There are many pros and cons on gun control, and both sides have strong supporters.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If someone doesn’t have a firearm, there is a 100% chance that people will not be in danger of getting shot. This is a fact but other individuals believe that they have a right to have a gun because it is needed for protection against killers and local criminals. According to procon.org, '' The Second Amendment, which states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This is where the controversy of gun control begins and the pros and cons being explored. The pros of gun control includes the decrease of deaths, prevents a violent conflict it protects women from domestic abusers, it prevents mass murders and make the environment less dangerous. The cons of gun control includes: Gun control laws would prevent citizens from protecting themselves from foreign invaders, Gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety and education about guns and gun safety is needed to prevent accidental gun deaths than having gun…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the last couple of years, gun control has continued to be a huge controversial debate in Congress. This argument over whether gun control laws should be strict is nothing new to the world of politics. The ideas of gun control consist of laws that either keep away firearms from people, or allow one to keep guns for personal protection. They also control who the guns are being sold to and who can own them. In America, each state government has passed many gun control laws. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Whenever people hear the word gun, the thoughts…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a old saying that guns dont kill people, people kill people. This is a known saying that comes out all the time when this conversation pops up.The media portrays gun control in a positive light, they believe that this is something that would work; I believe that gun control will never work and giving people guns to protect themselves and taking guns from people the public judges or deems unfit is a terrible idea. It is unsafe, and also endangering people's lives and is unfair, plus it is going against the second amendment which many have died to protect.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to individuals supporting gun control, they often don’t see a middle ground between the two. Individuals that support gun control only see guns as the murder not the person holding the gun or pulling the trigger. Often media posts graphs of gun related deaths and injuries on graphs that are not accurate. Individuals don’t do the research to determine what is true or is a fallacy claim of disordered statistics is. More than 60% of all gun related deaths per year are from suicides around 35% are homicide related the other 5% are from accidental deaths. (Pew Research) Guns are not responsible for killing people; the person behind the trigger is the one responsible for killing innocent individuals. When a mass shooting event takes place…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro-gun advocates see gun control laws as only a way for the government to control its citizens. For the debate of both side will comes down to who should own a gun and under what restrictions should they be able to possess it? Guns control is an important question either we should put a law to it or not. Everyone involved in the issue, and extremely important to society. Guns play a role in everyone’s life. Whether it be your own personal possession or someone else possession. We as Americans value our rights to freedoms and we were granted by our founding fathers, which includes the possession of firearms in the Second Amendment. As citizens we must know that there are many guns violence happened in our society. It needs to stop as soon as possible so innocent people will not die.In conclusion, every citizens has the right to speech up for everything that they did not feel right. I personally think gun causes problem because of gun can lead to serious violence and dangerous to our society. It is important that we pay close attention to guns control law to see how it will have a great impact on our lives. Do gun control laws help or hurt the people the citizens they are trying to protect? I think it helps innocent people because we never know who the bad guy is and who the good guy is to sell the gun…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Cons

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun control has sparked quite a controversy over the years. Some people believe that having strict gun control is the only way to fix the problems. While others, including myself, believe it is more a problem with the person that is behind the trigger. There has been laws about gun control as early as 1934. as citizens, we need to ask ourselves if having gun control will solve all the issues at hand. With both arguments, there is facts to support. I believe that gun control will not have the ability to make all the problems go away, there needs to be more done.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While guns are owned by many Americans, there are both pro and con arguments for gun control.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Effectiveness

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun control laws take away the right to self defense and take away their feeling of safety. If a person doesn’t have a gun, when attacked they have a higher chance of dieing. “A small women is armed with a knife and the large man has a knife, he is more likely to win, but if she has a gun she gets to live another day” (Cooke, 26). This is an example of why the 2nd amendment is needed. “The 2nd amendment does protect the individual right of law- abiding,…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Arguments

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They believe the laws that are in place are effective and need to become stricter. “To date, this system [Brady Bill] has prevented more than 200,000 gun purchases by people who had been in mental institutions, been dishonorably discharged from military service, were fugitives, or had a history of domestic abuse" (“Gun control,” World of Health, par. 35). For this reason, opponents argue that more and stricter gun control laws will result in less gun violence. It may be true that gun control laws help reduce gun violence. However, more and stricter gun control laws will reduce one’s Second Amendment rights. “...gun advocates favor freedom, choice and self-responsibility. If someone wishes to be prepared to defend himself, he should be free to do so. No one has the right to deprive others of the means of effective self-defense such as a handgun" (Stossel, par. 3). Not only would more and stricter gun control laws be unconstitutional, they would also be just as ineffective as the ones in place already. It is impossible to stop every single criminal from getting a gun. Gun control advocates often ignore that guns can save lives. “Today there are more than 300 million legally owned guns in America, and there were roughly 350,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2011. In other words, the number of legal guns in private hands went up by a third, while the number of firearm-related crimes dropped by 74 percent." (Domenech, par. 24). The only thing that will stop gun violence is another person with a gun. More gun control laws are not the answer because criminals do not follow the laws that are in place…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    To be controlled, or to not be controlled? That is the question that people have been asking about guns for years, and there still has been no true action for or against gun control. As Jeff Cooper once said, “The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness, by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.” (Cooper) In short; guns don't kill people, people kill people. A gun in the hands of an evil man can be controlled through the actions of good men with guns. When it comes to gun control, there is no definitive answer because it is, to its core, a very opinionated debate. People believe that gun control will help solve everyone’s problems, but the truth is that taking guns away will not solve anything. Here’s something to keep in mind, if you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. The government’s idea that have more gun control, stricter gun laws, and harsher punishments will help decrease the amount of gun-related crimes is completely off base and wrong.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays